On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 10/04/2016 03:24 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
>
>> This can be accomplished by just this (generates ifcfg files etc):
>>
>> # virsh iface-bridge eth0 br0
>>
>
>
> Brilliant! I'm not sure why I haven't noticed that in the docs, before.
> I've
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Gordon Messmer
> Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 1:18 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
>
> On 10/04/2016 04:18 A
On 04/10/16 11:24, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 04.10.2016 um 08:46 schrieb Gordon Messmer :
>> On 10/03/2016 07:00 PM, TE Dukes wrote:
>>> /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-eth1
>>> GATEWAY=192.168.1.1
>> ...
>>> /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-lo
>>> GATEWAY=192.168.1.1
>>
>> Don't specify GATEWAY in interface files where
On 10/04/2016 04:18 AM, TE Dukes wrote:
I disabled NetworkManager and created one.
You don't need to do that on CentOS 7, and I wouldn't recommend it. Use
NetworkManager where it works.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.cent
On 10/04/2016 03:24 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
This can be accomplished by just this (generates ifcfg files etc):
# virsh iface-bridge eth0 br0
Brilliant! I'm not sure why I haven't noticed that in the docs,
before. I've definitely been to the page where Red Hat documents
it... Thanks.
_
> Date: Monday, October 03, 2016 22:00:07 -0400
> From: TE Dukes
>
> I posted some files previously but that was like 20 or so installs
> ago. I don't know the files you need.
>From what you've indicated, you appear to be deleting/reinstalling
when the networking isn't working right. If the iss
Am 04.10.2016 um 08:46 schrieb Gordon Messmer :
> On 10/03/2016 07:00 PM, TE Dukes wrote:
>> /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-eth1
>> GATEWAY=192.168.1.1
> ...
>> /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-lo
>> GATEWAY=192.168.1.1
>
> Don't specify GATEWAY in interface files where it isn't used. This should be
> set on eth0 onl
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Gordon Messmer
> Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 2:47 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
>
> On 10/03/2016
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Richard
> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 10:41 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
>
>
>
> > Date: Monday
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of John R Pierce
> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 10:18 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
>
> On 10/3/2016 7:00 P
On 10/03/2016 07:00 PM, TE Dukes wrote:
/etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-eth1
GATEWAY=192.168.1.1
...
/etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-lo
GATEWAY=192.168.1.1
Don't specify GATEWAY in interface files where it isn't used. This
should be set on eth0 only.
# brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP e
> Date: Monday, October 03, 2016 22:00:07 -0400
> From: TE Dukes
>
>> From: Gordon Messmer
>> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 4:25 PM
>>
>> On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote:
>> > I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every
>> > was possible to be able to access the guest
On 10/3/2016 7:00 PM, TE Dukes wrote:
4: vboxnet0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state
UNKNOWN qlen 1000
link/ether 0a:00:27:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
are there any other /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg- files
beyond the ones you listed?
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Gordon Messmer
> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 4:25 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
>
> On 10/03/2016 04:54 A
On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote:
I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every was possible
to be able to access the guest from the LAN or even the host. Nothing I have
tried works.
The only thing all documentation leaves out is how to set up the guest
networking during
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 07:54:36AM -0400, TE Dukes wrote:
>
> OK, I'm about done trying to get this to work. I have spent HOURS reading,
> installing, re-installing, etc.
>
> I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every was possible
> to be able to access the guest from the LAN
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Liam O'Toole
Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 10:28 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
On 2016-10-03, TE Dukes
wrote:
>
>
>>
On 2016-10-03, TE Dukes
wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message- From:
>> centos-boun...@centos.org
>> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>> Behalf Of Liam O'Toole Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 9:19 AM To:
>> centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS]
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Liam O'Toole
> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 9:19 AM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
>
> On
On 2016-10-03, TE Dukes
wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message- From:
>> centos-boun...@centos.org
>> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>> Behalf Of Michael Cole Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 9:41 PM To:
>> centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 1:54 PM, TE Dukes wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> > Behalf Of Michael Cole
> > Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 9:41 PM
> > To: centos@centos.org
>
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Michael Cole
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 9:41 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
>
> Deletion does not re
Deletion does not remove all, Try a erase if that did not work.
