Also, where a lot of the militia stuff changed is when we went from a state
militia model to the national Guard Model. In either case, that "well
regulated militia" was an actual legal entity that has the governor of the
state as CinC. So when you see in military records civil war and earlier,
y
It's actually quite interesting, and something that gets little
mentioned in this day, that the logic used in early American
jurisprudence would lead to almost an exact inverse of the law we have
today. Since they viewed it as a individual right but collective in
it's purpose to be able to muster
The militia certainly can be all of us...and ought to be well
regulated. Hence the term "well regulated".
I do believe that the founding fathers viewed many of the heavy handed
weapons restrictions as tools of tyranny wielded by England and they
wanted to make sure that that was not going to happ
I don't ignore either part. Remember, who is the militia?
According to Madison it is all of us.
No, I'm sorry. My reading of the thoughts of the founders has proven to me
beyond a shadow of a doubt that they men the arms trade to be free and open
and without the fetters it currently has.
On W
Ok, here's the actual text:
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free
state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be
infringed."
The first clause sets up the second clause. The context being set for
the right to bear arms is that of security of a free
I would say that is probably where the justification comes from. Whether it
actually I or not is another story for the courts to decide...and it's not
looking good for NDAA...
Three Ravens Consulting
Eric Roberts
Owner/Developer
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com
i just move it up to about halfway, or a bit more, and it seems fine to me now.
the DEFAULT was too low. and i dont mind some battery drain for a
brighter screen.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Bruce Sorge wrote:
>
> I did that already.
>
> Sent from my iPhone 4S.
>
> On Oct 2, 2012, at 3:43 PM
By that standard the government can do anything it wants. Is NDAA
necessary and proper?
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> The national Labor Relations Act is a great example of necessary and
> proper...Labor laws are usually defined by t
The national Labor Relations Act is a great example of necessary and
proper...Labor laws are usually defined by the states, but there had to be
some over all regulation, so they we able to go above what they would
normally be able to do because of need...even if that means stepping on the
toes of
I would disagree.
Three Ravens Consulting
Eric Roberts
Owner/Developer
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com
tel: 630-486-5255
fax: 630-310-8531
http://www.threeravensconsulting.com
-Original Message-
From: LRS Scout [ma
No it does not.
The 10th amendment soundly closes that loophole.
That is simply not true.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> The constitution has a "necessary and proper" clause to allow for situation
> that the constitution does not exp
Precisely... shall not be infringed is pretty cut and dry. I don't see any
exclusionary language in there... or anything indicating congress has the
authority to infringe that right.
As for the states, it's only recently that the second has been held to apply
to the states rather than just the F
The constitution has a "necessary and proper" clause to allow for situation
that the constitution does not explicitly cover.
Three Ravens Consulting
Eric Roberts
Owner/Developer
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com
tel: 630-486-5255
fax: 630-310-8531
http://www.thr
I dvr and zoom through Bret Bier then the first 15 minutes of some
local news station.
The internet covers the rest.
.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "I know this is the popular thing to say these days but"
>
> I am not sure it's popular. I know people who don't w
It seems the judge upheld the law as constitutional, makes sense, but
blocked enforcing it for this election because not all voters have
photo id's yet.
As for Holder, do as I say not as I do?
.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> I am neither a proponent nor an opponent of
Where is the power contained in the law (I assume we're talking about the
brady prevention of handgun violence act?) Granted to congress or the
states specifically?
On Oct 2, 2012 9:26 PM, "Eric Roberts"
wrote:
>
> That is in the law.
>
>
> Three Ravens Consu
That is in the law.
Three Ravens Consulting
Eric Roberts
Owner/Developer
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com
tel: 630-486-5255
fax: 630-310-8531
http://www.threeravensconsulting.com
-Original Message-
From: LRS Scout [
I am neither a proponent nor an opponent of voter id laws. I don't
understand why its such a huge issue that citizens show proof they are
who they say they are when they go to vote.
However, in order for a voter ID laws to pass the 'smell' test with
me, it needs to have provisions for people who
Really, what part of the law in question provides these exceptions?
A felon cannot vote because of the provisions of due process. That's in
the constitution, where is background checks?
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> There are also tim
There are also times when that right can be infringed...and those times are
stated in the law. Like a felon cannot vote. Or you need to have a
background check, and thus an ID, to buy a weapon.
Three Ravens Consulting
Eric Roberts
Owner/Developer
ow...@thre
nerdgasm !!
On 10/2/2012 8:12 PM, Eric Roberts wrote:
> Well working on them anyhow.
>
>
>
> http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-57523867-1/star-trek-fusion-impulse-engi
> ne-in-the-works/
>
>
>
> Still very cool.
>
>
>
>
~~~
"I know this is the popular thing to say these days but"
I am not sure it's popular. I know people who don't watch "news", but it's
not an intentional action to ignore certain channels. It's just a
lifestyle. I know people who will only watch Fox. I know people who will
only watch CNN. U
It's funny that you think that the 2nd Amendment is so clear cut,
since a couple centuries of case law finds it to be rather muddied. I
support an individual right to bear arms, but nothing about the 2nd
Amendment is cut and dried.
