Hi Guys
I am doing a lab and little confused with the proposed solution.
The requirement is that on interface queue 2 queue 3 queue 4 should share
bandwidth as 20 40 40 percentage.
Now what's the best answer.
Interface f1/0/1
Srr-queue bandwidth share 1 2 4 4
Or
Interface f1/0/1
Hi Guys
Regarding the mls qos trust command.
If the question demands to trust dscp values.
On the interface connected to the phone. If I configure mls qos trust dscp and
mls qos trust device cisco-phone.
Does this means that the interface will trust the incoming dscp only if it's
I am on a current session now and I can't access proctorlabs via hardware vpn,
my router can ping internet but my laptop connected to the router can't access
the internet so as to initiate hardware VPN .
Please help, you can even connect to my laptop via team viewer .
Experts kindly assist
/attachments/20111001/9a038c30/attachment.html
--
___
CCIE_Voice mailing list
CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 68, Issue 1
Is anybody else having issues getting to their session, been fighting this for
over an hour. I actually had a session from 12 AM and hoped it would continue
but I went to sleep for a couple of hours and return to not being able to
access anything. I can login now but so far that's as far as I
In IPX workbooks ; they limit number of channels just by pri-group timeslots
1-5,24 service mgcp command only. ( I didn't go through all the solutions
yet , but I have seen this few times so far)
But I think fractional pri for MGCP is not supported by CUCM as per Cisco
documentation.
Somehow
The weights are relative to each other. Assuming priority queue is enabled
on queue 1 and having Srr-queue bandwidth share 1 2 4 4 would mean:
Queue 2 = 2/10 or 20%
Queue 3 = 4/10 or 40%
Queue 4 = 4/10 or 40%
Both ways get the same results. There is no reason for the shape 3 0 0 0
unless
You can open a case with support, that would be the quickest way to get
their help. Did you use IPE's configuration for hardware vpn? What type of
router are you using? Did you enter the commands to initiate the xauth?
Chris
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 5:58 AM, pithog...@yahoo.com wrote:
I am on
Its not you it's them I am having same issues, they say they are looking at it.
Now I can get to the login page and start my session but it is slow routers are
not always responding.
Edgar
From: pithog...@yahoo.com pithog...@yahoo.com
To:
The only issue you may run into is if your transcoder is picked as a
Media Termination inadvertently. For example, if an MTP is required for
G729-G729 media termination, MRM will still allocate the transcoder, but
the ORC-ACK will fail on the second leg. In the same MRG, MRM load
balances
I use a 881 cisco router, I entered the crypto ipsec client connect command but
it did not request for xauth . I tried for a long time but was not successful.
Another challenge I had was that my laptop could not connect to the internet
via my router. I was getting a dns error.
Thanks for your
I use a 881 router, I entered the crypto ...connect command but I did not get
the xauth request, that was an indication that there was a problem.
Another challenge I had was that I could not access the internet from my laptop
despite the fact that my router was assigning ip address to my
Either answer yields the same results. 2+4+4=10. 2/10 = 20%.
20+40+40=100. 20/100 = 20%. So either answer is correct.
If the question doesn't mention shaping, I wouldn't add it. Does it ask
that you enable the priority queue?
John
-Original Message-
From:
There is nothing we can do until Proctorlabs resolves the ISP issue they are
having. I was told anyone who had issues would get a replacement voucher.
EJF
From: pithog...@yahoo.com pithog...@yahoo.com
To: edgar feliz ejfeli...@yahoo.com;
Check the MRGL setting on HQ Device Pool is correct, then if it is, try
manually adding the MRGL on the h323 gateway in UCM.
From: Bill Lake whl...@gmail.commailto:whl...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 07:31:15 -0500
To: vega2...@yahoo.com.aumailto:vega2...@yahoo.com.au
Cc:
It's better to do it on the pri-group than on CUCM with the service parameter
in case the gateway is in SRST you won't use all channels.
Joe
On Oct 1, 2011, at 9:31 AM, Ken Wyan wrote:
In IPX workbooks ; they limit number of channels just by pri-group timeslots
1-5,24 service mgcp command
because you added the command mls qos trust device cisco-phone the
switch will know via CDP that you are connecting Cisco Phone other
wise the default behavior (*after enable the mls qos on the switch)
will be applied of not trust ,
i would say that 99% you will be trusting the COS on the switch
the correct answer for your Question is to busy out the non-defind B
channels from the Service parameters ,
Note that CCM doesn't support Fractional T1/E1 over mgcp , this
service parameter is kind of workaround and i will use it myself if
will setup Fractional T1/E1 over mgcp ,
Ash
In IPX
Earlier they said ISP issues.
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 8:07 PM, edgar feliz ejfeli...@yahoo.com wrote:
Its not you it's them I am having same issues, they say they are looking
at it.
Now I can get to the login page and start my session but it is slow routers
are not always responding.
Edgar
To many people are having issue for it to be operator error it's definitely
something on their end ISP etc.
EJF
From: Chris Martin clm.c...@gmail.com
To: pithog...@yahoo.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Saturday, October 1, 2011 10:31 AM
Subject:
It will trust DSCP from IP phone only if its detected using CDP. Non ip
phone traffic will use default trust rules which is untrust dscp and rest to
0.
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Nowork_onlyfun noworkonlyf...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Guys
Regarding the mls qos trust command.
If the
://www.platinumplacement.com/
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20111001/9a038c30/attachment.html
--
___
CCIE_Voice mailing list
CCIE_Voice
The support people at ipexpert have not been helpful in recent times all they
tell me is that there are not ccie level support engineers, I just changed my
hardware vpn to a 881 router last week so its been difficult to ascertain where
the issue is coming from although I have done all I should
It's definetly not supported, since the MGCP protocol asume all channels are
in service. You can use the service parameter to take them out of service
from CUCM perspective.
They do this to avoid allocating more DSP to bring all 24 channels, when you
will only place a few calls, so they can save
24 matches
Mail list logo
