Done.
Thanks,
Dimutu
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Dimuthu,
I also see quite a number of e.printStacktrace() calls in the user.core
code. Please properly handle these exceptions as a part of this exercise.
Thanks
Azeez
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
It is an interesting question. What is the maximum recommended resource
size in Registry?
We are storing things on a blob column. As per the size, we are not
specifying.
eg:
34 CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS REG_CONTENT
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Kishanthan Thangarajah
kshanth2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Senaka,
I tried several times increasing the memory size, but i cant upload a file
with size of 700mb to registry. Always getting the java memory(heap size)
error.
My ram is 3GB,
There are several
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Sumedha Rubasinghe sume...@wso2.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.comwrote:
It is an interesting question. What is the maximum recommended resource
size in Registry?
We are storing things on a blob column. As per
$subject
It still builds 3.1.0 branch
Thanks,
Samisa...
Samisa Abeysinghe
VP Engineering
WSO2 Inc.
http://wso2.com
http://wso2.org
___
Carbon-dev mailing list
Carbon-dev@wso2.org
https://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
I'm getting the following compilation failure. Any orbit projects that I've
missed?
[INFO] Building WSO2 Carbon - Registry - Extensions
[INFO]task-segment: [clean, install]
[INFO]
[INFO] [clean:clean]
[INFO] Deleting
I was able to build it after building [1]. But the version is 1.6.2 which is
wrong. Please update it to have a .wso2 version.
Thanks,
~Isuru
[1] https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2/trunk/carbon/dependencies/wsdl4j
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Isuru Suriarachchi is...@wso2.com wrote:
I'm
[INFO] Executed tasks
[INFO] [compiler:compile]
[INFO] Compiling 105 source files to
/home/carbon/stratos/carbon/components/data-services/org.wso2.carbon.dataservices.core/3.1.0/target/classes
[INFO] [scr:scr {execution: generate-scr-scrdescriptor}]
[INFO] Generating 2 MetaType Descriptors to
Hi Sanjeewa,
It is my distinct pleasure to welcome as a WSO2 committer. Thanks for your
contributions, and looking forward to many more valuable contributions in
the future as well.
Thanks
--
*Afkham Azeez*
Senior Software Architect Senior Manager; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com,
*
*
*Member;
Congratulations Sanjeewa.
Thank you.
Regards,
Pradeeban.
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Sanjeewa,
It is my distinct pleasure to welcome as a WSO2 committer. Thanks for your
contributions, and looking forward to many more valuable contributions in
the
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
$subject
+1.
Guess the same is applicable to Stratos too; it still builds 1.0.0 branch.
Regards,
Pradeeban.
It still builds 3.1.0 branch
Thanks,
Samisa...
Samisa Abeysinghe
VP Engineering
WSO2 Inc.
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Sanjeewa,
It is my distinct pleasure to welcome as a WSO2 committer. Thanks for your
contributions, and looking forward to many more valuable contributions in
the future as well.
Congratz Sanjeewa!
Thanks and Regards,
Congratz!
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Sanjeewa,
It is my distinct pleasure to welcome as a WSO2 committer. Thanks for your
contributions, and looking forward to many more valuable contributions in
the future as well.
Thanks
--
*Afkham Azeez*
---
Test set: org.wso2.carbon.registry.core.test.multitenant.MultiTenantTest
---
Tests run: 5, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Sanjeewa,
It is my distinct pleasure to welcome as a WSO2 committer. Thanks for your
contributions, and looking forward to many more valuable contributions in
the future as well.
Congratulations Sanjeewa
Thanks
--
Congratulations Sanjeewa !!!
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Sanjeewa,
It is my distinct pleasure to welcome as a WSO2 committer. Thanks for your
contributions, and looking forward to many more valuable contributions in
the future as well.
Thanks
--
[INFO] qpid.wso2 . SUCCESS [8.226s]
[INFO]
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO]
congrats Sanjeewa
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Ranga Siriwardena ra...@wso2.com wrote:
Congratulations Sanjeewa !!!
