From EWeek
Xbox Next Microsoft Hardware Product to be Axed?
Somewhere in Redmond, there's a plot full of shallow, unmarked graves. The
last resting place of Microsoft's ill-begotten hardware products just keeps
growing. Now, you can add Wi-Fi to the crowded cemetery, joining the sound
card, US
In this case it seems to work - the columns actually end when the content
does (although in this case all of the columns are close to the same length)
- you just can't notice it since there are no changes in background colors
or borders.
If you're happy with all the columns having the same backgro
Here is an example of a single CSS that handles header and footer, plus a three
column layout.
http://www.clickdoug.com
==
Our Anti-spam solution works!!
http://www.clickdoug.com/mailfilter.cfm
For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
http://www.forta.com
Sorry - I know how to work around the issue. I really do. But I still
think they all suck.
This one, for example, uses a variation of the background image hack (so it
won't degrade well at all) and looks like it would be difficult to add
anything but the simplest borders.
Believe me - you will
Actually that site doesn't have any examples that show columns with equal
heights - and thus lies the problem.
Just to be clear I'm actually quite good at CSS - been doing it for years
and my designs have been featured in a couple of CSS books (early books to
be sure, but actual-factual books none
Try this one.
http://www.pmob.co.uk/temp/2colfixedtest_4.htm
_
From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:01 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Damn CSS... Damn it to hell!
It seems that a main problem is that the height is calculated to the height
of the cont
Try this one, not mine, but it looks good.
http://www.pmob.co.uk/temp/2columncentred_equalising.htm
_
From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 7:54 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Damn CSS... Damn it to hell!
I think we missed the mark here - this design
It seems that a main problem is that the height is calculated to the height
of the container - but only within the viewport (at least in some browsers).
So once you have to scroll all bets are off.
Jim Davis
_
From: Sandy Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 7:50
At 07:07 PM 5/25/04, you wrote:
>Sorry - just venting.
>
>Every time I get into this it amazes me that CSS made it so damn difficult
>to do one of the most common layouts online: a full-width header, two
>equal-height (despite content) columns (one for navigation and one for
>content), and a full-w
I'm sorry - is this not a good place to rant? I'm pretty sure I've seen
rants here before. nearly positive in fact. ;^)
And, mr fancypants, this is hardly a complaint that it "doesn't slice bread"
- this is a complaint that it doesn't allow authors to replicate most of the
layouts online.
This
I think we missed the mark here - this design doesn't display two columns.
It displays (at least for me) a strictly "tiered" (stacked) layout:
Navigation is above Main Content, not next to it.
It's specifically getting two columns to extend the height of the longer one
that's got me worked up.
Ji
Jim Davis wrote:
>
> Every time I get into this it amazes me that CSS made it so damn
> difficultto do one of the most common layouts online: a full-width
> header, two equal-height (despite content) columns (one for navigation
> and one for content), and a full-width footer.
Every time I get into
Actually, height is always computed in relation to the parent element. If
you use html, body{height: 100%}, then containing elements are always
computed in relation to that. Using html, instead of just body helps Opera.
If you are looking for a 2 column layout, I can help you out if you want to
I've spent a lot of time on that site. ;^) That definitely falls into the
"sorta does it" category - but the image used to mimic full columns doesn't
degrade well and is fixed width. Since the column color/background is
"simulated" in this case an end-user style-sheet can royally screw it up
eve
Hmm.
How bout this?
Note I haven't tested completely for cross browser, but it works fairly
well.
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
Simple Layout
/*
body, html{
height: 100%;
top:0;
left:0;}
#container{
width:100%;
Have you tried some of the samples out there? I found this one that
looks like what you want to do:
http://nemesis1.f2o.org/articles
FWIW, I feel the same way. I love CSS in theory. Practice is another
story. Time consuming doesn't even begin to explain it. Perhaps fine for
people who get paid
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s1113950.htm
-Gel
--
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 7.0.245 / Virus Database: 262.10.4 - Release Date: 5/22/2004
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[
Sorry - just venting.
Every time I get into this it amazes me that CSS made it so damn difficult
to do one of the most common layouts online: a full-width header, two
equal-height (despite content) columns (one for navigation and one for
content), and a full-width footer. In other words, this:
2004, 2004, 2004. AS 2 is a true OO programming language - Class files,
etc. I'd definitely use MX 2004. I know youonly have standard, but if
youcan upgrade I recommend it - the screens based development (and other
features) are terrific.
~Simon
Simon Horwith
CTO, eTRILOGY ltd.
Member of Tea
sorry - I can't speculate for obvious reasons.
~Simon
Simon Horwith
CTO, eTRILOGY ltd.
Member of Team Macromedia
Macromedia Certified Master Instructor
http://www.cfstandards.org
Jim Davis wrote:
> I didn't mean to indicate that I knew anything (I don't) - just that CF
> releases are pretty wel
IMO, definitely go with 2K4. being able to use AS 2.0 and create
classes and have your movie clips and components be able to inherit the
properties of those classes is such a powerful feature. The strict data
typing does take a little getting used to but once you do it's pretty
cool. The only issue
(I sent this at lunchtime but it hasn't shown up. Apologies in advance if
duplicates happen.)
I've got a couple Flash projects coming up. They won't be heavy programming,
but there will be some code. One of them will store collected data to send
to a
database later.
So my question is, should I go
http://www.ftc.gov/donotcall/
I guess the smart thing for me to do is an ONLINE SEARCH!!!
