Ok, so you all realize that economic policy really hasn't changed in
20 years no matter what party runs what right?
None of these candidates represent anything other than the statu quo.
I just gotta laugh that people perceive a difference on anything
between Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama or Romney.
seems reality was skewed that way too.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> The polls were skewed to Dems +6%. With the economy in shambles,
> unemployment too high and Obama having no plan for a second term, the
> thinking was the dems would not come out in force. But they did the
>
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> They got the married female vote but didn't get the single mom vote.
> Can you guess why?
>
Because married women whose husbands voted R lie about who they
actually voted for?
~|
get sold to companies that then resell them in the third world. A
buddy of mine is with the State department in Africa. He sent me a few
photos about 6 years ago showing all these people buying these John
Kerry t-shirts in Uganda.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Casey Dougall - Uber Website Solut
"93% of black voters voted for Obama."
96% of black voters supported him in 2008.
39% of whites voted for Obama. He carried 43% of the white vote in 2008.
While both seem low, the 43% ties Bill Clinton's take of white voters.
Jimmy Carter is the only Democrat in recent history to top that wit
"What the fuck does 'almost exactly similar' even mean?"
Along with so many other things, the art of speaking and writing are dying.
Read the prose of Charles Dickens and compare it the popular writers of the
day. You'll feel dirty after reading modern prose.
Read some of the letters written b
depends on who prints them. I have bought some on the streets of boston
outside events immediately after losing bids. 2 bucks for a decent tshirt
or hat.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Casey Dougall - Uber Website Solutions <
ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com> wrote:
>
> What happens to all the c
They are typically sent to poor countries. Like the '19-0' shirts from 2007
http://blog.epromos.com/images/super-bowl-shirts-patriots-19-0.jpg
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Casey Dougall - Uber Website Solutions <
ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com> wrote:
>
> What happens to all the championshi
"What happens to all the championship t-shirts, hats and stuff that get printed
for the loosing teams?"
The "loosing" team probably gives them to the salvation army or goodwill.
Or they hide them with all of the Atari 2600 ET cartridges.
J
-
Every immigrant who comes here should be required w
What happens to all the championship t-shirts, hats and stuff that get
printed for the loosing teams?
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> You mean like this one:
>
> http://emergingcritic.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/34569547.jpg
>
~~
Replace "Christian" with "Muslim", and replace references to Liberals with
"America", and you would have the outline for a speech that a Taliban or Al
Qaeda official might be giving a would-be suicide bomber. Seriously, look
at how spooky this is:
"Just like what the Americans did to the Palestin
No Scott I was referring to the extremist wing who had taken over the
party in 1990's, not the entire political party. I would prefer and
could support the fiscally conservative, socially moderate Republican
party of Dole, Bush I and others. I could never support the Know
Nothing wing that had tak
You mean like this one:
http://emergingcritic.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/34569547.jpg
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Not meant as political commentary
>
> Who here has never pushed something to production that should not be there?
>
> http://gizmodo.com/5958827/rom
http://www.lyonsmorris.com/test/robertson.jpg
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-communi
"He may not represent all of them, but I think he presents more of them
than Gov. Romney."
Just out of curiosity, and don't feel obligated to answer, in what ways
does Obama represent the following
Limited Government
Liberty
Equal application of rule of law.
Equality of opportunity
better than
Bruce you owe me a new monitor. I sprayed coffee on this one.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Bruce Sorge wrote:
>
> So I am working up in the tower on a range today and I can hear through the
> window a drill sergeant yelling to a private "You pissed yourself? How the
> hell you piss yourse
interesting blog piece. I agree with most of it.
One example of the current republican party approach that is very
telling is to consider this, in the 1970's almost 2/3rds of all
scientists were Republicans. Now its less than 6%. Most of the
scientists interviewed for the last AAAS survey of this
They got the married female vote but didn't get the single mom vote.
Can you guess why?
.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> I would say the republican party is out of touch. They relied on getting
> the white evangelical male vote to carry them and didn't count on the
> n
That's not true, Jerry posted the numbers.
