Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [cisco-voip] CUCM 7.0.1 SUB replication issue "Connection to the Server cannot be established(Unable to access Remote >> Node)" error

Hi Tim, IP connectivity is OK from both ends couple of simple changes like adding NTP ,phones , GW. cheers, Jeremy On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Tim Smith wrote: > Whats changed? > Do they actually have IP connectivity between them? > Can you ping both ways from the shell? > > Cheers,

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM 7.0.1 SUB replication issue "Connection to the Server cannot be established(Unable to access Remote >> Node)" error

Hi folks, CUCM 7.0.1 I installed both SUB and PUB on Vmware and at the beginning life was good and SUB synced with PUB. Now when I try to access to SUB services on PUB ,I get this error "Connection to the Server cannot be established(Unable to access Remote >> Node) and everything is locked in

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [cisco-voip] CUCM 7.0.1 , Subscriber does not show up in CM group configuration Window

Thanx Guys, I installed both pub and sub again and now issue has been sorted. Cheers, Jeremy On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Eric Butcher wrote: > I had this a while back during an upgrade from 6 to 7. I opened a TAC > case, and it was decided that the sub’s database config was messed u

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Qos 3750 --- output queue

Hi Pavan,   Sorry for the wording.   I mean change the map  cos to Queue, but why it only  generate  Threshold 3 ?   I understand it assign cos 5 to Q1     cos 3 6 7  to  Q2     cos 2  4  to  Q3   Can we not use Threshold 1 or 2 ?   and what

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Qos 3750 --- output queue

You are mistaken. Its not changing the threshold. The first line means that cos 5 will be assigned to q1 upto its third threshold. The 3750 command reference is a better book if you want to ubderstand the parameters Sent from my phone On Jun 29, 2010, at 18:52, Erwan Erwan wrote: > hi all, >

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab1 6.2 - MeetMe and Location

Hi Expert, Has anyone got this section with Meet-me calling from PSTN to work perfectly without alter the CAC Location requirement of 4 g729 calls from previous section? Any suggestion? Thanks, TN. On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Tam Nhu wrote: > Hi Mark, > > As I stated before, this Vol2 L

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Qos 3750 --- output queue

hi all,   I am reading the 3750 QoS   , and confuse with the threshold in output queue.   When I run   int f0/4   auto-Qos cisco-phone !    it generete following :   mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 1 threshold 3  5 mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 2 threshold 3  3 6 7 mls qos s

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why are my SIP Phones registering to the PUB

Dont understand only my SIP phones are registering to the PUB, when the SUB is set are the primary Server in the Cluster Cisco 7940 SEP000D65ECB991 BR1 PHN 2 Default SCCP Registered with 10.10.210.11 10.10.201.252 Cisco 7941G-GE

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] dbreplication

Thanks Dan From: Dan Russell [mailto:danfruss...@gmail.com] Sent: 29 June 2010 21:23 To: Duncan Hamilton-Walker Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] dbreplication Duncan, Replication status of 2 for each node is good (replication complete). Another way to

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] dbreplication

Thanks Steve.. just needed to be sure From: steve dickey [mailto:scdic...@corb.net] Sent: 29 June 2010 21:05 To: Duncan Hamilton-Walker Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] dbreplication A dbreplication status of 2 is an indication that things are healthy. That output looks good for your clust

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] dbreplication

Duncan, Replication status of 2 for each node is good (replication complete). Another way to quickly check this is to navigate to the Cisco Unified Reporting web page and run the Unified CM Database Status report. There it will show the db status and its health. HTH, Dan On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 a

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] dbreplication

I have just realised that the cluster values are added together from the node values...!! doh...so i take it this is good ? From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Duncan Hamilton-Walker Sent: 29 June 2010 20:47 To: ccie_voice@on

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] dbreplication

Hi All, Can someone please help me out with an concern.. In the RTMT it shows the following Node number of connections Replicates created Replication status 10.10.210.10 50 425

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voice Hunt Group to Voicemail Vol2 Lab 9

Thanks Roger, that's what I thought, ext 1000 is an alternative number for 1003 on UC so it get to the right mailbox. I always like to get a second opinion when the PG doesn't match my solution, although as with all things Cisco there is often more than one way to solve a problem Graham On 28

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame-relay fragment question

Exactly what Roger said below...I will never change Fragment Size. Ash> Roger Källberg wrote: You shouldn't change the fragment size. Reason being that you want the fragment to be of a size that would give you a 10ms transmit delay in the event of congestion.   Brgds,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame-relay fragment question

Thank you Roger, I will leave it, then Bo 2010/6/29 Roger Källberg > Yes, that is correct. > > *Roger Källberg* > CCIE #26199 (Voice) > Consultant > Cygate AB > Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ > > Direkt: +46108787498 > Växel: +46108787400 > roger.kallb...@cygate.se > ---