Configuration files are not always where you expect then to be.
Regards Michael Cole
On Friday, September 30, 2016 9:16:44 PM TE Dukes wrote:
> I deleted all virtualization packages and re-installed.
>
> Something must have been ho
I deleted all virtualization packages and re-installed.
Something must have been hosed up.
Installing a VM and it didn't even ask to setup the network. Hopefully
that's a good sign.
Will know shortly
TIA
___
CentOS mailing list
Ce
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Richard
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 8:50 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
>
>
>
> > Date: Fr
> Date: Friday, September 30, 2016 07:14:59 -0400
> From: TE Dukes
>> From: Gordon Messmer
>> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 1:01 AM
>>
>> On 09/29/2016 07:54 PM, TE Dukes wrote:
>> > For whatever reason, the default NAT setup no longer works.
>>
>> Start over with a new install. Record e
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Gordon Messmer
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 1:01 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
>
> On 09/29/2016
On 09/29/2016 07:54 PM, TE Dukes wrote:
For whatever reason, the default NAT setup no longer works.
Start over with a new install. Record each change you make, carefully.
I got some kind
of bridge network (mactap) setup that has access to the outside but I still
can't connect locally.
As
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Gordon Messmer
> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 11:47 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
>
> On
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of John R Pierce
> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 2:16 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
>
> On
On 09/28/2016 08:43 AM, tdu...@palmettoshopper.com wrote:
I have one of those free domains/DNS from no-ip.com, centos7vm.ddns.net
I plan to use as the host name.
I want to be able to access this VM from the internet.
...
This is what I was seeing. Either it lands on the DSL router's login
page
On 9/28/2016 11:09 AM, tdu...@palmettoshopper.com wrote:
I guess this is why I'm confused. I thought a VM could be setup as its
own domain with all available services.
it can, if its got its own internet IP address... but if you're on
consumer internet, with only one public IP address, then th
Original Message
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
From: Warren Young
Date: Wed, September 28, 2016 1:19 pm
To: CentOS mailing list
On Sep 28, 2016, at 9:43 AM,
wrote:
>
> The first one, I created in my / file system but didn't really have the
&
Original Message
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
From: John R Pierce
Date: Wed, September 28, 2016 12:54 pm
To: CentOS mailing list
On 9/28/2016 8:43 AM, tdu...@palmettoshopper.com wrote:
> I'm a little confused on which networking option I need t
On Sep 28, 2016, at 9:43 AM,
wrote:
>
> The first one, I created in my / file system but didn't really have the
> space so I deleted it.
One of the primary advantages of VMs over real machines is that you can pause
them, move them, and then restart them, with the VM guest OS not realizing tha
On 9/28/2016 8:43 AM, tdu...@palmettoshopper.com wrote:
I'm a little confused on which networking option I need to choose when
setting up a VM.
the host thats running the VM, is it connected to a LAN behind a
firewall/router, or directly to the internet? if directly, is there a
dedicated in
Hello,
I'm a little confused on which networking option I need to choose when
setting up a VM.
I set up two VMs this past weekend both with NAT. Both able to were
access the internet.
The first one, I created in my / file system but didn't really have the
space so I deleted it.
The second one,
I use VirtualBox (on a CentOS host machine) because it allows me to use
multiple large monitors on my guests.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
well. current version of kvm on centos does not allow live backups without
downtime to guest.
it's only possible with newer version of kvm and related qemu tools.. so
sad..
--
Eero
2015-06-17 19:44 GMT+03:00 Gordon Messmer :
> On 06/17/2015 03:32 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
>
>> If host is using L
On 06/17/2015 10:24 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
On 06/17/2015 04:52 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
But to address the direct question of the OP, I use KVM for many
things, but I have older hardware in quantity on which I'll likely
run Xen4CentOS with paravirtualized guests,
Is not LXC an alter
On 06/17/2015 03:32 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
If host is using LVM for disk partitioning and uses logical volumes for VM
disks, it is possible to do LVM 'snapshots' and these snapshots can then be
backed up, all without shutting down the VMs.
