You can - I am sure there is tool for this, I cannot remember the name
(cfanywhere?)
"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information w
Just be wary of the DB size. For smaller less intense projects MSDE is
suitable - glad it is working out!
"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
Registered in England, Number 678540. It co
AG?
Which newsgroup?
"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is
confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the e
Seriously, is this scare 4 or 5.
I mean, CF has been in the process of being discontinued since like CF 4
right?
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Garza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 11:11 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: All Adobe ColdFusion products to be disc
Peter Tilbrook wrote:
>>From the ColdFusion newsgroup
you mean from our one & only troll (AG). is there any reason why you want to
spew his troll talk on a technical list? i thought that cf-community was there
for this sort of stuff?
Oh god... Here we go again...
-Original Message-
From: Peter Tilbrook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 8:04 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: All Adobe ColdFusion products to be discontinued
>From the ColdFusion newsgroup
<<
My insider told me that the CF model didn't fit
Don't feed the troll.
Warmest Regards,
Phillip B. Holmes
http://phillipholmes.com
214-995-6175 (cell)
-Original Message-
From: Peter Tilbrook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 10:04 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: All Adobe ColdFusion products to be discontinued
>From
>From the ColdFusion newsgroup
<<
My insider told me that the CF model didn't fit in with what they
(Adobe) have planned. They see the app server market as worthless,
they are probably right with similar free products like PHP around.
They are probably focusing on new products that are more app
Nevermind... found it. T'was only the image directory loc on the xml config
file.
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael E. Carluen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 5:03 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Object Instantiation Exception on LylaCaptcha
>
> I just got an "Obj
I just got an "Object Instantiation Exception" message while running
LylaCaptcha. any recommendation on what I should check?
Thanks
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date C
Every time I have used MSDE, I have found it eats the CPU like a starved
animal whenever you put any intensive load on it.
It also has a limited number of simultanious connections too.
I would presume every page on your site does not hit the database.
Snake
-Original Message-
From: Matt
I just built a sql server running MSDE 2000 for a client. They get a
few tens of thousands of sessions per day and I am absolutely amazed
at how well the server is handling the load.
I opted NOT to go with SQL Server Express because I didn't see the
point, frankly. SSE uses tons of extra resourc
Figured it out..damn ODBC datasources. I have to remember that you have to
restart after making changes.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Doug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk"
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: Help please
> Well, I can browse the server and the
Well, I can browse the server and the datasources cerify as ok. I can see
the SQL's base tables but cannot see the user tables. Just weird.
- Original Message -
From: "Loathe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk"
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 4:40 PM
Subject: RE: Help please
> You can't s
It would be cool if you could deploy apps on cd.
Anyone on here use Coral Web Builder? You can build coldfusion applications
and deploy them on a auto run cd as one of the choices...
http://www.pcaonline.com/prod/index.cfm?loc=coral
~~
> Basically, what if they pulled a Flex on CF?
Well, I think the value proposition is far different for CF than it is for
Flex. It never made much sense for Flex to be a server-side product
primarily, since Flex was really just another way to generate SWFs. CF, on
the other hand, is all server-si
You can't see the tables under the DB tab, but are you able to browse files
on the server?
Additionally, are the user name and passwords for the data sources actually
in the administrator? I know I sometimes don't do that, and pass them in to
the connection through the cfquery tag, for security.
Have not used CF in a long time...cannot see user tables in RDS in CF Studio 5.
I am using SQL 2000 and CF 5
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by you
No more beer for you.
Will Tomlinson wrote:
> I think this is lots more readable, no??
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered t
I usually write like this:
There's even more greatness in my queries.
sElEcT * fRoM tBlPrOdUcTs
I think this is lots more readable, no??
:)
Will
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hittin
Yes, but if you have to run a separate query for each row of the parent
query, that will kill performance.
