Bear? Where? Run for your life
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 11, 2013, at 8:53 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> Bear
> On Apr 11, 2013 9:52 PM, "LRS Scout" wrote:
>
>> That's basically the argument.
>>
>> Beat and not infringed all at once.
>> On Apr 11, 2013 9:48 PM, "Jerry Barnes" wrote:
>>
>>>
>
Bear
On Apr 11, 2013 9:52 PM, "LRS Scout" wrote:
> That's basically the argument.
>
> Beat and not infringed all at once.
> On Apr 11, 2013 9:48 PM, "Jerry Barnes" wrote:
>
>>
>> "I don't see an constitutional right for concealed carry. Can you point
>> me to
>> some information?"
>>
>> I don'
That's basically the argument.
Beat and not infringed all at once.
On Apr 11, 2013 9:48 PM, "Jerry Barnes" wrote:
>
> "I don't see an constitutional right for concealed carry. Can you point
> me to
> some information?"
>
> I don't see a constitutional precedent to differentiate between conceal
"I don't see an constitutional right for concealed carry. Can you point me to
some information?"
I don't see a constitutional precedent to differentiate between concealed
and open. It should be "carry an way you want."
J
-
Ninety percent of politicians give the other ten percent a bad reputa
I'd say bear and not infringed
On Apr 11, 2013 3:09 PM, "Larry C. Lyons" wrote:
>
> I think that one is right beside arming bears - although frankly I don't
> think that bears need the extra help. At least it bears some more thinking.
> The alternative is unbearable.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 a
Obviously not a complete solution to the problem of gun violence, mental
health, voter fraud, election fixing and suppression, honey bee dieoffs, or
the cost of gasoline.
but, in this case, you have a large group advocating for increased ID and
proof for exercising a right, and another group sayi
Problem not solved, because even if someone legally buys a gun, if they
fail to keep said weapon from the hands of those who are not allowed to own
a guy, having the law is pointless. Frankly, if someone owns a gun, and
lets a either a child or a mentally ill family member have access to it,
the
bear with me on this one.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> I think that one is right beside arming bears - although frankly I don't
> think that bears need the extra help. At least it bears some more thinking.
> The alternative is unbearable.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 a
I think that one is right beside arming bears - although frankly I don't
think that bears need the extra help. At least it bears some more thinking.
The alternative is unbearable.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 7:09 AM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> >
> > I
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 7:09 AM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> If that's it and we undo all the other dumb shit like class 3 laws and
> capacity laws, and require JUDICIAL due process for incompetency decisions.
>
I agree with judicial review for incompetency decisions. No bureaucrat
needs to be decidi
Yeah sound ceazy if it weren't true huh?
On Apr 11, 2013 2:42 PM, "Larry C. Lyons" wrote:
>
> You know that sounds almost clinically paranoid.
>
> btw you forgot to tie in fluoridation, black helicopters and the FEMA
> relocation camps.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:02 AM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
You know that sounds almost clinically paranoid.
btw you forgot to tie in fluoridation, black helicopters and the FEMA
relocation camps.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:02 AM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> The government.
>
> If you do this they will tie the national health, criminal, gun, shopping,
> Face
"If you do this they will tie the national health, criminal, gun,
shopping, Facebook,
cellphone database all together and liberty is dead."
This is well underway. The federal government loves facebook, particularly
the FBI (
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/facebook/fbi-to-monitor-facebook-twitter-mysp
"I'm both and I know better"
Good one.
J
-
Ninety percent of politicians give the other ten percent a bad reputation.
- Henry Kissinger
Politicians are people who, when they see light at the end of the tunnel,
go out and buy some more tunnel. - John Quinton
~
I'm both and I know better
On Apr 11, 2013 1:30 PM, "Jerry Barnes" wrote:
>
> "How are you still willing to trust them with anything?"
>
> At this point, anyone who trusts the government is either a fool or a
> beneficiary of its largess.
>
> There is no compromise on trust. You can't argue
"How are you still willing to trust them with anything?"
At this point, anyone who trusts the government is either a fool or a
beneficiary of its largess.