.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Conservatives hardly stayed home...both liberal and conservative pundits
> were saying that voters on the right were really fired up. Obama won the
> popular vote by around or less than a milli
12% decided the week of.
Most searches on google last week, who's running for president.
1st and second debate the state polls had a spike. Nate's didn't.
The third debate, Romney didn't mind that Obama let Americans get
murdered in Libya and said he would be the same as Obama on foreign
policy.
S
like the blog name.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> We can probably predict (with frightening accuracy) how some on this list
> will respond to this, but I thought it was an interesting read.
>
> This kind of goes along with some comments made in various threads - most
> n
He may not represent all of them, but I think he presents more of them than
Gov. Romney.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> No, I mean that's pretty much the opposite of what Obama represents.
>
> .
>
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> >
> > You mean, why didn'
"No, I mean that's pretty much the opposite of what Obama represents."
In terms of these things, both candidates wouldn't be big defenders. I
would agree with you that Romney would be better at defending them than
Obama, but neither is great.
J
-
Ninety percent of politicians give the other t
No, I mean that's pretty much the opposite of what Obama represents.
.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> You mean, why didn't I vote for Romney? Mainly because he does not
> represent those principles, in my opinion.
>
>
http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-loser-one-donald-trump-calls-for-revolution-and-march-on-washington-over-phoney-obama-victory/
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/14
Please Sam...must you keep regurgitating the same party line bullshit?
On Nov 8, 2012 9:03 AM, "Sam" wrote:
>
> The poor, the unions and the minorities voted for free stuff, the
> workers stayed home.
>
> Funny how minorities vote for the Black guy and that's good but if a
> white guy doesn;t, h
ROFLMAO!!!
On Nov 8, 2012 9:20 AM, "Bruce Sorge" wrote:
>
> So I am working up in the tower on a range today and I can hear through
> the window a drill sergeant yelling to a private "You pissed yourself? How
> the hell you piss yourself"? I laughed.
>
> Sent from my iPhone 4S.
>
>
~~~
I would say the republican party is out of touch. They relied on getting
the white evangelical male vote to carry them and didn't count on the
non-evangelical/non-affiliated vote being so high. They also really
discounted the female vote on female health and other feminine issues.
They have alwa
He predicted the republican sweep in 2010...so his stats haven't been
skewed.
On Nov 8, 2012 9:09 AM, "GMoney" wrote:
>
> I guess the answer i'm looking for is: When does luck end, and competence
> begin?
>
> Is it only when he correctly predicts a win for one of your guys?
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 8,
Most pundits on both sides...dans the folks just spouting party line
bullshit agree that Sandy had little to no effect.
On Nov 8, 2012 9:05 AM, "Sam" wrote:
>
> They were in line with the State polls, same as Nate, but when the
> storm took politics off the news and Obama's Katrina was reported
While I agree to an extent G...is that race or just agreeing with policy/
realizing that the other guy really sucked badly?
On Nov 8, 2012 9:03 AM, "Sam" wrote:
>
> The poor, the unions and the minorities voted for free stuff, the
> workers stayed home.
>
> Funny how minorities vote for the Blac
Unsqewedpolls.com is apparently (from what I have been hearing and
reading), is a right leaning site that takes data and skews it quite a bit,
despite its name. I haven't checked the site personally... that is just
what I heard in reference to discussions about Nate Silver.
Please excuse any hor
He got the 2008, 2010, and 2013 election almost exact. He was spot on for
this one, getting the electoral exactly. His methodology appears to be
pretty precise.
On Nov 8, 2012 8:21 AM, "GMoney" wrote:
>
> Just thought I'd revisit this:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Sam wrote:
> >
> >
I would say genius. As stated earlier... this is the third election he got
right and in all three, they were either spot on or really close...within
the difference of a state's electoral votes.
