> Umm stop the bus you're way off.
>
> in 1935 & 1936 germany was very weak very poor and who are
> the allies you talk of? Even in 1939 Germanys military was
> not ready for war not until 1941 was its military machine of
> any real depth. 1939 if the allies could have kept it
> together they
1) Germany and it's allies were strong and allowed to build up massive
military machines. Iraq is not strong and has not been allowed (even at
it's height) to build military machines capable of conquest on a global
scale.
>>> Germany was not strong. After the first world war it had been disarmed
e.
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 2:58 PM
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[
domination of the USA over the
world will be complete.unless the UN pays us
. one hundred million dollars.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 2:58 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 7:53 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
>
>
> Ok,
>
> Don't compare Iraq to 19400 or 41 Germany. Compare it
t: RE: The Choice Before Us
> Jim, were not trying to figure out what to eat here.
> We are in fact talking about dictators and powerfull
> government figures. So, to compare and contrast with
> historical figures is quite valid.
Comparison with comparible historical figures perhaps.
> Jim,
>
> What are your feelings on the treaties signed by Iraq at the
> end of the Gulf war agreeing to voluntarily disarm, get rid
> of all WMD, other weaponry (such as long range missiles)?
>
> Should the Iraqis be held to these agreements?
> What should be the penalties for not upholding t
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 1:16 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
>
>
> Jim,
>
> What are your feelings on the treaties signed by Iraq at the
>
Any agreement is only as strong as the paper its written on as we've seen from
the North Korea situation. As for the world community, that concept (as well as
the UN) is a joke. All you need is a country or two to be contrary for its own
interests and it fails. Lets look at some situations:
Iraq -
Jim,
What are your feelings on the treaties signed by Iraq at the end of the Gulf war
agreeing to voluntarily disarm, get rid of all WMD, other weaponry (such as long range
missiles)?
Should the Iraqis be held to these agreements?
What should be the penalties for not upholding them?
What about
> Crew, sorry to keep this going but I cant let this go by.
> Jim, Lets take this point by point.
>
>
> Germany and it's allies were in a position to militarily,
> technologically and economically control much (perhaps all)
> of Europe and significant areas of Asia and Africa as well.
> Sadd
> //snip
> not to be inflamitory, but surely any argument that applies
> to the Iraq
> situation apart from oil applies more to South Korea?
> //snip
>
> Was that not the biggest dodge I have ever seen. If you say
> the oil argument holds water, prove it. I haven't seen any
> valid argument
2003 8:20 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
I have to agree. I think comparing Saddam to Hitler is incorrect and
potentially grossly offensive to the memories of the millions of people who
died fighting him.
While we are at it, lets add Saudi to the list. Their history of hu
Well, the answer to this question lies in what type of trees they are, who owns the
lumber rights, and who is in office in Washington and at the state capitol.
Jerry Johnson
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/17/03 08:34AM >>>
It seems extremely simple to me. If you have a small fire in a huge forest
full
how about dropping a few of them babies on Iraq? :-)
>-Original Message-
>From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 9:58 AM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: The Choice Before Us
>
>Three words for you: World Pork Expo. Best tenderlo
//snip
What about the pork tenderloin sandwiches? One of my favorite Iowa memories.
//snip
Three words for you: World Pork Expo. Best tenderloins in the Universe.
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?foru
//snip
1. the iraq's have an oil stash
2. Its worth a small fortune, enough to bolster an economy for a not
insignificant while
//snip
Ok, that wasn't so hard. So you think that we want to risk American lives so we can
get more oil to help the slumping economy. Doesn't do much for supporting
Sent: 18 February 2003 15:31
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
lets think
1. the iraq's have an oil stash
2. Its worth a small fortune, enough to bolster an economy for a not
insignificant while
3. All the other arguments, have no definete proof and do not really
...yes and why is there no mention of them?
As I recall, Bush's original justification for interest in Iraq was the
"you're harbouring terrorists so you're in deep shit" argument, but it has
turned into what I can only describe as military gamesmanship looking for a
reason.
