Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Live Reply

2012-02-05 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
I tried both internal and external numbers. Neither work. I ran a debug ccsip messages and never see CUE try to transfer the call. John From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Baktha Muralidharan Sent: Saturday, February

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CFUR does not work

2012-02-05 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
(jomcgaug) Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CFUR does not work No. it is supported. The destination Phone will just ring a bit later through PSTN. On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 3:16 AM, John McGaughey (jomcgaug) jomcg...@cisco.com wrote: Hi Vik/All I'm working

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Live Reply

2012-02-05 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
Thanks. That works. DSG does say 4-4. I overlooked it. L From: datucha123 datucha123 [mailto:datucha...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 8:43 AM To: John McGaughey (jomcgaug) Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Live Reply You have press 44

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Live Reply

2012-02-04 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
Hello, I'm in lab 4 of the new 5 labs. Question 6.4. It's asking to configure Live Reply. The DSG says to just click the check box Enable Live Reply. I've done so but when I press option 4 it says this message cannot get a reply. I'm calling from the SiteC phone 1. I added a user and

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CFUR does not work

2012-02-04 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
Hi Vik/All I'm working on Lab #4 of the new 5 labs. Quesiton 9.2. They are asking you to configure CFUR on SiteB phone 2. However this will not work because of the RDP assigned to the phone. RDP and CFUR and not supported together. See CSCtg43998. John

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS question from new 5 labs, lab 2, question 10.1

2012-01-27 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
Hello, From the new 5 labs, Lab 2 question 10.1 it asks the following. For traffic being sent to the Site A gateway ensure that traffic marked with COS 5 is dropped if queue 1 is 75% full. The solution guide says to add queue-set 2 to the fastethernet port and change the following 2

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS question from new 5 labs, lab 2, question 10.1

2012-01-27 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
3rd threshold is 100% implicit. So that wouldn't work since it will drop when 100% full. -Original Message- From: Farkas Péter [mailto:wormh...@sch.bme.hu] Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 8:04 AM To: John McGaughey (jomcgaug) Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] New Five Labs: UCCX Question

2012-01-23 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
In lab 1 of the new 5 labs, question 7.3 it asks that the agent be able to see the ani and number of calls in queue. The DSG says to add a salesinq field to the default layout. The problem is that there is nothing telling IPPA what to populate this field with. So in my lab I see the

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS question on Workbook2 Lab 10

2012-01-18 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
The question doesn’t say anything about trusting or not trusting, which to me means we can use either. -Original Message- From: Rrcrumm [mailto:rrcr...@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 1:14 AM To: Ashraf Ayyash Cc: John McGaughey (jomcgaug); ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS question on Workbook2 Lab 10

2012-01-16 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
Hello, In Workbook 2, Lab 10, question 5.2 it asks you to setup MLP LFI between HQ and BR1. In the solution guide it has you use auto qos trust on the HQ side but does not use trust on the BR1 side. The DSG guide says the reason for not using the trust key word is because of the following:

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Five New Lab from IPExpert

2012-01-15 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
Has anyone purchased the five new labs from IPExpert? If so, are they worth money? What's different about them versus the 10 lab workbook? Anything new or just more of the same? John ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calls to CUE fail over WAN

2011-12-28 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
from CUCM (or any other sources) to use the G729, so that xcoder will get invoked. On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 4:44 AM, John McGaughey (jomcgaug) jomcg...@cisco.com wrote: Nevermind.  I figured it out.  I created a separate inbound dial-peer with g729 and that caused the xcoder to get invoked

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calls to CUE fail over WAN

2011-12-27 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
Hello, I'm in Workbook 2, Lab 8, question 4.5. I have CUE setup properly and calls between CME phones roll successfully to voicemail. However, they fail to roll to voice mail when an HQ phone calls a BR2 phone. The answer guide says to configure an xcoder on the BR2 router. Here's my

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calls to CUE fail over WAN

2011-12-27 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
...@gmail.com [mailto:bkvalent...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 6:42 PM To: John McGaughey (jomcgaug); ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calls to CUE fail over WAN Did you enable cube? Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - Reply message - From

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPX Vol 2 Lab 1

2011-12-22 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
I think they split it up between each link. There's 2 between HQ and BR1. 48K on each link. Doesn't look like a typo to me. John -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Rrcrumm Sent: Wednesday,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CBarge with SNR

2011-12-12 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
I tried adding it to HQ and same issue. Also, the DSG shows that you should add it to BR2's MRGL not HQ's. John From: datucha123 datucha123 [mailto:datucha...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 4:54 AM To: John McGaughey (jomcgaug) Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 70, Issue 89

2011-12-11 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
...@onlinestudylist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest... Today's Topics: 1. CBarge with SNR (John McGaughey (jomcgaug)) 2. Re: lab/6 MGCP TS got the lab in Dubai really hard luck (Ray) 3. Re: srst behaviour under telephony

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Lab 7 TEHO - phone display issue