On Nov 8, 2012 8:46 AM, "Sam" wrote:
>
> Nate used the individual states polls and this time they wer
Conservatives hardly stayed home...both liberal and conservative pundits
were saying that voters on the right were really fired up. Obama won the
popular vote by around or less than a million votes (without doing the
math). That hardly showing either side stayed home. I think voters came
out in
"If you think Romney and Fox News are leftist, your views must be somewhere to
the right of Darth Vader."
Romney is a self professed Progressive.
Murdoch was known as Rupert the Red in college. The red wasn't for
Republican, but for socialism.
Fox has a job. It is to steer "conservatives" to
I also enjoyed this in the comments:
"Seems to me the GOP could stand a little less Sam Adams and a little more
John Adams."
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 12:05 PM, GMoney wrote:
>
> http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83571.html
>
> My favorite snippet:
>
> My wifes a Democrat, and she was
"Then why did you vote against them?"
Ehh. At this point, it's not even worth point out who voted for who.
The problem is that the current generation, the last generation, and
probably all future generations don't even know the concepts on the list
exist. They don't know what "limited governme
You mean, why didn't I vote for Romney? Mainly because he does not
represent those principles, in my opinion.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Then why did you vote against them?
>
> .
>
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> >
> >> Limited Government
> >> Libe
Then why did you vote against them?
.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
>> Limited Government
>> Liberty
>> Equal application of rule of law.
>> Equality of opportunity
>>
>>
> Those are principles I can get behind.
~~
"True to some extentthe Tea Party took a whoopin'as they deserved."
Did the tea party take a whoopin'? Can you back that up without *anecdotal*
evidence.
How many congressmen known as tea party affiliates lose? Is that rate
higher than non-tea party congressmen?
Interesting numbers f
Meanwhile people voted for Biden. Go figure.
.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> The GOP has been told this for years. They continue to let idiots like
> Akin get nominated and then throw support behind them (I am talking about
> before Akin stuck his foot in his mouth).
My dad mostly vote R for president. This year he told me he doesn't
like Obama but voted for him because Romney is a corporate crook that
is looking to get his business buddies wealthier at out expense., He
said he saw it on the evening news so it's true.
I guess I'm going to have to start checki
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
>
>
> "What are these conservative, constitutional principles on which America
> was built, in your view?"
>
> In my view:
>
> Limited Government
> Liberty
> Equal application of rule of law.
> Equality of opportunity
>
>
Those are principles
"Jerryuhh...what are these moral values that Romney's campaign
embodied that
were for the good of America?"
"Perhaps I was observing a different Romney campaign, but it's better to hear
what you mean instead of speculating."
What in the hell are talking about. Are you confusing me with som
"We have the right message on the finances, he continued, but added, We have
to get out of peoples lives, get out of peoples bedrooms, and we have to
be a national party
or else were going to lose.
The GOP has been told this for years. They continue to let idiots like
Akin get nominated
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83571.html
My favorite snippet:
My wifes a Democrat, and she was so close to voting for Mitt Romney, he
said. But then, you know, Mourdock and Akin opened their mouth, and we
sent [voters] running back to the Democratic Party, because they think
wer
WowI had not seen that one before.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Remember this one?
>
> http://www.darryl.com/guilty.html
>
> .
>
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> >
> > Not meant as political commentary
> >
> > Who here has never pushed somethi
Remember this one?
http://www.darryl.com/guilty.html
.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Not meant as political commentary
>
> Who here has never pushed something to production that should not be there?
>
> http://gizmodo.com/5958827/romney-staffers-publish-sad-victor
The latter will likely have a better effect. Otherwise, they might be
accused of trying to cover something up.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Should they take out an ad saying he doesn't represent them or should
> we just start talking football?
>
> .
>
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 a
I did not mean to imply there was something you specifically can do. I
think is more a conversation between the RNC and Trump. :D
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> I hear you but not sure what you want me to do. I'm sure his lawyers
> explained that he might run amiss of some law
Should they take out an ad saying he doesn't represent them or should
we just start talking football?
.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> He may not have been an 'official' face of the republican party, but to
> some he may have been perceived that way. And perception is k
I hear you but not sure what you want me to do. I'm sure his lawyers
explained that he might run amiss of some laws and so he deleted the
post. Done.
