oh :)
Yes, apparently I have neglected the cartoons in my study of American culture :) As for depraved ... well, you knew that already :)
Dana
>You're asking about the Tick.
>
>larry
>
>>
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
You're asking about the Tick.
larry
>Larry, who are you answering? Do ya think you could leave sliver of
>the post you are replying to? I usually manage to guess, but this
>one has me baffled.
>
>Dana
>
>>Culturally deprived (or would that be depraved?).
>>
>>- ducks and runs -
>>
>>larry
>>
>>
Larry, who are you answering? Do ya think you could leave sliver of the post you are replying to? I usually manage to guess, but this one has me baffled.
Dana
>Culturally deprived (or would that be depraved?).
>
>- ducks and runs -
>
>larry
>
>>
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
Culturally deprived (or would that be depraved?).
- ducks and runs -
larry
> -Original Message-
> From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 12:09 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: terror threat [Timeout?]
>
>
> hehe. What
Don't forget Chairface Chippendale (an evil supervillain that actually
_was_ furniture). And Charles the Brain Child (best Toy/TV tie-in
ever...Taco Bell had a cup and ball toy where the body was Charles and
the ball was his glass encased super (evil) brain!!)
My personal favorite villain from
It started as a comic book (which was great), became a fabulous cartoon
on Fox, then became a mediocre live-action prime-time thing.
The Tick is wierd, blue, and nigh-invulnerable. He has a sidekick,
Arthur, who is (typically) cowardly and wears a flying Moth suit (which
got him fired from bei
Mandingo I grok your lingo, Fiery Blaze...
http://www.thetick.ws/
!_!
dana tierney wrote:
> hehe. What's the Tick?
>
> >"Your pants reek of predjudice, naughty spawn, and I'm just the
> >detergent of justice and moderation to wash the bias out of your
> >double-knit evil!"
--
will
"If my li
d it), but the animated series was fairly true to the book
and funny as hell.
SPOON!
- Original Message -
From: "dana tierney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: terror threat
SPOON!
http://www.thetick.ws/
http://www.cs.rose-hulman.edu/~stinerkt/Tick.html
Greatest super hero. Ever!
dana tierney wrote:
> hehe. What's the Tick?
>
> >"Your pants reek of predjudice, naughty spawn, and I'm just the
> >detergent of justice and moderation to wash the bias out of your
> >doub
hehe. What's the Tick?
>"Your pants reek of predjudice, naughty spawn, and I'm just the
>detergent of justice and moderation to wash the bias out of your
>double-knit evil!"
>
>--Ben Doom
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
Hahahahahhaa
I miss the tick cartoon. :-[
Ben Doom wrote:
> Charlie Griefer wrote:
> > i just wanted to comment that I *swore* you said:
> >
> > "...how do my pants reek of prejudice?" I was dumbfounded for a moment.
> >
> > I'm going to get more coffee now...
>
> Heh. That sounds like a quote
Charlie Griefer wrote:
> i just wanted to comment that I *swore* you said:
>
> "...how do my pants reek of prejudice?" I was dumbfounded for a moment.
>
> I'm going to get more coffee now...
Heh. That sounds like a quote from the Tick.
"Your pants reek of predjudice, naughty spawn, and I'm ju
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 8:23 AM
Subject: Re: terror threat [Timeout?]
>snip<
> And also, how do my rants reek of prejudice? Etc.
>snip<
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
I guess we *aren't* going offline? It's kinda hard to discuss whether there are grounds for apology in public without potentially giving more, supposing I am wrong. But ok, let's try it this way.
If this were said to me, I would retort that I am really not very young, but if I am being childish, p
Dana!
You are boring,tedious and predictable!
Your rants reek of chauvinism and prejudice,
but I suppose we shouldn't be surprised at that because you're so young.
...
...
...
...
?
-Gel
-Original Message-
From: dana tierney
Ok, I am considering this. I still think you are wron
Darn. There goes my bet. OK in 7.
larry
> -Original Message-
> From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 10:30 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: terror threat [Timeout?]
