I don't think this is a good place to discuss this, especially since the
people local to that area are now opposing this whole "movement." I don't
believe the people involved in this "movement" have properly grasped the
complexity of this issue - especially the racial aspects - and I don't
think i
So what do you do ten years later when nobody on the team was there when the
code was written?
--
~ Mike Stemle, Jr.
On Feb 29, 2012, at 18:25, James Holmes wrote:
>
> This is why we pair program. Eventually everyone on the team has seen each
> bit of code in the app (or at least most of it)
> --
> Shu Ha Ri: Agile and .NET blog
> http://www.bifrost.com.au/
>
>
> On 29 February 2012 09:48, Michael Stemle wrote:
>
>>
>> In properly designed code you don't have 1500-line files. Now that I've
>> made my ridiculous assertion can we p
Ha Ri: Agile and .NET blog
> http://www.bifrost.com.au/
>
>
> On 29 February 2012 08:45, Michael Stemle wrote:
>
>>
>> We are in disagreement. Some of us actually use comments as a way of
>> planning and maintaining our code.
>
>
>
~~~
Well played :)
--
~ Mike Stemle, Jr.
On Feb 28, 2012, at 18:59, Bryan Stevenson
wrote:
>
> tabs inserted as 2 spaces ;-)
>
> On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 18:45 -0600, Michael Stemle wrote:
>
>> We are in disagreement. Some of us actually use comments as a way of
>> p
ure that it needs a comment is silliness.
>
> --
> Shu Ha Ri: Agile and .NET blog
> http://www.bifrost.com.au/
>
>
> On 28 February 2012 23:32, Michael Stemle wrote:
>
>>
>> This reminds me of the time that Ruby's developers told me that unit tests
> > postcard. ;)
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Casey Dougall - Uber Website
> > Solutions wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Michael Stemle <
> themanchic...@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >>
This is a pretty simple task to script, but why would one wish to remove all
comments? That seems like a poor practice.
--
~ Mike Stemle, Jr.
On Feb 28, 2012, at 6:57, Chad Baloga wrote:
>
> Are there any programs out there that will remove all CF comments from your
> code??
>
>
~~~
+1 for Textastic.
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 17:41, Brian Thornton wrote:
>
> I second Larrys comments
>
> > > I'm trying to decide which CF-friendly iPad code editor to get. So
> > far,
> > > its a toss-up between Koder Code, Textastic, and Gusto. Anyone got
> > > some experience in using any of
ck down" the page beneath before... how is that done?)
>
> Rick
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Stemle [mailto:themanchic...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 11:12 PM
> To: cf-talk
> Subject: Re: (ot) Mobile Modal Dialogs Trouble
>
>
> I suppose i
ather not work with a framework completely, but is it
> possible to somehow use parts of it only, such as a modal
> functionality, if it has one?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Stemle [mailto:themanchic...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 10:02 PM
>
Are you using a framework like jQuery Mobile or Sencha? I've had great luck
with jQuery Mobile, and a colleague of mine has had similar luck with Sencha.
On Feb 13, 2012, at 20:51 , Rick Faircloth wrote:
>
> I've started doing quite a bit of mobile development
> and have been working on implem
There is an addon in cydia for those who jailbreak that helps. It's called
ContactPrivacy, and it's free.
Now that jail breaking has been ruled not to be DMCA-violating, and it's crazy
simple to do, those who are concerned about privacy should learn about that
option.
What you've described h
Try also writing an appropriate content-type header, see if that helps.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 15:07, fun and learning wrote:
>
> >What do you mean "fails"?
> >
> >On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 14:58, fun and learning >wrote:
> >
> >>
> It does not work. It does not throw any error. It tries to open
What do you mean "fails"?
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 14:58, fun and learning wrote:
>
> Hi All -
>
> I have used cfcontent to write some data to excel docs.
>
> I am trying to do the following - I have a drop down, and when one of the
> value is selected, I need to open a word document that is save
I would approach this by writing a test against the webservice, and then
throwing a little bit of benchmarking code into the procedures you call.
That should give you some sort of idea as to which parts of the procedure
are running slower than expected.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 15:39, fun and lear
I think that the best way to do that would just be to do some sort of file
comparrison. There are many ways you could go about this. I think the three
most common are to compare the last modified times for the files, to
compare the files' size in bytes, and then to compare a fingerprint -
usually
like a
> potentially interesting idea. I'm guessing you are talking about a way
> wrapper that knows how to fetch and install custom tags?
>
> Judah
>
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Michael Stemle
> wrote:
>>
>> So you have a link? I'm mobile at the momen
basic compatibility testing. It
> seems to work just fine as far as I can tell, but I'm not running any
> Fusebox apps. In terms of inexpensive hosting, it should be noted that
> OpenBD runs on Google App Engine, so that might be an interesting
> option to look into.
>
> Cheers,
Railo claims that Fusebox is compatible from what I can see. I've only
played with Railo so far, but both of them seem like a bit of a pain to
install on anything but Windows. That said, I run regular apache, so maybe
that's what makes it complicated.
I'm running my CCFAN development stuff on cfm
It really depends on the DBMS in question. I am unclear from your message
if you're talking about SQL Server specifically (it seems like you might be
asking if SQL Server is the only DBMS you can use AD/LDAP authentication
with, to which I would say "no").
For AD with SQL Server in CF7, you can c
21 matches
Mail list logo
