t; _______
> > ceph-users mailing list
> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
--
John Wilkins
Red Hat
jowil...@redhat.com
(415) 425-9599
http://redhat.com
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
a single node to be
> the minimum failure domain for CRUSH purposes?
>
> Thanks!
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-cep
, run the ceph-deploy install command again.
--
John Wilkins
Red Hat
jowil...@redhat.com
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
ts.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
--
John Wilkins
Red Hat
jowil...@redhat.com
(415) 425-9599
http://redhat.com
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Richiede: libtcmalloc.so.4()(64bit)
>>> [node1][WARNIN] Richiede: libleveldb.so.1()(64bit)
>>> [node1][WARNIN] Richiede: libtcmalloc.so.4()(64bit)
>>>
>>> This seems strange.
>>> Can you fix this?
>>>
>>>
&g
; http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
--
John Wilkins
Senior Technical Writer
Inktank
john.wilk...@inktank.com
(415) 425-9599
http://inktank.com
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
mmand: sudo ceph --cluster=ceph
>> --admin-daemon /var/run/ceph/ceph-mon.ceph-admin.asok mon_status
>>
>> [ceph-admin][ERROR ] admin_socket: exception getting command descriptions:
>> [Errno 2] No such file or directory
>>
>> [ceph-admin][WARNIN] ceph-admin is not defined in `mon initial members`
>>
>> [ceph-admin][WARNIN]
users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
--
John Wilkins
Senior Technical Writer
Inktank
john.wilk...@inktank.com
(415) 425-9599
http://inktank.com
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
solve this issue?
>
> Thank you!
>
> Regards,
> Santhosh
>
>
>
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
>
--
John Wilkins
Seni
d:638154011@09122011-048B]
>
> 9601 S. Meridian Blvd.
>
> Englewood, CO 80112
>
> 720-514-6293
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph
; [image: cid:638154011@09122011-048B]
>
> 9601 S. Meridian Blvd.
>
> Englewood, CO 80112
>
> 720-514-6293
>
>
>
>
>
> _______
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph
DNL / +31 (0)162 820 000
>> <%2B31%20%280%29162%20820%2> | F. +31 (0)162 820 001
>> <%2B31%20%280%29162%20820%20001>
>> Cloud.nl B.V. | Minervum 7092D | 4817 ZK Breda | www.cloud.nl
>>
>> ___
>> ceph-users m
ion because I've already deployed my third monitor to my cluster.
>
> Have a good night
>
> Erik
>
>
> P.S.: yes, the IPs above are not valid
>
>
>
> ----------
> Bay
es_main_binary-amd64_Packages
>> Hash Sum mismatch
>>
>> W: Failed to fetch
>> bzip2:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/in.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_trusty-updates_universe_binary-amd64_Packages
>> Hash Sum mismatch
>>
>> W: Failed to fe
gt; rbd
> module would not. ?
> Would one expect performance differences between librbd and module rbd?
>
> Thanks!
> Chad.
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/cep
n the
>> sizes of each pool I would expect it to be closer to 572 GB (sum of the
>> size of each pool multiplied by pool ‘size’) plus some overhead of some
>> kind. This is a factor of 9 different. So my question is: what have I
>> missed?
>>
leton Laboratory | Harwell
> Oxford | Didcot | OX11 0QX
>
> (01235 44) 5021
>
>
>
> --
> Scanned by iCritical.
>
>
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/c
++---+--+-+--+-+
> >> | ID | Status | Name |
> >> | Size | Volume Type | Bootable | Attached to |
> >>
> +--
ists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> >
>
> You could create keyrings with ceph-make-keys. Did you run ceph with
> compiling source code?
>
>
>
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-us
*"
>
> The key above does not match the keyring on osd.45.
>
> Anybody have any clue what might be the authentication issue here? I'm
> running Ceph 0.72.2.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Fred
>
> ___
> ceph-users maili
he new segment it will
> be cephnode1-n.
>
> Thanks,
> Fred
>
> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S3
>
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
>
-
return email and delete this message and any attachments
> from your system.
>
> *Virus Warning:* Although the company has taken reasonable precautions to
> ensure no viruses are present in this email. The company cannot accept
> responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the u
5008 Paris
> > Web : www.enovance.com - Twitter : @enovance
> >
> > ___
> > ceph-users mailing list
> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
> __
level to 1, and I still only got 39 pgs active. Is
> there something obvious I'm doing wrong?
>
> m.