> -Original Message-
> From: Kris Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 5:08 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: SQL concat? help
>
> In CF, getting a list of
Nevermind. I looked it up in the dictionary.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/google
-e
-Original Message-
From: Robert Feyerherm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 4:58 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Authorize.net CFC
Use the google define tool to define itsel
In CF, getting a list of values from a column in a query is pretty trivial:
valuelist(qryname.colname)
Cheers,
Kris
> What I actually wanted was a list of all someotherID's for a someID in a
> single column. I found a function that sort of does this (Coalesce), and
> after digging up my old cod
Use the google define tool to define itself..
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define%3Agoogle
-Original Message-
From: Josh Nathanson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 2:51 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Authorize.net CFC
If you Google "google" you can probably
What I actually wanted was a list of all someotherID's for a someID in a
single column. I found a function that sort of does this (Coalesce), and
after digging up my old code, did it using temp tables and cursors.
I was optimizing code that was doing it in CF and was taking a little too
long to
Hello,
Apologies in advance for the long and OT post. Don't worry, this isn't
yet another cf wish list (or is it?). This really is long and rambling,
so you will need coffee, and you might not want to read this at your
desk... maybe print it and take it home for the weekend?
Unless you've been li
The syntax you're using is, I think, correlated subquery. Not sure
what that concat() function does--maybe that was a UDF that returned
an actual list of IDs? In any case, here is a simple join that would
return a recordset of related IDs:
select s.someid, so.someotherid
from mytable s left outer
If you Google "google" you can probably find out what it means. :0)
Wait, I just spun myself into an infinite loop...
-- Josh
- Original Message -
From: "Emmet McGovern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk"
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 12:36 PM
Subject: RE: Authorize.net CFC
> O
O. I'm so mad at you right now Ferg I just forgot to mention
that.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 3:42 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Authorize.net CFC
I was hoping that's how you'd take that comment Emmet! Too man
Thanks everyone for the supportive answers.
Without the valuable members of this list my quest to do as little work as
possible on a Friday would be an utter failure. I will lift my glass to you
all in the forthcoming happy hour I will soon embark upon.
I will look into this thing called Goog
I was hoping that's how you'd take that comment Emmet! Too many people
would have been offended by my backhand slap.
--Ferg
-Original Message-
From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 2:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Authorize.net CFC
What the hell
For mySQL:
SELECT CONCAT(t1.id,'=', t2.id) AS newstring
FROM table01 t1
INNER JOIN table02 t2
ON t1.id = t2.id
-Original Message-
From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 2:17 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SQL concat? help
I'm trying to do a query that should go so
>Has anyone made a CFC yet for authorize.net? Free or Paid.
>
>Emmet
Yep, I have one. Email me offlist.
Will
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by
Just this website...
-Original Message-
From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 2:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Authorize.net CFC
What the hell is a google?
-e
-Original Message-
From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday,
I'm trying to do a query that should go something like
Select someid, (select concat(someotherid) from anothertable where
anothertable.someID=mytable.someid) from mytable
Basically I want a query that brings in someID and for each of those a list
of ID's from another table.
Is this
Not really, seefusion's unlicensed mode is 2 hours between cf service
restarts, which might be acceptable for most dev/staging environments. .
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 3:02 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Announc
On 8/4/06, Russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's unlimited instances, but it's per server, right? So with 2 servers, 3
> instances each, I would still need 2 licenses
>
That's correct. Don't forget (in both products' cases, for that
matter) to consider your development and staging environmen
What the hell is a google?
-e
-Original Message-
From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 2:44 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Authorize.net CFC
Hey check that out. I Googled Authorize.net cfc and it was like the
second listing. I guess some people just can
It's unlimited instances, but it's per server, right? So with 2 servers, 3
instances each, I would still need 2 licenses
> -Original Message-
> From: Snake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 2:18 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Announcing SeeFusion 4 (with Flex
Hey check that out. I Googled Authorize.net cfc and it was like the
second listing. I guess some people just can't match my mad googling
skills, huh?
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/thread.cfm/threadid:43531
Thanks,
Ken Ferguson
214.636.6126
-Original Message-
From: Emmet
Has anyone made a CFC yet for authorize.net? Free or Paid.
