On Aug 8, 2004, at 9:16 PM, S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
> Don't ploy me with your 4-fingered hands! :)
Bi-Quinary was one of my early favorites, But, then I discovered the
Trinary (base 3) numbering system -- interesting name for the atomic
unit!
Dick
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscrip
> On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 16:40:17 -0400, Michael Dinowitz
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 0 alone is a number. 0 after 1 is the number 10. 021 is
>> the number 21. This is how it is in all programming
>> languages.
>
> In some programming languages (C, C++ and others in that
> family), 021
> means 2
No, not good enough, but forget it I've got the problem resolved as I noted when I first posted the msg.
>>>needed to get all the digits portion of a VAR
>
>Then just use reverse(), you dont need val().
>
>--
>___
>REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
>See http://www.co
Charlie encouraged me to join the BD list, I decided to take a shot at it, let me be honest, say, MM CF team and BD team are equally talented, MM has invested so much time and resources into CF and CF has come a long way to reach its current status while BD is a new kid in the block (no disrespect,
>>needed to get all the digits portion of a VAR
Then just use reverse(), you dont need val().
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm
(Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Thanks.
[To
OK, I expected a bit too much from Val :), needed to get all the digits portion of a VAR. Thanks for everyone's input and time.
>
>No, it isn't - at least not mathematically. In math you use significant
>digits only - meaning, basically, only those digits that would affect the
>outcome in an ope
Now we're getting into unnecessary semantics which just spirals down into just
so much OT.
> On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 16:40:17 -0400, Michael Dinowitz
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 0 alone is a number. 0 after 1 is the number 10. 021 is the number 21. This
is how it is in all programming languages.
Ahh thanks (doh), is there an easier way to get just the Requirements1,2,3 and the Proposed1,2,3,4 into a list, than doing my usual one by one method?
:)
Thanks
>Shouldn't you be doing something like this
>
>stReturn.a= ListGetAt( Valuelist( qGetSiteConfig.Config_VariableName
>), ListFindNoCase
>>You don't know your C or C++ well enough...
Right, I must admit I have forgotten a little this part, I've never used octal numbers actually,
I've always worked in hexadecimal.
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags
On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 20:27:22 -0400, Claude Schneegans
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>In some programming languages (C, C++ and others in that family), 021
> means 21 OCTAL which is 17 decimal.
>
> Not exactly: \021 is octal, and it should be include between quotes, like in
> x = '\021';
You don't
listqualify() is more of what I set out to find, thanks, I ended up using the cfqueryparam. cftalk ALWAYS prevails : )
- Original Message -
From: Michael Dinowitz
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 6:56 PM
Subject: Re: SELETCT IN (LISTOFSTRINGS)
When you have a sing
>>In some programming languages (C, C++ and others in that family), 021
means 21 OCTAL which is 17 decimal.
Not exactly: \021 is octal, and it should be include between quotes, like in
x = '\021';
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.co
>>021 IS DIFFERNT FROM 21.
As a string, you would be right, however the val() function does not return a string, but a numeric value,
and, as numeric values, 021 and 21 are identical.
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/cust
On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 16:40:17 -0400, Michael Dinowitz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 0 alone is a number. 0 after 1 is the number 10. 021 is the number 21. This is how it is in all programming languages.
In some programming languages (C, C++ and others in that family), 021
means 21 OCTAL which is 17
> Chunshen (Don) Li wrote:
>> Now it goes to the definition of number, 0, as 1 or 2, is
>> A NUMBER.
>> 021 IS DIFFERNT FROM 21.
> Yes, but it is not a significant difference.
Meaning that while the _format_ of the number is different, it is not
a "different number" in a mathematic context - whic
Try using this:
where Username IN
value="#userlist#" separator=",">
> -Original Message-
> From: Ewok [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 5:46 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: SELETCT IN (LISTOFSTRINGS)
>
> I don't know whats going on here...but as long as the list has
When you have a singel value, the IN looks like this:
In ('value')
When you have multiple values, it looks like this:
In ('value1,value2,value3')
What you want is to use the ListQualify() function to set each element in the list to be within single quotes (like so)
In ('value1','value2','value3')
T
Ewok wrote:
>
>
>
>
> select Username, UserID from tbl__Users
> where Username IN ('#userlist#')
> order by Username
>
>
>
> does each item need single quotes and take the single quotes out of the query???
