If we're going to get really geeky, I don't like the onscreen menu system
for the Westinghouse. I would fail them on usability.
That leads to a whole line of inquiry about the transition to a digital
world. When does the bar get sufficiently set by great user UI like the
iPhone or Wii to make us d
I have this one:
http://www.magnavox.com/index.cfm?event=main&cat_id=1&subcat_id=3&product=93#
Bought it about a year ago for around 700 bucks, and I really like it.
There's a 42 inch version.
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Scott Raley -ITC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking at to getting
I second the Westinghouse. Had it for a couple years now and am pretty
happy with the price and quality.
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a Westinghouse I got last year that I am very happy with. The main
> things to look for are resolution, contras
wellI guess it's a good logo then :)
On Dec 6, 2008, at 11:13 PM, C. Hatton Humphrey wrote:
>> I keep seeing this logo for Salvation Army and can't help thinking
>> it's a picture of somebody's butt with a Salvation Army Tat on it.
>
> Apparently the Salvation Army now lets individuals or gro
+1 from here. that's weird, in a child molester-weird kind of way.
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 9:10 PM, C. Hatton wrote:
> > make that 5.
>
> +2 from here
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic relea
> I keep seeing this logo for Salvation Army and can't help thinking
> it's a picture of somebody's butt with a Salvation Army Tat on it.
Apparently the Salvation Army now lets individuals or groups sign up
to sponsor their own virtual Kettle. If you go to BabyGotMac.com
you'll see that logo with
> make that 5.
+2 from here
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/grou
make that 5.
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Consensus here is that it is a butt. 4 people agree.
>
> On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 11:56 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I keep seeing this logo for Salvation Army and can't help thi
Consensus here is that it is a butt. 4 people agree.
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 11:56 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I keep seeing this logo for Salvation Army and can't help thinking
> it's a picture of somebody's butt with a Salvation Army Tat on it.
>
> http://give.salvationar
I keep seeing this logo for Salvation Army and can't help thinking
it's a picture of somebody's butt with a Salvation Army Tat on it.
http://give.salvationarmyusa.org/site/TR?px=1415463&fr_id=1200&pg=personal
--
You see I really have to tell you
That it all gets so intense
From my experience
I cannot help but think he was actually convicted and sentenced for killing
his wife and not really for the crime with which he was charged.
I would find it hard to believe if some of the more liberal members of this
list felt the same way, but are OK with it.
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:35 PM, C. H
My bad...saw it a few lines down...
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Keep reading the thread :)
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
> Yeah, it's NV. No idea why I said CA.
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at
Keep reading the thread :)
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
Yeah, it's NV. No idea why I said CA.
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Scott Stroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But I thought that crime he was convicted of took place in Las Vegas?
>
>
Not that it's important, but I was curious for the straight up facts, but I
can't two sources that say the same thing. Anyway.. here's the AP release:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iUNgbOr-2bnpFUX0MiII6je2CkRAD94TGPG80
~~
But I thought that crime he was convicted of took place in Las Vegas?
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> The five could be the right number since apparently CA law requires at
> least
> a third of the sentence be served.
>
> Gosh, cant the news report the
So what are you saying, The Juice has been squeezed?
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 10:35 AM, C. Hatton wrote:
> OJ Simpson has been sentenced to at least 15 years!
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramat
LOL
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Scott wrote:
> I agree. 8 years of Bush made a large porion of our popultion so stupid,
> they feel Obama is our Savior.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramat
I agree. 8 years of Bush made a large porion of our popultion so stupid,
they feel Obama is our Savior.
>
>
> 8 years of Bush has really either revealed or turned a large portion
> of our population into fucking idiots.
>
> So I'm not sure, I guess. Were these people idiots first,
> susceptible
Yup, looks like a good thing overall. I love Amsterdam, but it's really gone
through a phase of being really seedy in some areas. They seem to be copying
successful drives in other cities to push out organized crime and the
nastiness that goes with it. If you are a fan of historic urban
architectur
I have a Westinghouse I got last year that I am very happy with. The main
things to look for are resolution, contrast (make sure you check black
levels) and the number of inputs the system has. Mine was relatively cheap
at the time because it only has a single HDMI input. One is all I need, so
I'm
I've been nothing but happy with our LG.
Been plug'n my laptop into it and watching hi-res television...
Beautiful picture-- VHSs, DVDs... everything looks fine. HD looks
best, of course of course.
It was about a grand, 6 months ago or so. 42", lots of inputs. No
picture-in-picture, but that's
Which part?
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Dana wrote:
> Really. Do you honestly think that is true or are you hiding behind
> some sort of sophistry like he *personally* has not done that? Or not
> exactly that?
~|
Adobe® Col
I'm looking at to getting an LCD TV for wife for xmas. I don't subscribe to
consumer reports anymore so I can't see whats going on. I know a lot of
people talk about Aquos and Sony.. What about Toshiba and Maganavox? Heck
I've had a Sanya 32" tv for 11 years and its in the kids room now still
kick
Really. Do you honestly think that is true or are you hiding behind
some sort of sophistry like he *personally* has not done that? Or not
exactly that?
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First, slavery is an entirely separate issue. What we are talking about
That may be true. But Jose Padilla was supposedly plotting to detonate
a dirty bomb, and that charge turned out to be based on no evidence.