Emmet
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four
t
The enterprise edition of fusionreactor is for unlimited instances. So you
can monitor all your servers and all instances from a single dashboard.
The only drawback being that you need to install enterprise on ALL servers
in order for dashboard to be able to conenct to them, which is rather silly
w
So you would only need 4 SeeFusion licenses. That would come to a total
of $1196. Two dollars cheaper than Fusion-Reactor! :)
In this case, it would actually be cheaper if you had three servers with
two instances apiece. Then you would only need three licenses, which
would leave you at $900.
K
Don't laugh, that's what the legacy code looks like that I rewrite every
day (3k plus templated system, what a nightmare)
Cutter
__
http://blog.cutterscrossing.com
Mark Drew wrote:
>
> I personally write my functions in a mixture of upper case and camel
> case such as
> and
>
> Funct
"* New 2-for-1 pricing model for individual servers. For any single
physical server, every 2 ColdFusion instances that you want to monitor
now require just 1 SeeFusion license."
This is a quote from the email that webapper sent today.
Rich
On 8/4/06, Dave Carabetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/4/06, Dave Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Russ, one thing to note is that the SeeFusion pricing
> > > actually uses "per server" to really mean "per instance."
> >
> > I think they've changed the license to allow two instances per
>Google checkout it supposed to be really awesome and yet here we
>are getting suggestions to use COM object calls just to encrypt an xml
>shopping cart (which frankly has ZERO top-secret data unless it bothers you
>that some hacker might now you are purchasing a t-shirt that says "hooters"
>on it
Matt,
What are you copy/pasting x 100+ times???
LOL
On 8/4/06, Matt Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/3/06, Dan Plesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's just one string and it's the same one string CF uses but in a
> > different location or any location you wish it to be.
>
>
On 8/4/06, Dan G. Switzer, II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Russ,
>
> >Russ, one thing to note is that the SeeFusion pricing actually uses
> >"per server" to really mean "per instance." So if you have the max of
> >what you said your infrastructure might be (2 servers * 3 instances of
> >CF), you wo
On 8/4/06, Dave Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Russ, one thing to note is that the SeeFusion pricing
> > actually uses "per server" to really mean "per instance."
>
> I think they've changed the license to allow two instances per license.
>
Hmmm, I got my info from this link:
http://www.see
> Russ, one thing to note is that the SeeFusion pricing
> actually uses "per server" to really mean "per instance."
I think they've changed the license to allow two instances per license.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber v
Russ,
>Russ, one thing to note is that the SeeFusion pricing actually uses
>"per server" to really mean "per instance." So if you have the max of
>what you said your infrastructure might be (2 servers * 3 instances of
>CF), you would have 6 instances times $299, which is $1,794 (assuming
>you get
No worries, i got to bone up on less commands ;)
> Sorry about that. I'm working on it. I've been doing a major overhaul
> of the site UI and backend and the digests are being moved over to a
> new setup today. The whole thing was in a single looped template but
> will be moved over to an async
>>>but one item has entries of 15,16,30,49,50,52,75 and it is being put in
>>>a catecory that has the id of 2 there are lots of these that are
>>>behaving this way. any one think of a way to help with this?
> > SELECT catid FROM deep_images WHERE #uid# IN (catid)
> IN is evil.
> It will randomly
I was browsing the archives and it seems a few people mentioned that
companies like McAfee and others have products that you can install on
your server that give you an .exe that you can call via that
you can pass a filename to and it will tell you whether or not the file
is infected with a virus.
I've always hated using that syntax as it totally breaks the idea of
encapsulation and just feels totally wrong.
Anyway, using a custom tag means creating a 'new' instance of something that
has it's own environment. More overhead than I want, even if it's small. But
that doesn't address the ori
Sorry about that. I'm working on it. I've been doing a major overhaul of the
site UI and backend and the digests are being moved over to a new setup today.
