Non-public archives

2005-07-29 Thread Erika L Walker-Arnold
Yeah - I think it sucks too sometimes ... Mikey - why does community have to be public? I mean it's just nonsense chatter - not tech talk. It REALLY doesn't have to be public ... Can't we make it private? Cheers, Erika -- ##| -Original

Re: Non-public archives

2005-07-29 Thread Michael Dinowitz
Will the ability to hide who is posting be good here? The post will still be there, but the name associated with it will not. Yeah - I think it sucks too sometimes ... Mikey - why does community have to be public? I mean it's just nonsense chatter - not tech talk. It REALLY doesn't have to be

RE: Non-public archives

2005-07-29 Thread Matthew Small
To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Non-public archives Will the ability to hide who is posting be good here? The post will still be there, but the name associated with it will not. Yeah - I think it sucks too sometimes ... Mikey - why does community have to be public? I mean it's just nonsense chatter

Re: Non-public archives

2005-07-29 Thread Paul Ihrig
we should all use nics. tht would fool them. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~| Find out how to get a fax number that sends and receives faxes using your current email address http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=64

Re: Non-public archives

2005-07-29 Thread Deanna Schneider
Removal of names would be good - but what about quoted names or direct references - I would think that could be hard to remove I'd prefer that it be a membership only list - you can't see it unless you're a member. On 7/29/05, Michael Dinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Will the ability to

Re: Non-public archives

2005-07-29 Thread Kevin Graeme
On 7/29/05, Michael Dinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Will the ability to hide who is posting be good here? The post will still be there, but the name associated with it will not. Not really. You can strip out the name from the header information, but it's a lot harder to strip out any and all

Re: Non-public archives

2005-07-29 Thread Tony Weeg
+1 :) tw On 7/29/05, Kevin Graeme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/29/05, Michael Dinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Will the ability to hide who is posting be good here? The post will still be there, but the name associated with it will not. Not really. You can strip out the name from

Re: Non-public archives

2005-07-29 Thread Loathe
Everyone knows I am loathe :) Paul Ihrig wrote: we should all use nics. tht would fool them. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100%

Re: Non-public archives

2005-07-29 Thread Loathe
It's really no big deal. It's my cell. If anything negative happens, which I don't think will happen, I can always just change it. It was my mistake, no reason to change anything to my mind. Although if it were a members only list I would be a bit more open in my posts. Not sure if that's

Re: Non-public archives

2005-07-29 Thread G
I'd advise discretion in ANY email one composes, even if you are sending it to a private list. If you don't want it public, don't put it in an email. That being said, i'm all for privatizing the archives. Any chance you can privatize social security while yer at it? I'd be all for that too :)

Re: Non-public archives

2005-07-29 Thread Kevin Graeme
On 7/29/05, Loathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Although if it were a members only list I would be a bit more open in my posts. Not sure if that's a good thing or not. Shut your pie hole you fucker! :-) As I said, nbd either way. Just sometimes might be nice. -Kevin

Re: Non-public archives

2005-07-29 Thread Tony Weeg
would there be a way to prevent google from indexing as well? tony On 7/29/05, Kevin Graeme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/29/05, Loathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Although if it were a members only list I would be a bit more open in my posts. Not sure if that's a good thing or not. Shut

RE: Non-public archives

2005-07-29 Thread Erika L Walker-Arnold
##| From: Kevin Graeme ##| ##| It's not a big deal, but sometimes I've just thought it ##| would be nice to be able to think of this list as a small ##| gathering of friends hanging out at someone's pad rather ##| than sitting in a public square with a bunch of microphones around. Well said.

Re: Non-public archives

2005-07-29 Thread Michael Dinowitz
Mickey's always swamped. We have a delayed issue of FA that's about to go out, a client site about to launch, a number of blog posts to Satan's Tool which will have to wait till later (www.satanstool.com), a tech blog site which isn't even started yet, and that's just the last hour. :) Let me

Re: Non-public archives

2005-07-29 Thread Ray Champagne
++! Tony Weeg wrote: +1 :) tw On 7/29/05, Kevin Graeme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/29/05, Michael Dinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Will the ability to hide who is posting be good here? The post will still be there, but the name associated with it will not. Not really. You

Re: Non-public archives

2005-07-29 Thread Jerry Johnson
The speed is good. The interface itself is slower than I would like, but the image searches and gallery displays are fast enough to offset that. Q: How do I get to my lightbox other than going to the portfolio, then searching, then clicking my lightbox. It took a while to get back to it. Q: how

Re: Non-public archives

2005-07-29 Thread Tony Weeg
theispot is cool. love the illustration art! one thing: preload those mouseover images. in firefox i moused over, then it took time to load the graphic, and then the effect happened. tw :) On 7/29/05, Michael Dinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mickey's always swamped. We have a delayed issue