Note that making an LVM snapshot, alone, will not pro
On 06/17/2015 04:52 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
But to address the direct question of the OP, I use KVM for many
things, but I have older hardware in quantity on which I'll likely run
Xen4CentOS with paravirtualized guests,
Is not LXC an alternative for such situation? Simpler, fully integrated
to
On 06/17/2015 03:28 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
MMmmm, I really thought ESX was in some way a RHEL derivative but when
reading
http://www.v-front.de/2013/08/a-myth-busted-and-faq-esxi-is-not-based.html
it is clearly not...
Older ESX had an RHEL 3-based service console; ESXi does not. L
qemu-img works for most image conversion formats including from vmware to
kvm. try it?
--
Eero
2015-06-17 14:43 GMT+03:00 Mihamina Rakotomandimby <
mihamina.rakotomandi...@rktmb.org>:
> On 06/17/2015 11:10 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> regardless of all that noise, in RHEL and therefore CentOS,
On 06/17/2015 11:10 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
regardless of all that noise, in RHEL and therefore CentOS, KVM is the
preferred and best supported hypervisor.
I dont catch your point.
The OP was wide enough in his question in order to allow that discussion.
Anyway, I'll add one point: compatibi
At Wed, 17 Jun 2015 12:31:49 +0300 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> yep, but still lack critical features :) like livebackup.
If host is using LVM for disk partitioning and uses logical volumes for VM
disks, it is possible to do LVM 'snapshots' and these snapshots can then be
backed up, all wi
yep, but still lack critical features :) like livebackup.
2015-06-17 12:26 GMT+03:00 Leon Fauster :
> Am 17.06.2015 um 11:17 schrieb Eero Volotinen :
> > It's so sad that centos is using very old versio on kvm
> > and due that fact live backup without downtime is not possible.
>
>
> just some tho
Am 17.06.2015 um 11:17 schrieb Eero Volotinen :
> It's so sad that centos is using very old versio on kvm
> and due that fact live backup without downtime is not possible.
just some thoughts
old != not good
new != better
s/old/stable/
s/new/not\ mature/
:-)
--
LF
___
It's so sad that centos is using very old versio on kvm and due that fact
live backup without downtime is not possible.
Anyway, virtsh+virtmanager + kvm is good choice.
--
Eero
2015-06-17 11:10 GMT+03:00 John R Pierce :
> regardless of all that noise, in RHEL and therefore CentOS, KVM is the
>
regardless of all that noise, in RHEL and therefore CentOS, KVM is the
preferred and best supported hypervisor.
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 06/17/2015 09:54 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
Also ESX(i) is not CentOS related but is included in this post.
And what about oVirt?
MMmmm, I really thought ESX was in some way a RHEL derivative but when
reading
http://www.v-front.de/2013/08/a-myth-busted-and-faq-esxi-is-not-based.html
it i
Please don't top-post with fully quoting all previous content. This is a
mailinglist.
Proxmox VE is based on Debian. What does this have to do with CentOS? As
it makes use of KVM you can run CentOS on top of it as a virtualization
guest.
Alexander
_
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:06:20PM +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 16.06.2015 um 18:50 schrieb Alessandro Baggi:
> >What do you think about Proxmox VE?
>
> Please don't top-post with fully quoting all previous content. This is a
> mailinglist.
>
> Proxmox VE is based on Debian. What does this
Am 16.06.2015 um 18:50 schrieb Alessandro Baggi:
What do you think about Proxmox VE?
Please don't top-post with fully quoting all previous content. This is a
mailinglist.
Proxmox VE is based on Debian. What does this have to do with CentOS? As
it makes use of KVM you can run CentOS on top o
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 06:50:27PM +0200, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
> What do you think about Proxmox VE?
It appears to just be an interface that runs on top of KVM and
OpenVZ.
--
Jonathan Billings
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.
What do you think about Proxmox VE?