> if i hardcode the list in the query it needs single quotes around each o
I don't know whats going on here...but as long as the list has only one item in it, it works... once it gets more than one it bombs.
select Username, UserID from tbl__Users
where Username IN ('#userlist#')
order by Username
does each item need single quotes and take the single quo
"CF Arrays are actually java.util.Vector data structures underneath the
hood."
CFMX documentation suggests the above.. i am not quite sure what is under
the hood.
Have you tried returning a Primitive Array from a Java Class? Yes the
documentation
says it casts the Primitive Array to Vector...Howe
I think calling v2.0 a beta is a bit overoptimistic. Its more of a
teaser/progress report. Tons of stuff doesn't work, or doesn't work
right. 1.6 is solid as a rock, but as you know its IE-only.
When it *does* come out, it sure does look like it will be great. We'll see.
--
--Matt Robertson-
Kay, I'm having the same issue with FckEditor and Firefox too. I'm hoping
that it gets fixed soon because between HTMLArea and FCKeditor, FCKEditor is
hands down a lot easier to implement.
Marlon
> -Original Message-
> From: John Beynon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, August 08
Not sure about Blackstone, but the current release of BlueDragon supports
exactly this sort of "mixed mode" deployment. We have one customer, for
example, who only deploy their custom tags as "precompiled" templates; the
presentation logic is deployed as source, allowing their clients to modify
it.
From: Chunshen (Don) Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 4:29 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Val function seems buggy
Now it goes to the definition of number, 0, as 1 or 2, is A NUMBER.
021 IS DIFFERNT FROM 21.
No, it isn't - at least not mathematically. In math you use si
I feel as if I should jump back into the conversation again. I did ask a loaded question regarding if MM is going to continue with CFscript in the future. I am sorry for opening up a can of worms.
As for the things not available in cfscript (i.e. cfabort, cfinclude, cflocate, etc.), there are wa
Chunshen (Don) Li wrote:
> Now it goes to the definition of number, 0, as 1 or 2, is A NUMBER.
> 021 IS DIFFERNT FROM 21.
Yes, but it is not a significant difference.
Jochem
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
An example of this sort of application.cfm/property.xml mix is
documented a little at http://www.benorama.com
Cutter
Jim Davis wrote:
> This kind of deployment is common in the J2EE world - there's rarely any
> source.
>
> In most applications many of the things that you'd normally find in
> Ap
0 alone is a number. 0 after 1 is the number 10. 021 is the number 21. This is how it is in all programming languages. A number is a number is a number. If you want to have a 0 in front, then your talking a string (or a forced format number which is basically the same thing).
>Now it goes to the d
Shouldn't you be doing something like this
stReturn.a= ListGetAt( Valuelist( qGetSiteConfig.Config_VariableName
), ListFindNoCase( valuelist( qGetSiteConfig.Config_Name ),
"RequirementsTitle"))
- Original Message -
From: Carl V <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 15:53:46 -0400
S
Now it goes to the definition of number, 0, as 1 or 2, is A NUMBER.
021 IS DIFFERNT FROM 21.
>I dunno - that seems right to me. The Val() function returns the value, not
>the "digits" - I would expect it to only return significant digits. After
>all the value of "021" is "21" just as the value o
I am having one of those brain freezes?? :)
any help is appreciated
I have a config.cfc
goes along the lines of...
Config_Name,
Config_VariableName
FROM siteConfig
and yes I have set the vars for stReturn
which cfdumps like this..
CONFIG_NAME - CONFIG_VARIABLENAME
1 RequirementsTitle -
Ha. We're so wrapped up in the Val that we miss the obvious
>>
>>
>
>> The value of dtgVar is 21 instead of 021, 021 is correct.
>> I have workaround to circumvent the problem though.
>
>Well given the code above, the value of dtgVar should be 0 since you
>populated var120 with "a string", not "
I haven't look at the source for it, but I think it uses the GD
library or something similar to create a dynamic image. Not quite as
clean as what you might get out of MS Project, but it works pretty
well.
Matt
- Original Message -
From: Frank Mamone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2
> I agree with all that you say.
>
> But what is the alternative?
>
> Running multiple versions of CF?
>
> if MM or NA wants to move the CF install base to their latest versions,
> then providing total backward compatibility will forever restrict the
> implementation to the mistakes and limitati
I was doing some research on something totally unrelated and happened upon this
http://www.andykhan.com/jexcelapi/
A java library to read and modify M$ Excel workbooks. Theoretically
you could just use it in cfmx (or maybe MM could put it in blackstone
:-o). I haven't used it, but there have been
> "Sourceless Deployment" sounds like "deployment without source"
> which by definition would not leave Application.cfm editable...
