Jay Jaeger wrote:
> I have fiche for ZKDJB0, and fortunately it seems to match at this
> particular error and address.
>
> "This test looks for BEVENT to Interrupt when BIT 6 in the BEVENT
> Control register is set and interrupt priority level is set to 5".
>
> The particular error that you
On 09/14/2015 01:53 PM, Mike Stein wrote:
Thanks for confirming that these cards are indeed from a CD display
unit; here's the model info:
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-y78OZlnQIMA/Vfcy4SwF3gI/AW0/sVPC0C8y9BY/s912-Ic42/DSCI0005.JPG
But after all that I take it they're of no use
The death of tape is greatly exagerated.
My duties today included removing 50 tapes from our Storagetek 500 tape
library and sending them offsite for safe storage. These are LTO-5
cartridges that can hold up to 30 Tbyte of compressed data and it can be
written on the tape with astonishing speed.
I came across a fascinating article by Evan Koblentz in TechRepublic
Daily Digest today entitled: “Tape isn't dying -- it's getting
healthier and smarter”. Does this mean my ADAM tape drive system has a
future after all? Naw! But one can wish. Are there tape systems in the
PDP family, et. al.,
On 2015-09-14 20:43, Murray McCullough wrote:
I came across a fascinating article by Evan Koblentz in TechRepublic
Daily Digest today entitled: “Tape isn't dying -- it's getting
healthier and smarter”. Does this mean my ADAM tape drive system has a
future after all? Naw! But one can wish. Are
On 9/14/2015 1:10 PM, Holm Tiffe wrote:
> Holm Tiffe wrote:
>
>
> Ok, the test is running fine now ..
> I had to enable BEVENT with Switch 1 on the BA23 front panel (was disabled)
> but still the same error. Next I removed W9 from the M8192 Module and it
> works now. :-|
>
> Please, can someone
I spoke to my former employer and they are ditching tape. They want off-site
replication and if they have an off-site replica they see no need for
tape.
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Richard
> Loken
> Sent: 14 September
Recall that the other day, I was seeing this on running AJRLHA.DG:
STATE NOT 5 AFTER SEEK WITH 0 DIFFERENCE (this error and register dump
prints twice in succession. State 5 = Lock-on, keeping on track).
WD1 0317 (lower head, heads not out, spin-down)
WD2 0204 (write data error, write gate
To the cloud, to the CLOUD!!
=P
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Dave G4UGM wrote:
> I spoke to my former employer and they are ditching tape. They want
> off-site
> replication and if they have an off-site replica they see no need for
> tape.
>
> Dave
>
> >
I came across a fascinating article by Evan Koblentz in TechRepublic Daily
Digest today entitled: “Tape isn't dying -- it's getting healthier and
smarter”. Does this mean my ADAM tape drive system has a future after all? Naw!
But one can wish. Are there tape systems in the PDP family, et.
Oops, just realized nobody posted the link:
http://www.techrepublic.com/article/tape-isnt-dying-its-getting-healthier-and-smarter/
cartridges that can hold up to 30 Tbyte of compressed data and it can be
written on the tape with astonishing speed.
30Tbyte compressed*
(100Gbyte uncompressed)
--
Ethan O'Toole
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015, Evan Koblentz wrote:
>
> >I came across a fascinating article by Evan Koblentz in TechRepublic Daily
> >Digest today entitled: “Tape isn't dying -- it's getting healthier and
> >smarter”. Does this mean my ADAM tape drive system has a future after all?
> >Naw! But one can
We just procured a new Overland LTO-6 library this year at work so I can
tell you from direct experience that tape is not dead! Although
direct-to-disk and to-tape backup cost has more or less converged from a
price standpoint, there are still some nice aspects of tape ... you get
practically
More testing this evening.
Drive 1 ran for 8 ten-minute AJRLIA read-write passes before I stopped it,
with a single error flagged during pass 6:
WD1 0235
WD2
ER 4001
CB 1117
indicating a Data CRC error and a Read header without CRC command. Not
completely unexpected, a lot of data is
I work for a VAR, and we've sold a fair number of IBM TS7650G ProtecTIER VTL's
backed by Storewide V7000 disk. It basically emulates a bunch of LTO3 drives
and cartridges, and does excellent deduplication when writing. If you have
two, they'll replicate. It makes a great backup and DR
For those who can't be bothered to read the article :) it basically
talks about a perspective that the rise in flash arrays will kill disk
arrays while tape continues to chug along as cheap reliable backup.
> That would be my first interpretation too: that it is a directive
> addressed to someone putatively running the test. It _might_ mean that
> the test also tests to ensure that the jumper is installed.
There is another interpretation that I have just realised. If this is the right
one
then
Holm Tiffe wrote:
> Jay Jaeger wrote:
>
> > I have fiche for ZKDJB0, and fortunately it seems to match at this
> > particular error and address.
> >
> > "This test looks for BEVENT to Interrupt when BIT 6 in the BEVENT
> > Control register is set and interrupt priority level is set to 5".
> >
>
> Please, can someone from the natural english speakers here explain
> how this sentence is meant:
>
> "ZKDJB2
> This diagnostic tests the KDJ11 basic instruction set including EIS,
> TRAPS and the alternate register set. Ensure that halt trap option is
> disabled (jumper W9 installed)."
>
> Please, can someone from the natural english speakers here explain
> how this sentence is meant:
> "ZKDJB2 [...]. Ensure that halt trap option is disabled (jumper W9
> installed)."
> For me (as a german) that means that the jumper W9 has to be
> installed to run the test,
That would be my
> From: Holm Tiffe
> "Ensure that halt trap option is disabled (jumper W9 installed)."
Well, either that was transcribed incorrectly, or the person who wrote it
confused. On the M8192, per EK-KDJ1A-UG-002, pg. 2-1, W_5_ is the halt trap
option, and W9 is... BEVENT recognition. One
Mouse wrote:
> > Please, can someone from the natural english speakers here explain
> > how this sentence is meant:
>
> > "ZKDJB2 [...]. Ensure that halt trap option is disabled (jumper W9
> > installed)."
>
> > For me (as a german) that means that the jumper W9 has to be
> > installed to run
All,
I'm trying to help Cindy find homes for some of what's left from her
warehouse. I can hold them only temporarily, but if any of this interests you
please contact me ASAP via Private (not list) email at mtap...@swri.edu.
If you do want something, send me your shipping
>> [...] a dose of the clue-by-four!
> Häh? What's that "clue-by-four!" ? :-)
The :-) makes it look as though you actually know what it is, but your
asking for native-anglophone help makes me think perhaps not. So I'm
going to treat this as the request for idiom explanation it looks like
on the
tony duell wrote:
>
> > That would be my first interpretation too: that it is a directive
> > addressed to someone putatively running the test. It _might_ mean that
> > the test also tests to ensure that the jumper is installed.
>
> There is another interpretation that I have just realised. If
Dwight wrote...
My main thinking was the best place to save a boot is to save it on paper.I
recall looking at mine to see how the flag worked.( not mass storage yet so
needed a serial loader ).
-
Ah, gotcha. Yep, you're right!
On a few loaders where the part #'s were obscured, I had to
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 7:44 PM, J. David Bryan wrote:
> On Sunday, September 13, 2015 at 8:42, Jay West wrote:
>
>> 3) Any I/O instructions in the loader are automatically patched during
>> the transfer (based on switch register bits 11 through 6) so that the
>> correct I/O
28 matches
Mail list logo