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
-
gt;> Instead I have ALL PG-s „active + degradated“
>
> >>>
>
> >>> Output:
>
> >>> health HEALTH_WARN 192 pgs degraded; 192 pgs stuck unclean
>
> >>> monmap e1: 1 mons at {storage=172.16.3.2:6789/0}, election
>
> >>> epoch 2, quorum
> > ceph-users mailing list
> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> >
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>
>
> _
k:
> Original exception was:
>
> And in this time in folder /var/run/ceph/ present file with name
> ceph-mon.mon.asok
>
> Why does name of admin socket not changes to right?
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/l
gt;>> -6 1 host vsm3_ssd_zone_a
> >>>>
> >>>> 10 1 osd.10 up 1
> >>>>
> >>>> -11 1 host vsm4_ssd_zone_a
> >>>>
vious configured in ceph.conf? e.g.,
> data drive, journal drive, [osd] conf, etc.
>
>
>
>
>
> Wei Cao (Buddy)
>
>
>
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cg
> _______
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
--
John Wilkins
Senior Technical Writer
Intank
john.wilk...@inktank.com
(415) 425-9599
http://inktank.com
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_____
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
--
John Wilkins
Senior Technical Writer
Intank
john.wilk...@inktank.com
(415) 425-9599
http://inktank.com
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
> On 01/15/2014 03:58 PM, John Wilkins wrote:
>
> Jeff,
>
> First, if you've specified the public and cluster networks in [global],
> you don't need to specify it anywhere else. If you do, they get overridden.
> That's not the issue here. It appears from you
erspecified in
> ceph.conf, but the problem appeared with far less specification.
>
> Any ideas? Thanks,
>
> Jeff
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
>
--
John Wilkins
Senior Technical Writer
Intank
john.wilk...@inktank.com
(415) 425-9599
http://inktank.com
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
gri.com
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
--
John Wilkins
Senior Technical Writer
Intank
john.wilk...@inktank.com
(415) 425-9599
http://inktank.com
___
ttp://about.me/scottix
> scot...@gmail.com
>
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
>
--
John Wilkins
Senior Technical Writer
Intank
john.wilk...@inktank.com
(415) 425-9599
http://inktank.com
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
ts.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
>
--
John Wilkins
Senior Technical Writer
Intank
john.wilk...@inktank.com
(415) 425-9599
http://inktank.com
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
the monitors or
> similar? I've never noticed a problem with puppet deployed hosts, but that
> manually writes out the ceph.conf as part of the puppet run.
>
> Many thanks in advance,
>
> Matthew Walster
>
>
>
> ___
> c
; the
>>>>> monitor keyring, as indicated in the doc. The configuration is really
>>>>> out-of-the-box: 3 monitors, each with the keyring in
>>>>> /var/lib/ceph/mon/ceph-???/keyring, all keyrings have umask 644 and
>>>>> are owned by ceph.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, no matter which combination of "auth_cluster_",
>>>>> "auth_service_", or "auth_client_required", is set to cephx; no matter
>>>>> either the keyring options like "-k" and "--id" on the command line.
>>>>> Authentication fails every time with:
>>>>>
>>>>> client.admin authentication error (95) Operation not supported
>>>>> Error connecting to cluster: Error
>>>>>
>>>>> A big thanks to any one who gives me a hint about what it means. (This
>>>>> message carries so little information, I feel it could be simply replaced
>>>>> by the "!" character.) I have looked in every ceph and system log file,
>>>>> nothing more.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Nicolas Canceill
>>>>> Scalable Storage Systems
>>>>> SURFsara (Amsterdam, NL)
>>>>>
>>>>> ___
>>>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>>>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>>>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>>>>
>>>> ___
>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>>
>>
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
--
John Wilkins
Senior Technical Writer
Intank
john.wilk...@inktank.com
(415) 425-9599
http://inktank.com
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
ce how the "up" set is only one OSD, so it's adding another one
> in "acting") — what's your CRUSH map look like?
> -Greg
> Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
--
John Wilkins
Senior Technical Writer
Intank
john.wilk...@inktank.com
(415) 425-9599
http://inktank.com
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Kevin Weiler
>> >>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi guys,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I have an OSD in my cluster that is near full at 90%, but we
gt; 6. The command "radosgw-admin pool list" returns "could not list placement
> set: (2) No such file or directory". But radosgw seems to work as expected
> anyway?
>
> Looking forward to your suggestions.
>
> Alessandro Brega
>
>
> _______
ed recipient), you may not read, use, copy or disclose to
> anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have
> received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and
> delete the message and any attachment(s) thereto without retaining any
>
__
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good people do nothing.
