thanks, that helps a little :)
- Original Message -
From: Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:34:01 -0400
Subject: Re: al-qaeda and Iraq and the war
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It was supposed to be but the moment Israel was created, all
It was supposed to be but the moment Israel was created, all of it's
Arab neighbors attacked it and basically took over some of the land
that was supposed to be Israel and all of the land that was supposed
to be Palestine. Rather than giving a state to their Arab
(Palestinian) brothers, they forced
Judith,
Is Palestine actually a country? Granted that supporting terrorists is
immoral, is it grounds for causing the deaths of innocent third
parties? Isn't that what made the terrorists terrorists?
I hope that these questions and any ignorance they betray are not
offensive, and if they are I ap
eedom fighter
> attack and the only
> difference is the blurry bias?
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 06:51:07 -0500
> Subject: Re: al-qaeda and Iraq and the war
> To: CF-Community <[EMAI
That's a big "if". It's entrenched in our history of foreign policy.
-Kevin
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:24:43 -0400, Jerry Johnson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't have a problem accepting the argument, if the US has changed its views on the subject.
>
> It's like a smoker who quits smoking. They
I don't have a problem accepting the argument, if the US has changed its views on the subject.
It's like a smoker who quits smoking. They often become the most rabid anti-smokers. That doesn't make them hypocrites, it makes them converts.
I think It would only be two-faced is the US said - "You c
e blurry bias?
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 06:51:07 -0500
> Subject: Re: al-qaeda and Iraq and the war
> To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I'm not justifying the actions on any side.
-qaeda and Iraq and the war
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm not justifying the actions on any side. I'm simply saying that the
labels of "terrorist" and freedom fighter", "funding terror" and "aid
to victims" can get blurry based on bias.
ry.
sorry to interject.
John
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 7:51 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: al-qaeda and Iraq and the war
I'm not justifying the actions on any side. I'm simply saying that the
labels
I'm not justifying the actions on any side. I'm simply saying that the
labels of "terrorist" and freedom fighter", "funding terror" and "aid
to victims" can get blurry based on bias.
Honestly, the whole thing makes me sick.
-Kevin
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:51:17 -0400, Judith Dinowitz
<[EMAIL PROTE
Countries invaded by Saddam? 1 (Kuwait)
Countries attacked by Saddam without provocation? At least 2 (Israel and Saudi
Arabia)
Terrorist groups supported by Saddam directly? over a dozen Palestinian
terrorist groups
Weapons of mass destruction used by Saddam? 1 proven (poison gas)
Weapons of mass d
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:55:44 -0400, Angel Stewart
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Iraq supported Hamas I believe, paying money to the families of suicide
> > bombers.
>
> And we have sent aid packages to families of the Taliban and al Qaeda
> in Afghanistan. We have been offering buckets of cas
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:55:44 -0400, Angel Stewart
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Iraq supported Hamas I believe, paying money to the families of suicide
> bombers.
And we have sent aid packages to families of the Taliban and al Qaeda
in Afghanistan. We have been offering buckets of cash to people in
I believe this is true.
- Original Message -
From: Angel Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:55:44 -0400
Subject: RE: al-qaeda and Iraq and the war
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Iraq supported Hamas I believe, paying money to the families of suicide
b
Iraq supported Hamas I believe, paying money to the families of suicide
bombers.
The war was predicated upon WMD and Saddam having a direct hand in 9/11.
THe links were drawn , and the implication was solid by the bush
administration that he had something to do with it. That was why polls
found
> In it he says terrorists tried to turn our cities
> into killing fields.
> They failed. (Not using quotes as I don't want to
> restart to be sure,
> but very close to this anyway)
>
> Remember, this is a speech whose focus is that we
> had won in Iraq.
> Bush THEN moves on to talk about Afg
16 matches
Mail list logo
