Its basically join softkey.
On Sep 21, 2011, at 10:30, Mann Chaddha wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> Does anyone know what construct JAL uses while bridging 2 calls on different
> Line Buttons?
>
> I ask as I need to plan India specific dial plan which shall restrict
> bridging of VoIP Calls to Local P
First, let me say, I do need a rest, it's hard to work on a lab and do real
paying work at the same time.
Second, thanks to everyone who has replied.
Here's what was throwing me.
I have 2 sites built in UCM, HQ which is a 10-digit site, npa-nxx of
904-607-..
And BR2 which an internat
You can strip off the digits with a translation pattern
Hth
Randall
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 21, 2011, at 11:42 AM, "Stephen Manuel" wrote:
> I am working on a Gatekeeper Lab today and have most if the problems
> resolved, but one is stumping me and I think it’s because I ‘m frustrated and
You ae Right it is pretty easy
On the CUCM Trunk confg set in the inbound call set the Significant digit to
the number that matches your internal dial-paln for example if you use 4 digit
extensions set the significat digits to 4
Dude you have to take a rest
From: srman...@bellsouth.net
Yeah what was pointed out earlier there is a UCM Service Parameter under
mobility called "Inbound Calling Search Space for Remote Destination" by
default it is set to use the gateways incoming calling search space, this
can be changed to device+line allowing better control over whom they can
call.
There are a couple ways to strip the tech prefix for incoming calls into
UCM, the simplest is the Significant Digits field on your GK trunk. Set
from all to 4 (or whatever works for your dial pattern). If this doesnt
work for you, ie TEHO, then use a translation pattern, ie: 1#. or 1#.!
using
Hi Stuart,
Here are the things that I would check:
1. Make sure that the GW CSS has access to the Route Pattern
2. Make sure that the Signifcant digits set on the GW are equal to the MVA
DN.
3. Make sure that the two service parameters in CUCM for MVA are enabled.
(one is for enabling MVA and one
Hi all,
My CSS for my H323 Gateway could see the MVA partition but i did not have the
internal partiton - doh!
KP, hopefully that solves your problem too
Kind Regards
Stuart
From: DeShon Crayton [dcrayto...@comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 7:03
I am working on a Gatekeeper Lab today and have most if the problems
resolved, but one is stumping me and I think it's because I 'm frustrated
and need another set of eyes on the problem.
So Thanks in advance.
Here's a basic rundown on what I've got setup.
HQ router/site - MGCP control
Check the ucm service parameter for mva and see what css is being used to
route calls..
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Geoghegan,
Stuart
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 8:39 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sub
Having the same issue here with MGCP and H323 gateway on the HQ router ... No
answer for you yet but I feel your pain ...
Sent from my iPad
KP
On Sep 21, 2011, at 5:39 AM, "Geoghegan, Stuart"
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I have an issue with MVA and hairpinning.
>
>
>
> I have followed I
Hi Guys
Does anyone know what construct JAL uses while bridging 2 calls on different
Line Buttons?
I ask as I need to plan India specific dial plan which shall restrict
bridging of VoIP Calls to Local PSTN Calls. I went through Geolocations but
so far am not too convinced with its usability as a
Hi All,
I have an issue with MVA and hairpinning.
I have followed IPX proctor guide for LAB 6 question 5.3
I have reached the stage where I can dial in to the MVA access number from the
PSTN line (2123942123 - simulated mobile phone number of HQPH2 - 5002) and CUCM
recognises the associated Re
Hi Rynard
Good news, glad to help!
Cheers
Stuart
From: Rynard Coetzee [mailto:rynard.coet...@bytes.co.za]
Sent: 21 September 2011 09:50
To: Geoghegan, Stuart; Brian Mulgrew
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Problem with CUCM and CUC SIP integration
Hi
I managed
Hi
I managed to fix the issue ,it would seem as if my CUCM might be bugged ,I put
the VM profile under the Line of the phone and that solved the problem ,my UC
VM profile was set to the default profile for the system but it did not work
with setting the VM profile under the line to None ,which s
Yes the correct VM profile is assigned to the phone ,also the mask has been
configured as in the VM profile. When the phone presses the Messages
button ,UC answers and I can sign the user into the associated mailbox without
any issues ,it is only on forwarding to UC when the problem occurs.
Hi Rynard
That's interesting output
Cdpn - called party number
oCdpn - original called party number
I think VMPN would mean voicemail pilot number
It's almost as if the device you are forwarding from is not assigned the
Voicemail profile
Can that specific phone reach the correct unity connect
Hi Brian
It is checked for outbound calls. I get the following error when I go through
the CUCM sdi trace ,not sure what it means though .
09/20/2011 05:38:02.147 CCM|Forwarding - ERROR processCFToVM - both oCdpnVMPN
and cdpnVMPN are NULL - clear the call, callKey=
0x19|
09/20/2011 05:38:02.147
18 matches
Mail list logo