>
&
me host. I believe my setup does not violate that,
> since the rbd kernel module is not loaded, and instead the device is
> attached through the xen_blkfront module instead.
>
> Thanks-
>
> John
> ___
> ceph-users mailing li
I still need to update the graphics. The update text is here:
http://ceph.com/docs/wip-doc-radosgw/radosgw/federated-config/
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:49 AM, John Wilkins wrote:
> It will be updated by the end of the day today...
>
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 7:31 PM, maoqi1982 wro
"secret_key": "O7IIFHwRw2EsG5n9Qjx4POquMjT0MlU7PSoTjiXq"}],
> "swift_keys": [],
> "caps": [
> { "type": "usage",
> "perm": "*"}],
> "op_mask": "read, write, dele
rated-config/ ( v0.71 ) to
> deploy the region /zones/agent
>
>
>
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
--
John Wilkins
Senior Technical Writ
>
> A Ceph web page search yielded no results. Does documentation exist? Where?
>
>
>
> Tim
>
>
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
h-deploy that cause a lot of
> investigation and workaround time & effort and still have to accept
> its limitations. The bad part of this is all the current online
> documentation is being changed to reference use of ceph-deploy only
> and any documentation of how to do tasks without cep
/master/rados/operations/add-or-rm-osds/
> [2] http://ceph.com/docs/master/start/quick-ceph-deploy/
>
> Regards!
> --
> j.hofmüller
>
> Optimism doesn't alter the laws of physics. - Subcommander T'Pol
>
>
>
> Ecologic Institut gemeinnützige GmbH | Pfalzburger Str. 43/44 | 10717
> Berlin | Germany
> GF: R. Andreas Kraemer | AG: Charlottenburg HRB 57947 | USt/VAT-IdNr.:
> DE811963464
> Ecologic™ is a Trade Mark (TM) of Ecologic Institut gemeinnützige GmbH ***
> *
>
>
10:08 AM, Snider, Tim wrote:
> Is the form: auth cluster required = none or auth_cluster_required = none?
> ("_"s as a word separator)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Wilkins [mailto:john.wilk...@inktank.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 11:43 AM
>
>
>
> From: ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com
> [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of Snider, Tim
> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:15 AM
> To: Gary Mazzaferro; John Wilkins
> Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>
>
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] ceph.conf changes
> ___
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>
>
>
> ___
> ceph-users mailing
; Vienna University Computer Center - ACOnet - VIX
> Universitaetsstrasse 7, A-1010 Vienna, Austria, Europe
> Tel: ++43 1 4277 - 14070 (Fax: - 9140) KB1970-RIPE
>
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/
ved from server "/var/www/s3gw.fcgi"
> [Tue Sep 17 08:13:02 2013] [error] [client 46.231.147.8] FastCGI:
> incomplete headers (0 bytes) received from server "/var/www/s3gw.fcgi"
>
>
>
> I'm really diapointed because i can't understand where is the is
but you basically need super-user
> permissions here to run (any?) ceph commands.
>>
>> Thanks in advance for any help, and apologies if I missed anything obvious.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______
>> ceph-users
>>
>> ashely
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>
> _____
this host:
>
> (root) NOPASSWD: ALL
>
>
>
> Can anyone tell me where I’m going wrong here, or in general how to give the
> ceph user the appropriate permissions? Or is this a ceph-deploy problem
> that it is not including the “sudo”?
>
>
>
> Tha
an provide an update for dumpling.
>
> Best Regards
>
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
--
John Wilkins
Senior Technical Writer
Intank
getent hosts
> {hostname} as a test?
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
--
John Wilkins
Senior Technical Writer
Intank
john.wilk...
.com
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>
>
>
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
--
John Wilkins
Senior
osd journal size = 1024
> filestore xattr use omap = true
>
> [osd.1]
> host = quantal64
>
> Am I doing something wrong?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Francesc Alted
> _______
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists
biggest hardware, but i don't
>> think it's a good way to have a version who uses the filesystem and
>> one version who use ceph.
>>
>> We prefer a Object Storage for our Files. It should work like the
>> Object Storage of the App Engine.
>> That scale
>>> it would with ceph. probably :)
>>>
>>> That's nice to hear. I was really scared that we don't find a solution
>>> that can run on 1 system and scale up to even more. We first looked at
>>> HDFS but this isn't lightweight.
