How is it you're attempting to configure CAS channels to talk using CCS
signaling? (aka ISDN)
Change your DS0 group command to PRI group.
greg
-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of J Hogan
Sent:
Make sure it's on both sides if you enable it. You will need it for
QOS anyways.
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Cisco Dave ciscod...@live.com wrote:
Yes, it was a misplaced command as seen here below. Removing that one
command resolved my issue.
interface Serial0/1/0:0
no ip address
Do you guys mean CALLING party mask/number? If you manipulated the called
party number the call would not make it to the destination.
Mike Thompson is correct, you should be sending all your calls to the
translation patterns (not transformation) patterns and do your calling party
I did not know that it needs to be pri- group. Also is there a
specific isdn switch type?
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 28, 2009, at 6:24 AM, Pulos, Greg gpu...@doc.gov wrote:
How is it you're attempting to configure CAS channels to talk using
CCS signaling? (aka ISDN)
Change your
Hello,
I've got an issue with calling between a CME SIP phone and a CUCM SIP
phone that I could use help with. Assume workbook 1 lab 4a has been
done.
CUCM SCCP phone over a GK-controlled trunk to a CME SCCP phone works.
CUCM SCCP phone over a GK-controlled trunk to a CME SIP phone works.
CUCM
All,
I have been working with AAR, but at least in my case I am noticing that
the actual dn itself must be assigned an AAR group for the rerouting to
occur?
I presume this is to enable a more granular approach to AAR (ie.
allowing a per-dn-AAR group and prefix). However, if this is the
Hello,
i passed all internal calls throught a translation pattern so as to expand
the ANI , testing it shows the full E.164 number in the missed and received
directory
in order for it to show 4 digit, i configured the calling party
transformation pattern and applied it to the device pool, yes it
Working through the Media section of this lab, I'm having what I think is a
transcoding problem with MOH. All RTP streams across WAN, in this lab, are
g729. MOH works okay for HQ but not for BR1. If HQ phone calls the BR1
phone and BR1 presses hold, music plays on HQ. If the opposite happens
Hi Folks,
My understanding is to pass the voice lab we have to score not only 80%
in total but also must score 80% in each individual section. Say for
example if the lab consist of 10 sections and my score is 75% in a
particular section but my overall average score is 90% that would still
be a
it is 80% overall NOT per section.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Aamir Panjwani
aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au wrote:
Hi Folks,
My understanding is to pass the voice lab we have to score not only 80% in
total but also must score 80% in each individual section. Say for example if
the
And to be more specific, you need to get 80 POINTS total.
The reason that's important is that the 'Open Ended Questions' are worth 21
of your TOTAL available points. If you don't get 3 out of 4, you only are
CAPABLE of getting 79 points (a failing grade). If you get the OEQ correct,
you get
To further on Craig's point. It is a 'strategy' for those very weak in an
area, say UCCX, to totally skip an area and hope that they ace other
sections to make up for it.
Definitely not something I would recommend since most of us will not ace
sections on this exam due to the complexity of
Must get 3/4 of the open ended questions correct to get 25 points. Those 25
are all or nothing. No partial credit. You also need at least 55 more points
out of 75 in the actual lab portion.
Your total needs to be 80 or more to pass.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original
Brain, I think OEQ worth 21 points not 25...
-Original Message-
From: bkvalent...@gmail.com [mailto:bkvalent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 29 September 2009 10:05 AM
To: Craig Staffin; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com; Aamir
Panjwani
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re:
Have you changed the MOH service parameter to allow g729? Make sure ip
pim dense mode is set on BR1. Run debug ccm-manager music-on-hold
events while the calls is on hold and you should see MOH is streaming
on 239.1.1.3 assuming that your base multicast address in CUCM is
239.1.1.1.
From:
Ok, 21 it is then.
--Original Message--
From: Aamir Panjwani
To: bkvalent...@gmail.com
To: Craig Staffin
To: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab scoring
Sent: Sep 28, 2009 8:04 PM
Brain, I think OEQ worth 21
Thanks Mike, it does make sense. Assuming OEQ is all good we only need
to score 74.7% (59 out of 79) to nail the lab...hmm doable J
From: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 29 September 2009 10:02 AM
To: 'Craig Staffin'; Aamir Panjwani
Cc:
Hello,
You mean i should uncheck the Use Device Pool Calling Party Transformation
CSS and leave the one on the device pool?
Regards
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:14 AM, Mike Thompson mthompson...@gmail.comwrote:
Did you try applying it at the phone and unchecking the Device Pool box?
