> Jerry wrote:
> I don't know if his agenda still matches with his controller's agenda.
>
Yeah, I think that's true. Anybody that thinks Mr. Bush won because
of policy is nuts; he won because of the Christian right. It's an
element the left doesn't have so it's a tie breaker.
That Christian sup
I don't know if his agenda still matches with his controller's agenda.
I think we will know in the next few weeks if he has broken the leash
his handlers had on him. Robert's and Meirs will show us by their
actions if Bush fulfilled his promise to his farthest right
constituents by padding the cou
> Jerry wrote:
> I don't think he is weak now. He is in his second term and has nothing
> to be threatened with.
>
Except losing the control over his agenda, his legacy, and his
standing in the party.
~|
Find out how CFTicket ca
I don't think he is weak now. He is in his second term and has nothing
to be threatened with.
On 10/6/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jerry wrote:
> > Not without Bush's approval, it can't.
> > And do yo usee that happening at this point?
> >
>
> I think the political pressure is th
> Jerry wrote:
> Not without Bush's approval, it can't.
> And do yo usee that happening at this point?
>
I think the political pressure is there to do it - he's very weak now.
However if Mr. Fitzgerald needs more time, unless he's just cracked
something big, then there isn't much of a case.
Not without Bush's approval, it can't.
And do yo usee that happening at this point?
On 10/6/05, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> not really, the jury's term can be extended.
>
> larry
>
> On 10/6/05, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Don't forget Fitzgerald only has 13 days
not really, the jury's term can be extended.
larry
On 10/6/05, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't forget Fitzgerald only has 13 days left to finish whatever he
> wants to finish. Then he is done.
>
> On 10/6/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Sam wrote:
> > > We should
I'm pretty confident someone high up is getting indicted, just don't know who.
On 10/6/05, Gruss Gott wrote:
> > Sam wrote:
> > We should know by tomorrow.
> >
>
> Well we might never know. The flurry of volunteer activity could
> suggest behind the scenes maneuvering that will allow Mr. Fitzger
Don't forget Fitzgerald only has 13 days left to finish whatever he
wants to finish. Then he is done.
On 10/6/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sam wrote:
> > We should know by tomorrow.
> >
>
> Well we might never know. The flurry of volunteer activity could
> suggest behind the sce
> Sam wrote:
> We should know by tomorrow.
>
Well we might never know. The flurry of volunteer activity could
suggest behind the scenes maneuvering that will allow Mr. Fitzgerald
to drop the case. Then we'd never know exactly what happened only
that something did. And Mr. Fitzgerald would have
Here's hoping Rove's perp walk will be on the evening news tomorrow.
larry
On 10/6/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Gillers, a New York University law professor, said it was
> unusual for a witness to be called back to the grand jury four times
> and that the prosecutor's legal
We should know by tomorrow.
On 10/6/05, Gruss Gott wrote:
> Stephen Gillers, a New York University law professor, said it was
> unusual for a witness to be called back to the grand jury four times
> and that the prosecutor's legally required warning to Rove before this
> next appearance is "an om
Stephen Gillers, a New York University law professor, said it was
unusual for a witness to be called back to the grand jury four times
and that the prosecutor's legally required warning to Rove before this
next appearance is "an ominous sign" for the presidential adviser.
"It suggest Fitzgerald ha
13 matches
Mail list logo