.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> It was not just 'one lonely white guy' - it was Donald Trump, a guy who has
> 1.8 mill
Not meant as political commentary
Who here has never pushed something to production that should not be there?
http://gizmodo.com/5958827/romney-staffers-publish-sad-victory-website-by-mistake
--
Scott Stroz
---
You can make things happen, you can watch things happen or you can
He may not have been an 'official' face of the republican party, but to
some he may have been perceived that way. And perception is key.
If a voter thinks Trump represents the republican party and its ideals, and
they don't like what he has to say...guess what? That is
the republican party's prob
They sure did, and worse. Some
were saying Romney should be assassinated should he win. I commented at the
time that I really hope the Secret Service follows up on some of those,
too. Would love to be a fly on the wall when they come knocking on some of
those doors.
It was not just 'one lonely wh
Most of the Hollywood idiots represent the Democrats but who cares?
Trump is not a face of the R's but he really really wants to be.
.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> In my opinion, Trump still has more influence due to his deep pockets and
> his level of 'celebrity'.
>
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> His name is Matthews.
>
Oops...my bad...and I did that a lot too
Trump is a citizen that's allowed to say what he wants. If people
> believe him, that's another problem.
>
Ditto on Matthews.
Matthews is an idiot that MSNBC is pretending is
You do get the mysticism behind polling don't you? Or do you believe
it's an exact science and Nate has the key? Again, he just parroted
existing state polls, no magic.
.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> I guess particle physicists got lucky with every single prediction ov
Didn't many Obama supporters threaten to riot if he lost? You found
one looney white guy and that's where you complain?
.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Casey Dougall - Uber Website
Solutions wrote:
>
> Except he can't yell fire in a crowded building. Calling for a revolution
> and then delet
WTF are you talking about? Obama made it about free condoms and nobody cared.
Married woman voted Romney, single woman voted Obama. It's the freebees baby.
.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> This sh** right here is why they lost.
>
> The party's platform is simply not viable.
Except he can't yell fire in a crowded building. Calling for a revolution
and then deleting the tweet, irresponsible as anything else he's said along
the election path.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Sam wrote:
> Trump is a citizen that's allowed to say what he wants. If people
> believe him
Turn out was way down.
.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Jerry Milo Johnson wrote:
>
> I read (dont have a link or any actual facts) that black voters have voted
> for the DEMOCRATIC candidate 85%+ of the time in the last 7 elections.
>
> Regardless of the race of the candidate.
>
> If so, I d
I though you hated talking politics.
.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Jerry Milo Johnson wrote:
>
> I greatly enjoyed this:
>
> "As noted, Romneys plan to cut PBS was like deleting text files to clear
> space on a gigabyte drive."
>
~
His name is Matthews.
Trump is a citizen that's allowed to say what he wants. If people
believe him, that's another problem.
Matthews is an idiot that MSNBC is pretending is a news anchor. That
is intentionally fooling people. That is a bigger problem. Luckily
nobody watches him but still.
.
On
This sh** right here is why they lost.
The party's platform is simply not viable. They made it about women's
rights, abortion, contraception.
And they signed a mandate stating that next year they will oppose or seek
to overturn many civil rights amendments, roe v wade etc.
And women said f* that
Trying to get kicked out.
On Nov 8, 2012 10:31 AM, "Vivec" wrote:
>
> In a situation like that..why would you say anything?
> Say nothing and if someone asks..."I have an unusual sweat gland problem"
> ...
> lol
>
>
>
> On 8 November 2012 11:25, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> >
> > Someone is working on
In a situation like that..why would you say anything?
Say nothing and if someone asks..."I have an unusual sweat gland problem"
...
lol
On 8 November 2012 11:25, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> Someone is working on a chapter :)
> On Nov 8, 2012 10:20 AM, "Bruce Sorge" wrote:
>
> >
> > So I am working
Sam wrote:
>
> food stamp crowd showed up in larger numbers than expected
Don't forget the "slut vote" silly!
http://gawker.com/5958728/fact+checking-the-slut-vote-with-the-christian-mens-defense-network
"this election cycle shows that the Slut Vote is real, and Republicans
lose because they d
Good summary.