If what you say is true then what is the problem with trying him on
criminal charges? If he gets a fair trial and is found guilty then he
can be placed in the
No, I'm not defending any murder and not only was there no murder, we have
no clue as to what really happened in the video. We can look at it and see
that its a partial and edited so we know nothing other than a mob was
threatening 2 men who pulled weapons. We're told what to think of the
actions b
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Gruss wrote:
> >
>
>
> 8 years of Bush has really either revealed or turned a large portion
> of our population into fucking idiots.
>
> So I'm not sure, I guess. Were these people idiots first,
> susceptible to becoming idiots?
>
> What do you think?
>
I think
First, slavery is an entirely separate issue. What we are talking about here
is whether the President can, when there is an existential threat to the
nation, limit individual rights including habeus corpus in the interest of
protecting the country. Bush has never employed this power, for instance,
What does this have to do with the post made previously?
Are you defending murder because it is a Jew murdering a Palestinian?
2008/12/6 Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I wonder if the woman was waving a gun around or traveling on a road owned
> by the attackers. Or maybe the attackers fe
I wonder if the woman was waving a gun around or traveling on a road owned
by the attackers. Or maybe the attackers felt threatened by her. Or or or. I
wonder what civil rights group is going to protest in her favor. And should
I post the daily attacks like this that you don't see because they are
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/128715
(IsraelNN.com) News coverage of the violent expulsion of Jews from Peace
House is also showing a video of an incident which immediately followed the
expulsion, in which a Jew is seen firing a handgun at an Arab in Hevron and
then is pelted by
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > JJ wrote:
> > I cannot comment on what happened before or after this, but the
> aggressors
> > in this case definitely appear to be the guy without the gun.
> >
>
> First off, the guy with the gun didn't seem to be threaten
For shooting in the air when threatened by a mob? I guess Israel has a
different law where stoning someone is not a crime while shooting in the air
in self defense is.
>
> I'm going to.
>
> I'm sure of the law in Israel, but I hope that shooter is charged and
> convicted of attempted murder in the
A group known to forge their statistics and manipulate video shows a portion
of video which looks like 2 people (not settlers, not criminals, not
colonists, people with legal homes) are threatening innocent arabs. Nothing
about them being attacked with rocks before. Nothing about them shooting in
t
> I don't agree with the bailouts either, but I am slightly more
> outraged over the concept that it is ok to assert that someone is a
> terrorist and lock him up for years on end. That could be me; it could
> be you. Once you say it is ok to do that you are relying on government
> officials to hav
In reading the article, it seems as though they are not doing away
with these things... just limiting them to where they have
historically been.
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 2:15 PM, C. Hatton Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> NOoooOoooo!!
>>
>> The HORROR! THE HORROR!
>>
>> WHYYyy?
I don't agree with the bailouts either, but I am slightly more
outraged over the concept that it is ok to assert that someone is a
terrorist and lock him up for years on end. That could be me; it could
be you. Once you say it is ok to do that you are relying on government
officials to have a sense
> NOoooOoooo!!
>
> The HORROR! THE HORROR!
>
> WHYYyy??
>
> *sob* *sob*
In reading the article - it's not about morality or religion, it's
about organized crime.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most impo
> point is... do you think this should be happening? It might have been
> upheld in the past but Ronald Reagan subsequently apologized for it on
> behaldf of the US. *SLAVERY* was upheld in the past!
Point is, it doesn't make two bits difference what I think (though for
the record I think both sl
point is... do you think this should be happening? It might have been
upheld in the past but Ronald Reagan subsequently apologized for it on
behaldf of the US. *SLAVERY* was upheld in the past!
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 12:21 PM, C. Hatton Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Abe Lincoln did the
NOoooOoooo!!
The HORROR! THE HORROR!
WHYYyy??
*sob* *sob*
2008/12/6 C. Hatton Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/12/06/world/main4651958.shtml?source=RSSattr=HOME_4651958
>
> Amsterdam unveiled plans Saturday to close brothels, sex shops and
> ma
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/12/06/world/main4651958.shtml?source=RSSattr=HOME_4651958
Amsterdam unveiled plans Saturday to close brothels, sex shops and
marijuana cafes in its ancient city center as part of a major effort
to drive organized crime out of the tourist haven.
The city is targ
Yes, and that was a massive human rights violation which the US apologised for.
That doesn't quite help the case that you're trying to make.
2008/12/6 C. Hatton Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_American_internment
>This power was used to declare that all peop
>> Abe Lincoln did the same thing.
>
> Dude. That shit was over a hundred years ago and I sure as hell don't
> give a fuck.
Okay, something more recent then -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_American_internment
President Franklin Roosevelt authorized the internment with Executive
Order 90
> JJ wrote:
> My point is that without context, which I do not have even with all of the
> reading I have tried to do), I cannot fault either side for their actions.
>
I'm going to.
I'm sure of the law in Israel, but I hope that shooter is charged and
convicted of attempted murder in the 1st degr
> RoMunn wrote:
> Abe Lincoln did the same thing.
Dude. That shit was over a hundred years ago and I sure as hell don't
give a fuck.
'
What I do give fuck about - and you should too - is if the government
can hold me indefinitely without trial or process and the President
you voted for twice says
Abe Lincoln did the same thing. According to your logic, Abe Lincoln hated
America, and you hate Abe Lincoln.
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Gruss wrote:
> Here's one of a many reasons why:
>
> "But in the most recent decision, the US Court of Appeals for the 4th
> Circuit ruled 5-4 that the pre
It looked to me like they were _all_ on a street.
Are streets not public there? was that a private road? (I don't know this
answer)
I would not have been waving the gun around, which is a stupid thing to do.
But if I had a gun, and was accosted in such a way by these 5 guys, with
more behind them
48 matches
Mail list logo