Which in my opinion is
-
From: "John Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 8:46 AM
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
> Exciting, so bacon is pretty cheap there? I love baconand I think I
> speak for everyone
the combination leads me to my conclusion and i'm not a liberal for the
record
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 February 2003 14:28
To: CF-Community
Subject: The Choice Before Us
//snip
surely i don't have to prove anything. If your go
-Community
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
I have to agree. I think comparing Saddam to Hitler is incorrect and
potentially grossly offensive to the memories of the millions of people who
died fighting him.
While we are at it, lets add Saudi to the list. Their history of human
rights abuses is m
//snip
surely i don't have to prove anything. If your government and mine wish to
attack another country its THEM that have to prove they have the right to do
so. So far in my opinion and many others, they havn't.
//snip
Why the spin? Can't you defend your assertion that the war in Iraq is a
was outdated intel. I'm not saying wait for the "smoking gun".
Just show me a new gun with a round in the chamber and fingerprints on it
and I'll get out of the way.
-Kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesda
? There are
countless countries that the US and UK should be liberating.
w
-Original Message-
From: Mark Smyth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 February 2003 15:13
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
comparing the iraq of today to Nazi germany is virtually
t not more
applicable to another dodgy country
-Original Message-
From: Andre Turrettini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 February 2003 15:04
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
Crew, sorry to keep this going but I cant let this go by.
Jim, Lets take this point by point.
G
Crew, sorry to keep this going but I cant let this go by.
Jim, Lets take this point by point.
Germany and it's allies were in a position to militarily,
technologically and economically control much (perhaps all) of Europe
and significant areas of Asia and Africa as well. Saddam is barely
capabl
in Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 February 2003 13:51
To: CF-Community
Subject: The Choice Before Us
//snip
not to be inflamitory, but surely any argument that applies to the Iraq
situation apart from oil applies more to South Korea?
//snip
Was that not the biggest dodge I have ever
//snip
not to be inflamitory, but surely any argument that applies to the Iraq
situation apart from oil applies more to South Korea?
//snip
Was that not the biggest dodge I have ever seen. If you say the oil argument holds
water, prove it. I haven't seen any valid arguments that prove oil is
mmon rebuttal from people. I feel very
angry about how my government, and Prime Minister in particular, is dragging
us into a war without taking account of public opinion.
w
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 February 2003 13:38
To: CF-Community
Subj
//snip
As an argument it holds more water than the Titanic that is the WMD
position, or for that matter the moral outrage position.
//snip
As yet, I have not seen a convincing argument to make me believe it holds any water.
Feel free to try though, you never know.
~
Sent: 18 February 2003 13:25
To: CF-Community
Subject: The Choice Before Us
//snip
but don't forget, we aren't allowed to talk about oil. we'd be stupid if we
thought that's what it was all about.
//snip
Obviously your are referring to my comment to Maureen. I never said you
w
//snip
but don't forget, we aren't allowed to talk about oil. we'd be stupid if we
thought that's what it was all about.
//snip
Obviously your are referring to my comment to Maureen. I never said you were stupid
if you thought that, just that you lose credibility in my eye, as that argument
d
yup...thought I might make a trip up to the big smoke!!
w
-Original Message-
From: Mark Smyth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 February 2003 12:44
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
not sure as yet, havn't given it a great deal of thought.
Going to have a close
hoice Before Us
so sorry... :)
you going to cf-europe in may?
w
-Original Message-
From: Mark Smyth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 February 2003 12:14
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
please don't be ridiculous ;)
-Original Message-
From: Will Swa
so sorry... :)
you going to cf-europe in may?
w
-Original Message-
From: Mark Smyth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 February 2003 12:14
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
please don't be ridiculous ;)
-Original Message-
From: Will Swain [mailto:[
please don't be ridiculous ;)
-Original Message-
From: Will Swain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 February 2003 12:07
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
absolutely
but don't forget, we aren't allowed to talk about oil. we'd be stupid if we
th
absolutely
but don't forget, we aren't allowed to talk about oil. we'd be stupid if we
thought that's what it was all about.