ESX(i) 6 and vCloud Air. At home, KVM and Vagrant.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Numan Fatih YARCI <
fatih.ya...@linux.org.tr> wrote:
KVM - Vagrant - Docker :)
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 at 17:41 Alessandro Baggi
wrote:
Hi list,
what solution do you use f
ESX(i) 6 and vCloud Air. At home, KVM and Vagrant.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Numan Fatih YARCI <
fatih.ya...@linux.org.tr> wrote:
> KVM - Vagrant - Docker :)
>
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 at 17:41 Alessandro Baggi
> wrote:
>
> > Hi list,
> > what solution do you use for virtualizzation?
> >
KVM - Vagrant - Docker :)
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 at 17:41 Alessandro Baggi
wrote:
> Hi list,
> what solution do you use for virtualizzation?
>
> thanks in advance.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/
Hi list,
what solution do you use for virtualizzation?
thanks in advance.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I need to virtualize a server, but this needs to be stable enough for
production.
What are the advantages/disadvantages of the different hypervisers with
CENTOS
ESXi (vmware)
XEN
KVM
Primarily I will be running Centos6.4 there may or may not be a windows
server.
I need stability as this will
On 08.Jun.2013, at 14:03, Fidel Dominguez wrote:
> What I want to achieve is to install a virtual machine from a ks.cfg on
> RHEL 6
How would you do it with a bare metal machine?
I do not think your question has anything to do with virtualization.
That said, try virt-manager, while creating a n
On 06/08/2013 08:16 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 06/08/2013 07:11 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 08:03:36AM -0400, Fidel Dominguez wrote:
>>> Hello Friends
>>>
>>> I need a guide to virtualization in RHEL.
>> I think it would help if you were a bit more specific.
>>
>> For exa
On 06/08/2013 07:11 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 08:03:36AM -0400, Fidel Dominguez wrote:
>> Hello Friends
>>
>> I need a guide to virtualization in RHEL.
> I think it would help if you were a bit more specific.
>
> For example, putting ks.cfg virtualbox into google came up wi
Am 01.11.2012 13:55, schrieb Johnny Hughes:
>
> Note: This is a very good resource to explain the differences between a
> Cloud and Virtualization:
>
> http://vimeo.com/51856809
Is that available as text somewhere?
Presentation videos are so wearisome to sit through,
especially if they are in a
On 11/01/2012 12:42 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> If you are looking for Cloud stacks and not just Virtualization, then
> take a good look at Eucalyptus:
>
> http://www.eucalyptus.com/
>
> Here is a "faststart" install video, which could not be easier to get
> started with:
>
> http://www.eucaly
- "Johnny Hughes" escreveu:
> De: "Johnny Hughes"
> Para: centos@centos.org
> Enviadas: Quinta-feira, 1 de Novembro de 2012 10:55:05 (GMT-0300)
> Auto-Detected
> Assunto: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Options!
>
> On 11/01/2012 07:42 AM, Johnny
On 11/01/2012 07:42 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 11/01/2012 06:53 AM, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>>Thanks for your advices, I'll take a look on all and post what I conclude
>> on
>> it.
>>
>>Maybe I'm not clear enought, I already had CentOS5.8 Xen on my Hosts,
On 11/01/2012 06:53 AM, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>Thanks for your advices, I'll take a look on all and post what I conclude
> on
> it.
>
>Maybe I'm not clear enought, I already had CentOS5.8 Xen on my Hosts, but
> I'm
> finding a solution more "enterprise". Th
Hi folks,
Thanks for your advices, I'll take a look on all and post what I conclude on
it.
Maybe I'm not clear enought, I already had CentOS5.8 Xen on my Hosts, but I'm
finding a solution more "enterprise". The HA/Load Balance solution we had are
self
made, it is much time consuming for o
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>I'm searching for "virtualization options". I already take a look on
> VMware, but it needs too much MS software to work for my needs. Citrix needs
> less, but the key validation is still MS-AD.
The latest VMware
On 31.10.2012 17:40, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote:
> Hi,
>
>I'm searching for "virtualization options".
