RE: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-28 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
> I dunno this reeks to me more of "I'm gonna get that > teacher back for (insert various reasons here)" then "Oh > my God she's wearing a cross my rights have been violated" > I guess in my grand scheme of things, someone wearing an > emblem of their religion (Star of David, Cross, Crescent, > Pe

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-28 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
Or say... Margaret Thatcher. :P I thought they called it "holiday". > Aye, the girl across the street is on vaca or something. > :) > The Queen mum? I guess so, overactive imagination aside. > :) > Dana wrote: >> tsk. I submit that there are indeed cases where the >> sight of a pearl necklace

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-28 Thread Ray Champagne
Aye, the girl across the street is on vaca or something. :) The Queen mum? I guess so, overactive imagination aside. :) Dana wrote: > tsk. I submit that there are indeed cases where the sight of a pearl > necklace would not stir your obviously overactive imagination :) Is > that girl across th

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-28 Thread Dana
tsk. I submit that there are indeed cases where the sight of a pearl necklace would not stir your obviously overactive imagination :) Is that girl across the street not home today or something? LOL. Seriously, a pearl necklace on the Queen Mother would be just that, right? Dana On 6/28/05, Ray Ch

RE: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-28 Thread SStewart
ana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 03:40 pm To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Thanks ACLU! Importance: Low Reluctantly, I agree. Assuming of course that the facts of the case are as reported here. I think French schoolgirls should be able to wear headscarves, and American teacher

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-28 Thread Ray Champagne
Unless it's a Pearl necklace. :) Dana wrote: > true... and children are subject to all sort of limitations as to the > clothes *they* can wear to school. While I think that some > restrictions are necessary (see-through blouses and gang colors come > to mind) a number of schools I have dealt with

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-28 Thread Dana
true... and children are subject to all sort of limitations as to the clothes *they* can wear to school. While I think that some restrictions are necessary (see-through blouses and gang colors come to mind) a number of schools I have dealt with had some really silly restrictions. Pink frilly dresse

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-28 Thread Dana
ss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 12:03 pm > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Thanks ACLU! > Importance: Low > > > Larry wrote: > > Where and when? The cases that the ACLU have taken on are constitutionally > > based. > > The teacher w

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-28 Thread Dana
I don't think a smaller organization would be capable of taking on the Patriot Act. Dana On 6/28/05, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Smaller organizations, like shelters, do a great job of addressing the > local symptoms. But sometimes you need a large organization to deal > with the sy

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-28 Thread Gruss Gott
> Sam wrote: > How sterile do you want your children's environment to > be? > How dirty do we want it to be? ~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-28 Thread Gruss Gott
> Brian wrote: > In this scenario, the school could be perfectly within their right to tell > teachers that they aren't allowed to wear ANY symbol such as a cross or > pentagram or.but this would be decided on a school by school basis, and > not by a federal mandate. (If one school won't let yo

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-28 Thread Sam
What if the teacher's white and the kids are not? What if they have an accent? What if they wear expensive clothing, jewelry, nice shoes or gang colors? How sterile do you want your children's environment to be? On 6/28/05, Larry Lyons wrote: > While I agree that this may be a bit extreme I can

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-28 Thread G
> > On 6/28/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > have a dress code for teachers? Should they be free to endorse any > lifestyle they'd like? How about if the teacher had a pentagram or > Nazi symbol? > Good questions. The way I see it, there are two considerations here. 1) The federal st

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-28 Thread Larry Lyons
>One case comes to my mind. A public school teacher wore a gold cross around >her neck. Just a little necklace. > >A child complained that it was offensive (we won't discuss the silliness of >this assertion). The ACLU came swooping in on the side of the CHILD. This >really bothered me, as I see

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-28 Thread Gruss Gott
> Ike wrote: > nose and eyebrow rings all the time, which is trivial, so I don't > think it's beyond the pale to ask a public servant to act as though > they're serving the public and not just those members of the public > who happen to agree with their particular religious inclinations. > I agre

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-28 Thread G
> > Evidence please. The ACLU's annual report show that most of their money is > from small donations, according to their 2004 annual report, > http://www.aclu.org/About/About.cfm?ID=17235&c=204 > > Moreover with that argument most organizations to the right of center fit > within your criteria,

RE: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-28 Thread SStewart
, Suite 300 Chantilly, VA 20151 Phone: (703) 995-1737 Fax: (703) 834-5527 -Original Message- From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 12:03 pm To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Thanks ACLU! Importance: Low > Larry wrote: > Where and when? The cases

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-28 Thread Kevin Graeme
BAM! Nazi post. On 6/28/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > have a dress code for teachers? Should they be free to endorse any > lifestyle they'd like? How about if the teacher had a pentagram or > Nazi symbol? ~| Disco

