http://news.slashdot.org/story/12/05/09/1538217/us-air-force-can-accidentally-spy-on-american-citizens-for-90-days
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
http://news.slashdot.org/story/12/05/09/1538217/us-air-force-can-accidentally-spy-on-american-citizens-for-90-days
This appears to say that domestic drone video/data can be kept for 90 days.
How long is satellite video/data
good question and I don't know. I wasn't even aware the Air Force was
using drones in the US. I find the idea slightly chilling considering
how they are used elsewhere.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Cameron Childress camer...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Dana
Border patrol wants to use them on the US Canadian border and I
believe they are testing unarmed drones, for surveillance only, on the
Mexican border.
Here's a thought experiment, what's better, for the data to be only in
the hands of corporate or government hands, or available to anyone?
On
what data are we talking about exactly? Now there's a question. Is
this an advanced version of google maps? With intercept capability? Or
is there eavesdropping capability as well?
Offhand, I'd choose corporate. I can tell Google to F* off if I so choose.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:31 AM,
I would have to look for the story, but i seem to recall hearing about some
police deopartmetns purchasing a drone. It may have been in ref to
immigaration enforcement. I will have to look to be sure.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
what data are we
http://www.bellinghamherald.com/2012/04/21/2491063/aclu-concerned-about-seattle-police.html
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
I would have to look for the story, but i seem to recall hearing about
some police deopartmetns purchasing a drone.
crap...404...
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
http://www.bellinghamherald.com/2012/04/21/2491063/aclu-concerned-about-seattle-police.html
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
I would
here is the cached page...
http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=drones+used+by+police+departmetnsd=27023553397000195mkt=en-USsetlang=en-USw=8e681f6a,8d9f59b6
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
crap...404...
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:20 PM,
If its something like that, how different is it from the police using
helicopters or even a cop on the beat. I think the issue is who get
the data and how long is it kept for. I trust corporations as much as
I'd trust governments.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Eric Roberts
not sure if this is blocked or not here...but here is a Chicago tribune
article...or at least is supposed to be. i got a blank page...,
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-mct-police-apologize-for-not-keeping-council-in-loop-20120503,0,1811700.story
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Eric
There a re a bunch of local police forces that have gotten into the drone
business. I saw an article about them being used in Dallas recently.
What's funny is that even though these local police are using the the DHS
doesn't want to siting privacy concerns, it was in a wired article
recently.
I think the big issue is saftey...what happens if they lose control of a
drone...there is no direct human intervention availaible to avert it from
crashing into a busy street or into a school full of kids...yes, accidents
happen with manned aircraft, but at least then there is a piolt that gets
dunno, if you get hit by the uncontrolled drone...
About 2 years ago I was working on a contract for a engineering
institute, I had to attend their annual scientific conference. One of
the biggest presentations was the demonstration of an antonymous urban
navigation system for drones. Part of
Well, that may be your concern, but it's certainly not mine.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
I think the big issue is saftey...what happens if they lose control of a
drone...there is no direct human intervention availaible to avert it
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.comwrote:
dunno, if you get hit by the uncontrolled drone...
Then you should go buy lotto tickets.
-Cameron
...
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology
at that point you've probably used up all your luck .Speaking of drones etc
http://news.yahoo.com/unmanned-drones-patrolling-us-canada-border-eastern-washington-163654228.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/more-predator-drones-fly-us-mexico-border/2011/12/01/gIQANSZz8O_story.html
On
Here is the article about DHS not wanting to use drones:
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/01/spy-drones-over-america-dhs-would-rather-not/?utm_source=Contextlyutm_medium=RelatedLinksutm_campaign=Previous
Here is a map of people using drones in the U.S.:
Rats they're flying drones over my favourite discrete crossing points.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:56 PM, LRS Scout lrssc...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is the article about DHS not wanting to use drones:
that's probably the most encouraging thing I've heard about DHS this month
at least.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:56 PM, LRS Scout lrssc...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is the article about DHS not wanting to use drones:
20 matches
Mail list logo
