Re: Insane SGU (was Re: The stunning decline of Barack Obama: 10 key reasons why the Obama presidency is in meltdown)

2010-08-16 Thread denstar
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Cameron Childress wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 4:08 PM, denstar wrote: >> I like crossovers.  Especially if the sibling shows are dead.  :)  A >> little bit is ok. > > I just don't want them to give up on the new enemies and fall back on > the old ones.  One

Re: Insane SGU (was Re: The stunning decline of Barack Obama: 10 key reasons why the Obama presidency is in meltdown)

2010-08-16 Thread denstar
lliants...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2010 1:09 AM > To: cf-community > Subject: Insane SGU (was Re: The stunning decline of Barack Obama: 10 key > reasons why the Obama presidency is in meltdown) > > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote: &

Re: Insane SGU (was Re: The stunning decline of Barack Obama: 10 key reasons why the Obama presidency is in meltdown)

2010-08-16 Thread Kris Sisk
Wait, what? They made another Stargate? *Makes a note to check all his normal TV sites for episodes* >... >> Then, if the stars are aligned right, Grahamnesty  will lose during his next >... > >Speaking of the stars, I found another space-ish show to watch. > >I remembered somebody mentioning St

Re: Insane SGU (was Re: The stunning decline of Barack Obama: 10 key reasons why the Obama presidency is in meltdown)

2010-08-16 Thread Rick Root
I agree with Cameron's initial assessment. It was slow and not all that exciting. Relative to the other stargate shows (I watched 14 seasons of SG1 and SGA in about 2 years before watching the final season of SG:Atlantis "live"). It wasn't bad enough to quit on though because I found most of t

Re: Insane SGU (was Re: The stunning decline of Barack Obama: 10 key reasons why the Obama presidency is in meltdown)

2010-08-16 Thread Cameron Childress
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 4:08 PM, denstar wrote: > I like crossovers.  Especially if the sibling shows are dead.  :)  A > little bit is ok. I just don't want them to give up on the new enemies and fall back on the old ones. One of the things I liked about SG1 is that they actually won against so

Re: Insane SGU (was Re: The stunning decline of Barack Obama: 10 key reasons why the Obama presidency is in meltdown)

2010-08-16 Thread Cameron Childress
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Eric Roberts wrote: > The movie was awesome.  SG1 was pretty awesome.  SGA was good...not as good > as SG1, but still good.  I am loving SGU.  Did it start back up?  I am so > lost without a DVR...I am living in a hotel for the next month and a 1\2, so > none of t

Re: Insane SGU (was Re: The stunning decline of Barack Obama: 10 key reasons why the Obama presidency is in meltdown)

2010-08-16 Thread Cameron Childress
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Martin, Dustin W wrote: > I just watched it for the first time yesterday on Netflix. It is decent but > kind of slow so far. I'll be interested to see where it goes. Don't count on it speeding up much till the last third of the season. -Cameron ... ~~

RE: Insane SGU (was Re: The stunning decline of Barack Obama: 10 key reasons why the Obama presidency is in meltdown)

2010-08-16 Thread Martin, Dustin W
as Re: The stunning decline of Barack Obama: 10 key reasons why the Obama presidency is in meltdown) On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote: ... > Then, if the stars are aligned right, Grahamnesty will lose during his next ... Speaking of the stars, I found another space-ish

RE: Insane SGU (was Re: The stunning decline of Barack Obama: 10 key reasons why the Obama presidency is in meltdown)

2010-08-16 Thread Eric Roberts
. -Original Message- From: denstar [mailto:valliants...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 1:51 AM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Insane SGU (was Re: The stunning decline of Barack Obama: 10 key reasons why the Obama presidency is in meltdown) On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Jerry Barnes

Re: Insane SGU (was Re: The stunning decline of Barack Obama: 10 key reasons why the Obama presidency is in meltdown)

2010-08-15 Thread denstar
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote: > > Never watched any of the  Stargate TV shows.  I did enjoy the movie though. > 94 was a good year. :Den -- We are not very pleased when we are forced to accept a mathematical truth by virtue of a complicated chain of formal conclusions a

Re: Insane SGU (was Re: The stunning decline of Barack Obama: 10 key reasons why the Obama presidency is in meltdown)

2010-08-15 Thread Jerry Barnes
Never watched any of the Stargate TV shows. I did enjoy the movie though. J - Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny - Thomas Jefferson on government ~

Re: Insane SGU (was Re: The stunning decline of Barack Obama: 10 key reasons why the Obama presidency is in meltdown)

2010-08-15 Thread denstar
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Cameron Childress wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 1:09 AM, denstar wrote: >> Speaking of the stars, I found another space-ish show to watch. >> >> I remembered somebody mentioning Stargate Universe, so said what the >> hell, and fired it up. >> >> Been enjoying

Re: Insane SGU (was Re: The stunning decline of Barack Obama: 10 key reasons why the Obama presidency is in meltdown)

2010-08-15 Thread Cameron Childress
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 1:09 AM, denstar wrote: > Speaking of the stars, I found another space-ish show to watch. > > I remembered somebody mentioning Stargate Universe, so said what the > hell, and fired it up. > > Been enjoying it, too!  Kinda got that Rama deal going for it. So far for me SGU

Insane SGU (was Re: The stunning decline of Barack Obama: 10 key reasons why the Obama presidency is in meltdown)

2010-08-13 Thread denstar
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote: ... > Then, if the stars are aligned right, Grahamnesty  will lose during his next ... Speaking of the stars, I found another space-ish show to watch. I remembered somebody mentioning Stargate Universe, so said what the hell, and fired it up.