On Nov 8, 2012 10:20 AM, "Scott Stewart" wrote:
>
> I'd call Johnson a pragmatic centrist, some of what he wanted to do was
> fairly extreme, like a 43% cut in defense spending,, he clarified that
> by stating that it would be in conjunction with the Joint Chiefs of
> Staff, giving
Someone is working on a chapter :)
On Nov 8, 2012 10:20 AM, "Bruce Sorge" wrote:
>
> So I am working up in the tower on a range today and I can hear through
> the window a drill sergeant yelling to a private "You pissed yourself? How
> the hell you piss yourself"? I laughed.
>
> Sent from my iPh
Bahahaha!!!
On Nov 8, 2012 10:20 AM, "Bruce Sorge" wrote:
>
> So I am working up in the tower on a range today and I can hear through
> the window a drill sergeant yelling to a private "You pissed yourself? How
> the hell you piss yourself"? I laughed.
>
> Sent from my iPhone 4S.
>
>
~
I read (dont have a link or any actual facts) that black voters have voted
for the DEMOCRATIC candidate 85%+ of the time in the last 7 elections.
Regardless of the race of the candidate.
If so, I don't see that statement as being true.
What I DO expect the numbers will reflect is a greater-than
I'd call Johnson a pragmatic centrist, some of what he wanted to do was
fairly extreme, like a 43% cut in defense spending,, he clarified that
by stating that it would be in conjunction with the Joint Chiefs of
Staff, giving them what they needed to be effective and cutting out
things that the
So I am working up in the tower on a range today and I can hear through the
window a drill sergeant yelling to a private "You pissed yourself? How the hell
you piss yourself"? I laughed.
Sent from my iPhone 4S.
~|
Order the
I guess particle physicists got lucky with every single prediction over the
last century too...
Einstein didn't believe "God plays dice" but i guess He does.
The beauty of publishing a methodology is anybody can see your secret and
prove it wrong. Of course this also reveals those who can't p
I greatly enjoyed this:
"As noted, Romneys plan to cut PBS was like deleting text files to clear
space on a gigabyte drive."
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> This is actually an excellent piece.
>
> What happened is indicative of backward thinking by a group of people that
>
Like I said about Rasmussen.
No poll is always right, \they can't be.
.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:09 AM, GMoney wrote:
>
> I guess the answer i'm looking for is: When does luck end, and competence
> begin?
>
> Is it only when he correctly predicts a win for one of your guys?
>
>
~
Blacks, Single moms, Chinese, Latinos and food stamp recipients voted
overwhelmingly Obama.
On the Conservative side we had millions less than those that voted for McCain.
It's not only about race but I hear a lot of whites and blacks saying
the only reason someone didn't vote for Obama was beca
I guess the answer i'm looking for is: When does luck end, and competence
begin?
Is it only when he correctly predicts a win for one of your guys?
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> What's the point? Are we to believe him as an Oracle from now on?
> Rasmussen was the most accurate
What's the point? Are we to believe him as an Oracle from now on?
Rasmussen was the most accurate pollster for years and they were the
furthest from reality this go round.
What answer are you looking for?
.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:55 AM, GMoney wrote:
>
> I don't really know. I don't pretend
They were in line with the State polls, same as Nate, but when the
storm took politics off the news and Obama's Katrina was reported as a
success it all changed.
Did you know FEMA in NY is closed do to weather?
.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> Sam, what about the Republican p
93% of black voters voted for Obama.
That is a staggering number.
Any way you slice it, race still plays a big role in 21st century America.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> The poor, the unions and the minorities voted for free stuff, the
> workers stayed home.
>
> Funny how m
The poor, the unions and the minorities voted for free stuff, the
workers stayed home.
