Hi Marcus,
On 03/15/2013 01:32 AM, Marcus Smith wrote:
>
>
> In addition, maintainers of installation tools are asked to release
> two updates. The first one shall provide clear warnings [...]
> The second update for installation tools should change the default
> mode to allow o
In addition, maintainers of installation tools are asked to release
> two updates. The first one shall provide clear warnings [...]
> The second update for installation tools should change the default
> mode to allow only installation of package files hosted at the index
> domain,
sounds good to
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Justin Cappos wrote:
> Maybe a different way to say it is that the current TUF integration doc
> assumes that it is desirable to make minimal change to PyPI's layout and
> pip, easy_install, etc. while adding security. We made several choices
> based upon this as
Maybe a different way to say it is that the current TUF integration doc
assumes that it is desirable to make minimal change to PyPI's layout and
pip, easy_install, etc. while adding security. We made several choices
based upon this assumption, including using and retaining the /simple dir.
If t
On 3/14/13 4:58 AM, holger krekel wrote:
I haven't followed the latest TUF discussions and related docs in
depths yet but if those developments will regard "simple/" as a deprecated
interface, i think this PEP here should maybe not introduce
"simple/-with-externals" as it will just make the situ
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 23:43 -0700, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Carl Meyer wrote:
> > There is no "instead of." There are parallel proposals (see the TUF
> > thread) to improve the security of the ecosystem, and those proposals
> > are not mutually exclusive with this o
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Carl Meyer wrote:
> There is no "instead of." There are parallel proposals (see the TUF
> thread) to improve the security of the ecosystem, and those proposals
> are not mutually exclusive with this one. If you search the PEP text,
> note that you don't find the wo
On 03/13/2013 01:33 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> The proposal marks all external links as evil,
I'm sorry the text of the PEP gave you that impression. I can see how
you'd have gotten it from some of the comments here on catalog-sig, but
we went to some lengths to avoid it in the PEP text, and plan
On Mar 13, 2013, at 3:33 PM, "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote:
> On 13.03.2013 20:08, Donald Stufft wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 13, 2013, at 2:57 PM, "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote:
>>
>>> On 13.03.2013 12:21, holger krekel wrote:
[V3 proposal]
>>>
>>> I must say, don't like this change in motivation compared
>>>
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 3:33 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> On 13.03.2013 20:08, Donald Stufft wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 13, 2013, at 2:57 PM, "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote:
>>
>>> On 13.03.2013 12:21, holger krekel wrote:
[V3 proposal]
>>>
>>> I must say, don't like this change in motivation compared
>>> to
On 13.03.2013 20:08, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
> On Mar 13, 2013, at 2:57 PM, "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote:
>
>> On 13.03.2013 12:21, holger krekel wrote:
>>> [V3 proposal]
>>
>> I must say, don't like this change in motivation compared
>> to V1 and V2.
>>
>> The original of the discussion was to make PyP
On Mar 13, 2013, at 2:57 PM, "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote:
> On 13.03.2013 12:21, holger krekel wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> after some more discussions and hours spend by Carl Meyer (who is now
>> co-authoring the PEP) and me, here is a new V3 pre-submit draft.
>> It is now more ambitious than the previ
On 13.03.2013 12:21, holger krekel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after some more discussions and hours spend by Carl Meyer (who is now
> co-authoring the PEP) and me, here is a new V3 pre-submit draft.
> It is now more ambitious than the previous draft as should be obvious
> from the modified abstract (a
On Mar 13, 2013, at 10:26 AM, PJ Eby wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:21 AM, holger krekel wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> after some more discussions and hours spend by Carl Meyer (who is now
>> co-authoring the PEP) and me, here is a new V3 pre-submit draft.
>> It is now more ambitious than the pre
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:21 AM, holger krekel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after some more discussions and hours spend by Carl Meyer (who is now
> co-authoring the PEP) and me, here is a new V3 pre-submit draft.
> It is now more ambitious than the previous draft as should be obvious
> from the modified a
Hi all,
after some more discussions and hours spend by Carl Meyer (who is now
co-authoring the PEP) and me, here is a new V3 pre-submit draft.
It is now more ambitious than the previous draft as should be obvious
from the modified abstract (and Carl Meyers and Philip's earlier
interactions on th
16 matches
Mail list logo