2011-12-03 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
Hi Stuart, I ran into the exact same problem. The answer in the DSG is incorrect. I got it to work by doing the following. I created the following dial-peer on BR1. dial-peer voice 415 pots destination-pattern 415... port 1/0/0:23 forward-digits 7 In the teho route list I

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Lab 7 TEHO - phone display issue

2011-12-03 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
OK now it's working for me using this config. It wasn't earlier. Not sure what I did wrong. Thanks for the clarification. John From: Vik Malhi [mailto:vma...@ipexpert.com] Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2011 3:35 PM To: John McGaughey (jomcgaug) Cc: Geoghegan, Stuart; ccie_voice

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook 2 typos

2011-11-11 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
] Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 10:56 PM To: John McGaughey (jomcgaug); ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook 2 typos Did you configure the calling party transform pattern? \.+44.! predot/prefix 0? At least in other labs with similar question this was part

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook 2 typos

2011-11-11 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of John McGaughey (jomcgaug) Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 6:04 AM To: edgar feliz; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook 2 typos I configured the calling

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook 2 typos

2011-11-10 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
Is it just me or is Workbook 2 full of mistakes? For example, I'm in lab 5 question 2.3. It says calls from phone button 2 should appear in the history logs as +44 020 5943 2785. The answer states to set the Subscriber Number Prefix to +44. That's incorrect since the call comes in like

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on the HWIC-ESW

2011-10-22 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
In workbook volume 2, lab 2, section 6.1 it says You must trust markings from all endpoints and servers. How do you trust the markings on FastEthernet ports on the HWIC-ESW? mls qos commands are not available (even though the answer guide shows them in there). auto qos doen't do much.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN qos question

2011-10-01 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
Either answer yields the same results. 2+4+4=10. 2/10 = 20%. 20+40+40=100. 20/100 = 20%. So either answer is correct. If the question doesn't mention shaping, I wouldn't add it. Does it ask that you enable the priority queue? John -Original Message- From:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Strange Intercom/RSVP issue

2011-09-05 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of John McGaughey (jomcgaug) Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2011 12:57 PM To: Ashraf Ayyash Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Strange Intercom/RSVP issue OK. I'll work on getting this. I was also going to look at the traces as well to see what

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Strange Intercom/RSVP issue

2011-09-05 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
maximum sessions software 4 associate application SCCP -Original Message- From: Ashraf Ayyash [mailto:ash.ayy...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 2:11 PM To: John McGaughey (jomcgaug) Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Strange Intercom/RSVP

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Strange Intercom/RSVP issue

2011-09-05 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
The bind didn't work either. Upgrading the IOS now. -Original Message- From: Ashraf Ayyash [mailto:ash.ayy...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 2:20 PM To: John McGaughey (jomcgaug) Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Strange Intercom/RSVP issue

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Strange Intercom/RSVP issue

2011-09-05 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
IOS upgrade didn't help either. :( -Original Message- From: Ashraf Ayyash [mailto:ash.ayy...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 2:20 PM To: John McGaughey (jomcgaug) Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Strange Intercom/RSVP issue and bind

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Strange Intercom/RSVP issue

2011-09-05 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
Ayyash [mailto:ash.ayy...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 3:17 PM To: John McGaughey (jomcgaug) Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Strange Intercom/RSVP issue catch it , CSCtg88293 Intercom: Talkback fails when phone is using RSVP mtp intercom

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Strange Intercom/RSVP issue

2011-09-04 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
Yes I have. -Original Message- From: Ashraf Ayyash [mailto:ash.ayy...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2011 12:06 PM To: John McGaughey (jomcgaug) Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Strange Intercom/RSVP issue have you configured the QOS section

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Strange Intercom/RSVP issue

2011-09-04 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
OK. I'll work on getting this. I was also going to look at the traces as well to see what port CUCM is telling the phone to send RTP to. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Ashraf Ayyash [mailto:ash.ayy...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2011 12:55 PM To: John McGaughey (jomcgaug

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] {BR1 or HQ GATEWAYS WON'T REGISTER WITHSUBSCRIBER USING MGCP]

2011-09-04 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
Check your CCM group on the GW config in CUCM. Does the group contain the Sub? John From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of michael.se...@compucom.com Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2011 3:42 PM To:

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Strange Intercom/RSVP issue

2011-09-03 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
Hello, I'm in workbook 1, lab 9A. I'm testing the Intercom feature between the assistant and manager. It doesn't matter who initiates the intercom, I get no audio to the target phone. I pressed ?? on each phone, and the initiating phone I see packets going out, and on the target phone I

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Dial Rules and +Dialing

2011-08-21 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
Do SIP Rules support +Dialing? For example if I have the following SIP Dial Rule: Pattern - \+1212... Timeout - 0 On a SIP phone missed calls shows +12123945001. If I try to dial this number I have to wait for the interdigit timeout. It seems to ignore the \+1212... pattern I