We all know we are our parents.
Are you really going to start thinking like Dana?
.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> http://www.imdb.com/name/nm147/
>
> Both parents were university profs, so I guess by Sam's definition
> poor Colin was doomed to be a liberal.
>
~~~
This just changed from real boring to train wreck and I should do the
right thing and look away... but you used up all your sympathy passes.
I'm trying to figure out if you intentionally ignore everything I say
that's proves you're wrong or it's just to complex for you to
understand. This last ti
Only in the sense that Sam's brain is a zombie. And yes, it is a waste ;)
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 4:32 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> Damn I thought this was about zombies.
>
> What a waste.
>
>
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Antho
oh. I heard it was a good performance. From there to slavish defense
of anything he may say, which Sam seems to think we must be engaged
in, is a mighty big leap.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> The only thing I have seen him in was "The King's Speech" where he played a
eyeroll.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> http://www.imdb.com/name/nm147/
>
> Both parents were university profs, so I guess by Sam's definition
> poor Colin was doomed to be a liberal.
>
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Eric Roberts
> wrote:
>>
>> http://kingsspeech.co
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm147/
Both parents were university profs, so I guess by Sam's definition
poor Colin was doomed to be a liberal.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> http://kingsspeech.com/
~|
yeah? I'll check it out.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Great story about it in this month's issue of Rolling Stone.
>
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Dana wrote:
>>
>> yeah, and what happened in Mendocino County can't be described as
>> anything but harmful, I agree.
>>
Damn I thought this was about zombies.
What a waste.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/c
http://kingsspeech.com/
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2012 5:21 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Fox News? Really can this be called a News channel?
> Why do you think you have to? I said I could probably debunk it
> without
The only thing I have seen him in was "The King's Speech" where he played a
speech therapist who treated King George VI, who had a speech impediment.
As a result of his therapy, he was able to give one of the more rousing
speeches of WWII Britain. It was a good movie and based off of a true
story
Great story about it in this month's issue of Rolling Stone.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> yeah, and what happened in Mendocino County can't be described as
> anything but harmful, I agree.
>
>> I actively despise what the Obama administration is doing to the
>> medical mariju
> Why do you think you have to? I said I could probably debunk it
> without even knowing which study he was referring to. You decided that
> was your mission of the week to hold me to that. So I did.
No, you didn't, actually. Do you really think you did?
It was
> funded by an idiot and his radi
Yup, plus it sounds like a great movie
On Feb 18, 2012, at 2:31 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> well... maybe part of the problem is that I don't usually read the
> entertainment section. I gather that this is a movie? Which Waxman
> hearings? Are we talking about Big Tobacco? Since I had a little to do
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> so not to revive this zombie thread, but I can't resist restating
> this. You don't know whether your journal article even applies. Larry,
> the local neuropsych and statistics wonk, says no, although he seems
> to think there might be a differ
yeah, and what happened in Mendocino County can't be described as
anything but harmful, I agree.
> I actively despise what the Obama administration is doing to the
> medical marijuana collectives out here, and while I might hold my nose
> and vote for him simply because of that lack of better cho
by the way, you should update your social media profiles. Rapportive
keeps telling me you're in Minneapolis.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Dana wrote:
> well... maybe part of the problem is that I don't usually read the
> entertainment section. I gather that this is a movie? Which Waxman
> he
well... maybe part of the problem is that I don't usually read the
entertainment section. I gather that this is a movie? Which Waxman
hearings? Are we talking about Big Tobacco? Since I had a little to do
with tha, I agree that it might be an interesting story. But...is the
whole point of the post
I had a major blow-up with a long time friend who is a rabid Paul
support based on the stance on legalizing drugs when I tried to point
out to him that based on Paul's actual legislative record he is much
more conservative Republican than Libertarian. Doesn't matter really,
because no way is he g
>From an over-wieght addict and we know how he feels about them :)
.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> this reads like a paragraph out of the middle of a review. Lack of
> context. No entiende.
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>>
>> From Roger Ebert's rev
I know a few people who claim to be progressives even that are saying they
are voting for Paul. They like the legalize pot and no war stance while
forgetting about his anti-woman, racist, anti-immigrant, anti-civil rights,
corporatist, Randian dystopian views
-Original Message-
From: Mau
so not to revive this zombie thread, but I can't resist restating
this. You don't know whether your journal article even applies. Larry,
the local neuropsych and statistics wonk, says no, although he seems
to think there might be a different problem. If I sank several days
into the statistics
this reads like a paragraph out of the middle of a review. Lack of
context. No entiende.
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> From Roger Ebert's review:
>
>
> "Addiction Incorporated," directed by Charles Evans Jr., doesn't tell a new
> story, although it closes very recently
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "The opposition would have a much better chance of defeating Obama if they
> would stop quoting sound bites from the bobble-heads that put
> forth the assumption that we are all naive fools who fell for anything
> resembling
> "Hope and Ch
Read through these two links they may help:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/thread.cfm/threadid:53866
http://www.raymondcamden.com/index.cfm/2010/3/12/Coloring-CFCHART-Dynamically
hth,
larry
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 1:07 PM, sarah mfr wrote:
>
> I have a result set that has the fol
"The opposition would have a much better chance of defeating Obama if they
would stop quoting sound bites from the bobble-heads that put
forth the assumption that we are all naive fools who fell for anything
resembling
"Hope and Change" and did an analysis of the real reasons he won"
Of course ev
"The US bribes and bullies nations as a matter routine policy."
I do believe you are missing the point completely. A country that
complains that global warming is going to cause it to be covered in water
has to be bribed to sign the Copenhagen accord.
"This is typically referred to as 'America
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> Kind of like falling for "Hope and Change".
The opposition would have a much better chance of defeating Obama if
they would stop quoting sound bites from the bobble-heads that put
forth the assumption that we are all naive fools who fell
" Of course, manufactured controversy is so much easier and more fun,
right?"
Whatever. I really don't care about the statement in and of itself. Just
the double standard. That is, progressives get a pass while those who are
not get excoriated for things not even remotely as offensive as this.
"You are conflating my posts with Larry's post. I did not say"
I am not trying to merge you and Larry together. Just saving space.
You are nothing like Larry. While you might not agree with another side,
you at least try to contemplate it. Likewise, you refrain from making
sweeping accusatio
I have a result set that has the following columns
studentid,sectionid,tracedate,duration,pagehits
I want to draw a horizontal bar chart per student per section
displaying tracedate as xaxis and duration and pagehits as the yaxis one below
the other
Thanks
~
30 matches
Mail list logo
