So, Gitmo would have been OK with you if it was in Iraq?
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>
> I don't know.
>
> Afghanistan = war zone.
>
> war zone != laws as normal
>
> I have no problem with keeping prisoners in a war zone using long-held
> prisoner of war rules, includ
> JJ wrote:
>
> No, we paid bounty for any people other people we didnt really know
> very well said were "combatants" captured "on the battlefield".
Yeah, that's what I said.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most impor
> jj wrote:
> Including a number of people that were "sold" to us for bounty, with
> no real idea of what they did. Captured in a dozen different countries
> (not just countries we are "at war" with or in.
>
Zackly. We paid bounty for any "combatants" captured on the "battlefield".
No, we paid bounty for any people other people we didnt really know
very well said were "combatants" captured "on the battlefield". Which
turns out now was often not true. people were actually kidnapped and
sold to settle family and business feuds, not because they were
terrorists. And they were t
Not from what I have read about who was and are there. I took from who
was there, how they got there, and what we were accusing them of (not
"charges" per se, just "he is bad"), that it became a place to send
those people we didn't know what else to do with.
Including a number of people that were
bwahaha. You silly dreamer you.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 9:58 AM, G Money wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>
>> The problem _I_ had with Guantanamo is that it was a "throw em all in
>> the same pot" plan, with no distinguishing between where they were
>> captured
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
> The problem _I_ had with Guantanamo is that it was a "throw em all in
> the same pot" plan, with no distinguishing between where they were
> captured, what they were doing, and no possible resolution, since it
> wasn't in a war zone, so th
I don't know.
Afghanistan = war zone.
war zone != laws as normal
I have no problem with keeping prisoners in a war zone using long-held
prisoner of war rules, including rights to medical but not legal,
until the end of the war in that war zone.
The problem _I_ had with Guantanamo is that it wa
When it comes to some points, there ain't none. I bet this action
pisses off a few Obama supporters.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/10/AR2009041003269.html
Obama Follows Bush Policy on Detainee Access to Courts
By R. Jeffrey Smith
Washington Post Staff Writer
Satur