The whole thing was in a single looped template but will be moved over to an
async process on a scheduled event. Much more efficient and the
I have never passed back scopes from a custom tag... But couldn't you just
be like:
Or maybe THISTAG ???
Then all local variables of the custom tag would be passed back into one
data variable... No hassle.
...
Ben Nadel
www.bennadel.com
-Original Message-
> Hello. Sorry if this has been mentioned. But all week I have not
> received any of the CF-Talk digests. I am subscribed to the 2 hourly
> ones. I re-subscribed but nothing I only get the spam that started
> coming through when I first signed up?
>
> cheers
> Martin
Hello Martin,
I just
On Friday 04 August 2006 16:29, Ben Nadel wrote:
> But isn't part of the beauty of CF is that we don't have to worry about
> actual destruction? That's all supposed to be optimized for us via Java (I
> think... I don't really know this stuff).
99.9% of the time, you don't need to care, no.
--
To
I'd prefer not to have to worry about passing all of the variables that I do
use from the CFX tag back to the function from the cfmodule.
It's more of a generic question to see if someone has investigated any
overhead. I've already incorporated what I learned about types, required and
returntype
Back up.
On 8/4/06, Tom Chiverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 04 August 2006 15:35, Raymond Camden wrote:
> > They know and it's being worked on now.
>
> \o/
>
> --
--
===
Raymond Camden, Vice President of Technolo
Well, I've have to speak up here and voice my satisfaction with
SeeFusion. I had already been using SeeFusion 3.3 and I helped Beta test
SeeFusion 4 and I really-really liked it. I think WebApper has brought
their UI up to speed with Flex 2.0. And with Free dot releases, I'm
looking forward to th
But isn't part of the beauty of CF is that we don't have to worry about
actual destruction? That's all supposed to be optimized for us via Java (I
think... I don't really know this stuff).
...
Ben Nadel
www.bennadel.com
-Original Message-
From: Tom Chiverton [mailto:
On 8/4/06, Russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good that you've finally decided to price it out more competitively, as
> before I was strongly leaning toward FusionReactor, which is licensed per
> server, not per instance.
>
> One thing that I like better about FusionReactor is that they allow you to
On Friday 04 August 2006 15:07, Ben Nadel wrote:
> its not set into REQUEST or APPLIACATION or something) should be destroyed
> at the end of the custom tag automatically.
Of course, this destruction could take longer than the harmless update :-)
--
Tom Chiverton- to the test harness Batman !
*
On Friday 04 August 2006 15:35, Raymond Camden wrote:
> They know and it's being worked on now.
\o/
--
Tom Chiverton
This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP.
Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in Eng
On 8/4/06, Bobby Hartsfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't you think it would be easier to just have a multi select or a checkbox
> for all the users (all named the same)... select the ones you want and
> submit. The form field would have a list of selected users. Then you just
> run an update
They know and it's being worked on now.
On 8/4/06, Tom Chiverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems to be foo bar.
>
> Error Occurred While Processing Request
>
> Element COMPONENTS.HANDLERS is undefined in a Java object of type class
> [Ljava.lang.String; referenced as
>
>Please try the f
Good that you've finally decided to price it out more competitively, as
before I was strongly leaning toward FusionReactor, which is licensed per
server, not per instance.
One thing that I like better about FusionReactor is that they allow you to
view past requests, and go and see exactly what s
It seems to be foo bar.
Error Occurred While Processing Request
Element COMPONENTS.HANDLERS is undefined in a Java object of type class
[Ljava.lang.String; referenced as
Please try the following:
Enable Robust Exception Information to provide greater detail about the source
of e
On 8/4/06, Mingo Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would do that a little different. You coul repeat the checkboxes like so:
>
>
>
>
>
> On the other side of the form action you would receive a list of id's in
> the form.isBannedUserID, like this: "1,2,3" for all checked inputs.