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Sanjeewa,
It is my distinct pleasure to welcome as a WSO2 committer. Thanks for your
Hi,
For now build the dependencies-wsdl4j and orbit-wsdl4j to solve this
issue. This will fix this in the 3.2.0 release once the 3.2.0 branch has
been done.
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Isuru Suriarachchi is...@wso2.com wrote:
I was able to build it after building [1]. But the version is
congrats Sanjeewa
___
Carbon-dev mailing list
Carbon-dev@wso2.org
https://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
Hi all,
There is a requirement of defining a custom object class schema with the
required attributes which are not defined in ApacheDS-LDAP by default
(issues: CARBON-8215 https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-8215,
CARBON-8054https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-8054
)
According to the
Hi Asela,
IIRC we discussed this issue during the Stratos release. The issue here
IIRC, is that the UM Kernel caches the tenant's user realm, but does not
invalidate it when the realm configuration is updated. Can you have a look
and get this sorted?
Also, long term, we need to move the UM
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Kathiravelu Pradeeban pradee...@wso2.comwrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
$subject
+1.
+1.
Thanks,
Senaka.
Guess the same is applicable to Stratos too; it still builds 1.0.0 branch.
Regards,
Pradeeban.
It
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Janaka Ranabahu jan...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi,
For now build the dependencies-wsdl4j and orbit-wsdl4j to solve this
issue. This will fix this in the 3.2.0 release once the 3.2.0 branch has
been done.
You don't have to wait until the 3.2.0 branch is created.
Congratz!
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Sarasi Munasinghe sar...@wso2.com wrote:
congrats Sanjeewa
___
Carbon-dev mailing list
Carbon-dev@wso2.org
https://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
--
*Kasun Weranga*
*WSO2 Complex Event Processing Server 1.0.0- Alpha Released!*
WSO2 CEP team please to announce the 1.0.0-Alpha release of the WSO2 Complex
Event Processing Server
WSO2 Complex Event Processing Server, based on the award-winning WSO2 Carbon
framework introduces complex event processing to SOA
Asela, can we work on this and move the user management concerns to the UM,
and get the trunk stabilized ASAP?
Dimuthu, we also have to get rid of that hack where the user.core code
reflectively calls registry.core. As you mentioned, the proper solution is
to add a column to some user.core DB.
We need a builders team to own the continuous build. Ideally should have
4-5 people who constantly monitor these continuous build messages. I can
give a quick training to these folks on how to manage, trigger, maintain
scripts etc.
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Senaka Fernando sen...@wso2.com
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
We need a builders team to own the continuous build. Ideally should have
4-5 people who constantly monitor these continuous build messages. I can
give a quick training to these folks on how to manage, trigger, maintain
Do we have Carbon core fixes in svn trunk, that are not there in 3.1.0?
We need to release 3.2.0 Carbon core first. Then Chunk 3 products. And
should we not release patch versions for those already released under 3.1.0
chunk 1 2?
Thanks,
Samisa...
Samisa Abeysinghe
VP Engineering
WSO2 Inc.
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
Do we have Carbon core fixes in svn trunk, that are not there in 3.1.0?
Yes.. In the user-core...
Thanks regards,
-Prabath
We need to release 3.2.0 Carbon core first. Then Chunk 3 products. And
should we not
Also, we need to start working on deploying snapshots to maven repo with the
trunk continuous builds at least on a weekly basis.
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Kathiravelu Pradeeban pradee...@wso2.comwrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Denis Weerasiri de...@wso2.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan
Guys, we cannot leave a branch on a build broken state.
Please fix this ASAP, before we move the build process against the trunk.
Thanks,
Samisa...
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:23 PM, WSO2 Builder buil...@wso2.org wrote:
[INFO] qpid.wso2 . SUCCESS
And we will start building with tests enabled as soon as we turn into trunk
- and all test got to pass.
