Personally, I would use the CUCM to push the images since it's much quicker
and easier. Then after the images are loaded, they will stay once you
register with the CME, so just change the TFTP server to the CME when done.
The lab is about results not process. So, may as well take it easy.
My 2
That's mostly right, but I think you are missing the priority queue.
So taking your example (with modifications):
srr-queue bandwidth share 0 40 30 30
srr-queue bandwidth shape 10 20 0 0
priority-queue out
This is the way it would appear in the config, and it works bottom up.
The
I believe it's because of the previous question, 5.2 . You did not do any
trusting on the switch, instead of remarked all of the packets at the switch
level; therefore, you were able to trust anything that eventurally got to
the HQ router. Whereas on BR2, nothing could be done at the switch
The voip dial-peer on the H323 gateway does not support the +. You have to
use a voice translation rule on the H323 gateway to re-insert the + after
it's been striped.
HTH,
Ohamien
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Matteo Bardon bart...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello All,
i've noticed that
Hey guys --
I am currently labbing at home with a 3560, and I'm a bit confused with what
the auto qos commands should also generate.
According the the QOS SRND, the auto qos voip command will create all
of the mls qos commands, plus the interface level commands, srr-queue share
and shape.
, Ohamien Uhakheme oham...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys --
I am currently labbing at home with a 3560, and I'm a bit confused with
what the auto qos commands should also generate.
According the the QOS SRND, the auto qos voip command will create all
of the mls qos commands, plus the interface
Odd.. For SG, try putting 5001 in the None partition, and placing the same
CSS on the trunk. Technically that CSS should be able to see the none
partition and it should work. If not, then we most likely have something
wrong with that CSS...
HTH,
Ohamien
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Ryan
cluster with no luck…..very odd.
*From:* Ohamien Uhakheme [mailto:oham...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* August-31-10 10:49 PM
*To:* Ryan Schwab
*Cc:* OSL Group
*Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Inbound CSS on GK Trunk not working?
Odd.. For SG, try putting 5001 in the None partition, and placing
Email support and they will mail you the file, or you can load Vol 2 Lab 1,
and it should be on the root of C:
Ohamien
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:01 PM, groganhockey groganhoc...@gmail.comwrote:
Am I missing it? I don't see it on the IPCC server?
Major congrats! You earned it!
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Ryan Barnum r...@ipexpert.com wrote:
Great Job Matthew
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Matthew Berry
ciscovoiceg...@gmail.comwrote:
I just got my score report. I passed guys.
More follow-up to come later. Right now
What about during the q931 debug? Will it show in the Calling Number on the
debug?
Ohamien
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.com wrote:
CME 7.0 won't display '+' sign at the top with incoming calling number.
If you have properly applied translation rules then
Hey everyone --
I wanted to get the feeling for how everyone creates their partitions for
the lab. It seems to be a fairly time consuming task, especially when it
may not be needed (depending on your COR requirements).
Some of the thoughts I have were:
1 ) Creating any/all partitions at the
Hey guys --
I've been lurking for a while, so I figured that I'd chime in. I sat for my
first attempt yesterday with less than passing results. Like other people
have mentioned, it is heart breaking to see 0% in areas that you are sure
that you nailed completely. It's cool though, I needed to
Is B-ACD eligible for the lab? It's not on the blueprint.. No CME
Applications are on the blueprint for that matter..
Ohamien
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:01 AM, Matthew Berry ciscovoiceg...@gmail.comwrote:
I had to work through some issues with B-ACD tonight. I posted a short
write-up with
What about during the OEQs? Do we have access to anything during that time?
Ohamien
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Mike Brooks 2xcci...@gmail.com wrote:
According to Ben Ng:
We have four SRND documents ready to be opened, also you have the online
Cisco document page.
1. UC 7 SRND
2.
MAJOR CONGRATS!
Ohamien
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Daryl Smith darylpsm...@gmail.com wrote:
I took the exam last Friday in RTP and received the news today. This was
also my first attempt
I'm a product of the BLS and VoDs and personal work experience. Also
having some equipment at
Hey guys --
So I'm working on the lab, trying to get some conferencing going, and I do
the following:
sccp local fa0/0.30
sccp ccm 10.10.210.10 identifier 1 priority 1 version 5.0.1
sccp
!
sccp ccm group 1
associate ccm 1 priority 1
associate profile 1 register CFB001
*Then I get to the
I have 8GB on my server and it runs fine. Just allocate enough to each VM.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Ravindra Lakpriya lakpr...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes you can but i prefer distributing the load among multiple servers.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Tanner Ezell
Hey Guys --
Is there any good material out there about SIP Endpoints in comparison to
SCCP Endpoints as it pertains to the lab? Also, is there anything on the lab
that would require us to learn the differences between the SIP and SCCP
endpoints, instead of just knowing how to configure the two.
This will definitely help. Thank you!
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 8:35 PM, dave menk menk...@hotmail.com wrote:
Ohamien,
I do not have a comparison but there is a nicely put togehter doc in the
link below that goes through setting up SIP endpoints.
I still have access to all of the 2009 Networkers Documentation, but I see
nothing for the CCIE Voice, only SAN and Wireless.
If you happen to run across the thread, and it gives any more detail, I will
be happy to search again.
Ohamien
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 8:55 PM, dave menk
21 matches
Mail list logo
