"BTW 7.9 is a horrible number."
Damn it Sam. I have to correct you every time.
7.9% is perfectly acceptable if the President has a "D" beside his name.
5.4% is horrible if the President has a "R" beside his name.
J
-
Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder
res
"The argument that the jobs aren't coming back fast enough is a specious
one which is impossible to prove that anyone else could have done it
better."
The argument that unemployment is only 8% is also specious since it doesn't
count the long term unemployed.
In the 90's, the government changed t
Yeah, saves me the trouble of doing all the writing.
.
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Op eds Sam? Really?
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Antholog
x: 630-310-8531
http://www.threeravensconsulting.com
-Original Message-
From: Vivec [mailto:gel21...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 6:41 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Barack's policies improving employment
So because the official
They are also real numbers published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
http://portalseven.com/employment/unemployment_rate_u6.jsp
BTW 7.9 is a horrible number.
.
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> So because the official numbers , which are verified, are looking too good,
> yo
So because the official numbers , which are verified, are looking too good,
you now have to add some nebulous additional factor?
Unemployment is unemployment. Looking at speculative "non participation of
the labour force" is ridiculous.
When you add those figures to the unemployment under Bush whe
[mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 4:47 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Barack's policies improving employment
Really? You present a facebook graph as an argument?
http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2012/10/11/obamas-real-unemployment
-rate-is-14-7-and-a-recessio
Really? You present a facebook graph as an argument?
http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2012/10/11/obamas-real-unemployment-rate-is-14-7-and-a-recessions-on-the-way/
or this:
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/080312-621034-real-unemployment-much-higher-than-white-house-claims.htm?p
if you compare the rate to other large scale economic downturns, while
not as good as the previous one, the current climb is much better than
what happened in the great depression, given the same time period. In
fact, the great depression offered a natural experiment. In 1936-1937,
the government
we lost 800,000 jobs in ONE MONTH
Jesus...i'd forgotten just how bad it was.
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> Actually guys,
>
> Here's the truth and a graph showing exactly what happened with the
> unemployement rate since Barak took office.
>
> Sam, for you in particular
Actually guys,
Here's the truth and a graph showing exactly what happened with the
unemployement rate since Barak took office.
Sam, for you in particular :)
https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/196160_10151246112671749_2101778253_n.jpg
http://www.barackobama.com/jobsrecord
A
Yeah, I thought the analysis of those numbers showed the initial reporting
to be pretty flawed.
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "You can't seriously claim a rise in unemployment is good?"
>
> It's called "doublethink". "1984" Read it or read it again.
>
>
> Oh, and un
"You can't seriously claim a rise in unemployment is good?"
It's called "doublethink". "1984" Read it or read it again.
Oh, and unemployment did not fall last month.
J
-
Do we really think that a government-dominated education is going to
produce citizens capable of dominating their gover
Officially ended June of 2009 making this the longest and non-existing
recovery ever.
.
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> Just wow.
>
> Not even going to address your point, which is questionable, that the
> recession *ENDED* when Obama took office.
>
> Are you saying that at t
Just wow.
Not even going to address your point, which is questionable, that the
recession *ENDED* when Obama took office.
Are you saying that at the point a recession ends, the unemployment rate
magically reduces back to pre-recession levels?
Please point out the last recession where this happe
You can't seriously claim a rise in unemployment is good?
The recession ended the first few months of Obama presidency yet
millions more are unemployed.
Just wow.
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> It seems that Obama's policies are slowly working and the unemployment
> situati
16 matches
Mail list logo
