Hi Francesca,
It may be worth trying D2O (rather than H2O) in the final protein buffer. It
sometimes causes problems in NMR experiments. One of my colleagues had success
with this approach. Crystal screening will need to be done under oil (micro
batch) to stop losing D2O by vapor diffusion.
the same as the 1 in P1 ;-)
seriously, if you look at space group names:
143 P3
144 P31
145 P32
149 P312
151 P3112
153 P3212
150 P321
152 P3121
154 P3221
the 1s in 149 to 154 are necessary to differentiate them all.
On 18 Feb 2015, at 04:51, Keller, Jacob wrote:
Dear
Hi Francesca,
since your protein is expressed in eucarytic cells, glycosylation might be an
issue. Glycosylation usually enhances the solubility and can influence the
crystallisation negativly because of high flexibility. There are commercially
available deglycosylation kits.
You can try
Applications are invited for a PhD studentship in Dr. Arianna Fornili's group
at Queen Mary University of London starting from October 2015.
Using a combination of state-of-the-art Molecular Modelling, Molecular Dynamics
and Bioinformatics techniques, the successful candidate will investigate
At the risk of muddying the waters further, the difference between 312 and 321
is that the 2-fold normal to the 3-fold is along the diagonal of the ab face in
312, while it is along the a (or b, by equivalence) in 321. The 1 is definitely
no place holder. It has a very significant meaning.
The
...The 1 is definitely no place holder. It has a very significant meaning.
Not sure why place holders are inimical to significance. I think you are saying
that the 1 tells you there is no rotation here, like the 0 in the number 201
tells you there are no tens in that number. I call that a place
Dear William,
In a similar circumstance, we cut out the density from one crystal, and used
that to solve the structures of non-isomorphous crystals by molecular
replacement. At this point, we had an envelope (needed to cut out the
density), initial maps, and operators to place one copy of the
Laurent Maveyraud laurent.maveyr...@ipbs.fr writes:
this is explained in details in table 2.2.4.1 of vol A of
International Tables of Crystallography (p 18 in my edition).
For trigonal/hexagonal, the primary direction is along c, along the
3-fold (6-fold axis). It's the same in tetragonal
Dear Fang Lu,
These spots are from a small molecule crystal. There is one very short
axial length (large distance between
reciprocal lattice rows) and one quite long axis (the spots are close
together in the straight reciprocal lattice
row near the bottom of your diffraction pattern) You can
Well let me further muddy the waters by insisting that the 1 IS DEFINITELY a
place-holder, telling you that there is no rotation (greater than 1-fold) along
the a or b axes, and that the 2 therefore refers to 2-fold rotation along the
next axis, the ab diagonal (no the -a,b diagonal which is
Dear all,
The SGC and Target Discovery Institute at the University of Oxford are seeking
applicants for two new group leader positions. To find out more about the
positions and to apply go to the University's jobs and vacancies pages
https://www.ox.ac.uk/about/jobs/index.html.
Chemical Biology
Dear All,
I'd like to call your attention to a second position announcement for a PhD
level structural biologist to join a new biotechnology company called
HarkerBIO. I am posting this announcement for any members of the CCP4 board
that may be looking for positions but please note that I am
Dear All,
We have transnational user access slots for the production and crystallization
of bacterial and eukaryotic membrane proteins from Biostruct-X available. If
you are interested (or if know someone at your institute who might be
interested) to produce together with us at PSI membrane
The spots at the very edge is around 2.5A.
2015-02-18 12:15 GMT+00:00 Fang Lu fangluwork...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
I got this odd diffraction. Not sure what it is, detergent or protein? Any
ideas?
The crystallisation condition is 2.4M Sodium Malonate.
GF buffer contains HEGA-10,Tris,
Dear Dear Crystallographers,
Thanks very much to all who replied on and off the list—I feel I have to
express my continuous admiration and gratitude to the folks who respond to
these questions. I am not sure where there is a listserve like CCP4BB!
Anyway, in the current issue I have gotten to
Hmm, placeholder for me does not seem to emphasize enough the role that this
number plays in the space group names. My understanding (but I fail to remember
where I read this ...) is that the first number is the order of the rotation
(i.e. 6,4,3,2 or 1) of the unique unit cell axis (often the
Hi all,
I got this odd diffraction. Not sure what it is, detergent or protein? Any
ideas?
The crystallisation condition is 2.4M Sodium Malonate.
GF buffer contains HEGA-10,Tris, KAcetate, MgAcetate, EDTA and DTT.
Protein size is around 100kDa.
Thank you for your time.
Fang
[image: 内嵌图片 1]
Yes, the 1 in these space group names is the same as the 1 in P1.
1 is the identity symmetry operator.
For a trigonal space group (and hexagonal) the symmetry operators are given in
an axis order of
(z) (a,b) and (i) where i is defined by the ab vector (the ab diagonal)
So, for example in
Hi,
this is explained in details in table 2.2.4.1 of vol A of International
Tables of Crystallography (p 18 in my edition).
For trigonal/hexagonal, the primary direction is along c, along the
3-fold (6-fold axis). It's the same in tetragonal (obviously for the
4-fold axis !)..
The
Well, I meant no harm to the poor 1 by calling it a placeholder, but that in
the case of P3212, the 1 is simply to tell you that there is no rotation about
the second axis but is instead about the third. Saying okay, nothing here
amounts to being a place-holder to avoid ambiguity in assigning
Dear All,
It often finds for the Ramachandran favored determined by Coot, MolProbity
regards as Ramachandran outliers. There are earlier posts regards Coot and
MolProbity has different database for the determination of the Ramachandran
plots. Then will you please let me know the correct way to
Hi,
If your Hg dataset is not isomorphous with the SeMet you can cut out some
density and use cross-crystal averaging (molecular replacement using electron
density) to transfer the Hg phases to the Se dataset. You can then try using
an anomalous difference fourier map to find more or weaker
22 matches
Mail list logo