Judah
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Jeff Garza wrote:
>
>> So
Well working on them anyhow.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-57523867-1/star-trek-fusion-impulse-engi
ne-in-the-works/
Still very cool.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfu
> So is owning a gun.
And that is a distinction that the folks on the left seem to be totally
incapable of comprehending. No matter how many times "Shall Not Be
Infringed" is explained, they just don't get it.
Jeff
Original Message
> From: "LRS Scout"
> Sent: Tuesday, Octo
"You need a photo ID to see Eric Holder speak but not to vote."
Hey Sam,
do you know if one needs an ID to get an Obama phone?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpAOwJvTOio
J
-
I never thought this day would happen. . . . I wont have to work on
putting gas in my car. I wont have to work at pa
The individual right to bear arms has only been decided law for less
than 2 years, but yeah, I agree. Hence why it is important to be very
careful about infringing upon that right and making sure any laws
impacting that right are narrowly tailored. Just like, for instance,
laws banning felons from
So is owning a gun.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> That's a distinction that folks on the right seem to be totally incapable
> of
> comprehending. No matter how many times it is explained, they just don't
> get it.
>
>
That's a distinction that folks on the right seem to be totally incapable of
comprehending. No matter how many times it is explained, they just don't
get it.
Three Ravens Consulting
Eric Roberts
Owner/Developer
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com
tel: 630-486-525
Voting is a constitutional right. Seeing Eric Holder isn't.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 2, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Sam wrote:
>
>> You need a photo ID to see Eric Holder speak but not to vote.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 2, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Sam wrote:
> You need a photo ID to see Eric Holder speak but not to vote.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/143027
I did that already.
Sent from my iPhone 4S.
On Oct 2, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson wrote:
>
> there is a setting which tries to "adjust the brightness" based on the
> amount of light available to the 2 cameras.
>
> turn this off for your sanity.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:
there is a setting which tries to "adjust the brightness" based on the
amount of light available to the 2 cameras.
turn this off for your sanity.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Bruce Sorge wrote:
>
> Is it just my phone or has anyone else with an iPhone who upgraded to iOS 6
> having an iss
Is it just my phone or has anyone else with an iPhone who upgraded to iOS 6
having an issue with the brightness going way down automatically when clicking
the home button to use the phone? It's really annoying and random. I'll click
the home button, and the screen will come on for a half a seco
You need a photo ID to see Eric Holder speak but not to vote.
Gotta love the game.
.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> voter suppression law halted for now.
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology n
Is that the suppression of voter suppression? What is it's overturned?
would that be suppression of the suppression of voter suppression?
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> voter suppression law halted for now.
>
>
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/decision2012/p
My touchy today aren't we?
Is it my fault that you cannot see the joke?
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson wrote:
>
> You do realize that non-useful belittling names, like Faux, invalidate
> any argument you have for many people, and cause most people to stop
> reading at that p
about time
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> voter suppression law halted for now.
>
>
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/decision2012/pennsylvania-voter-id-law-enforcement-halted-by-judge/2012/10/02/bf240ffc-0c9d-11e2-bb5e-492c0d30bff6_story.html
>
>
~
Why?
I know this is the popular thing to say these days but.if you ignore
the stupid shows set up to just scream, then they are just news
organizations...some do a better job than others, but why would every
single one of them be so poor at reporting the news that you'd feel
obligated to refu
You do realize that non-useful belittling names, like Faux, invalidate
any argument you have for many people, and cause most people to stop
reading at that point?
I have talked to a lot of people (from many parts of the political and
religious spectrums) and they feel the same way.
Does anyone f
Aren't live feeds usually on a delay just for that reason?
Three Ravens Consulting
Eric Roberts
Owner/Developer
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com
tel: 630-486-5255
fax: 630-310-8531
http://www.threeravensconsulting.com
-
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
> Personally, I can't stand Fox, MSNBC, PBS, NPR, ABC, NBC, and CBS. I
> refuse to watch any of them.
>
I don't have cable TV, only business class internet from Time Warner.
~~
"If people have a problem with the fact that it was broadcasted, they can
take it up with the FCC."
Or just turn Fox off.
Personally, I can't stand Fox, MSNBC, PBS, NPR, ABC, NBC, and CBS. I
refuse to watch any of them.
J
-
The problem is, is that the way Bush has done it over the last eigh
"If the cops can record video of everything we do in public so should the
press."
Amen.
I just saw that the TSA confiscated someone's camera and erased footage of
the checkpoint.
There maybe cause to confiscate the camera, but there is
no justification to delete the footage. If the TSA confis
Faux has journalistic integrity? Whoda thunk that? I guess there's a
first time for everything.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Ray Champagne wrote:
>
> Yeah, I don't think it was a conscious decision. I mean, it IS Fox, but
> even they have *some* journalistic integrities. Someone fucked up,
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:58 PM, GMoney wrote:
> Fox fucked up when they showed this. It is against their policy to show it.
> Someone was supposed to cut off the live feed before it ever got to that.
> Presumably that person has been fired.
