Jonathan Charles wrote:
> !
> voice register dn 1
> number 3005
> call-forward b2bua busy 3100
> call-forward b2bua mailbox 3005
> call-forward b2bua noan 3100 timeout 12
> allow watch
> name Phone1
> voice register pool 1
> id mac 0016.9DEF.16E5
> type 7961
> number 1 dn 1
> template
Hi,
I am new to this forum wanted to check is anyone attempted on ver 3 labs
I just saw the blue print and they have added lot of new things which will
be really difficult
I also wanted to start my practise, as i am busy in lot of projects.
Guys best of luck whoever is attempting the labs soon.
Hello and welcome to the list
Can you tell us a little about what study materials you are using and what
your experience level is now?
This is a board where you can feel confident that you can and will receive
help and guidance from the IPexpert folks as well as all of those ( myself )
includ
Yep, that did it silly missing command...
Jonathan
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 3:10 AM, Phil G wrote:
> Jonathan Charles wrote:
>
>> !
>> voice register dn 1
>> number 3005
>> call-forward b2bua busy 3100
>> call-forward b2bua mailbox 3005
>> call-forward b2bua noan 3100 timeout 12
>> allo
Hi Michael,
I believe your tests in 7.1(2a) are now more consistent across the gw types
than we have seen in the 7.0(1) version, I would summarize them as follow
(pretty much the same as PG states):
1.- UCM looks for a cg xform pattern match at the RP level, if there's a match
(calling# vs p
Weirdness...
I have voice call send-recv and voice call rtp ...
Jonathan
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Urgh! Gang, please help!
So, I've got a AIM-CUE in my lab (cause the NME-CUE is too expensive) and
the AIM was all I could get my hands on. Problem is - she's not working. :(
Well, I'm hoping that she really is working, and that I just don't know how
to get it to work. And after posting here,
Yes - everything EXCEPT for TechNotes. Those are not promised (and
shouldn't be expected).
Otherwise the link for exactly what is in the lab was published some
time ago in this news article (third from the bottom):
http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/le3/ccie/announcements/index.html
This link
Try resetting the CUE module from CME
ctpresident wrote:
> Urgh! Gang, please help!
>
> So, I've got a AIM-CUE in my lab (cause the NME-CUE is too expensive)
> and the AIM was all I could get my hands on. Problem is - she's not
> working. :(
>
> Well, I'm hoping that she really is working, a
So, on HQ router, I see this in SRST:
HQ#
Jul 24 18:33:08.073: ISDN Se0/1/0:23 Q931: RX <- SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x00AD
Bearer Capability i = 0x9090A2
Standard = CCITT
Transfer Capability = 3.1kHz Audio
Transfer Mode = Circuit
I was able to get this to work. I just have one more question. I'd like to
get crazy.
I'd like the caller's name to be played before he joins the bridge.
I have the subflow that will record the name and it works great.
I haven't found a way or a step that will play the prompt or do some kind of
int
In testing mobility questions, when I call from BR1 Phone 2 (as is
recommended by the proctor guide) the call does not forward out to my remote
destination. When I call from 5001 (or external numbers) it works fine. So
I started thinking.
- The numbering scheme for BR1 is obviously 6178631XXX
if ypou are following the guide did you do the application rules setup.
I had the same issue doing it on my own. followed the guide and did application
rules, restarted mobility service and all is well
Respectfully
Charles George
From: mthompson...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.c
To rule out a few of those things I called from BR1 phones and then from HQ
phones.
It only happened from the BR1 phones (it also worked fine from PSTN phones).
Doing more research, it actually looks like it's being caused by the calling
number transformation pattern from a previous step ev
Anyone have a guide to how to configure it? To make sure sure telco
sends it, and it is received, etc.?
Jonathan
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
??
The calling trans should not affect the called number to the PSTN.
The question is is the number associated to the phone's DID?
Is the user associated with the phone mac and mobility is enabled
is the user associated with the phone under owner
Respectfully
Charles George
From: mthompson
The reason is that we have as part of the lab an ACL blocking numbers from
the ³617² area code from ringing out to the Remote Destination. So that bit
of your config is working:-) Call from a UCME phone and it should be good.
--
Vik Malhi CCIE #13890
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Is anyone going to join this class? I was told the recordings would be
available after it's done. I wouldn't mind splitting the cost with someone.
http://www.ccbootcamp.com/news/ccie-voice-bridge-the-gap.html
Thank you!
___
For more information r
Depends on how the subflow did the recording, where and how it stored it, etc.
You can attach the aef files and we can take a look. Might be a little tricky
if multiple people are joining at about the same time. Pretty easy to record
one name, play it just before joining the conference then t
Here's what I've done in real life. Send the call to Unity Connection.
Unity connection can do a "consult transfer". It asks the caller to state
their name before transferring the call.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of M
Rolls eyes. You are kidding on the last statement, right?
I can't even think of anything funny to make fun of you.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Rachell Thornton
[rachellthorn...@gmail.com]
Sen
Read carefully before placing your order you have not only to be a
partner to get the nfr but a particular type of partner.
Regards,
Dale
On Jul 23, 2009, at 18:15, Bai Min wrote:
Hi Juliana,
You can place an order via cisco marketplace for NFR. It includes
everything you want for ccie v
Probably voice specialization.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of DEC [...@bestoftnt.com]
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 9:45 PM
To: Bai Min
Cc:
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco Unity 7 vmware insta
Honesty --there are certain things money can't buy
For everything else there is a mastercard
-)
Cheers,Padhu
--
Sent using BlackBerry
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
To: rachellthorn...@gmail.com ; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.
Can you re-phrase that?
Like SRND 7.x, page 10-65 escape character?
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Charles
[jonv...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 4:01 PM
To: ccie_voice@
I would also like to know how people are preparing for topics like
+dialing, calling party normalization (localizing the calling number,
globalizing the calling party number, mapping the global party number to
its local variant).
I have read above mentioned topics in SRND few times and it is extre
I'm trying to use phones in my home lab to connect during a rack session. I
have everything, but am short one 7961. Does BR2 Phone 3 absolutely need to be
a 7961/7962? Could I get by with a 7960 or even a 7940? I looked through most
of the labs and didn't see anything that indicated I needed
28 matches
Mail list logo