>>
>0/ 5 optracker
>0/ 5 objclass
>1/ 3 filestore
>1/ 3 journal
>0/ 5 ms
>1/ 5 mon
>0/10 monc
>0/ 5 paxos
>0/ 5 tp
>1/ 5 auth
>1/ 5 crypto
>1/ 1 finisher
>1/ 5 heartbeatmap
>1/ 5 perfcounter
>1/ 5 rgw
set
>> >'osd_mount_options_xfs' and done a 'config push' - however the mount
>> >options don't seem to change when I restart the ceph service. Any clues
>> >why this might be?
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >
>> >Matthew
>> >
>> >--
>> >The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> >Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>> >
>> >___
>> >ceph-users mailing list
>> >ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>> >http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>
>
--
John Wilkins
Senior Technical Writer
Intank
john.wilk...@inktank.com
(415) 425-9599
http://inktank.com
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
t; the clients would probably be running on the same hardware as the OSD/MON,
> because space on the chassis is at a premium.
>
> (d) I was thinking about single node failure scenarios, with 3 nodes,
> wouldn't a failure of 1 node cause PAXOS to not work?
>
>
>
> Than
ift_keys": [
>
>>
>
>> { "user": "gwuser1:swift",
>
>>
>
>> "secret_key": "kVcKPg1QFu73emgrP7w6JrFs3tvZ4+gLISW+703K"}],
>
>>
>
>> "caps": []}
>
>>
>
>
ython bindings for it yet. librados
> bypasses cephfs and talks directly to the object store (and doesn't
> understand directories). For many applications, though the object API is
> more than sufficient.
>
> sage
--
John Wilkins
Senior
doesn't matter since it works.
>
> Thanks for clarification,
> Scottix
>
> --
> Follow Me: @Scottix
>
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-us
ot;
wrote:
> Is using s3/swift emulation the only way to access object store with python?
>
>
> On 06/11/2013 08:32 PM, John Wilkins wrote:
>> Here are the libraries for the Ceph Object Store.
>>
>> http://ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/s3/python/
>> http://ceph.co
t;>
>> --
>>
>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
>>
>>
>> Smart Weblications GmbH
>> Martinsberger Str. 1
>> D-95119 Naila
>>
>> fon.: +49 9282 9638 200
>> fax.: +49 9282 9638 205
>> 24/7: +49 900 144 000 00 - 0,99 EUR/Min*
>> h
ut to the Python
> APIs reference docs for the object store?
> Do you have example to share for reading files/dirs?
> Thanks,
> Giuseppe
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listi
You can also start/stop an individual daemon this way:
sudo stop ceph-osd id=0
sudo start ceph-osd id=0
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:33 PM, John Wilkins wrote:
> Ok. It's more like this:
>
> sudo initctl list | grep ceph
>
> This lists all your ceph scripts and their sta
Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:16 PM, John Wilkins wrote:
> Alvaro,
>
> I ran into this too. Clusters running with ceph-deploy now use upstart.
>
>> start ceph
>> stop ceph
>
> Should work. I'm testing and will update the docs shortly.
>
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7
_members = IP1,IP2
>
> auth_supported = cephx
>
> fsid = 43501eb5-e8cf-4f89-a4e2-3c93ab1d9cc5
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks in advanced and best regards,
>
> Álvaro
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Verificada la ausencia de vir
Sorry...hit send inadvertantly...
http://ceph.com/docs/master/start/quick-ceph-deploy/#multiple-osds-on-the-os-disk-demo-only
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:00 PM, John Wilkins wrote:
> Actually, as I said, I unmounted them first, zapped the disk, then
> used OSD create. For you, that might loo
ceph 203. Each has a /dev/sdb1
> partition formatted as xfs. Do I need to mount them in a particular
> directory prior running the command or ceph-deploy would take care of it?
>
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:17 PM, John Wilkins
> wrote:
>>
>> Dewan,
>>
>&g
ead.
> I think there may still be a bug in Cuttlefish which doesn't set the value
> of "secret_key" in the "swift_keys" map that's there or something. That's
> the only thing I can think of at least.
>
> Daniel
>
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:17
eph.conf
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 119 May 28 15:19 keyring.radosgw.gateway
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:26 AM, John Wilkins
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you have your admin keyring in the /etc/ceph directory of your
>>> radosgw h
16:00:29.118380 7f5f60cf6700 2 req 11:0.000238:swift-auth:GET
> /auth/:swift_auth_get:http status=403
> 2013-05-29 16:00:29.118504 7f5f60cf6700 1 == req done req=0x14d3b30
> http_status=403 ==
>
>
> Which looks reasonable since I don't have the proper key to
Dewan,
I encountered this too. I just did umount and reran the command and it
worked for me. I probably need to add a troubleshooting section for
ceph-deploy.