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-28 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
> One case comes to my mind. A public school teacher wore a > gold cross around her neck. Just a little necklace. > A child complained that it was offensive (we won't discuss > the silliness of this assertion). The ACLU came swooping > in on the side of the CHILD. This really bothered me, as > I s

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-28 Thread Gruss Gott
> Larry wrote: > Where and when? The cases that the ACLU have taken on are constitutionally > based. The teacher with the cross around her neck is maybe one - however there is an issue here: 1.) On the one hand the teacher has a right to express her religion (cross, yamaka, head scarf) 2.) On

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-28 Thread Larry Lyons
>They simply suffer the same problem that many large organizations of their >ilk do. They receive disproportionately large monetary donations from a >handful of people. These people have their specific agendas. Some are good, >some are suspect. The organization sees that the money is used to fur

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-28 Thread Kevin Graeme
Smaller organizations, like shelters, do a great job of addressing the local symptoms. But sometimes you need a large organization to deal with the systemic problems. But yeah, there are lots of big orgs that take things to extremes. On 6/28/05, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > They simply suffer t

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-28 Thread G
One case comes to my mind. A public school teacher wore a gold cross around her neck. Just a little necklace. A child complained that it was offensive (we won't discuss the silliness of this assertion). The ACLU came swooping in on the side of the CHILD. This really bothered me, as I see the te

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-28 Thread Gruss Gott
> Brian wrote: > And I'm not sure I agree with your ascertion that you have to go "over the > top" to get normal stuff done. When an organization starts going "over the > top", they start to trivialize themselves in my mind (PETA for example). > Do have any examples of positions that that ACLU ha

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-28 Thread G
They simply suffer the same problem that many large organizations of their ilk do. They receive disproportionately large monetary donations from a handful of people. These people have their specific agendas. Some are good, some are suspect. The organization sees that the money is used to further

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-28 Thread Gruss Gott
> Brian wrote: > I'd advise you strongly to keep your hard earned money, or to give to > another charitable organization. > Please remind me again of your objections to them. Some of the stuff they pursue is, granted, a bit over the top but then it seems you have to be a bit over the top to get

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-28 Thread G
I'd advise you strongly to keep your hard earned money, or to give to another charitable organization. >I would wholeheartedly suggest to any and all of you who are not active > members of the ACLU to join right now: > > http://www.aclu.org > > It's only $35 per year, and your money is being wis

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-27 Thread Adam Churvis
evelopers * ColdFusion MX Master Class * Advanced Development with CFMX and SQL Server 2000 - Original Message - From: "Gruss Gott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 3:10 PM Subject: Thanks ACLU! > Personally I'm glad

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-27 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
> I think the ACLU is a perfect example of how true liberty > and freedom is NOT supposed to be all sunshine and happy > feelings. Liberty is not always easy or pretty. Thanks Ray. I'm very tempted to archive this thought somewhere... s. isaac dealey 954.522.6080 new epoch : isn't it time for a

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-27 Thread Ben Doom
Dana wrote: > I think that if there were not an ACLU we would have to invent it. > Which is more work and sacrifice than I really want to commit to, so I > am grateful to those who have done it already :) Amen, preach it again! --Ben ~

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-27 Thread Gruss Gott
> Dana wrote: > I think that if there were not an ACLU we would have to invent it. > Which is more work and sacrifice than I really want to commit to, so I > am grateful to those who have done it already :) > Well said!! That's what I was mumbling. ~~

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-27 Thread Dana
I think that if there were not an ACLU we would have to invent it. Which is more work and sacrifice than I really want to commit to, so I am grateful to those who have done it already :) Dana On 6/27/05, Ben Doom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think there's no such thing as an organization that's

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-27 Thread Ben Doom
I think there's no such thing as an organization that's ALL good, but the ACLU is a darn sight better than most! Plus, as a denizen of this fair land called Kentucky (we have lots of fairs, you see) I'm glad that someone is taking steps to put the smackdown on the bigoted jerks who think that Chri

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-27 Thread Raymond Camden
I think the ACLU is a perfect example of how true liberty and freedom is NOT supposed to be all sunshine and happy feelings. Liberty is not always easy or pretty. On 6/27/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Personally I'm glad we have a organization like the ACLU who is taking > these case

Re: Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-27 Thread Jennifer Larkin
Me too! The ACLU rocks. On 6/27/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Personally I'm glad we have a organization like the ACLU who is taking > these cases (10 commandments) to court. > > While I know some of you think the ACLU isn't all good (I'm still > undecided), in this case they were.

Thanks ACLU!

2005-06-27 Thread Gruss Gott
Personally I'm glad we have a organization like the ACLU who is taking these cases (10 commandments) to court. While I know some of you think the ACLU isn't all good (I'm still undecided), in this case they were. ~| Discover CFTi