>
>
> impossible, they lost last night.. ;-) but I
impossible, they lost last night.. ;-) but I do want the flames to win
the cup
-Original Message-
From: Lyons, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 10:26 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: terror threat [Timeout?]
If I may, I'd like to suggest that we all
07 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: terror threat [Timeout?]
>
>
> Ok, I am considering this. I still think you are wrong. I
> didn't call her any names, though I grant you that "tedious
> and predictable" comes close. I suppose it may not be that
> tedious
Ok, I am considering this. I still think you are wrong. I didn't call her any names, though I grant you that "tedious and predictable" comes close. I suppose it may not be that tedious and predictable if you have NOT already been through the "but Clinton this" and "but Clinton that" stuff a few tim
It's also one thing to make personal attacks because one is upset.
"monique, anyone ever tell you that bored people are really boring?"
"You sound pretty young"
"your chauvinsitic little world view"
"You're worse. You're tedious and predictable"
I've been called on personal insults before while
me too Dana.me too
-Original Message-
From: Ben Doom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 9:17 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: terror threat [Timeout?]
> already over. This morning it's kinda annoying. The woman said I have no
> right to critic
> already over. This morning it's kinda annoying. The woman said I have no
> right to criticize cause I wasn't born here. Excuse me, but that is
> simply not the case. I will gladly say so to anyone *else* that thinks I
> should go back to Canada if I don't agree with George Bush.
If you bow to
It's one thing to have prejudices and another to refuse to examine them. Humph.
The Yoda thing was slightly funny yesterday, especially as it was already over. This morning it's kinda annoying. The woman said I have no right to criticize cause I wasn't born here. Excuse me, but that is simply not
Okay, that deserves a Bossk brownie (which I just happen to have) and some
Yoda Soda. Sorry, no muffins in the Star Wars cookbook. (The R2D2 treats and
Wookie Cookies look good, though.)
- Original Message -
From: "Angel Stewart"
>
> *yoda voice*
>
> Let he who has no prejudice throw the
Good one Gel. Are you taking over the list mom duties while Erika is on
break.
larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Angel Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 5:06 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: terror threat [Timeout?]
>
>
>
*yoda voice*
Let he who has no prejudice throw the first Womba egg.
And then run like hell as the Womba Beast runs after him I say.
Mmm.
Yes.
A crystal colored by the light of prejudice and opinion a discussion is.
One needs patience, and an open mind to see the rainbow.
In understand
I'm sure there'll be more tomorrow :-)
> Dammit I missed the fun!! We were at the airport!
will
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
Dammit I missed the fun!! We were at the airport!
/me passes belated stale muffins around ...
Who we throwing them at? :D
/me drags toe in sand ... I haven't been following the main thread ---
the "timeout" caught my eye ...
Cheers,
Erika
>>| From: dana tierney
>>|
>>| lol. Where is Erik
lol. Where is Erika when I need stale muffins :)
Dana
>what are you kidding me?
>
>girl fight! w00t! :)
>
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Angel Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent:
what are you kidding me?
girl fight! w00t! :)
- Original Message -
From: "Angel Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 2:05 PM
Subject: RE: terror threat [Timeout?]
> OK!
> Sod
LOL
Angel Stewart wrote:
> *yoda voice*
> anger leads to insults...insults lead to anger..and this leads to the
> Dark Side ;-)
>
>
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
aint nuthin more to say. She has many prejudices and no point.
Dana
>OK!
>Sodo we need a timeout on this thread now?
>People seem to have polarised views and are getting quite heated
>unnecessarily.
>:-)
>
>One should remember that in the spirit of a happy list, one should not
>retort to i
OK!
Sodo we need a timeout on this thread now?
People seem to have polarised views and are getting quite heated
unnecessarily.
:-)
One should remember that in the spirit of a happy list, one should not
retort to insults with insults as general list ettiquette and all that.
This starts the
33 matches
Mail list logo