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 4:00 PM, John Wilkins wrote:
> ceph-deploy does have an ability to push the client keyrings. I
> h
TP:Authorization},L]
>
> contents of /var/www/s3gw.fcgi:
> #!/bin/sh
> exec /usr/bin/radosgw -c /etc/ceph/ceph.conf -n client.radosgw.gateway
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Daniel Curran
> wrote:
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>&
Daniel,
I finished up the procedure this morning and put it up on the web. It
seems to be working fine for me.
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 3:35 PM, John Wilkins wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> I'm working on it. It did need a bit of a rewrite for ceph-deploy,
> even though the steps are conc
oy osd create ceph0:/dev/sda3 ceph1:/dev/sda3 ceph2:/dev/sda3
>>
>> It gets stuck.
>>
>> I'm using Ubuntu 13.04 for ceph-deploy and 12.04 for ceph nodes. I just
>> need to get the cuttlefish working and willing to change the OS if it is
>> required. Please help. :)
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Dewan Shamsul Alam
>
>
>
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
--
John Wilkins
Senior Technical Writer
Intank
john.wilk...@inktank.com
(415) 425-9599
http://inktank.com
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
ound this
>> > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4924
>> > It says it's resolved, but I couldn't find the branch mentioned
>> in github.
>> >
>> > As a new user, trying to build production environments reliably
urran wrote:
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Daniel Curran
> Date: Fri, May 24, 2013 at 4:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] RADOS Gateway Configuration
> To: John Wilkins
>
>
> Hey,
>
> I just finished the 5-minute quick start for rados th
yring?
>
> Daniel
>
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 7:19 PM, John Wilkins
> wrote:
>>
>> Daniel,
>>
>> It looks like I need to update that portion of the docs too, as it
>> links back to the 5-minute quick start. Once you are up and running
>> with
er": "johndoe:swift",
> "secret_key": ""}],
> "caps": []}
>
>
> Giving me no swift key to use. I don't believe the key is supposed to be
> blank because I tried that and received auth errors (to the best of my
> ability). I can't tell if this is my fault since I'm new nor am I able to
> find a way around it. It looks like there are definitely changes between the
> version used in the doc and mine so maybe it's all working as it should but
> the secret_key for swift lives somewhere else. If anyone knows anything I'd
> appreciate it a lot.
>
> Thank you,
> Daniel
>
>
>
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
--
John Wilkins
Senior Technical Writer
Intank
john.wilk...@inktank.com
(415) 425-9599
http://inktank.com
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
/#no-free-drive-space
Maybe we can get some others to look at this. It's not clear to me
why the other OSD crashes after you take osd.25 out. It could be
capacity, but that shouldn't make it crash. Have you tried adding more
OSDs to increase capacity?
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Jo
is incomplete, acting [31,19]
> pg 8.71d is incomplete, acting [24,19]
> pg 8.5e2 is incomplete, acting [0,19]
> pg 8.56c is incomplete, acting [19,28]
> pg 8.528 is incomplete, acting [31,19]
> pg 8.3fa is incomplete, acting [19,31]
> pg 8.3e0 is incomplete, acting [31,19]
> pg 8.
ph-deploy mds create and this starts the
>> > ceph-mds
>> > daemon in the mds_node, but I see that the ceph-mds daemon crashes after
>> > sometime.
>> >
>> > Kindly help me on this issue.
>> >
>> > --
>> > --sridhar
>> >
>
the ceph-mds daemon crashes after
> sometime.
>
> Kindly help me on this issue.
>
> --
> --sridhar
>
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
sts.ceph.com
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>
>
> Up. Nobody can help me on that problem ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Olivier
>
> _______
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
--
John Wilkins
Senior Technical Writer
Intank
john.wilk...@inktank.com
(415) 425-9599
http://inktank.com
___
ceph-use
_____
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
>
>
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
--
John Wilkins
Senior Technical Writer
Intank
john.wilk...@inktank.com
(415) 425-9599
http://inktank.com
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
d.cGE&fp=aa2ea750bee51b45&biw=1916&bih=1082
>>
>> euaxoctopus
>> http://eol.org/pages/49675/overview
>>
>> exannulatus (octopus exannulatus)
>> http://eol.org/pages/491114/overview
>>
>> ___
&g
=1082
>
> euaxoctopus
> http://eol.org/pages/49675/overview
>
> exannulatus (octopus exannulatus)
> http://eol.org/pages/491114/overview
>
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
--
John Wilkins
Senior Technical Writer
Intank
john.wilk...@inktank.com
(415) 425-9599
http://inktank.com
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
