+1
On 1 Feb 2011, at 02:31, Ben Forta wrote:
I officially nominate this thread as the least productive on cf-talk ever.
--- Ben
Mark Drew
Railo Technologies UK
Professional Open Source
skype: mark_railo
email: m...@getrailo.com
gtalk: m...@getrailo.com
tel:+44 7971 85 22
Dave, your right it doesn't seem to have made much difference yet, but as I
have said many times before is the fact that the cf community does not
cover the entire cf user base. There are a huge number of developers and
users out there who do not participate in the community. Customers with CF
then move it there.
+1
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Paul Hastings p...@sustainablegis.comwrote:
On 2/1/2011 12:46 PM, denstar wrote:
First off, this portion of the discussion probably belongs on
cf-community.
then move it there.
Sorry if this ends up being a dupe post.
I'm working on a client site that already had a CF Form in place using cfinput
and validation via required=yes
We added some select boxes that are required and as most of you know CF forms
don't really validate those. So, I am using jquery to validate
I generally try to roll my own validation and just use form instead. You
can much nicer validation. However with that being said I believe whatever
you define in onSubmit=return bla will only fire if the cf validation
passes.
Ray explains it here:
Is your JQuery validation returning false?
Here is how I see it (I'm assuming here so don't shoot me)...
CFValidation = false
JQuery = true
One result is true so it processes.
CFValidation = true
JQuery = false
Same One result is true so it processes.
CFValidation = false
JQuery = false
Both
I'm not sure that's correct. Using the same scenarios (and assuming the
jquery validation is defined in onsubmit with return specified) here's my
understanding:
CFValidation = false - validation ends.
JQuery = doesn't get processed.
Form Doesn't Submit
CFValidation = true
JQuery = false -
Can anyone recommend a decent yet cheap web host for ColdFusion?
Right now I'm hosting my site at DreamHost (Simple wordpress as CMS site).
I didn't see anyone mention this, but for cheap hosting, but good service, you
may want to consider looking at Railo hosting through Alurium.com.
Hello All!
I'm trying my first Join of two tables and not having the best of luck...
One table holds just a part number off our top 200 products, the second table
holds a part number along with all the information that accompanies that part.
I'm trying to pull back all the data from the
On 2/1/2011 9:41 AM, Aaron Renfroe wrote:
Hello All!
SELECT DISTINCT PartNumber FROM GriffinDataRevised
INNER JOIN Top200 ON GriffinDataRevised.PartNumber = Top200.Part_Number
WHERE Top200.part_number = GriffinDataRevised.PartNumber
INNER JOIN will enforce a filter that
a standard join looks like this..
select foo from a
join b on a.id = b.id
So yours would look something like
SELECT PartNumber
FROM GriffinDataRevised d
JOIN Top200 t on d.partnumber = t.part_number
You're not technically doing a join, you're doing a sub query.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:41
Hello Ian and thank you!
I have tried both the left and right joins, the RIGHT join brought back the 15k
results again, the LEFT join was bringing back so many that i killed the
browser before it hurt something :)
JOINS:
SELECT * FROM GriffinDataRevised
LEFT OUTER JOIN Top200 ON
On 2/1/2011 10:22 AM, Aaron Renfroe wrote:
Hello Ian and thank you!
But my query was still running wrong, correct?
Not necessarily, maybe your data is wrong. You may need to provide some
more description on what data is in each of these tables and how you are
trying to utilize it before we
I guess it could be both.
While some part numbers can fit multiple years, makes, and models of a
vehicle others just fit one. The top 200 are our best selling radiators.
In theory, i want to hit the master table, pull out all the information on
the radiator based on the part number being
On 2/1/2011 11:35 AM, Aaron M Renfroe wrote:
But i'm now getting an error that the part_number field
is ambiguous. Ugh
That just means that the field is in both (multiple) tables and the
database wants you to tell it which table you want to use to get the
value for this column to use in
On 2/1/2011 11:35 AM, Aaron M Renfroe wrote:
On another note, the
query that brought back 98 results may have been working right, i found
another 78 records in another table for race car radiators, i'm almost
guessing that the last few are in another table that would make the total
200
Thank you! I will research the UNION Clause. You have been a great help!