KVM+libvirt, definitely (+VirtManager as desktop GUI). It's a fantastic
match.
Might be worth looking at openstack, too, it's all the rage these days.
It is also using kvm and lib
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Stephen Harris wrote:
> I'm still using KVM, but using with kickstart rather than templates.
I switched from Xen (and, before that, VMware) to KVM about eighteen
months or so ago just to see what the fuss was about, and have not looked
back. I have since deployed about 75-8
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 03:40:05PM -0200, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote:
> Hi,
>
>I'm searching for "virtualization options". I already take a look on
> VMware, but it needs too much MS software to work for my needs. Citrix needs
> less, but the key validation is still MS-AD.
http:/
On 10/31/2012 01:40 PM, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote:
> Hi,
>
>I'm searching for "virtualization options". I already take a look on
> VMware, but it needs too much MS software to work for my needs. Citrix needs
> less, but the key validation is still MS-AD.
>
>Now I'm taking a
Hi,
I'm searching for "virtualization options". I already take a look on
VMware, but it needs too much MS software to work for my needs. Citrix needs
less, but the key validation is still MS-AD.
Now I'm taking a look at RHEV... and run into Oracle VM! Somebody had already
take a look at O
> how do you install a windows guest on ESXi without the console provided
> by the GUI vSphere Client ?
Painfully:) Actually its not that bad,
1. Setup a firewall rule for a port range to utilize multiple vnc consoles.
2. Take a copy of an existing platform compatible guests vmx, edit and create
On 04/15/12 9:28 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> I'm comfortable doing everything I need to via ssh into the esxi server so I
> don't need the client really. All the Linux guests are console based, and for
> the windows guests I certainly use rdp if need be.
how do you install a windows guest on ESX
>If you like ESXi and have a windows box to run the client, why not use
>the free version?
Under the original use case where I had to use the desktop to work also, I
couldn't.
> In any case I would probably use a 'native' remote
>access method (freenx/NX for linux, VNC or remote desktop for win
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
>>I'm not sure if this is what you're looking for, but ...
> /snip
>
> Yeah, that helps. Frankly, my use of vcenter has spoiled me, thinking I might
> try and find a way to utilize my desktop for esxi and work off a laptop...
>
> A colleagu
>I'm not sure if this is what you're looking for, but ...
/snip
Yeah, that helps. Frankly, my use of vcenter has spoiled me, thinking I might
try and find a way to utilize my desktop for esxi and work off a laptop...
A colleague has kvm running so I will look at it...
Thanks everybody,
jlc
_
On 04/14/2012 05:04 AM, n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
> Joseph L. Casale writes:
>
>> I might be needing to utilize one of the provided virtualization packages
>> either in a headless
>> console only setup of CentOS or on my desktop. I havent used anything but
>> ESXi in ages
>> except virtualbox which I
Joseph L. Casale writes:
> I might be needing to utilize one of the provided virtualization packages
> either in a headless
> console only setup of CentOS or on my desktop. I havent used anything but
> ESXi in ages
> except virtualbox which I did not like at all. Most of the guests which I
> wi
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 9:03 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 04/13/12 8:25 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> I might be needing to utilize one of the provided virtualization packages
>> either in a headless
>> console only setup of CentOS or on my desktop. I havent used anything but
>> ESXi in ages
>
On 04/13/12 8:25 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> I might be needing to utilize one of the provided virtualization packages
> either in a headless
> console only setup of CentOS or on my desktop. I havent used anything but
> ESXi in ages
> except virtualbox which I did not like at all. Most of the g
I might be needing to utilize one of the provided virtualization packages
either in a headless
console only setup of CentOS or on my desktop. I havent used anything but ESXi
in ages
except virtualbox which I did not like at all. Most of the guests which I will
need to run will be
wnidows based a
2011/3/31 David Sommerseth :
> On 29/03/11 21:13, Kenni Lund wrote:
>> The main problem is Windows guests, which easily chokes on hardware
>> changes (forced reactivation of Windows or unbootable with BSOD). Each
>> qemu-kvm version will behave differently, so moving from one major
>> qemu-kvm vers
On 29/03/11 21:13, Kenni Lund wrote:
> Den 29/03/2011 15.41 skrev "David Sommerseth" :
[...snip...]
