Re: [ccp4bb] short step

2010-02-23 Thread Marian Szebenyi
Ed, Did you tell scalepack not to add partials? It certainly shouldn't be doing this when your oscillation ranges overlap - perhaps it is smart enough to realize this is the situation, perhaps not. Marian Szebenyi MacCHESS Ed Pozharski wrote: Ed, thanks - this is a great suggestion. Unfor

Re: [ccp4bb] short step

2010-02-23 Thread Ed Pozharski
Ethan, manual handling of the mosaicity seems to help. There are now plenty of other things to sort out, but at least scalepack does not crash anymore. I used lower fixed mosaicity setting in denzo and fixed it in scalepack. Another issue is that there was apparently something funny about first 5

Re: [ccp4bb] short step

2010-02-23 Thread Ed Pozharski
Ed, thanks - this is a great suggestion. Unfortunately, it's not the problem - I had the "oscillation start 0.0 range 0.5 step 0.001" statement in the denzo input file. Denzo runs fine and there is no slippage issue. I tried turning off postrefinement and both batch and crystal rotx refinement (

Re: [ccp4bb] short step

2010-02-23 Thread Mark A. White
__ > > From: CCP4 bulletin board [ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ed Pozharski > > [epozh...@umaryland.edu] > > Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 5:23 PM > > To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK > > Subject: [ccp4bb] short step > > >

Re: [ccp4bb] short step

2010-02-22 Thread Edward A. Berry
Edward A. Berry wrote: Try grepping "crystal" your .x files (or whatever you called the denzo output files). Also grep for "start". By default denzo updates start-phi to the end of the previous oscillation. Since 0,5 degree is within radius of convergence, it re-refines crystal rotx to be compat

Re: [ccp4bb] short step

2010-02-22 Thread Edward A. Berry
Try grepping "crystal" your .x files (or whatever you called the denzo output files). Also grep for "start". By default denzo updates start-phi to the end of the previous oscillation. Since 0,5 degree is within radius of convergence, it re-refines crystal rotx to be compatible with this assumpti

Re: [ccp4bb] short step

2010-02-22 Thread Ethan Merritt
On Monday 22 February 2010 15:23:35 Ed Pozharski wrote: > I want to process bunch of frames with extremely short step - i.e. these > are 0.5degree oscillations but crystal only rotates by 1 degree over > 1000 frames (I would have kept it at the same orientation if Rigaku > control software would al

[ccp4bb] short step

2010-02-22 Thread Ed Pozharski
I want to process bunch of frames with extremely short step - i.e. these are 0.5degree oscillations but crystal only rotates by 1 degree over 1000 frames (I would have kept it at the same orientation if Rigaku control software would allow zero step). Denzo can process the frames all right, but sca