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
Also, we need to start working on deploying snapshots to maven repo with
the trunk continuous builds at least on a
Shall we also arrange a bug fixing hackathon around Carbon 3.2.0?
I think we can phase this around products to be released, based on chunks.
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Prabath Siriwardana prab...@wso2.comwrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
We need a builders team to own the continuous build. Ideally should have
4-5 people who constantly monitor these continuous build messages. I can
give a quick training to these folks on how to manage, trigger, maintain
+1
I too loke to join.
thanks,
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Amila Maha Arachchi ami...@wso2.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
We need a builders team to own the continuous build. Ideally should have
4-5 people who constantly monitor
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
We need a builders team to own the continuous build. Ideally should have
4-5 people who constantly monitor these continuous build messages. I can
give a quick training to these folks on how to manage, trigger,
Hi,
This broker.test module was removed from the parent pom.xml. It was used
only for testing purposes.
Thanks
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
Guys, we cannot leave a branch on a build broken state.
Please fix this ASAP, before we move the build
[INFO] qpid.wso2 . SUCCESS [12.011s]
[INFO]
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO]
I think some recent fixes to Axis2 has caused some major issues. After
invoking some of the WSAS admin services (WebappAdmin, Axis2RepoAdmin etc),
on the client side, we get the following error. Also, I noticed that
sometimes the RegistryAdminService is getting invoked when I try to access
the
I had the same error, when uploading a BPEL process(.zip) in latest trunk.
[2011-01-03 21:49:37,141] ERROR
{org.wso2.carbon.bpel.ui.fileupload.BPELUploadExecutor} - BPEL Package
Deployment Failed!com.ctc.wstx.exc.WstxUnexpectedCharException: Unexpected
character '-' (code 45) in prolog; expected
It seems the problem is local to me. Upon building axiom separately fixed
the problem. Thanks Heshan for your note.
Rajika
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Heshan Suriyaarachchi hes...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi Rajika,
I was able to build Carbon trunk's Axiom successfully (with tests).
On Mon,
Hi,
Is this admin service using MTOM? We saw the same in ResourceAdminService in
G-Reg, and it seems that MTOM is broken on the trunk. :(.
Thanks,
Senaka.
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Denis Weerasiri de...@wso2.com wrote:
I had the same error, when uploading a BPEL process(.zip) in latest
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Senaka Fernando sen...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi,
Is this admin service using MTOM? We saw the same in ResourceAdminService
in G-Reg, and it seems that MTOM is broken on the trunk. :(.
Thanks,
Senaka.
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Denis Weerasiri
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
Do we have Carbon core fixes in svn trunk, that are not there in 3.1.0?
We need to release 3.2.0 Carbon core first. Then Chunk 3 products. And
should we not release patch versions for those already released under 3.1.0
[INFO]
[INFO] [clean:clean]
[INFO] [site:attach-descriptor]
[INFO] [install:install]
[INFO] Installing
/home/carbon/stratos/carbon/components/broker/target/pom-transformed.xml to
[INFO]
[INFO] [clean:clean]
[INFO] [site:attach-descriptor]
[INFO] [install:install]
[INFO] Installing
/home/carbon/stratos/carbon/components/broker/target/pom-transformed.xml to
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Sameera Jayasoma same...@wso2.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
Do we have Carbon core fixes in svn trunk, that are not there in 3.1.0?
We need to release 3.2.0 Carbon core first. Then Chunk 3 products. And
You need to build Axiom with tests enabled.
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.com wrote:
It seems the problem is local to me. Upon building axiom separately fixed
the problem. Thanks Heshan for your note.
Rajika
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Heshan
[INFO] Executed tasks
[INFO] [compiler:compile]
[INFO] Compiling 105 source files to
/home/carbon/stratos/carbon/components/data-services/org.wso2.carbon.dataservices.core/3.1.0/target/classes
[INFO] [scr:scr {execution: generate-scr-scrdescriptor}]
[INFO] Generating 2 MetaType Descriptors to
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Asela, can we work on this and move the user management concerns to the UM,
and get the trunk stabilized ASAP?