Funny how minorities vote for the Black guy and that's good but if a
white guy doesn;t, he's racist. Heard a lot of that yesterday.
.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Casey Dougall - Uber Website Solutions
w
Holy crap! That's the first link on politics on this list that I've read in
totality in a long long time! Wow, that was really good.
It seems like the definition of a good Republican over the last few years
has been defined by how much you hate Obama, and that just can't be the
principal on which
The polls were skewed to Dems +6%. With the economy in shambles,
unemployment too high and Obama having no plan for a second term, the
thinking was the dems would not come out in force. But they did the
food stamp crowd showed up in larger numbers than expected and the
conservatives stayed home.
I don't really know. I don't pretend to be smart enough to understand that.
You said he got lucky once, and now, apparently, he's gotten lucky a second
time. I guess it's subjective as to when luck ends, and competence begins.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Nate used the indiv
All valid points, except that I think Trump has more influence than you
give him credit for. I know people who parrot (and believe) what he says -
thankfully, a small group. But Trump has kind of become the face of the
'Crazy GOP'.
With Chris Williams and anyone else on MSNBC, you kind of have to
Sam, what about the Republican polls. Those were COMPLETELY incorrect
bearing no resemblance to reality at all.
I see you have chosen the route of rationalising.
On 8 November 2012 10:46, Sam wrote:
>
> Nate used the individual states polls and this time they were all
> right. Those polls had
Youths, Hispanics, Blacks and anyone of color by majority voted for Obama,
So do you think it was luck or is the republican party out of reach with
large percentage of our population?
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Sam wrote:
> So do you think he's a genius rather than just a bit lucky?
This is actually an excellent piece.
What happened is indicative of backward thinking by a group of people that
do not support scientific thinking and reasoning.
The author mentions "Magical thinking" and I laughed,because that falls
right in line with persons who exalt faith based beliefs above
Nate used the individual states polls and this time they were all
right. Those polls had Romney spiking until Katrina, I mean Sandy,
hit.
So do you think he's a genius rather than just a bit lucky?
.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:21 AM, GMoney wrote:
>
> Just thought I'd revisit this:
>
~~
The difference is Trump is an ass with a shitty reality TV show, much
like Snooky and taken as seriously. Chris Mathews is on MSNBC as a
news commentator and host of a syndicated news program. Granted nobody
watches MSNBC except his critics but still, Fox got rid of Beck.
.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 a
You mean that when someone posts stats that the right do not like they just
dismiss the facts and say it's liberal left leaning bias and go back to
believing in nuts, nads and nothings?
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:21 AM, GMoney wrote:
>
> Just thought I'd revisit this:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 a
I remember someone saying that all the polls were skewed. I remember
someone saying that they were polling democrats, and that was including a
heavy bias in the polls.
What was it? Unskewedpolls.com or something like that?
Interested in hearing what those people have to say now, since "their"
pol
Just thought I'd revisit this:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> He got one election right, that one was easy. We'll see how he does this
time.
So...here's how he did this time:
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-nate-silver-polls-rasmussen-20121107,0,3329768.story
--
Good point. However, I think there is a difference between Trump and Chris
Williams.
Trump is more mainstream. I think most 'normal Joes' would know who Trump
is, but would not know Chris Williams if he walked up and bit them on the
ass.
I will admit, I had heard the name Chris Williams before,
Blocked
.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> We can probably predict (with frightening accuracy) how some on this list
> will respond to this, but I thought it was an interesting read.
>
> This kind of goes along with some comments made in various threads - most
> notably by
He has access to a lot of Arab money, they just don't want to piss him
off. Like the crazy uncle.
So how about the Dems distancing themselves from Mathews and Maher and
...you get the idea.
.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> I think the GOP needs to try and separate itsel
We can probably predict (with frightening accuracy) how some on this list
will respond to this, but I thought it was an interesting read.
This kind of goes along with some comments made in various threads - most
notably by Jerry Barnes.
*http://*bit.ly/WFjOtM
--
Scott Stroz
---
Yo
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