w
-Original Message-
From: Mark Smyth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 February 2003 12:02
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: The Choice
: The Choice Before Us
I think she meant that it was heartening to see so many people of like mind
re the war, from all different walks of life and backgrounds.
w
-Original Message-
From: Bill Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 February 2003 18:46
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: The
I think she meant that it was heartening to see so many people of like mind
re the war, from all different walks of life and backgrounds.
w
-Original Message-
From: Bill Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 February 2003 18:46
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: The Choice Before Us
At 06:25 PM 2/17/03, Jim wrote:
>It's become a joke in and of itself to bring up Hitler in an argument.
Godwin's Law /prov./ [Usenet] "As a Internet discussion grows longer, the
probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."
There is a tradition in many groups that, once
> lol now thats just silly.
>
> I'm not taking either side but i think that people DONT want
> to give a dictator the power to perhaps move into the HITLER realm.
>
> I would put Saddam into the HITLERish category he just does
> not run a major power like hitler did.
>
> Comparing a murdering
> Jim, were not trying to figure out what to eat here.
> We are in fact talking about dictators and powerfull
> government figures. So, to compare and contrast with
> historical figures is quite valid.
Comparison with comparible historical figures perhaps.
Hitler and Saddam are incomparable for
worldwide country with no
enemies, and complete and utter domination of other cultures.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 2:26 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
LOL! I'll have to remember
y
threat.
-Kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 12:10 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
>
>
> > I wonder if you were transported back in time to 1939 and you
> >
003 1:57 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: The Choice Before Us
lol now thats just silly.
I'm not taking either side but i think that people DONT want to give a
dictator the power to perhaps move into the HITLER realm.
I would put Saddam into the HITLERish category he just does not run a m
itler is not even in the same ballpark as
saying hitler ate fish :)
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 1:09 PM
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
> I wonder if y
t: Monday, February 17, 2003 11:10 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
>
>
> > I wonder if you were transported back in time to 1939 and you
> > had the choice to protest against war with the Nazi's, you
> > would probably march up and down the st
PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 10:56 AM
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
would have loved to, but with twin 4 week old boys who both have streaming
colds, unfortunately I couldn't.
My mother in law went though, she had a g
How dare you defame Office Space by including it in this discussion!!
;-p
-Original Message-
From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 1:10 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
> I wonder if you were transported back in time to 1939
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
theres a world of difference between disagreeing and getting pissed off.
mind you, i don't really know why I'm involved in this at all. guess im just
nosy!! ;)
w
-Original Message-
From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 Februa
> I wonder if you were transported back in time to 1939 and you
> had the choice to protest against war with the Nazi's, you
> would probably march up and down the street saying "all we
> are saying, is give peace a chance" as the Nazi armor rolled over you.
"The nazis had little pieces of fla
> From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 11:23 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: The Choice Before Us
>
>
> Wonder who's numbers those are, as this line right here casts doubt:
>
> Organizers estimated the crowd at 100,0
ubject: RE: The Choice Before Us
right...because that would be wrong, to be angry about the position of the
original e-mail.
If the world was a massive field of daisies that we could all romp in as
one, and jump around and love each other, then I would agree with everything
that was said. But unf
come oni think we are off topic here now ;)
which is probably a good thing
w
-Original Message-
From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 February 2003 14:54
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
I could go for one right nowI'm sta
t: RE: The Choice Before Us
i was there, did you go will?
-Original Message-
From: Will Swain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 February 2003 12:43
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
Anywhere between 1 and 2 million people in London.
That makes this easily the biggest
ay, February 17, 2003 12:23 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: The Choice Before Us
Wonder who's numbers those are, as this line right here casts doubt:
Organizers estimated the crowd at 100,000; police put it at 30,000.
Organizers always inflate there numbers. So is 6 million the organizer
t
tive moral outrage.