>
The FCC can fine them for this, outside of that ac
Yeah, I don't think it was a conscious decision. I mean, it IS Fox, but
even they have *some* journalistic integrities. Someone fucked up, big
time, and this is the result.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:58 AM, GMoney wrote:
>
> Fox fucked up when they showed this. It is against their policy to sh
Fox fucked up when they showed this. It is against their policy to show it.
Someone was supposed to cut off the live feed before it ever got to that.
Presumably that person has been fired.
I don't know if Fox has issued an apologymy guess would be they have.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:54 AM,
I personally would not have shown it.
I have no compassion for the guy. He was a tool. But I wouldn't have
broadcast it on national live television.
And I admit I hold those who DID make that decision to show it in very
low regard.
I think they are bad people from a moral and personal honor per
A "real" person who shot at cops, carjacked a couple at gunpoint, shot at a
helicopter, and previously spent about 2 years in the clink on felony
charges.
I don't really feel bad for him.
Someone with terrible decision making skills allowed his kids to apparently
watch this, those kids are the p
This was certainly less graphic than many (most) movies. I mean,
generally in a movie you can actually see something.
Oh, is the clamor because this was a "real" person?
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Casey Dougall - Uber Website Solutions
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Ray Cham
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Ray Champagne wrote:
> I can't believe that we aren't already talking about this, whether it is
> because of the obvious subject matter, or because it was Fox who broadcast
> it.
>
If the cops can record video of everything we do in public so should the
press.
voter suppression law halted for now.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/decision2012/pennsylvania-voter-id-law-enforcement-halted-by-judge/2012/10/02/bf240ffc-0c9d-11e2-bb5e-492c0d30bff6_story.html
~|
Order the Adobe Coldf
i saw it.
meh. ive seen us citizens beheaded, hung from bridges and women raped
behind dumpsters.
like perry said so prophetically...
"nothing's shocking"
sadly.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> This is the first I heard of it...but then I don't watch Fox...or much ot
A buddy of mine's company is looking for a Junior Developer. The rates
are pretty good, and its 100% remote. If anyone knows of a good junior
CF Developer who would like a telecommute job, encourage them to
apply.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-jobs/thread.cfm/threadid:8221
thx,
larry
-
This is the first I heard of it...but then I don't watch Fox...or much other
TV for that matter.
Three Ravens Consulting
Eric Roberts
Owner/Developer
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com
tel: 630-486-5255
fax: 630-310-8531
http://www.threeravensconsulting.com
-
If you care to see it, it apparently is still showing in YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5dQym8bKhg
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Jerry Milo Johnson wrote:
>
> Didnt see it, Glad i didnt see it, and think Fox were a-holes to show it.
>
> (as would have been any news channel that sho
Yes, there was definitely time, so much so that in the video, Shepard Smith
was yelling at the production crew to "shut it off shut it off shut it off"
- literally several times. After it happened, they panned back to Shep and
he was visibly agitated.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:50 AM, GMoney wrot
Didnt see it, Glad i didnt see it, and think Fox were a-holes to show it.
(as would have been any news channel that showed it live).
I'd boycott them, but it is Fox News.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> I read about it. From what I read, it was pretty insane, the new
My buddies were talking about it, i guess one of them saw it, said it was
pretty messed up. Since this has happened on several occasions, networks
have people who are supposed to be acting as censors, and they are supposed
to immediately cut off the broadcast if they perceive the perp is about to
I read about it. From what I read, it was pretty insane, the news
reader and director wedre drooling over the violence from what I
understand. But I could be just misreading it.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Ray Champagne wrote:
>
> I can't believe that we aren't already talking about this, w
I can't believe that we aren't already talking about this, whether it is
because of the obvious subject matter, or because it was Fox who broadcast
it.
Did anyone happen to see the actual footage before it was yanked from
YouTube? I did, and it was pretty awful, but I've seen enough TV violence
If you are a beached whale in, say, California, there's a good chance some
nice hippies will come along and push you back into the water.
If you com ashore in Indonesia, however, they will eat you:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/indonesia/9581537/Indonesian-islanders-eat-beached-
http://www.foxnews.com/science/2012/10/02/weather-on-mars-surprisingly-warm-curiosity-rover-finds/
The inconvenient truth on Mars, is that this winter appears warmer since
the Curiosity Rover landed their several weeks ago. We are now artificially
warming TWO different planets!
--
Some nights I
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/01/us/california-bans-therapies-to-cure-gay-minors.html?_r=0
Hopefully this is just a first. This form of torture masquerading as a
psychotherapy should be banned.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Ant
Is it too late to scream in panic?
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/259347-santorum
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
htt
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Dakota Burns wrote:
> Hi CF Community -
>
Hi!
> Been awhile since I've chatted here with you great people.
>
Welcome back!
> I recently saw multiple tweets come across the wire re: #coldfusion from a
> "rural" oriented company advertising $47/hr for full tim
OK I'm tell on you!
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> I think that if we all agreed (yeah, I know...getting all of us to agree on
> something LOL) to charge our clients 1000/project, that might be considered
> price fixing, but if we had a discussion that determined that th
68 matches
Mail list logo
