...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Somphol Boonjing
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 11:26 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CFUR vs Calling Party Transformation on MGCP gateway
Hi All,
Am I understand correctly that unlike voice translation profile on IOS gateway,
the calling party
Hi All,
Am I understand correctly that unlike voice translation profile on IOS
gateway, the calling party translation pattern, that is applied to gateway
level for outgoing call, can't be tailored based on destination route
pattern?
For example, assuming both Site B and Site C are in SRST mode,
hi all.,
anyone face this before, call from 4001 to 3001 thru GK in SB SRST mode/Cfur,
most of time show as 4001 (instead of +19723033001).
But sometime, i will show as +19723033001.
And looks like this is caused by Phone 3001 is ringing, however CFUR is not
kick in, that is why only
Hi experts,
i have been trying to test the Call forward unregister whn the call arrive
on destination phone its show on the display as FORWARD,FOR and BY on the
phone screen so is there a way to display FROM on the destination phone
screen
thanks
___
Ramcharan,The link is now corrected and available to view once again. If you could confirm this for me on your end I would greatly appreciate it. Let me know if you need anything further and I would be glad to help you!
James Dull - CCNA, CCNA Voice, Comp TIA A+, Network+, Security+Technical
Hi All,
I am testing Cfur from HQBR2 to BR1; when calling from HQ or BR2 to BR1
phone 1 (3001) the calls display the following:
Forward HQ Phone 1 (+14082022001)
For (3001)
By (3001)
After that i am reloading my BR1 router; and again test the same call it
shows as the following:
Forward HQ
John/All,
We are not running into this bug since in lab #4 we do not make the Remote
Destination phone ring at all in this lab.
You will hit this bug and see that CFUR will not function correctly if the RD
rings (not the case in this lab).
I've tested the final solution and both the
No. it is supported. The destination Phone will just ring a bit later
through PSTN.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 3:16 AM, John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
jomcg...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi Vik/All
** **
I’m working on Lab #4 of the new 5 labs. Quesiton 9.2. They are asking
you to configure CFUR on
(jomcgaug)
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CFUR does not work
No. it is supported. The destination Phone will just ring a bit later
through PSTN.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 3:16 AM, John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
jomcg...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi Vik/All
I'm working
Hi Vik/All
I'm working on Lab #4 of the new 5 labs. Quesiton 9.2. They are asking
you to configure CFUR on SiteB phone 2. However this will not work
because of the RDP assigned to the phone.
RDP and CFUR and not supported together. See CSCtg43998.
John
Hi,
I am trying to achieve the CFUR with FOR and BY fields to show as below:
Forward: 5001(HQPH1)
For: +19723033001 (3...)
By: +19723033001 (3...)
My configuration is as below:
3001 directory page on CUCM has CFUR: +19723033001 and CSS:CFUR_CSS
Route Pattern: +1.972303001, PREDOT
I have
One other gotcha is that the name of the phone needs to be +19723033001.
This is default when a phone registers SRST.
Adam Compton
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:43 AM, sandeep.ra...@wipro.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to achieve the CFUR with FOR and BY fields to show as below:
Forward:
)
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CFUR FOR and BY Fields
One other gotcha is that the name of the phone needs to be +19723033001.
This is default when a phone registers SRST.
Adam Compton
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:43 AM
To achieve that in the field for and by u must have configured the external
phone number mask in the phone registered to cucm exactally as u want it to
appear on the for and the by.
Of course you shouldn't have edited the name in the ephone-dn on the SRST (
which if you don't edit anything takes
AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CFUR FOR and BY Fields
Hi,
I am trying to achieve the CFUR with FOR and BY fields to show as below:
Forward: 5001(HQPH1)
For: +19723033001 (3
ENPM = External Phone Number Mask.
And below mentioned method by Roger will 100% work as expected.
On 4/1/2011 2:00 PM, adam compton wrote:
Roger,
What is ENPM?
Thanks for all the suggestions. I've tried MGCP and H323 gateways,
vm-profile, and still can't get it to show up as:
For:
1. Created pt-cfur
2. Create css-cfur
3. Create rl-cfur with the HQ gateway, no RL/RG manipulation
4. Create RP \+1.6178631XXX, pedot and check ENPM
5. On the phone directory CFUR setting, +16178631000, css-cfur
On 31 March 2011 22:19, adam compton com...@gmail.com wrote:
Roger,
From hq ph 1
Roger,
What is ENPM?