- Original Message -
From: "Harkins,Patrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 11:19 AM
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
> http://makeashorterlink.com/?N57721083
>
>
http://makeashorterlink.com/?N57721083
>-Original Message-
>From: Angel Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 7:40 AM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
>
>
>What 'overwhelming' turnout?
>What's th
I could go for one right nowI'm starving
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 9:51 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: The Choice Before Us
I eat some bacon, but the Pork chops here are awesome. They have Iowa cho
I eat some bacon, but the Pork chops here are awesome. They have Iowa chops
as big as porterhouses! Great stuff!
- Original Message -
From: "John Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 8:46 AM
S
Choice Before Us
No, pigs. We have more pigs per capita than people.
- Original Message -
From: "John Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 8:40 AM
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
> Yes
No, pigs. We have more pigs per capita than people.
- Original Message -
From: "John Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 8:40 AM
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
> Yes, but think about a
Yes, but think about all that corn you get to see growingthat is Iowa,
isn't it?
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 9:35 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: The Choice Before Us
well 1 out of 2 ain't bad! I
nt: Monday, February 17, 2003 8:31 AM
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
> I have lived in California, Louisiana, and Florida and I love Michigan the
> best, I think it is the friendly people and
> solid professional football team that makes me most
> happyoh...crapwhat have I done
: Monday, February 17, 2003 9:20 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: The Choice Before Us
My wife is from GR and I have lived there, Lansing and Ann Arbor. We have
a cottage on Gunn Lake up near Ludington, so we're back there quite a bit.
- Original Message -
From: "John Stanle
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 8:17 AM
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
> Waterford, which is near Pontiac. Are you from Michigan?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 9:12 AM
> To: CF-Community
>
Waterford, which is near Pontiac. Are you from Michigan?
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 9:12 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: The Choice Before Us
John,
Where in Michigan are you?
Kevin
- Original Message
John,
Where in Michigan are you?
Kevin
- Original Message -
From: "John Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 7:46 AM
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
> i dont have 3 feet of snow,
Yea i miss the snow too :(
- Original Message -
From: "John Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 8:46 AM
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
i dont have 3 feet of snow, but happily I dont hav
: Re: The Choice Before Us
If you switched off how come you emailed :)
Seemed more like you got switched upto super hyped up lol
Let us just go and relax in our nice 80+ weather today while everyone else
gets to play in their 3 feet of snow
- Original Message -
From: "Angel St
TED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 8:19 AM
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
Not more anger than what was in the original email about 'little girls'
dying.
I switch off whenever I start reading something that uses imagined
thre
Hrm i've been starting to think that many "extreme" things we can do
without.
- Original Message -
From: "Angel Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 8:12 AM
Subject: RE: The
CTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 2:02 PM
Subject: The Choice Before Us
First, you need to take note that Saddam has actually been a territory
aggressor this is perhaps the most important point. Saddam was mounting
his military next to the Saudi border before we invaded (thus the reason
: CF-Community
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
You have hit the nail on the head.
These 'peace protestors' are extremist.
Peace at all Costs = War At All costs.
Sadly..it WILL take a major city of the world getting hit by nuclear, or
chemical weapons...or for a plague to spread
t: RE: The Choice Before Us
wowsuch anger.
chill
w
-Original Message-
From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 February 2003 13:03
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
Maureen, the choice before us was made by the sadistic, gun toting madman
who continu
i was there, did you go will?
-Original Message-
From: Will Swain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 February 2003 12:43
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
Anywhere between 1 and 2 million people in London.