There is no compromise on trust. You can't argue that government is
trustworthy in some areas. If it is untrustworthy anywhere, it fails.
The government.
If you do this they will tie the national health, criminal, gun, shopping,
Facebook, cellphone database all together and liberty is dead.
They could make you a felon right now today and take everything you own.
Hell just call it eminent domain.
Are you honestly missing the big
Who is "them"?
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:55 AM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> How are you still willing to trust them with anything?
> On Apr 11, 2013 10:49 AM, "LRS Scout" wrote:
>
> > You want the straight up truth
> >
> > I'd rather die a martyr than have to fire on another american.
> >
> > Ive h
How are you still willing to trust them with anything?
On Apr 11, 2013 10:49 AM, "LRS Scout" wrote:
> You want the straight up truth
>
> I'd rather die a martyr than have to fire on another american.
>
> Ive had the toughest times of my life and I haven't hurt anyone and I
> haven't used and tha
You want the straight up truth
I'd rather die a martyr than have to fire on another american.
Ive had the toughest times of my life and I haven't hurt anyone and I
haven't used and that in and of itself shows who I am
I want them to feel what ive felt
Doing what ive done.
And coming h
Words and actions are different
That is protected speech
Dissent
Its not crazy when they're at your house.
On Apr 11, 2013 10:41 AM, "Jerry Milo Johnson" wrote:
>
> FWIW, that sounds a little batshit crazy.
>
> Truthfully, I suspect that the huge support for background checks is a
> combinati
FWIW, that sounds a little batshit crazy.
Truthfully, I suspect that the huge support for background checks is a
combination of people thinking it is a reasonable, practical, possibly
effective step to curb the unacceptable gun violence in the country at the
moment.
But I also suspect it is thos
I agree, reasonable, and what I outlined is reasonable.
To which part do you object?
On Apr 11, 2013 10:30 AM, "Larry C. Lyons" wrote:
>
> You mean like prohibitions on free speech? such as not yelling fire in
> theaters? Or the classic case of fighting words? If you can have reasonable
> restr
How many software projects fa il again?
This isn't a bussiness process, no compromise!
On Apr 11, 2013 10:28 AM, "Jerry Milo Johnson" wrote:
>
> Sure, if these are issues, they should be addressed.
>
> Separately.
>
> As we all know as developers, the only way to make progress is a steady
> str
You mean like prohibitions on free speech? such as not yelling fire in
theaters? Or the classic case of fighting words? If you can have reasonable
restrictions on rights even more fundamental than the right to bear your
own machine gun with armour piercing bullets, I cannot see why you cannot
have
Sure, if these are issues, they should be addressed.
Separately.
As we all know as developers, the only way to make progress is a steady
stream of simple tasks completed, building towards a goal.
Successive approximations.
Unfortunately, we try to legislate by huge, complex, massive, multi-yea
My government has become my enemy
We're at war and Ft. Bragg just had to cancel their july 4th stuff due to
budget cuts, along with a laundry list of base services.
But DOS is sending more money to anti-American egyptians and Syrian rebels
with ties to al queda.
An ATF agent laid his hands on m
These are real questions current law fails to address.
As an enumerated incorperated right of man that shall not be infringed?
I know you know Apr 19th is coming just like I do. Aubrey was killed by a
german u boat in the north atlantic, all enemies foriegn and domestic.
Dont even get me starte
See, now you are adding unneeded complications. Are you a natural
legislator?
Keep it simple.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:09 AM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> If that's it and we undo all the other dumb shit like class 3 laws and
> capacity laws, and require JUDICIAL due process for incompetancy decisi
If that's it and we undo all the other dumb shit like class 3 laws and
capacity laws, and require JUDICIAL due process for incompetancy decisions.
And recognize constitutional concealed carry nationwide.
On Apr 11, 2013 10:06 AM, "Jerry Milo Johnson" wrote:
>
> How about this:
>
> We should cha
How about this:
We should change the laws so you need EXACTLY the same ID and background
check and non-felon history to
Vote
Buy a gun
compromise, and problem solved.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.am
31 matches
Mail list logo