Just as a
hello,
missed and received calls are not showing E.164 numbers
any ideas
rgd
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
No, if you uncheck that box it will NOT refer back to the DP.
My thought was configure it on the phone and uncheck that box (as a test).
NOTE: if you do configure it on the phone, but leave the box
checked..whatever is on the Device Pool will interfere with what's
configured on the phone.
NO DIFFERENCE, Still ve d 4 digits in the missed calls instead of the full
E.164 digits
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:31 AM, Mike Thompson mthompson...@gmail.comwrote:
No, if you uncheck that box it will NOT refer back to the DP.
My thought was configure it on the phone and uncheck that box
The first place to check would be the incoming calling party settings on the
gateway. Here a couple of examples:
On the HQ gateway:
National: +1
International: +
Unknown: Default
Subscriber: +1212
On the BR1 gateway:
National: +1
International: +
Unknown: Default
Subscriber: +1617
You need to
If you look at the MOH server that is being called by the HQ phone, it has a
MRGL assigned to it.
That MRGL will have a transcoder in it. that (those) transcoder(s) will be
used in order of precedence that they occur in the MRGL, top to bottom.
That being said, I would assume that the MOH
Try sh sccp connection on the gateway where xcoder is configured
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mike
Thompson
Sent: Tuesday, 29 September 2009 12:34 PM
To: 'Nara Shikamaru'
Cc: 'OSL Group'
Subject: Re: [OSL |
The MRG doesn't have a transcoder in it.
Maybe I'm overthinking this. Phones in each site speak G711 amonst
themselves but G729 when the stream is intersite. There wouldn't be any
transcoding taking place because point-to-point they're speaking the same
codec, right?
When I do a show sccp
No, if you set that Ent Param, it allowed the MoH to stream it natively, no
longer requiring transcoding.
There's something in the back of my head nagging that there's an issue when
you enable native G.729 in MoH. basically, if you have it stream g.729
natively that there's something else
That's kind of what I thought. This will take some time to sink in :(
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Mike Thompson mthompson...@gmail.comwrote:
No, if you set that Ent Param, it allowed the MoH to stream it natively,
no longer requiring transcoding.
There’s something in the back of my
DAMN IT JIM! THAT'S WHAT I WAS THINKING OF!
Thank you Brian!!!
NO, you absolutely can NOT transcode multicast. It was the exact opposite,
you can't use a transcoder.you NEED to set the serv param to allow g.729
natively.
Sorry for the Engineering Olympics Nara, I had a little
Long day for me, too. Took the day off to study all day and I still have
one more section. Gotta finish the module by Wednesday. Can you tell that
I'm working on my speed? :(
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Mike Thompson mthompson...@gmail.comwrote:
DAMN IT JIM! THAT’S WHAT I WAS
What model phone?
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ABIOLA ADEFILA
[adefilabi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 9:06 PM
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] missed/received call
When I clicked on your link below it install antivirus pro 2010 spyware. It
was a pain to get off my PC.
From: chikki venu [mailto:chik...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2009 10:55 PM
To: Craig Rees
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] cups
hi
Check the LDAP config on CUPS and CUCM
Double Jeopardy.
What model phone? Same as your other question.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ABIOLA ADEFILA
[adefilabi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 7:45 PM
To: OSL Group
Try configuring it on the dial-peer.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Sergio Polizer
[spoli...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 9:34 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL
So we came to the conclusion after I confirmed the same behavior. Does IP
Communicator support globalization / localization? CUPC does. SRND doesn't
say anything about IP Communicator.
Did one of the IPExpert Volume 1 labs say anything about this and they stated
to use your own hardware
Guys,
I have configured Device Mobility and Local Route Lists and have them both
working very nicely with one another. My question is pretty simply but I
cannot figure out where to do it. Is there a place in CUCM ( probably in
Real Time Monitoring Tool ) where you can see what phones are
The SRND does state it. Look for Calling Party Number Normalization (+
Dialing) in the Endpoint Features Summary section of the Unified Communications
Endpoints chapter. For each model of phone including software endpoints, plus
it breaks it out by SCCP/SIP. But, there are many typos. For
Only place I know off hand is at the phone itself.
You can click on the link next to the line where you set the mobility mode.
It says 'view current device mobility settings'.
No less of a pain that calling out, but you can see all the info there.
From:
I guess list all the phones out and look for phones in one device pool where
the IP Address doesn't belong to that device pool. Or get someone to write an
SQL procedure that knows CCM database.
I agree with what I think your thoughts are. On a large campus with
distributed callmanagers and
38 matches
Mail list logo
