Hi,
The reason I got into camping was because it was written by _why , because
liked the way _why looked at things and approached things. Camping contains
the spirit of _why , if you alter it too much it ceases to be Camping. Part
of the attraction is the tiny size, the 3k/4k limit or whatever it
Thought I'd weigh in for what it's worth,
My naive first impression of Camping basically took no notice of the whole
3/4k thing. I appreciate that it's a cool programming feat, and I love the
attitude that lead to it, but at the time my focus was on trying to figure
out what all these hidden
Daniel - that's a great reply and echoes much of my own experience
(although my Camping is much more on the tinkering side). The point
about Camping being an educational tool is a good one, which I've even
tried to apply to students (unsuccessfully - but that's my problem),
and it would be
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 15:07, Daniel Bryan danbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Thought I'd weigh in for what it's worth,
Thanks, I find it very interesting.
My naive first impression of Camping basically took no notice of the whole
3/4k thing. I appreciate that it's a cool programming feat, and I love
I think the trouble with streaming over the rack interface is that it's
confusing. I'm fairly good at ruby, but I'm not entirely sure how it would even
work. I guess I need to run my app in a threaded web server, running every
request in it's own thread? Then inside the each iterator in the
Not to forget Perl (who would have thought that?) which currently
has the best web framework I've ever seen: http://mojolicio.us/
I would have thought it - my sometimes co-developer opened my eyes to
Titanium:
http://mark.stosberg.com/blog/2008/12/titanium-a-new-release-and-more.html
and
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 17:49, Jenna Fox a...@creativepony.com wrote:
I think the trouble with streaming over the rack interface is that it's
confusing. I'm fairly good at ruby, but I'm not entirely sure how it would
even work. I guess I need to run my app in a threaded web server, running
To be honest I don't care if we leave the 4k stuff behind or not. I just want
Camping to be easy to extend and customize. Don't get me wrong, Camping is
crazy customizable. The fact that you can set it up to be a huge
application with the rackup file in an extremely cool way is definitely
If you want to use something like SASS for CSS, there are gems for
that (or use LESS), but I'd never expect such functionality to be
built into in Camping - that's one of the things I *like* about it: a
small functional default set that works, with options for other ways
left to me. BTW
+1 to all that David Costa wrote in response. Magnus *has and does*
kept things solid and on track in a way that suits Camping. We're
never going to go head-to-head in the framework competition stakes
(bit late for that anyway, with frameworks swerving all over client-
side dev).
As for
I thought about that, but I want to stay up to date with things like Mab and
all that. There are small differences. But I guess I could omit the use of
anything that differs. But still, we want the information to be fresh, no?
Cheers!
Isak Andersson
david costa gurugeek...@gmail.com skrev:
Well Sqlite works fine with the current camping so I don't see any reason
to use something not yet released for the screencasts.
so in short use the official camping-omnibus for the screencasts. I
checked your issue on github but I don't think is the fault of the new
version but that's not the
Yeah I was going to suggest that we do a screencasts going over New features.
Let's go with that instead!
Cheers!
Isak Andersson
david costa gurugeek...@gmail.com skrev:
Well Sqlite works fine with the current camping so I don't see any reason to
use something not yet released for the
Those are all great points - the eventstream support is a particular sticking
point to me. It feels like a standard which aught to be easily implemented -
even through rack! but I've yet to see any web frameworks where eventstream
doesn't seem like a total hack - except perhaps for Node.JS
I'm not too bothered about 3k. But I think what Nokan's saying is that
he'd like Camping to remain functioning as it is so he can continue to
run his apps as they're set up now, but that extra features could be
added with an optional `require 'camping/new_extra_stuff`... - Nokan,
is this
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Dave Everitt dever...@innotts.co.ukwrote:
I'm not too bothered about 3k. But I think what Nokan's saying is that
he'd like Camping to remain functioning as it is so he can continue to run
his apps as they're set up now, but that extra features could be added
I would leave the name camping for the original gem, and would choose
another
one for the fork.
But exactly what are those features that you (all) would like to add to
camping?
- before/after methods of controllers,
- something around serving static files and R(),
- ???
Actually I think it's
W dniu 16 kwietnia 2012 20:50 użytkownik Nokan Emiro
uzleep...@gmail.com napisał:
Actually I think it's not logical that you can build HTML by default using
Markaby, but you can't build CSS in the same way.
You never need to insert any variables into your CSS code. (If you do,
you're doing it
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:20:18PM +0200, Bartosz Dziewoński wrote:
W dniu 16 kwietnia 2012 20:50 użytkownik Nokan Emiro
uzleep...@gmail.com napisał:
Actually I think it's not logical that you can build HTML by default using
Markaby, but you can't build CSS in the same way.
You never need
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 22:14, Nokan Emiro uzleep...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/4/16 Bartosz Dziewoński matma@gmail.com
W dniu 16 kwietnia 2012 20:50 użytkownik Nokan Emiro
uzleep...@gmail.com napisał:
Actually I think it's not logical that you can build HTML by default
using
Markaby, but
Shit! If you told me about it a few hours ago, I wouldn't bother myself
writing a RobotsTxt Controller...
__END__
@@ /style.css
* { margin: 0; padding: 0 }
And Camping will serve it for you. See also:
https://github.com/camping/camping/blob/master/test/app_file.rb
For now I'm feeling like a pretty bad maintainer. I'm not using
Camping enough to see where things need to be fixed, I'm crappy at
actually shipping stuff, and I'm not sure if I believe that Camping is
a correct starting point for a new framework
Hey Magnus! I think that you are a great
Hi all :)
I have been playing with Sinatra a lot lately and perhaps *some* things are
done easily there (URL mapping, static files) but being a DSL and not a
framework it is a bit different. For many things camping does the job very
well and overall I find it a more comprehensive solution than
23 matches
Mail list logo