> Which you c
What about something like
SELECT
*
FROM
[table]
WHERE
date BETWEEEN
ISNULL( Effective_Date, 0 ) AND
ISNULL( Deactive_Date, getDate() )
The first ISNULL uses the zero date (in think usually 1900-1-1) if the date
is null. The Second ISNU
I think we should take a minute to step back and see how overly complicated
this is. Google checkout it supposed to be really awesome and yet here we
are getting suggestions to use COM object calls just to encrypt an xml
shopping cart (which frankly has ZERO top-secret data unless it bothers you
t
Would it help at all to create a ColdFusion custom tag and then call the CFX
tag within it? Since CF custom tags have their own scope not shared with the
general application, you shouldn't have to worry about all the VAR'ing of
function variables? Anything created by the CFX tag (so long as its not
> It will randomly stop working when you hit the
> db's limit for items in a string list.
much like Outlook and its limitation on the length of disclaimers at the
bottom of incoming mail...
;-)
..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
-Original Messag
#form["field" & index]#
However, since they are checkboxes, you have to test for their existence
first using isDefined() or structKeyExists().
M!ke
-Original Message-
From: Dmitrii Dimandt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 8:03 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Form para
Greetings, all. We're excited to announce that we formally released SeeFusion 4
on Monday! Here's a quick summary of new/enhanced features:
* Flex 2 rich interface! From real-time charts to spreadsheet export, this is
the crown jewel of SeeFusion 4. Never again can it be said that SeeFusion is
Dont you think it would be easier to just have a multi select or a checkbox
for all the users (all named the same)... select the ones you want and
submit. The form field would have a list of selected users. Then you just
run an update query where userid IN list
If you prefer to loop for no reason
On Thursday 03 August 2006 18:43, Kris Jones wrote:
> SELECT catid FROM deep_images WHERE #uid# IN (catid)
IN is evil.
It will randomly stop working when you hit the db's limit for items in a
string list.
Which is not fun :-)
If you must have comma lists rather than a more sensible layout, why
I would do that a little different. You coul repeat the checkboxes like so:
On the other side of the form action you would receive a list of id's in
the form.isBannedUserID, like this: "1,2,3" for all checked inputs.
Which you could then directly use in an UPDATE sql statement. (WHERE
userI
I know that :)
What I needed is a simple way to output and process a number of very
similar fields. Let's say, you want to ban 10 users from a forum at
once. After you've found these users, you could output this:
etc.
After the form is submitted you could do this in PHP:
w
Having SQL on the web server is generally not a good idea, especially if the
sites are making heavy use of it.
CF, IIS and SQL will be competing for CPU time and disk access.
Ideally you should have separate servers.
You can inprove performance on a single server by having a separate disk for
SQL S
FORM variables are a struct in CF. You can access them like this:
#CurrentFormField# is: #FORM[CurrentFormField]#
You can see how from there you can do processing based on the name of
the Form field etc. You can also use all of the struct functions on
the FORM scope like StructFindKey() etc.
Good morning all,
We're having some issues with server performance, and I wondered if anyone
else has been beating their heads against a wall with this issue. We've got
some brand new Dell servers, all configured with CF, .NET and SQL Express on
the same machine.
Currently I'm seeing decreased
Coming from PHP I sorely miss the following feature:
When submitted, form values would be accessible through an array. This
was immensely helpful in cases when multiple similar records (a list
from a database, for instance) needed to be edited simultaneously.
However, CF arra
On Thursday 03 August 2006 14:26, Ken Ferguson wrote:
> that's 120K/yr. You just double the hourly and add a K.
Woa. That makes it a bit easier.
:remembers
--
Tom Chiverton
This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP.
Halliwells
You just need an OR in your WHERE clause:
WHERE date > Effective_Date
AND (date < Deactive_Date OR Deactive_Date IS NULL)
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.5/407 - Release Date: 03/08/2006
~~~
Hello. Sorry if this has been mentioned. But all week I have not received any
of the CF-Talk digests. I am subscribed to the 2 hourly ones. I re-subscribed
but nothing I only get the spam that started coming through when I first signed
up?
cheers
Martin
89 matches
Mail list logo
