Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization

Works for me. Cheers, Roy. From: Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate [ajay.krish...@noaa.gov] Sent: 09 March 2015 19:43 To: John Graybeal Cc: Lowry, Roy K.; CF Metadata List Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization

Cheers, Roy. > > > > From: Hernan Garcia - NOAA Federal [mailto:hernan.gar...@noaa.gov] > > Sent: 03 March 2015 16:37 > > To: Lowry, Roy K. > > Cc: Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate; alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk; > cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu; Tim Boyer - NOAA Federal > &

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization

To: Lowry, Roy K. > Cc: Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate; alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk; > cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu; Tim Boyer - NOAA Federal > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: > apparent_oxygen_utilization > > Rigourously speaking, the O2 solubility in wa

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization

adata@cgd.ucar.edu; Tim Boyer - NOAA Federal Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization Rigourously speaking, the O2 solubility in water involves an atmospheric pressure term, a temperature, and salinity terms which are all variables (See for example;

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization

] Sent: 03 March 2015 16:11 To: Lowry, Roy K. Cc: Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate; alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu; Tim Boyer - NOAA Federal Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization Hello, Let me make the following suggestion for con

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization

18:11 To: Lowry, Roy K.; ajay.krish...@noaa.gov<mailto:ajay.krish...@noaa.gov>; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu> Subject: RE: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization Dear Ajay, Roy, All, Thank you for the clarification regard

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization

> From: alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk [alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk] > Sent: 26 February 2015 18:11 > To: Lowry, Roy K.; ajay.krish...@noaa.gov; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu > Subject: RE: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: > apparent_oxygen_utilization > >

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization

Alison's wording. Cheers, Roy. From: Nan Galbraith [ngalbra...@whoi.edu] Sent: 26 February 2015 18:46 To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization Thanks, Alison - Your def

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization

du] On Behalf Of Lowry, Roy K. Sent: 26 February 2015 15:29 To: Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization Hi Alison, Just to clarify that I am in total agreement with this and had a bit of a senior

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization

bruary 2015 15:29 *To:* Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu *Subject:* Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization Hi Alison, Just to clarify that I am in total agreement with this and had a bit of a senior moment in a previous message.

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization

edu] On Behalf Of Lowry, Roy K. Sent: 26 February 2015 15:29 To: Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization Hi Alison, Just to clarify that I am in total agreement with this and had a bit of a sen

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization

Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization Hi Alison, Yes, please use mol kg-1 as the canonical unit. Thanks, Ajay alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk<http://stfc.ac.uk> alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk <mailto:cf-metadata%40cgd.ucar.edu?Subject=Re%3

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization

Hi Alison, Yes, please use mol kg-1 as the canonical unit. Thanks, Ajay *alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk * alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk *Thu Feb 26 03:56:32 MST 2015* Dear All, Thank you for the constructive discussion of this proposal - it seems that agreement has been rea

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization

...@mindspring.com] Sent: 13 February 2015 17:56 To: Jonathan Gregory Cc: CF Metadata List Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization While I agree with your argument that apparent_oxygen_utilization is not ideal as a standard name, it will be a big

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization

-- > >> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:02:49 +0000 >> From: "Lowry, Roy K." >> To: Jonathan Gregory , John Graybeal >> >> CC: CF Metadata List >> Subject: RE: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: >> apparent_oxygen_utilizat

[CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization

that case it might help to indicate which > it is in the standard name. > > Best wishes > > Jonathan > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:21:40AM -0800, John Graybeal wrote: > > Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:21:40 -0800 > > From: John Graybeal > > To: CF Metadata List

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization

, Roy. From: Jonathan Gregory [j.m.greg...@reading.ac.uk] Sent: 12 February 2015 08:56 To: John Graybeal Cc: CF Metadata List Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization Dear John Thanks for your research. If I'm

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization

aybeal > To: CF Metadata List > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: > apparent_oxygen_utilization > X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) > > This discussion has been ongoing a while (though with few participants), and > I think it is valuable to the oce

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization

t nobody in the > domain would recognise without significant education. I didn't comment > because I as a semantic modeller I can see both sides. However, I think > you're right and Wally Broecker's work is so well absorbed into > biogeochemistry that we should respect hi

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization

ject: [CF-metadata] Fwd: Re: Request for new standard-name: > >> apparent_oxygen_utilization > >> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; > rv:1.9.2.28) > >> Gecko/20120306 Thunderbird/3.1.20 > >> > >> Hi all - > >

[CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization

41:08 -0800 > From: John Graybeal > To: CF Metadata List > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: > apparent_oxygen_utilization > X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) > > Three thoughts: > >

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization

be mol kg-1, but you > could have micromol kg-1 as your units, since they're physically equivalent. > > Cheers > > Jonathan > > > - Forwarded message from Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate > - > >> From: Ajay Krishn

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization

r.edu Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization Hi All, I had requested for a new standard name for apparent_oxygen_utilization during the last week of November. Since, there have been no discussions on it, I wanted to quickly follow up on it. Th

[CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization

equivalent. Cheers Jonathan - Forwarded message from Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate - > From: Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate > Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:54:17 -0500 > To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: > appar

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization

Hi All, I had requested for a new standard name for apparent_oxygen_utilization during the last week of November. Since, there have been no discussions on it, I wanted to quickly follow up on it. Thanks, Ajay On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate < ajay.krish...@noaa.go

[CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization

Dear CF community, On behalf of NODC, I would like to request for a new standard name: apparent_oxygen_utiliziation (AOU) definition: the difference between saturation oxygen content and observed oxygen content. units: micromoles/kg Description is from Broecker and Peng, 1982, Tracers in the Se

Re: [CF-metadata] request for new standard name

. --- > -Original Message- > From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of > Jonathan Gregory > Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 7:45 AM > To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] request for

Re: [CF-metadata] request for new standard name

Dear David and Christophe > Thinking ahead, I tried to put dobson into cf-python's CF Udunits data > base, but couldn't since it was already there (at Udunits version > 2.1.24): > > > 446.2 micromoles/meter^2 > > dobson > DU >

Re: [CF-metadata] request for new standard name

_thickness_"? All the best, David Original message from Christophe Lerot (09AM 19 Sep 12) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:03:35 +0200 From: Christophe Lerot User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 To: "Cameron-smith, Philip" CC: "

Re: [CF-metadata] request for new standard name

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 > Thunderbird/13.0.1 > To: "Cameron-smith, Philip" > CC: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu" > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] request for new standard name > > Dear Philip, > > Thank you for

Re: [CF-metadata] request for new standard name

Dear Christophe If wikipedia is correct, 1 Dobson unit equals 10 micrometres of the quantity equivalent_thickness_at_stp_of_atmosphere_ozone_content. The canonical unit is metres for this quantity in the standard name table, but any unit which is dimensionally equivalent to metres is acceptable. S

Re: [CF-metadata] request for new standard name

lnl.gov, Lawrence Livermore National Lab. --- -Original Message- From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Christophe Lerot Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 4:50 AM To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu Subject: [CF-metadata] request for new standard n

Re: [CF-metadata] request for new standard name

lnl.gov, Lawrence Livermore National Lab. --- > -Original Message- > From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of > Christophe Lerot > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 4:50 AM > To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu > Subject:

[CF-metadata] request for new standard name

Dear all, We are in the process to create NetCDF files for satellite observations of vertical ozone columns. This quantity represents the atmosphere vertically-integrated concentration of ozone and is generally expressed in Dobson Units (1 DU=2.69 molec/cm²). I didn't find any suitable standa

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard name

Dear All, In August Jim Biard requested one new standard name of brightness_temperature_anomaly which is defined as the difference between a brightness_temperature and its climatological value. As noted by Philip Cameron-Smith and Jonathan Gregory, this name follows established syntax and the

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard name for components ofplatform_speed_wrt_ground

Dear Nan > Water velocities are defined more consistently, with eastward_ > northward_ and upward_sea_water_velocity having parallel names/ > definitions, and allowing the e/n terms to be used with or without > a vertical component. ... > I think the latter is a better way to handle platform moti

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard name for components ofplatform_speed_wrt_ground

The treatment of air velocity - wind - in CF is a little bit problematic, IMHO; wind is assumed to be a 2D vector. Water velocities are defined more consistently, with eastward_ northward_ and upward_sea_water_velocity having parallel names/ definitions, and allowing the e/n terms to be used wit

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard name for components ofplatform_speed_wrt_ground

Well, yes, the last sentence can be simplified. It is a copy/paste/adaptation of the sentence describing upward_air_velocity, where the 3D aspect is important. In our present case, I let readers/reviewers judge on that point. For your information, my current need is for airborne measureme

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard name for components of platform_speed_wrt_ground

These look good, and are certainly needed. Just one question about the last line of each of the definitions, referring to the 3D platform velocity. On ships, there's often only a 2D vector, I suppose the vertical velocity is presumed to be 0. Would it be preferable to not specifically mention 3D

[CF-metadata] Request for new standard name for components of platform_speed_wrt_ground

Dear all, I would like to request the creation of new standard names for the local geographic components of the platform_speed_wrt_ground. Following the already existing definition of speed, velocity, and the naming scheme for the wind component (eastward_wind, northward_wind, upward_air_velo

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard name

Dear Jim > I would like to request a new standard name. The name is > brightness_temperature_anomaly That seems fine to me. As Philip says, it follows an existing pattern. It is likely that Alison, the manager of standard names, is on holiday at present. Best wishes Jonathan __

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard name

-Smith, p...@llnl.gov, Lawrence Livermore National > Lab. > > - > -- > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message- > >> From: cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu [mailto:cf-metadata- > >

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard name

st 25, 2011 1:05 PM To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu Subject: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard name Hi. I would like to request a new standard name. The name is brightness_temperature_anomaly Grace and peace, Jim Biard -- Jim Biard Government Contractor, STG Inc. Remote Sensing and Application

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard name

r.edu] On Behalf Of Jim Biard > Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 1:05 PM > To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu > Subject: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard name > > Hi. > > I would like to request a new standard name. The name is > > brightness_temperature_anomaly

[CF-metadata] Request for new standard name

Hi. I would like to request a new standard name. The name is brightness_temperature_anomaly Grace and peace, Jim Biard -- Jim Biard Government Contractor, STG Inc. Remote Sensing and Applications Division (RSAD) National Climatic Data Center 151 Patton Ave. Asheville, NC 28801-5001 jim.bi.

Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard name

It looks like these terms and definitions follow the style that's used for sea ice and land ice terms, which is great - a good analogy. One quick question: is there some term needed for burned areas that will describe how burned an area is, or is it really a burned/not burned observation? Nan O

[CF-metadata] Request for new standard name

Dear colleagues, The fire disturbance ECV project will be quantifying burned area at a range of scales. There are standards for emissions, but nothing on area. I would like to request new standard names, burned_area and burned_area_fraction. Burned seems to be more popular with American English,