Thanks a lot for good information!
> The main problem is Windows guests, which easily chokes on hardware
> changes (forced reactivation of Windows or unbootable with BSOD). Each
> qemu-kvm version
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 08:59:09AM -0400, Steve Thompson wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 09:41:04AM -0400, Steve Thompson wrote:
>>> First. With Xen I was never able to start more than 30 guests at one time
>>> with any success; the 31st guest alway
Den 29/03/2011 15.41 skrev "David Sommerseth" :
> This makes me wondering how well it would go to migrate from SL6 to CentOS
> 6, if all KVM guests are on dedicated/separate LVM volumes and that you
> take a backup of /etc/libvirt. So when CentOS6 is released, scratch SL6
> and install CentOS6, pu
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:41 PM, David Sommerseth
wrote:
> On 27/03/11 11:57, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
>> Some may be bored with the subject - sorry...
>>
>> Still not decided about virtualization platform for my "webhotel v2"
>> (ns, mail, web servers, etc.).
>>
>> KVM would be a natural way to go, I s
On 27/03/11 11:57, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> Some may be bored with the subject - sorry...
>
> Still not decided about virtualization platform for my "webhotel v2"
> (ns, mail, web servers, etc.).
>
> KVM would be a natural way to go, I suppose, only it is too bad CentOS 6
> will not be out in time
Please also consider OpenNode - http://opennode.activesys.org - a CentOS based
KVM full virtualization + OpenVZ linux containers solution. Supports VM
templating and live migration, etc - with easy bare metal setup.
Cheers,
--
--
Andres Toomsalu, and
On 3/27/2011 3:07 PM, Jure Pečar wrote:
>
> It's interesting that nobody so far mentioned openVZ
I wouldn't use it since being bitten by its lack of swap support.
I run a couple of web sites on a fairly "heavy" web stack which loads up
a bunch of dependencies that don't actually end up being use
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 09:41:04AM -0400, Steve Thompson wrote:
First. With Xen I was never able to start more than 30 guests at one time
with any success; the 31st guest always failed to boot or crashed during
booting, no matter which guest I chose a
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 09:41:04AM -0400, Steve Thompson wrote:
>
> The slightly longer story...
>
> First. With Xen I was never able to start more than 30 guests at one time
> with any success; the 31st guest always failed to boot or crashed during
> booting, no matter which guest I chose as t
On 03/27/2011 09:00 AM, Jerry Franz wrote:
>
> On 03/27/2011 02:57 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
>> > Some may be bored with the subject - sorry...
>> >
>> > Still not decided about virtualization platform for my "webhotel v2"
>> > (ns, mail, web servers, etc.).
>> >
>> > KVM would be a natural way
David Brian Chait wrote:
I understand that vmware has much stronger marketing machine, however that
does not mean that their technology is somehow better. Their offer is a
reasonable choice for many scenarios in IT, mass web hosting is
unfortunately not one of them. As any competent admin will te
> I understand that vmware has much stronger marketing machine, however that
> does not mean that their technology is somehow better. Their offer is a
> reasonable choice for many scenarios in IT, mass web hosting is
> unfortunately not one of them. As any competent admin will tell you, use
> the
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 01:26:38 +0300
Eero Volotinen wrote:
> > The same is true for solutions like vmware. Just google for all the
> > "blue pill" talks. It's a theoretical risk that is small enough to be
> > irrelevant.
>
> WebServers running buggy php software provides (easy) way to execute
> lo
>> > Well.. eh. as you might know that virtuozzo/openvz does not provide
>> > kernel isolation. Mainly this means than one kernel exploit can provide
>> > full access to all openvz/virtuozzo containers.
>> >
>
> The same is true for solutions like vmware. Just google for all the "blue
> pill" talks
1 - 100 of 274 matches
Mail list logo
