"... , what makes anyone think they won't lie to a judge?"
Or just intimidate, blackmail, bribe, or set up (child porn seems to be the
easiest way to take someone down).
I'm sure all of the footage of incidental drone flights over the US will be
given to the NSA to "destroy".
J
-
Ninety per
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2012 2:58 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Good News: Court allows NSA and Google to keep their ties
secret
The NSA is probably the most abusive of our various intelligence agencies.
It is primarily an army of the military and isn't supposed to operate
domestically, but i
Word.
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> CISPA. Utah datacenter. Nuff said.
>
>
>
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:57 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> >
> > The NSA is probably the most abusive of our various intelligence
> agencies.
> > It is primarily an army of the military and isn't supp
CISPA. Utah datacenter. Nuff said.
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:57 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> The NSA is probably the most abusive of our various intelligence agencies.
> It is primarily an army of the military and isn't supposed to operate
> domestically, but it was central to the wireless wiret
The NSA is probably the most abusive of our various intelligence agencies.
It is primarily an army of the military and isn't supposed to operate
domestically, but it was central to the wireless wiretapping program, and
it's leaders like to lie to congress, what makes anyone think they won't
lie to
"You sound like someone with something to hide. Do you have something to
hide?"
If I did, I sure wouldn't use it with anything related to google.
"I am sure anyone they are spying on will totally let their guard down now."
Or stop using google.
"The NSA could save a lot of time and money if
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Dana wrote:
> well, this is 17, which I did not attend, but looks pretty relevant:
>
> http://www.securitytube.net/video/3425
>
Good thing I'm going camping tonight as I'd loose some sleep over this if I
was surfing the night away...
Reminder for Monday, look
well, this is 17, which I did not attend, but looks pretty relevant:
http://www.securitytube.net/video/3425
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Dana wrote:
> yeah that would be something they'd think about all right. They only
> question in my mind is "proven" vs "generally assumed".
>
>
> On Sa
yeah that would be something they'd think about all right. They only
question in my mind is "proven" vs "generally assumed".
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:41 AM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> Yeah I read something similar on an anonops wiki.
>
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> >
> > by th
Yeah I read something similar on an anonops wiki.
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> by the way, to clarify, as I understand it the problem is not so much tor
> itself as the endpoints. I found this with the quick google that I had time
> for:
>
> https://blog.torproject.org/blog/
lotsa good stuff there, communication networks in Arab Spring situations
and the like
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:33 AM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> Looking.
>
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm pretty sure that's been proven. If you're really interested I can
> > probably fi
by the way, to clarify, as I understand it the problem is not so much tor
itself as the endpoints. I found this with the quick google that I had time
for:
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/bittorrent-over-tor-isnt-good-idea
but I think it goes beyond bittorrent. I am fairly certain that appelbaum
Looking.
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> I'm pretty sure that's been proven. If you're really interested I can
> probably find you a reference on that. It would be on the DEFCON site if
> you want to look yourself.
>
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:11 AM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> >
>
by the way:
http://www.johnpilger.com/articles/you-are-all-suspects-now-what-are-you-going-to-do-about-it
that's the view from Australia.
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Dana wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that's been proven. If you're really interested I can
> probably find you a reference on t
I'm pretty sure that's been proven. If you're really interested I can
probably find you a reference on that. It would be on the DEFCON site if
you want to look yourself.
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:11 AM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> Throw in some TOR IRC chats just to prove it's not secure.
>
> This is
Throw in some TOR IRC chats just to prove it's not secure.
This is a great idea.
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Casey Dougall - Uber Website Solutions <
ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> >
> > It's all good people. If you're
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> It's all good people. If you're not doing anything wrong, you have nothing
> to worry about, right?
I say we start a stopwatch, buy a domain with a pre-paid credit card, setup
google hosted, a few email addresses like Mr Black, Mr Whit
well gee. You have to applaud the security of the secrecy, hmm? Seriously
though... this does look like bad mojo
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> Talk about more fascist...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry Barnes [mailto:crit
Talk about more fascist...
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Barnes [mailto:critic...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 8:46 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Good News: Court allows NSA and Google to keep their ties secret
Court allows NSA and Google to keep their ties secret (
http://rt.
You sound like someone with something to hide. Do you have something to
hide?
This whole song and dance is asinine and a waste of time. By defending
themselves for maybe or maybe not doing anything, the NSA might as well
be standing in a public forum with a bullhorn screaming "Don't look at
20 matches
Mail list logo
