Kevin Graeme
To: CF-Community
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: css, xhtml, standards, bandersnatch, etc...
I don't think your credibility is an issue for using the voice hack. Just
the opposite. It shows that you understand that some compromises need to be
made to accomplis
So with the semi-OT talk of standards over on cf-talk, it coincides with
something I've been thinking and some frustrations I've been having.
Standards don't exist.
They are a frumious Bandersnatch. We can write the words and they can even
have some kind of meaning to people, but they either
in their web sites.If we don't and use what's out there,
then where is the incentive?
_
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 1:25 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: css, xhtml, standards, bandersnatch, etc...
So with the semi-OT talk of standards over
- Original Message -
From: Sandy Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 1:00 PM
Subject: RE: css, xhtml, standards, bandersnatch, etc...
While its frustrating that some of the items promoted in the standards are
not in any browser, blame
Only in the blog cause I copied the graphic looking windows from CSS Vault.
_
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 2:17 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: css, xhtml, standards, bandersnatch, etc...
I want to write to standards. Believe me. I'm
(in spite of what practices they may employ).
Charlie
- Original Message -
From: Sandy Clark
To: CF-Community
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 12:00 PM
Subject: RE: css, xhtml, standards, bandersnatch, etc...
While its frustrating that some of the items promoted in the standards
will
gladly rework those items to be standards compliant.You are my audience
and my peers and I want to make sure I do the right thing.
_
From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 2:26 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: css, xhtml, standards, bandersnatch, etc
using the non-hack code.
-Kevin
- Original Message -
From: Sandy Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 1:36 PM
Subject: RE: css, xhtml, standards, bandersnatch, etc...
I think we are in a transitional.
Its funny, you are looking
: css, xhtml, standards, bandersnatch, etc...
I think we are in a transitional.
Its funny, you are looking only at the blog, if you go to my site
(http://www.shayna.com), you will note that it is ENTIRELY standards based,
no hacks and I do tell people that if it looks funny, they need to get
employ).
CG Charlie
CG- Original Message -
CGFrom: Sandy Clark
CGTo: CF-Community
CGSent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 12:00 PM
CGSubject: RE: css, xhtml, standards, bandersnatch, etc...
CGWhile its frustrating that some of the items promoted in the standards are
CGnot in any browser
10 matches
Mail list logo