Dimuthu, we also have to get rid of that hack where the user.core code
reflectively calls registry.core. As you
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Dimuthu Leelarathne dimut...@wso2.comwrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Asela, can we work on this and move the user management concerns to the
UM, and get the trunk stabilized ASAP?
Dimuthu, we also have to get rid of
Hi,
Currently the user.core stores realm configurations for each tenant in the
registry. This creates dependency to the registry. We can remove this and
still keep custom realm configurations by storing the non-bootstrap
user-mgt.xml as a blob in the UM database.
WDYT?
Thanks,
Dimuthu
On Tue,
$subject
Missing:
--
1) org.apache.qpid:qpid-client:jar:0.9
Try downloading the file manually from the project website.
Then, install it using the command:
mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=org.apache.qpid
-DartifactId=qpid-client -Dversion=0.9 -Dpackaging=jar
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
You need to build Axiom with tests enabled.
I did that, if you see the log you'll notice that.
Rajika
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.com wrote:
It seems the problem is local to me.
This happens due to checksum failures when downloading qpid dependencies.
You can locally avoid this issue by ignoring the checksum failures for the
wso2 maven repo in the root pom.xml as follows.
checksumPolicyignore/checksumPolicy
But this is something we have to fix properly.
Thanks,
~Isuru
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Dimuthu Leelarathne dimut...@wso2.comwrote:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Dimuthu Leelarathne dimut...@wso2.comwrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Asela, can we work on this and move the user management concerns to
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dimuthu Leelarathne dimut...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi,
Currently the user.core stores realm configurations for each tenant in the
registry. This creates dependency to the registry. We can remove this and
still keep custom realm configurations by storing the
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Senaka Fernando sen...@wso2.com wrote:
Asela, can we work on this and move the user management concerns to the UM,
and get the trunk stabilized ASAP?
Dimuthu, we also have to get rid of that hack where the user.core code
reflectively calls registry.core. As
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Senaka Fernando sen...@wso2.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dimuthu Leelarathne dimut...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi,
Currently the user.core stores realm configurations for each tenant in the
registry. This creates dependency to the registry. We can
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Sumedha Rubasinghe sume...@wso2.comwrote:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Senaka Fernando sen...@wso2.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dimuthu Leelarathne dimut...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi,
Currently the user.core stores realm configurations for each
Currently the csg[1] and the csg-agent[2] components can be found as two
components in the carbon trunk. As csg and csg-agent components can not be
used individually I don't see any purpose of having two components so I
suggest we merge the two components into two maven modules under a
component
Hi,
Currently I'm working on some improvements to the Gadget Upload UI.It
provides an interface to upload new gadgets to the gadget repository and do
further modifications on added gadgets.
The existing Gadget Upload UI provides the support for uploading gadgets as
seperate xml files or getting
This happens for webapp management admin service as well which has nothing
to do with MTOM. So I'm wondering what's going on. Anyway we are in an Axis2
hackathon today. So we'll be having a look into this as well.
Thanks,
~Isuru
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Denis Weerasiri de...@wso2.com
+1
Thanks,
Supun.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.com wrote:
Currently the csg[1] and the csg-agent[2] components can be found as two
components in the carbon trunk. As csg and csg-agent components can not be
used individually I don't see any purpose of having
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Sameera Jayasoma same...@wso2.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
Do we have Carbon core fixes in svn trunk, that are not there in 3.1.0?
We need to release 3.2.0 Carbon core first. Then Chunk 3 products. And
Hi Lalaji,
Here comes some comments. (Not sure if these are 'warm' enough ;-) )...
1. We already have a concept of a DAR. What is the different between DAR
ZIP? Right now, Carbon Studio supports creating DAR. Having too many
options is confusing.
2. You should not be adding a button to
[INFO] Executed tasks
[INFO] [compiler:compile]
[INFO] Compiling 105 source files to
/home/carbon/stratos/carbon/components/data-services/org.wso2.carbon.dataservices.core/3.1.0/target/classes
[INFO] [scr:scr {execution: generate-scr-scrdescriptor}]
[INFO] Generating 2 MetaType Descriptors to
Please fix this ASAP...