That makes this easily the biggest ever turnout for any kind
I am a lefty type myself though i feel at was as onesided as some of the
stuff i hear come out of
the warhawks mouth :)
- Original Message -
From: "Maureen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:14
PROTECTED]]
wowsuch anger.
chill
w
-Original Message-
From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Maureen, the choice before us was made by the sadistic, gun toting
madman who continues to threaten world peace and stability. I have
served in the military and would gladly give
wowsuch anger.
chill
w
-Original Message-
From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 February 2003 13:03
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
Maureen, the choice before us was made by the sadistic, gun toting madman
who continues to threaten world peace
-
From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Maureen, the choice before us was made by the sadistic, gun toting
madman who continues to threaten world peace and stability. I have
served in the military and would gladly give my legs so that MY children
don't have to grow up in a world with this
Maureen, the choice before us was made by the sadistic, gun toting madman
who continues to threaten world peace and stability. I have served in the
military and would gladly give my legs so that MY children don't have to
grow up in a world with this pestilence inhabiting it. I can't beli
*folds arms*
humph
-Gel
-Original Message-
From: Will Swain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Anywhere between 1 and 2 million people in London.
That makes this easily the biggest ever turnout for any kind of march in
this country.
And this at a time when people are supposedly apathetic.
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 February 2003 12:40
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
What 'overwhelming' turnout?
What's the population of those cities where marches took place?
How many people turned out?
How is that overwhelming?
-Gel
-Original Messag
What 'overwhelming' turnout?
What's the population of those cities where marches took place?
How many people turned out?
How is that overwhelming?
-Gel
-Original Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
You know what, Kevin, I'm going to practice what I preach and refuse to
not say so publically.
- Original Message -
From: "samcfug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: The Choice Before Us
> You state all the facts, why no one should support the S
ee this country pulling its troops
out of Germany, and any other European country that opposes us. A little more
nationalism would be a good thing, I think in my own libertarian mind.
=
Douglas White
| Subject: The Choice Before Us
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [
First, you need to take note that Saddam has actually been a territory aggressor
this is perhaps the most important point. Saddam was mounting his military next to
the Saudi border before we invaded (thus the reason we were allowed to use Saudi land
for the attack - they hate us perhaps more
In other words you have no sustance to your argument. That's fine I
understand.
- Original Message -
From: "Maureen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 1:02 AM
Subject: Re: The Choice Before Us
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Braver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 11:40 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
>
>
> I'm taking what I believe to be a moderate stance, as follows:
I agree with most o
Ben,
I believe that I am a moderate as well, although I am on the right-hand
side. I am wrestling with what is the right thing to do. I've added my
thoughts below, which unfortunately, are mostly questions for which I would
like to see an answer. Unfortunately, we really don't seem to be gettin
You know what, Kevin, I'm going to practice what I preach and refuse to
argue with you about this. I posted something that reflected my opinion
and based on the overwhelming turnout for the peace marches today, the
opinion of millions of other people. So I'm going to bask in peace and
quiet,
03:24 AM 2/15/03 -0500, you wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 2:23 AM
>> To: CF-Community
>> Subject: Re: The Choice Before Us
>>
>>
>> At 12:22 AM 2/15/03, Kevin wrot
me things,
only he is backing his words with actions.
- Original Message -
From: "Maureen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 5:30 PM
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
> At 06:20 PM 2/15/03,
lying about his
motive?
-Original Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 5:31 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
At 06:20 PM 2/15/03, Andy wrote:
>Ok. We have a precise list of what Saddam is missing. What is Bush ly
At 06:20 PM 2/15/03, Andy wrote:
>Ok. We have a precise list of what Saddam is missing. What is Bush lying
>about?
Motive.
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription:
http://www.hous
Ok. We have a precise list of what Saddam is missing. What is Bush lying
about?
-Original Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 5:06 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us
At 05:51 PM 2/15/03, you wrote:
>If we don'
At 05:51 PM 2/15/03, you wrote:
>If we don't go to war people will die. This is also an undisputed fact.
>So is the sun rising in the morning, setting at night, taxes, and much of
>the other tripe used by both sides to avoid a logical discussion.
>
>The US has cited what we know about Saddam. W
If we don't go to war people will die. This is also an undisputed fact.
So is the sun rising in the morning, setting at night, taxes, and much of
the other tripe used by both sides to avoid a logical discussion.
The US has cited what we know about Saddam. What I continue to find
amazing is the
anyone is
out there let's go!
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: The Choice Before Us
> Of course people will die. Th
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
