oh, I imagine this would get treated in the same way ebay treats a bum
transaction... it is documented and ca be used to weigh the credibility of
the user name. That's the way I understand it, anyway, the database
apparently did go down because when you start looking for info it tells you
the serve
Oh okay, that makes a lot more sense then... although I'd suspect they'd want to keep
that data as a record of the poster throwing allegations around... but that's a whole
other story...
> Oh, are you talkng about the bottom trash can? I believe
> the that is what
> happens if the subject of the
ya well, once you have done QA you get a little compulsive about it. I
like the gallery layout. One thought, when you start using it for real,
might want to have bigger fewer pictures per page. More fun that way. Or
not - the other hand of this is of course that you will totally bog down
anyone on
The problem that occurred with me as well. The real error is an expired
session but for some reason I haven't added in the code to catch the error
yet.
At 12:44 AM 7/6/2003 +, you wrote:
>doh, it is a link getting this now though, But although it says it is a
>critical error I can still
Oh, are you talkng about the bottom trash can? I believe the that is what
happens if the subject of the email denies the allegation (ie Bill is
bopping interns) and the poster of the information does not reply to the
email asking them if they stand by the information. If the poster says that
they *
I thought that the first time I looked at it.
However, I believe you are looking at what happens if you do not answer the
confirmation email after you post information. In other words say I have
info I am dying to share. I post it and receive an email asking me to
confirm that I made the post. I
Looks to me like according to the workflow diagram at the bottom that anything that
would reflect negatively on someone just ends up in the trash after a week or 2...
Makes me wonder why they say that nothing gets deleted and then they're using
trash-can icons (usually associated with deletion)
A bunch of publications have picked up the story now and the server was
down (overloaded?) for a while earlier, but I think this is a really
excellent idea by people who have the resources to carry it out. I
certainly plan to use it.
I also like the touch of allowing information to be refuted but
::nod:: you ever had one of those calls where you spend forty minutes on
how to enter a user name and password?
Dana
Todd writes:
> Ah. No argument there. I just seized the opportunity to do a little tech
> support ranting of my own. :)
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dana Tierney"
Ah. No argument there. I just seized the opportunity to do a little tech
support ranting of my own. :)
- Original Message -
From: "Dana Tierney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 8:35 PM
Subject: Re: Webcasst Feedback
> It happens
Some nice sunset/fireworks shots there. The gallery looks pretty good, does
its job well.
Dana
Nick McClure writes:
> Click on July 4th 2003
>
> It should be in bold, it is on my system with the exact same version of IE
>
> At 12:05 AM 7/6/2003 +, you wrote:
> >OK w98 SE and IE 6.0.28 this
doh, it is a link getting this now though, But although it says it is a
critical error I can still click the link and the pictures display well
more detailed feedback later.
Dana
A critical error has occured.
STRUCTURE WITH 16 KEYS
BROWSER DATETIME DETAIL DIAGNOSTICS ERRO
It happens quite a bit anyway; I would say I saw it about 4-5 times a week.
But the AOL thing was consistent enough to make me wonder if it was a
deliberate marketing decision on their part. It sure does make AOL look
easier.
::shrug::
Dana
Todd writes:
> bah .. it doesn't even take AOL to do a
Click on July 4th 2003
It should be in bold, it is on my system with the exact same version of IE
At 12:05 AM 7/6/2003 +, you wrote:
>OK w98 SE and IE 6.0.28 this is all I get:
>
>
>July 4th 2003 - July 4, 2003
>Pics from July 4th 2003 at Kims House
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>This site and all contents a
bah .. it doesn't even take AOL to do a number on Win 98's TCP/IP stuff. I
can't count the number of times I have to walk someone through removing and
reinstall DUN in a single day, on 2 hands. It seems like often Win 98 just
gets a wild notion that it wants to stop routing. Stupid OS.
- Or
OK w98 SE and IE 6.0.28 this is all I get:
July 4th 2003 - July 4, 2003
Pics from July 4th 2003 at Kims House
This site and all contents are Copyright © 1996-2003 Nick McClure
no pictures no controls. Are you maybe not done yet?
Dana
Nick McClure writes:
> Here are some pictu
Here are some pictures from a get together on July 4th/
http://www.nickmcclurephotography.com/clients/
username: friends
password: rhubarb
These are all pics from the new Nikon D100, most were shot in the Nikon raw
format, some using JPEG, I did a lot of bracketing which is why there are a
few
"Where there's a will, there's a whey..."
;-)
> *laughs* Leave it to the U of Wisconsin to figure a way to generate power
> from cheese byproducts! *shakes head snickering*
>
>
> -- Ben Doom
> Programmer & General Lackey
> Moonbow Software, Inc
>
> : -Original Message-
> : F
Having gone through things like this on occasion (more often than I'd like
to remember) I would guess that the breaking point is probably the database.
It's fairly easy to run two sites in parallel when they both attach to the
same data sources. However if, for this upgrade, they significantly ch
There are two books on Fusebox 3
Fusebox 3 - Nat Papovich and Jeff Peters
Fusebox 3 - Hal Helms and John Quarto-vonTivita
Also there is a Fusebox conference in 8 weeks in Las Vegas. It is 1.5
days and covers the new Fusebox 4. Currently $99 early bird price. See
http://www.cfconf.com/fusebox2003
It doesn't seem like best practice, no.
Some companies just aren't there yet. There are two local weekies here; one
has an attractive, well-thought-out website which archives past issues and
is easy to navigate. The other has a page that says "Under Construction."
Which they advertise, just cause
> And why...if a system is already up and working..would one
> shut down that aspect of the business to implement a new
> system? Wouldn't running them in parallel for a short time
> until the changeover occurs be a better solution?
Because it was buggy as Hell?
The other reason is that RUWebby d
I've been using Bestbuy recently to check what the hot products are in
the states right now for a little webstore I am trying to get set up
with products.
Hmm...you're right.
IT isnt' as devestating as if they were an Online Only store, they have
a brick and mortar foundation.
But is this sort o
Gel, why are you so fascinated with BestBuy? Do you have a vested
interest or something ;)
Obviously they've made a major decision to completely shut down (in the
beginning), then announce a "re-opening". Sure they are having technical
difficulties ... But it's not as if they are offering a servic
"BestBuy.com is temporarily unavailable.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Please come back soon to shop our biggest store"
I've been following this (and using the site almost daily) because it
was a MAJOR site update.
I think they totally changed out technologies to .jsp and added a lot of
new
25 matches
Mail list logo