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame-relay fragment question

Yes, that is correct. Roger Källberg CCIE #26199 (Voice) Consultant Cygate AB Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ Direkt: +46108787498 Växel: +46108787400 roger.kallb...@cygate.se Från: Berry, Matthew J. [mjbe...@krollontrack.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame-relay fragment question

I guess that makes sense. You're not actually making the link slower, so the fragment size wouldn't change. We'd only need to change the minCIR, CIR, and bc? Matthew Berry, CCVP, Sr. Unified Communications Engineer mjbe...@kroll.com From: ccie_voice-boun...@online

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame-relay fragment question

You shouldn't change the fragment size. Reason being that you want the fragment to be of a size that would give you a 10ms transmit delay in the event of congestion. Brgds, Roger Källberg CCIE #26199 (Voice) Consultant Cygate AB Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ Direkt: +46108787498 Växel:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame-relay fragment question

That's why I am confused. I have seen cases where some of them changed the value of fragment size, while the others did not. Thanks guys, I will keep looking for answers. Bo On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Graham Hopkins wrote: > > I think not, the fragment size is related to the amount o

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame-relay fragment question

Graham – But if you modify the CIR, it would seem to affect the calculation used for the fragment size? Fragment Size in Bytes = (PVC Speed in kbps * Maximum Allowed Jitter in ms) / 8 Matthew Berry, CCVP, Sr. Unified Communications Engineer mjbe...@kroll.com Fro

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame-relay fragment question

I think not, the fragment size is related to the amount of data that can be placed on the wire in 10 ms which relates to line speed not CIR Graham Hopkins On 29 Jun 2010, at 15:17, Bo Gao wrote: > HQ-BR1 bandwidth is 384K, I have the following config: > > map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame-relay fragment question

Bo, When you change the frame-relay CIR settings, your fragment size will also change if you want to stay in sync with the 95% PVC best practice. Page 3-27 of the QoS SRND: Fragment Size in Bytes = (PVC Speed in kbps * Maximum Allowed Jitter in ms) / 8 If your PVC is 95% then the calculation l

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame-relay fragment question

HQ-BR1 bandwidth is 384K, I have the following config: map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/0-201 frame-relay cir 384000 frame-relay bc 3840 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 384000 frame-relay fragment 480 service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust If I were to change the cir to 95% bas

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [cisco-voip] CUCM 7.0.1 , Subscriber does not show up in CM group configuration Window

I had the same issue. Had to revert the image again on the pub and sub for the sub to show up. On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:55 AM, jeremy co wrote: > Thanx for your response, > > SUB CM service was already started. I restart the service just a minute ago > to confirm that.  Still it didn't show up

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [cisco-voip] CUCM 7.0.1 , Subscriber does not show up in CM group configuration Window

Thanx for your response, SUB CM service was already started. I restart the service just a minute ago to confirm that. Still it didn't show up in CM group. To me it's very wired. Any suggestions? Cheers, Jeremy On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Mathew Miller wrote: > You need to start the

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM 7.0.1 , Subscriber does not show up in CM group configuration Window

You will need to start ccm service in sub for it to show up in cm group Sent from my phone On Jun 29, 2010, at 8:40, jeremy co wrote: > Hi, > > > I installed both Subscriber and publisher both with same version of 7.0.1 on > Vmware. ( both added as CUCM not CUCMBE). "Show network cluster" s

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM 7.0.1 , Subscriber does not show up in CM group configuration Window

Hi, I installed both Subscriber and publisher both with same version of 7.0.1 on Vmware. ( both added as CUCM not CUCMBE). "Show network cluster" shows both servers. I added SUB as a server and "Cisco Unified CM" ,but it will not show up in "Cisco Unified CM group " when I try to add it to the

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] File Transfer from CUCM to CUCME

HI Ash, I forgot that bro Anyways thanks for all your help. Regards, Joaquim Fernandes --- On Tue, 6/29/10, Ashar Siddiqui wrote: From: Ashar Siddiqui Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] File Transfer from CUCM to CUCME To: "Joaquim Fernandes" , "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" Date:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab1 6.2 - MeetMe and Location

Hi Mark, As I stated before, this Vol2 Lab 6.2 Meet-Me is using HW CFB IOS on BR1, which support both G711 and G729. Meetme conf initiated on BR1 Phone 2 and it used HW IOS CFB on BR1, as you see in the output of "show dspfarm dsp active". When dialing from PSTN into the Meet-me conf, which alre

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Extensin Mobility Queries

There are two Sites , Site A and B , which are part of the same cluster. Extension Mobility User which is now at Site A login into Device at Site B . My Requirement is that : 1. The user should be able to make call only through Site B gateway - Two options that i can look at is using devic