Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP and SRST

2008-04-10 Thread Paul and Bobs
Is there any command to see which application currently holds access to the isdn interface. On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Paul and Bobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks Jacob > > > > I tried that and it changed the command > > to > > application > > global > > service alternate DEFAU

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VATS and Percentage Bandwidth

2008-04-10 Thread Juan Lopez Hernandez -X (jlopezhe - IBM - INS at Cisco)
that's indeed what happens when enabling traffic shaping. For more info, there's a thread on this of some 2 weeks old. cheers, Juan From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Narvaez Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 5:51 AM To: ccie_voic

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VATS and Percentage Bandwidth

2008-04-10 Thread Juan Lopez Hernandez -X (jlopezhe - IBM - INS at Cisco)
that's indeed what happens when enabling traffic shaping. For more info, there's a thread on this of some 2 weeks old. cheers, Juan From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Narvaez Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 5:51 AM To: ccie_voic

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP and SRST

2008-04-10 Thread Paul and Bobs
> Thanks Jacob > > I tried that and it changed the command > to > application > global > service alternate DEFAULT > > but still no luck. > > Here is the output of the sho isdn stat. Link is up but huts not being > utilised by h323 (SRST) > > BR1-RTR#sho isdn stat > Global ISDN Switchtype = pri

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] VATS and Percentage Bandwidth

2008-04-10 Thread Christian Narvaez
Guys, It is normal that when I have configured VATS, once performed the comand "show policy-map" it displays the percentage bandwidth in relation to the CIR (33%/ 121 Kbps), and it does not apply the percentage in relation to the command "bandwidth" configured under the serial ??? --

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VG248 port 0

2008-04-10 Thread ccievoice1
Ports 1-48 are available for use with analog devices or for SMDI connections. If you are using the VG248 with SMDI, port 00 is used to transmit and receive voice mail messages to Cisco CallManager. If you are using the VG248 for analog devices only, this port appears, but it is not functional. On

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VG248 port 0

2008-04-10 Thread ccievoice1
Should be used for voicemail. On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Paul and Bobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is the first port on VG248 used for. Port 0?? >

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] VG248 port 0

2008-04-10 Thread Paul and Bobs
What is the first port on VG248 used for. Port 0??

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calling number manipulation on MGCP gateways

2008-04-10 Thread Jonathan Charles
Well, if you are North America only and your providers want 10 digits plus a 1 on all calls, it is a no-brainer... Jonathan On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Devildoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, if you use any prefix in the service parameter, then you'll need to > use a numbering plan.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First attempt at IPEXPERT lab

2008-04-10 Thread Jacob Owen
Oh yeah, forgot this on the 6500: set vlan y/z 2x0 - where y/z is the port connected to your call manager --- Jacob Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All I ever do when I start is the following config > on > the HQ Router and 6500: > > HQ > int f0/0.2X0 > encapsulation dot1q 2x0 > ip address

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First attempt at IPEXPERT lab

2008-04-10 Thread Jacob Owen
All I ever do when I start is the following config on the HQ Router and 6500: HQ int f0/0.2X0 encapsulation dot1q 2x0 ip address 10.x.200.3 255.255.255.0 ! int f0/0 no shut 6500 set trunk x/y on dot1q That's it, never had an issue with native vlans as 1 is normally chosen. If the lab require

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First attempt at IPEXPERT lab

2008-04-10 Thread Vik Ahuja
You also need to make sure you've create your sub-interfaces on the HQ router, one for data defining your native VLAN and one for voice with the correct IP addressing scheme. You'll also need to trunk these interfaces back to the 6k core, making sure to also define the native vlan on the correct

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] In B-ACD script and operator group

2008-04-10 Thread Balamurugan Singaram
Thanks a lot John..it is working.. John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What you should probably do is remove the aa-hunt2 statement and make it an aa-hunt10 That way, you can address the need for the operator and the operator option is only “0”. John.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GK Technology Prefix

2008-04-10 Thread Devildoc
Thanks John. JD From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:59:28 -0500CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GK Technology Prefix It is standard practice to use # at the end of a tech prefix because it will not overlap with a zone prefix n

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GK Technology Prefix

2008-04-10 Thread John
It is standard practice to use # at the end of a tech prefix because it will not overlap with a zone prefix number. If you are asked to use a tech prefix without the pound, don't configure it with the pound or you will miss the question. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] In B-ACD script and operator group

2008-04-10 Thread John
What you should probably do is remove the aa-hunt2 statement and make it an aa-hunt10 That way, you can address the need for the operator and the operator option is only "0". John. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Balamurugan Singaram Sent: Thursday,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calling number manipulation on MGCP gateways

2008-04-10 Thread Devildoc
Yes, if you use any prefix in the service parameter, then you'll need to use a numbering plan. jd Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:25:23 +1000From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calling number manipulation on MGCP gatewaysdo you have to be using t

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] In B-ACD script and operator group

2008-04-10 Thread Balamurugan Singaram
Hi, In B-ACD script the hunt group with the highest aa-hunt number is the operator group and allows this group to be reached when a caller dials 0. param aa-hunt1 1001 param-aa-hunt2 2002., In the above example I need to complete the following, when I press 0, the call should

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GK Technology Prefix

2008-04-10 Thread Devildoc
Thanks all. I know GK will work without the # because i have tried it. I just wanted to know if it's a standard practice or not. Let's just say that you are asked to configure a tech prefix of 1 for hq in the lab, so would they fail you if you don't put the # sign or would they fail you if y

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First attempt at IPEXPERT lab

2008-04-10 Thread Gierula, Christopher E
Can you ping 10.2.200.3 from the 6500? If not check your trunk on the 6500. On the HQ-RTR: int fa0/0. encapsulation dot1q native int fa0/0. encapsulation dot1q ip address int fa0/0 no shut -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul and Bobs S

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First attempt at IPEXPERT lab

2008-04-10 Thread Gierula, Christopher E
Your auxiliaryvlan should be your voice vlan (220). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul and Bobs Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 6:20 PM To: Devildoc Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First attempt at IPEXPERT