Samisa...
On Tuesday, January 4, 2011, WSO2 Builder buil...@wso2.org wrote:
[INFO] Executed tasks
[INFO] [compiler:compile]
[INFO] Compiling 105 source files to
Hi Guys,
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Sumedha Rubasinghe sume...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi Lalaji,
Here comes some comments. (Not sure if these are 'warm' enough ;-) )...
1. We already have a concept of a DAR. What is the different between DAR
ZIP? Right now, Carbon Studio supports creating
Hi!
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:32 AM, WSO2 Builder buil...@wso2.org wrote:
[INFO] Executed tasks
[INFO] [compiler:compile]
[INFO] Compiling 105 source files to
/home/carbon/stratos/carbon/components/data-services/org.wso2.carbon.dataservices.core/3.1.0/target/classes
[INFO] [scr:scr
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
Please fix this ASAP...
Samisa...
On Tuesday, January 4, 2011, WSO2 Builder buil...@wso2.org wrote:
[INFO] Executed tasks
[INFO] [compiler:compile]
[INFO] Compiling 105 source files to
Is packaging naming convention right?
Online build does not seem to download it. From where can I find the source?
/sumedha
Encountered following when building latest carbon-core trunk.
Missing:
--
1) org.wso2.pwprovider:org.wso2.pwprovider:jar:1.6.4
Try downloading the file manually
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Nuwan Bandara nu...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Guys,
2. You should not be adding a button to 'Gadget Upload UI' to modify the
gadget. Modifying the gadget option should be available on two locations.
- Page where we list all the available gadgets
+1 this
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.com wrote:
Currently the csg[1] and the csg-agent[2] components can be found as two
components in the carbon trunk. As csg and csg-agent components can not be
used individually I don't see any purpose of having two components so I
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Sumedha Rubasinghe sume...@wso2.comwrote:
Is packaging naming convention right?
org.wso2.pwprovider is related with carbon secure vault patch. This must be
renamed. (we have already discussed to changed the secure vault stuff). But
i just applied the patch
Hi all,
I am getting the following error during the start up of G-Reg, carbon core
starts successfully.
[2011-01-04 11:53:26,214] ERROR
{org.wso2.carbon.ui.internal.CarbonUIServiceComponent} - Failed to activate
Carbon UI bundle
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
Hi Prabath,
Sometime ago, we decided (in synapse DEV list) to move the Synapse secure
vault to WS-commons so that axis2 ( + transports) can use it. I even
provided a patch (only part of the solution).
Thanks,
Indika
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Prabath Siriwardana prab...@wso2.comwrote:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Hiranya Jayathilaka hira...@wso2.comwrote:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.comwrote:
Currently the csg[1] and the csg-agent[2] components can be found as two
components in the carbon trunk. As csg and csg-agent components can
Thanx for the comments Sumedha ayya :).
1. We already have a concept of a DAR. What is the different between DAR
ZIP? Right now, Carbon Studio supports creating DAR. Having too many
options is confusing.
Agreed.I will look into Dar archive model.
2. You should not be adding a button to
+1
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Ranga Siriwardena ra...@wso2.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Hiranya Jayathilaka hira...@wso2.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.com
wrote:
Currently the csg[1] and the csg-agent[2] components can be
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Indika Kumara ind...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Prabath,
Sometime ago, we decided (in synapse DEV list) to move the Synapse secure
vault to WS-commons so that axis2 ( + transports) can use it. I even
provided a patch (only part of the solution).
If Synapse secure
Yes, uploading webapps also generates the same error in the client side.
However, the artifacts have been successfully uploaded.
Azeez
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Denis Weerasiri de...@wso2.com wrote:
I had the same error, when uploading a BPEL process(.zip) in latest trunk.
[2011-01-03
84 matches
Mail list logo