Perhaps, but I'm sure there'll be some workaround - for example, referencing
text files not in the deployment directory with CFINCLUDE.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf So
I have had it working yes and don't recall any problems. I've got to
use it again tomorrow will will let you know results after,
jb.
On Sun, 8 Aug 2004 19:55:05 +0800, Kay Smoljak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks John
>
> On Sun, 8 Aug 2004 12:31:56 +0100, John Beynon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Looks like a nice product.
I wonder how they did the Gantt chart?
-Frank
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Fusfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 09:11:23 -0400
Subject: Re: Web Team Project Management App
To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We've been pretty happy with dotPr
>>that seems right to me.
You're quite right. I read too fast and oversight the val() function.
Actually, I was a bit upset because of a QofQ again.
I have 3 queries with one column having strings, some of them being only digits.
I'm trying to UNION them, but I have an error because Mr CF claims
I agree with all that you say.
But what is the alternative?
Running multiple versions of CF?
if MM or NA wants to move the CF install base to their latest versions,
then providing total backward compatibility will forever restrict the
implementation to the mistakes and limitations of past vers
I have created classes for each of my forms, whether multi-page or not. The
classes, using gets and sets retrieve and store information to the DB and
perform all validation. I persist an instance of the class in a session
variable to maintain state between screens for both a single screen form
va
On Aug 7, 2004, at 10:43 PM, Jim Davis wrote:
> I've had conversations about this kind of stuff with Mike Nimer in the
> past.
> It's one of those things that people either really want or just see
> no need
> for at all.
>
> One thing I would REALLY LOVE is the ability to call CF from Windows
For a display widget? ... Sounds like the wrong thing to use
persistence for to me... CFC is a matter of preference.
> this sounds like a good excuse to build a persistant cfc
> component.
> -- Original Message
> --
> From: Arden Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
> The value of dtgVar is 21 instead of 021, 021 is correct.
> I have workaround to circumvent the problem though.
Well given the code above, the value of dtgVar should be 0 since you
populated var120 with "a string", not "120"... since it's not numeric,
it would return 0... if you populated
I have to agree with Dave...
Beside requiring changes to existing code, many of the tags in CFML
are implemented as regular CFML custom tags -- they're in one of the
directories in your cfmx installation, although I don't remember which
offhand. Which means implementing the tag
would require modi
Thanks John
On Sun, 8 Aug 2004 12:31:56 +0100, John Beynon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> v2 is the first version to support Firefox, with previous versions of
> fckeditor it would just display a text area on Firefox,
Have you had v2 working with Firefox? It displays fine for me, but
doesn't pa
Kay,
v2 is the first version to support Firefox, with previous versions of
fckeditor it would just display a text area on Firefox,
jb.
On Sun, 8 Aug 2004 17:32:03 +0800, Kay Smoljak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I downloaded the v2 beta of FCKeditor to integrate into my blog. It
> works in IE, but
this sounds like a good excuse to build a persistant cfc component.
-- Original Message --
From: Arden Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 22:43:43 -0400
>In many cases I have a master form/page with a dozen or so
I downloaded the v2 beta of FCKeditor to integrate into my blog. It
works in IE, but in Firefox (0.92) the content of the text field is
not passed out in the form scope.
That's okay, it's a beta... so I thought I'd download a previous
version and use that. Except I go to the sourceforge page and t
Les Mizzell wrote:
>
>
>
>
> SELECT * FROM CAT_ORD
>
>
>
You might want to add a reset attribute here.
> --->
>
>
>
> DATE
> NAME
> ...more columns
>
>
>
> #HN_DATE#
> #HN_Name#
> ...more columns
>
>
>
> Is working sorta OK. Got a question
>
> 1. One fi
Carl V wrote:
> Ahh ok...if I hard code the file it just plays instead of downloading (IE only)..is there a way around this? or does this come under the same issue (and yes I have tried both "inline" and "attachment") and both don't work...
Yes, same issue.
Jochem
[Todays Threads]
[This Messag
You are correct as is plainly stated in the tag documentation:
Returns
A number. If conversion fails, returns zero.
A number in ColdFusion is as you state, a number with no leading zeros. No questions of loosly typed language, just a question of what a number is.
>I dunno - that seems right to
52 matches
Mail list logo
