> http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20050731
> Hatton
Haven't you seen Zardoz?
The gun is good, but the penis is bad!
s. isaac dealey 954.522.6080
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework
http://www.fusiontap.com
ht
http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20050731
Hatton
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble
Ticket application
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48
Message: http://www.hous
MARTIN O'MALLEY:
In Dubya's corner: Osama bin Laden?
Why did Osama bin Laden deliver his solemn videotaped speech when he
did, four days before the American presidential election?
Could it be that he wished to affect the outcome? If so, whom did he
want to help? Could it explain why 15 million mo
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2004 7:44 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Very interesting commentary. Exactly what hit the Pentagon?
My last word on this.
Getting to the truth and giving a true and factual account to the
grieving
relatives left behind in an attempt to give a them little peace i
My last word on this.
Getting to the truth and giving a true and factual account to the grieving
relatives left behind in an attempt to give a them little peace is one
thing, entertaining fallacies based on someones idea that there was a
conspiracy is another.
It should not be about What if I
sorry to chime in late, and not that my opinion really matters but i
think to put some objective clarity to this...
angel, its insulting for one REALLY big reason in my head...
and here it is..
to purport, for one instance of a nano second that there would be any,
and i mean any shadow of a doub
Oh come on. To see it that way is a further stretch than a missile
hitting the pentagon.
That is in no way what I meant. In fact the question of 'what happened
to the flight'
is one of the key failing points of any other explanation.
And yes I see now where you're coming from.Any questions ab
You somehow seem to be missing the point everyone else seems to be making.
Whether this is through choice or ignorance I don't know
To entertain the fact that flight 77 didn't exist by default then entertains
the fact that the passengers didn't exist. You go tell the families of those
people
Well from my own experience in various flight simulators keeping a plane
steady at a few tens of feet off the ground is pretty difficult. Far
easier to just dive bomb from above.
Historians, history buffs and conspiracy lovers everywhere have asked
several questions about JFK's assassination, an
Why?
-Gel
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
These theories are very insulting to those who died and those who
risked their lives to get others out of the building during the fire.
larry
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubs
According to witnesses, the aircraft hit the ground first and then
bounced up before hitting the building. This was also shown in the
video from the ATM security camera.
These theories are very insulting to those who died and those who
risked their lives to get others out of the building during th
> One thing I still want to know though, is how difficult would it have been
to keep a jet liner on course and steady at that altitude to hit the second
> floor of a building.
I think the whole point of accuracy when flying a plane into a building is a
moot one... they just aimed for the building
Well..I had fun disassembling it, not having the benefit of eyewitness
accounts etc.
At first glance though, it does catch your attention and make you
think," Hmm...what if..".
It is easy to see why people latch onto such conspiracy theories. The
manner of entry, and the damage seems to be very
Given that I know witnesses and had a neighbour who was injured in the
attack, yes I can.
larry
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 20:35:05 -0400, Angel Stewart
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> G..
>
> Not supposed to post debunking links so soon!
>
> *mutter* *grumble*
>
> So..without going to Snopes...coul
Its bullshit. I know witnesses who saw the aircraft impact on the
building and the resulting fireball. There was no missle strike, no
truck bomb. The aircraft, or rather pieces of it, including the
engines were found, right were they were expected to be if the
aircraft crashed into the building. Mo
G..
Not supposed to post debunking links so soon!
*mutter* *grumble*
So..without going to Snopes...could you have answered the questions
which the video raised?
-Gel
-Original Message-
From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wasn't this already debunked last week?
www.sn
Wasn't this already debunked last week?
www.snopes2.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
-sm
--- Angel Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'm anxious for people to start debunking the
> assertions made in this
> flash movie.
>
> http://www.ebaumsworld.com/pentagon.html#Main
>
>
> -Gel
>
>
>
[Toda
Subject: Very interesting commentary. Exactly what hit the
Pentagon?
I'm anxious for people to start debunking the assertions made in
this
flash movie.
http://www.ebaumsworld.com/pentagon.html#Main
-Gel
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscri
I'm anxious for people to start debunking the assertions made in this
flash movie.
http://www.ebaumsworld.com/pentagon.html#Main
-Gel
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
http://www.armytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-2903288.php
Around the halls of the Pentagon, a term of caustic derision has emerged
for the enlisted soldiers at the heart of the furor over the Abu Ghraib
prison scandal: the six morons who lost the war.
Indeed, the damage done to the U.S. military a
20 matches
Mail list logo