-Original Message-
From: Monique Boea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 4:30 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: CITA to create cell phone number database
where is that again?
---
www.donotcall.gov
At 01:29 PM 5/25/2004, you wrote:
>where is that again?
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Sandy Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 4:21 PM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: RE: CITA to create cell phone number database
>
>Throw your cell number in the do no
https://www.donotcall.gov/default.aspx
_
From: Monique Boea
where is that again?
-Original Message-
From: Sandy Clark
Throw your cell number in the do not call registry NOW.
_
From: Jacob
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/business/content/auto/epaper/editions/tue
http://www.donotcall.gov
just added mine and the wife's : )
- Original Message -
From: "Monique Boea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 1:29 PM
Subject: RE: CITA to create cell phone number database
> where is that again?
>
> -Or
where is that again?
-Original Message-
From: Sandy Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 4:21 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: CITA to create cell phone number database
Throw your cell number in the do not call registry NOW.
_
From: Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL P
Throw your cell number in the do not call registry NOW.
_
From: Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 3:55 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: CITA to create cell phone number database
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/business/content/auto/epaper/editions/tuesday/b
usiness_04
I didn't mean to indicate that I knew anything (I don't) - just that CF
releases are pretty well indistinguishable as far as scheduling goes. I
think it's safe to say that until there's a public beta there's no chance
for a release within 6 months and there's no chance for a more definite
release
They've got a pretty nice trailer on the web site. The story seems to
diverge quite a bit from the normal Arthurian legend though. I think it
will be an interesting take.
http://kingarthur.movies.go.com/trailers.html
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[Use
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/business/content/auto/epaper/editions/tuesday/business_042bfba6011c91cb0036.html
Great.. Now I will have to pay for telemarketers calling me.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
Check out the Picard song
http://tborgax.homepage.dk/audio.html
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
that's not what's planned, but it's also not impossible.
~Simon
Simon Horwith
CTO, eTRILOGY ltd.
Member of Team Macromedia
Macromedia Certified Master Instructor
http://www.cfstandards.org
Jim Davis wrote:
> CF has always had impressive public beta cycles for it's products - and
> there isn't o
Yeah, never saw that particular problem. No idea. Glad you got it working!
-Kevin
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Skinner"
> Never got an answer to this, but apparently installing the DW MX updater
resolved the problem. I had done a re-install yesterday and forgot to
include the update
Never got an answer to this, but apparently installing the DW MX updater resolved the problem. I had done a re-install yesterday and forgot to include the updater afterwards. So all is better now, but I do wish I knew what was happening?
--
Ian Skinner
Web Programmer
BloodSource
ww
CF has always had impressive public beta cycles for it's products - and
there isn't one for BlackStone (yet). Usually products end up released
within about 6 months of the public beta. I'd give BlackStone at least a
year or so.
Jim Davis
_
From: Greg Landers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a CFEclipse mailing list?
--
Marlon Moyer, Sr. Internet Developer
American Contractors Insurance Group
phone: 972.687.9445
fax: 972.687.0607
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.acig.com
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
http://www.andyfoulds.co.uk/amusement/bushv2.htm
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
Mine is misbehaving today. Does anybody know if DW caches files somewhere. I'm getting strange, mutilated versions of my files and I can not see where they are coming from? Using Notepad and Beyond Compare, I've looked at the source files in the local directory, the testing directory and the rem
Yep, beat me to it. It's not real split view and can be a pain to use when
DW tries to guess what you want to see in a given window, but it's as close
as it gets.
The tab guides and collapsable code are gone.
Some other things I miss:
- A cursor position indicator (error line 34 position 12)
- Ctr
You can split the code view in a way, by
go to Code View.
Then drag the Results pane upward to the middle of the screen.
Select Code Inspector.
You can now scroll through the code in what simulates a 'split' code
screen as much as possible in Dreamweaver. it's not the same, but it's
a
To the best of my knowledge those features are NOT available in DW - I know I certainly miss options 1 and 3 :)
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Greg Landers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 9:29 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: ColdFusion Studio VS DreamWeaverMX 2004
He
Greg, you realize that HomeSite+ is on the DW install disk. I usually bounce
between HS+ and DWMX. DW has very good support for cfc's etc and at times
its approach to developing dynamic applications works better than
HS+/CFStudio.
larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Landers [mailto:[E
Hey guys. I have been using CF Studio for many years. Trying to switch over to DreamWeaver has been like trying to pull out a perfectly good tooth. However in the past month or so, I have found myself using DW more than Studio (especially after finally upgrading from MX to MX 2004) and I don't thin
Sure! That we're all fickle mush-heads that can be talked into anything.
-Kevin
- Original Message -
From: "dana tierney"
> you think the United States has learned anything? Just asking...
>
> Dana
>
> >And Epistemological Analysis of U.S. Foreign Policy
> >
> >That could be a fun pa
At 17:26 5/24/2004 -0400, you wrote:
>true. We spent a lot of time on that in this philosophy class I took last
>year.
>
>Dana
I would wager that you were studying Nietzsche, with an outside chance
of Kierkegaard.
Either way, I'm not sure the US learned anything.
One of the thing the current a
Anyone else annoyed by the overuse of the word resolve in all the newspapers
and news broadcasts... I'm not sure why it irks me, but every time I hear it
I get pissed off. LOL
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
47 matches
Mail list logo
