I had heard that there was a world-wide Tungsten shortage, but this is
ridiculous!
JPK
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:29 PM, H. Raaijmakers wrote:
> That's nothing. Once someone wrote me because the tungsten atom of my
> "Tungsten containing formate dehydrogenase" had dissapeared.
> Lost in translati
That's nothing. Once someone wrote me because the tungsten atom of my
"Tungsten containing formate dehydrogenase" had dissapeared.
Lost in translation during some autoscripted conversion.
It was corrected soon enough.:)
Cheers,
Hans
Jan Dohnalek schreef:
> There have been other manipulations
.
Berry
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 6:55 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] "resolution" on PDB web page
We also use the US portal. Can't speak to the solvent content as we never
had a value much over 70%.
As for the resolution range, I never saw any place to ente
Original message
>Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:08:52 -0400
>From: CCP4 bulletin board (on behalf of "Edward A.
>Berry" )
>Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] "resolution" on PDB web page
>To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>
>My apologies, I guess there is a separate en
Regards,
Mitch
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Edward A.
Berry
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 6:55 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] "resolution" on PDB web page
We also use the US portal. Can't speak t
b/explore/explore.do?structureId=1vkk
Regards,
Mitch
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Edward A.
Berry
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 6:55 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] "resolution" on PDB web page
We
Curious that 83% solvent content would be out of range; A quick search in
the pdb indicates that there are 43 entries with solvent content >85% ...
Op 25 april 2012 09:41 schreef Jan Dohnalek het
volgende:
> There have been other manipulations with user-input values. We could not
> input solvent
We also use the US portal. Can't speak to the solvent content as we never
had a value much over 70%.
As for the resolution range, I never saw any place to enter this
user-defined resolution of the structure.
As far as i know it comes from the record:
REMARK 200 RESOLUTION RANGE HIGH (A) : 1
We indeed used the US portal for deposition which may be "the difference".
Nevertheless the recent reported resolution values etc. are projected also
to the PDBe portal.
Jan
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Mark J van Raaij
wrote:
> Phoebe, Jan, PDB,
> is this something particular to the US po
Phoebe, Jan, PDB,
is this something particular to the US portal of the PDB, or general?
We always use the European portal pdbe and have not had such "problems".
Mark
Mark J van Raaij
Laboratorio M-4
Dpto de Estructura de Macromoleculas
Centro Nacional de Biotecnologia - CSIC
c/Darwin 3
E-28049 Madr
There have been other manipulations with user-input values. We could not
input solvent content 83% for 3cg8 (the real value!!!) as "being out of the
allowed range".
The resulting value in the PDB is "NULL" not showing the actually
interesting feature of the structure.
I also noticed that the repor
I just noticed that the PDB has changed the stated resolution for one of my old
structures! It was refined against a very anisotropic data set that extended
to 2.2 in the best direction only. When depositing I called the resolution 2.5
as a rough average of resolution in all 3 directions, but
12 matches
Mail list logo
