Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "You can't raise taxes on top 2% because those are the job creators and this
> same top 2% relies on the markets and companies where we're fucked again
> because profit is the bottom line."
>
> Fifty percent of the citizens do not pay federal income taxes.
>
> In 2008, the
"I've been trying to hire a dependable graphic artist to do redesigns on my
websites for months, and can't get anyone who actually wants to work. Lots
of people who say they want a paycheck..none who will show up and do the
job."
You want someone to work instead of facebooking and twittering? Wh
Yes, I know. But the rhetoric is that raising taxes would kill job
creation. So it's simple. Create jobs, pay a lower tax rate.
I think the whole "there are no jobs" stuff is just BS. I've been
trying to hire a dependable graphic artist to do redesigns on my
websites for months, and can't get
For years, profits have been going to pay shareholders and not to
invest in jobs or infrastructure.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> So just raise the taxes on those who don't create jobs. An exemption
> for actual job creation should be simple to include in any tax
> legislat
So just raise the taxes on those who don't create jobs. An exemption
for actual job creation should be simple to include in any tax
legislation.
Propose that, and if the politicians balk, you know that "job
creators" is just a buzz word, and not an actual class of people or
businesses that exist
"You can't raise taxes on top 2% because those are the job creators and this
same top 2% relies on the markets and companies where we're fucked again
because profit is the bottom line."
Fifty percent of the citizens do not pay federal income taxes.
In 2008, the top 1% paid 38% of all income taxe
Free markets have collapsed, the rats are fleeing the sinking ship of
the US economy and they are trying to steal the furniture on their way
out.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> WOW: Morgan Stanley "Running Layoff Scenarios Into Several Thousand&q
Did you mean Lose, Lose, Lose?
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Casey Dougall
wrote:
> Loose loose loose, from every side.
>
> You can't raise taxes on top 2% because those are the job creators and this
> same top 2% relies on the markets and companies where we're fucked again
> because profit
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:20 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> > Would this be a case of "wall street" layoffsand not necessarily
> "main
> > street" layoffs?
> >
>
> Sir - Here are the main street layoffs you requested.
>
> http://signaln
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:20 PM, G Money wrote:
> Would this be a case of "wall street" layoffsand not necessarily "main
> street" layoffs?
>
Sir - Here are the main street layoffs you requested.
http://signalnews.com/cisco-layoff-1-employee-497
Thank you
-Cameron
--
Cameron Child
"Again, i never really understood the difference between wall street and
main street, since what happens there affects what happens here, and visa
versabut whatever."
Because the media loves to report on Wall Street but does not think Main
Street is as news worthy.
J
-
Ninety percent of po
this, I'm going to move all his stock to another firm
tomorrow. Should have already done it.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> WOW: Morgan Stanley "Running Layoff Scenarios Into Several Thousand"
>
> Excerpt:
>
> Layoffsacross Wall Str
13, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> WOW: Morgan Stanley "Running Layoff Scenarios Into Several Thousand"
>
> Excerpt:
>
> Layoffsacross Wall Street started in June and have continued through the
> summer.
>
> Morgan Stanley already begun reducing hea
WOW: Morgan Stanley "Running Layoff Scenarios Into Several Thousand"
Excerpt:
Layoffsacross Wall Street started in June and have continued through the
summer.
Morgan Stanley already begun reducing headcount in its brokerage.
But it looks like things are about to get much worse.
&q
14 matches
Mail list logo