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Ian Skinner h...@ilsweb.com wrote:
On 2/1/2011 11:35 AM, Aaron M Renfroe wrote:
On another note, the
query that brought back 98 results may have been working right, i found
another
Since everyone should be in a SQL Join state of mind...here's another one.
I have a weird issue that I haven't been able to narrow down yet. I'm trying to
add a new field to one of my tables to store some additional information, but
once I add the column, my previously working query breaks.
Fellow ColdFusion Community Members:
Has anyone had any experience with MediaSpa, located in Rye, NY?
I'm looking for any feedback - good / bad / indifferent.
Please respond off-list to jobs [at] accessiblecomputing [dot] com.
Thank you in advance!
Sincerely,
~Christian
This might be an issue I've had to deal with before.
Do something to change the fingerprint (no idea what the correct term
would be) of the query - or restart cf. By change the fingerprint, it
could be something as simple ad swapping p.* and pt.* (swapping as
in their ordinal position in the
On 2/1/2011 1:23 PM, Debbie Morris wrote:
What am I overlooking?
The evil of using * in SELECT clauses.
When that is done, database drivers are know to cache the columns and
datatypes of the SQL queries. Then somebody comes along and changes the
database structure, like you adding a field.
On 2/1/2011 2:21 PM, Charlie Stell wrote:
I assume this is something on CF's side -
as restarting the CF service also fixes it.
Not ColdFusion itself, but the database drivers used by ColdFusion and
the cached (pooled) data source settings.
Changing the Datasource to not used pooled settings
The evil of using * in SELECT clauses.
I'm with Ian on this 100%. Often times developers think that using * will be
faster, and easier and allow more flexibility. However that couldn't be
further from the truth as you are seeing now. Take Ian's advice and define
each column you want from your
I'm 100% with you guys on this as well. Replacing the hundreds of select *
from all the existing code here is one of my seemingly never ending tasks. I
should have addressed that first before attempting to add anything else to the
mix.
I'm done installing my Windows updates for the evening,
I'm running Coldfusion 8. Trying to use a cfloop over a query. I need to go to
the next index/user/database-row if some condition is met after generating my
report.
I asked yesterday, was given CFcontinue but tried it today and it's only for
ColdFusion 9.
Here's what I've tried:
Method:
Adam, as I suggested yesterday (if you are pre cf8) you will need to do some
conditional evaluation.
pseudo code:
set var doContinue = false;
if ( conditions are met )
{
doContinue = true;
}
if ( doContinue )
{
-- put all the rest of your processing code here and only run it if your
*should be pre cf9. sorry.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Michael Grant mgr...@modus.bz wrote:
Adam, as I suggested yesterday (if you are pre cf8) you will need to do
some conditional evaluation.
pseudo code:
set var doContinue = false;
if ( conditions are met )
{
doContinue = true;
Lesson ignored.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Maureen mamamaur...@gmail.com wrote:
Bluntly..stop begging for a job. Your frequent postings over the
years have alienated any prospective employer who reads them. And
your current bout of sarcasm and criticism of posters on the CF-TALK
Fellow ColdFusion Community Members:
Has anyone had any experience with MediaSpa, located in Rye, NY?
I'm looking for any feedback - good / bad / indifferent.
Please respond off-list to jobs [at] accessiblecomputing [dot] com.
Thank you in advance!
Sincerely,
~Christian
To all,
so that you all know I didn't start this one he came to me asking. perhaps
some good will come out of it though and whether if you think its professional
or not, it is only right that companies and other developers treat each other
with the same respect and try not to crucify each
Add me to your list. I just think you are a big dickhead.
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 1, 2011, at 6:07 PM, mftr...@att.net mftr...@att.net wrote:
I ve accepted the fact that I will not probably get another job from this
list so you know what who cares.
So i might as well empty the
Does this mean you'll unsubscribe from the list?
I'm sure a number of people have asked you to do so (respectfully).
I sincerely wish you the best of luck in your next career choice.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 4:07 PM, mftr...@att.net mftr...@att.net wrote:
I ve accepted the fact that I will
Well said.
Sent from a mobile device. Please excuse any typos.
On Feb 1, 2011, at 6:15 PM, Ray Champagne r...@raychampagne.com wrote:
Add me to your list. I just think you are a big dickhead.
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 1, 2011, at 6:07 PM, mftr...@att.net mftr...@att.net wrote:
33 matches
Mail list logo
