And what about the crotch pat-downs they have been giving people who
refuse? Apparently that's not even a safety procedure, it's designed to
force people back into the scanners. F-cking bureaucrats will be the death
of us all.
Oh, I think you're onto something here.
'Naked scanners': Lobbyists
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Robert Munn cfmuns...@gmail.com wrote:
I went through one at San Jose last month, but the more I read about this
technology, the more I am thinking I am not flying again until they remove
these things from security. They emit x-rays, far more than originally
Lemme throw this out there...
I blew my knee out badly about 10 months ago, given my current
work/family situation I can't have it surgically repaired so I'm
wearing a very large brace on my left knee. The brace in question is
made out of aluminium and velcro, and I really cant take it off
Last September I flew out to Portland OR. At the Dulles airport I was
the recipient of a full body pat down because of my insulin pump, and
a false positive reading on an explosives detector (I guess it didn't
help that I had cleaned out the ferrets' litter box just before
leaving). The pat down
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.comwrote:
Last September I flew out to Portland OR. At the Dulles airport I was
the recipient of a full body pat down because of my insulin pump, and
a false positive reading on an explosives detector (I guess it didn't
help
The irritating thing is that there is a much cheaper and more
effective alternative, use trained dogs. From what I remember, (had a
prof in grad school who studied this and trained dogs for the FDA and
other government agencies), a beagle's nose is sensitive enough to
detect trace amounts of PETN
This is all a simple matter of marketing.
Instead of an intrusive patdown in front of everyone, you get slipped a
little black players card, that lets you into the champagne room for a
lapdance and patdown from a hot dancer-type girl. (or guy - your
preference).
You walk away happy. College
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.comwrote:
The irritating thing is that there is a much cheaper and more
effective alternative, use trained dogs. From what I remember, (had a
prof in grad school who studied this and trained dogs for the FDA and
other
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:55 AM, G Money gm0n3...@gmail.com wrote:
And cute as hell...but they howl a lot.
But one things for sure, I'd much prefer a quick canine crotch-sniffing to
the shit we have to go through right now to establish a bullshit illusion of
security.
Dicey proposition,
something you need to tell us? :)
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:55 AM, G Money gm0n3...@gmail.com wrote:
And cute as hell...but they howl a lot.
But one things for sure, I'd much prefer a quick canine crotch-sniffing to
Except those people who are terrified of dogs, or look at dogs in a
different way than you and I due to culture, religion, or both.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.comwrote:
The irritating thing is that there is a much cheaper and more
effective
LOL...if it were only that easy Jerry hehehe
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:jmi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 10:39 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: full body scanners at airports
This is all a simple matter of marketing.
Instead of an intrusive
I'd never get out of the airport...
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Jerry Johnson jmi...@gmail.com wrote:
This is all a simple matter of marketing.
Instead of an intrusive patdown in front of everyone, you get slipped a
little black players card, that lets you into the champagne room for
And I'd spend way to much time trying to play with the dog
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Ray Champagne r...@raychampagne.com wrote:
Except those people who are terrified of dogs, or look at dogs in a
different way than you and I due to culture, religion, or both.
On Tue, Nov 16,
they can be redirected to the pat down room.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Ray Champagne r...@raychampagne.com wrote:
Except those people who are terrified of dogs, or look at dogs in a
different way than you and I due to culture, religion, or both.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:08 AM,
Oh, definitely not me. Must be a friend. I don't wear underwear :)
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Scott Stewart
webmas...@sstwebworks.com wrote:
something you need to tell us? :)
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology
BTW I just checked - its not FDA, its Dept. of Agriculture. My bad.
Next time you're arriving from an international flight, you'll see
these beagles wondering around about 10 or 20 feet away from their
handlers. They'll walk through the carry on baggage and sit by any
piece of carry-on luggage
oh yeah...I think have some explosive material there...yeah...right
there...oh yeah... heheheh
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stewart [mailto:webmas...@sstwebworks.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 11:07 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: full body scanners at airports
I'd never get
, November 16, 2010 11:07 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: full body scanners at airports
I'd never get out of the airport...
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Jerry Johnson jmi...@gmail.com wrote:
This is all a simple matter of marketing.
Instead of an intrusive patdown in front of everyone
I went through one at San Jose last month, but the more I read about this
technology, the more I am thinking I am not flying again until they remove
these things from security. They emit x-rays, far more than originally
estimated, and can lead to skin cancer. They store images and I'm guessing
not in Salisbury ;)
Sent from my iPhone... Don't hate.
On Nov 15, 2010, at 4:09 PM, Robert Munn cfmuns...@gmail.com wrote:
I went through one at San Jose last month, but the more I read about this
technology, the more I am thinking I am not flying again until they remove
these things from
I'll just wear my Utilikilt and we'll see who feels more
uncomfortable, the TSA agent or me. I'm going to bet that it isn't me.
Judah
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Robert Munn cfmuns...@gmail.com wrote:
I went through one at San Jose last month, but the more I read about this
technology,
strap on 2 or 3 GIANT dildos after you nuke them to warm them up a bit.
give them a shock. go for scan then pat down.
or show up in a robe and just drop trow before you go through scanner..
fnck every one.
~|
Order the Adobe
And if you need a few giant dildos, I will be happy to sell you some ;-)
-Original Message-
From: morchella [mailto:morchella.delici...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 4:19 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: full body scanners at airports
strap on 2 or 3 GIANT dildos after
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: full body scanners at airports
strap on 2 or 3 GIANT dildos after you nuke them to warm them up a bit.
give them a shock. go for scan then pat down.
or show up in a robe and just drop trow before you go through scanner..
fnck every one
25 matches
Mail list logo