Thanks for all the suggestions. I've tried MGCP and H323 gateways,
vm-profile, and still can't get it to show up as:
For: +16178631001 ( 1... )
by : +16178631001 ( 1... )
I even tried redirect translation rules on the SRST gateway, but can't get
it to show +16178631001
One more thing to add. I'm running 12.4T24 on 2801 routers if that matters.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 5:00 PM, adam compton com...@gmail.com wrote:
Roger,
What is ENPM?
Thanks for all the suggestions. I've tried MGCP and H323 gateways,
vm-profile, and still can't get it to show up as:
All,
I am desperately seeking help on how to alter the For and By fields on a
CFUR to an SRST phone and a branch site. This is what I need to display on
the phone:
Forwarded 5001
For: +16178631001 ( 1... )
by : +16178631001 ( 1... )
I've been trying for a month to figure out how to display
I've only been able to get below:
From hq ph 1
(5001)
For: +16178631001 ( 1... )
by : +16178631001 ( 1... )
if i restrict calling name i get
From
(5001)
For: +16178631...
by : +16178631001 ( 1... )
Using the VM profile solution i've managed below without (1...) or +
From
(5001)
For:
Have you enabled ISDN redirect-ie? (both on CUCM and router).
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:04 AM, adam compton com...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
I am desperately seeking help on how to alter the For and By fields on a
CFUR to an SRST phone and a branch site. This is what I need to display on
the
Roger,
From hq ph 1
(5001)
For: +16178631001 ( 1... )
by : +16178631001 ( 1... )
That's exactly what I want to see! Any tips how you achieved this?
Bo,
This is where I lose you:
4. Create a VM Profile called SBPH1 and mask +16178631001. This will
require you to configure Alternative Numbers
CUCM 7.01 has a bug. The VM Profile is a work around. Every time I would
reset my CUCM VM's sometimes I would get the expected display as shown below,
other times I wouldn't. A few other folks confirmed this as well. It's a
display issue with 7.01 and VMware
On Mar 31, 2011, at 12:19 PM,
Hi Experts,
Not sure if this subject has been posted before, but I could not find it in
this forum. Here is the problem I just discovered a couple days back and
can be duplicated in many labs.
I have configured CFUR to display the correct full E164 digits in FOR and BY
field; everything
Hi study2b,
You can look at this thread and make it works.
http://www.mail-archive.com/ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com/msg19418.html
I've just posted a thread related to this issue, so if you make it works and
run into the same problem, please let me know.
Thanks,
TN.
Hello experts,
I am working on CFUR and have a question:
When BR1 phones go into SRST mode(I am using call-manager-fallback), I can
get HQ phones ring to BR1 Phone 2
On the BR1 Phone 2 screen, it showed:
From 2123945002 (by 1002)
Instead of show by 1002, what do I need to do for it to show a
I know this doesn't make much sense, but it is done through a VM Profile.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of study2b ccie
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 10:10 AM
To: OSL
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CFUR display
Hello,
Let's consider a typical question for CFUR from one of the mock labs:
Ensure that users at HQ/BR1 (US) can still successfully call phones at the
BR2 site (Spain) using 4 digit dialing when there is a WAN outage at the BR2
site.
The obvious answer is: use CFUR. But it requires some
Hi Miron,
Your approach will work if there is no COR for the phones. If COR is
involved (a phone should not dial International) and when CFUR is required
you will need a pt and css to reach that route pattern and i.e I believe the
overhead.
HTH
Prashant
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Miron
Miron,
The problem is that your pattern 3XXX will never be matched as long as there
are DNs existing on CUCM with the specific patterns like 3001, 3002, etc.
CUCM is not like an H.323 gateway where a port down and dial-peer down makes
the outbound dial-peer never be matched.
On CUCM, if the
Hi Randall,
agree with you :) The reason it worked for me in tha lab today was that I
had a specific dialplan.
phones couldn't call each other directly (other DNs were not in the CSS),
only via [135]XXX translation pattern used to expand ANI to e164 for
internal calls (lab requirement).
the
I see how you made the CFUR RP to work now, but then how would you dial
the phones through the regular TP?
Now the CFUR RP is preferred over the TP, isn't it?
Cheers.
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Randall,
agree with you :) The reason it worked
Good point - I have not tested it good enough... Thanks for pointing this
out.
regards
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 00:38, Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com wrote:
I see how you made the CFUR RP to work now, but then how would you dial
the phones through the regular TP?
Now the CFUR RP is
34 matches
Mail list logo
