Adam, if you're that down on CF why are you still using it? Or for that matter
posting to a CF list?
This is a traditionally unpopular metric with CF developers, but there's
this:
http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html
Java's more prevalent than .NET platform
Open BD stagnant? You have to be joking. It has a very active google groups
mailing list, and OBD is actively developed - up to v. 3X now with some very
unique features. While opinions are fine, please don't mask opinions as fact
Adam.
I can't vouch for New Atlanta itself, but BD.NET has not
What in what I said suggested I'm down on CF?
That it is running out of steam and becoming less and less relevant as time
goes on (and I don't think anyone who has a reasonable purchase on reality
can contest that?) has no bearing on nor is impacted by what *I* personally
think about it.
I'm
Zombie Lover...
Steve 'Cutter' Blades
Adobe Community Professional
Adobe Certified Expert
Advanced Macromedia ColdFusion MX 7 Developer
http://cutterscrossing.com
Co-Author Learning Ext JS 3.2 Packt Publishing 2010
[Snort]. Yeah, OK mate. You keep telling yourself that.
--
Adam
On 13 March 2013 13:38, Larry Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com wrote:
Open BD stagnant? You have to be joking. It has a very active google
groups mailing list, and OBD is actively developed - up to v. 3X now with
some very unique
I looked at OBD site a while back noticed there was. No mention of the
windows installers done by Viviotech, you have to go to his site to find
them.
No mention of the Web Platform Installer version done by Helicon either.
I know it is very geared toward Linux users, but to purposefully exclude
Working on it as much as I can!
Regards
Mark Drew
On 13 Mar 2013, at 14:00, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote:
Although to be fair Railo are not very good at keeping their site updated
either.
~|
Order the Adobe
I know I have seen a lot of threads on this in the past, but didn't pay much
attention to them until now.
I have been using CF since v4.0 and now we have clients telling us that we can
not use CF anymore and that we need to switch to .NET.
Now I know our client's upper management couldn't
To be honest, if the reason is that is what others are doing, wouldn't it be
more appropriate to use PHP or Word Press? Those are in far greater use that
.net.
Robert Harrison
Director of Interactive Services
Austin Williams
Advertising I Branding I Digital I Direct
125 Kennedy Drive,
For those of u on this list that have experience with both, can I
please get your feedback on the Pros and Cons of going to the
.NET framework from ColdFusion?
Hi Dave, that will depend on what you're doing with it. I don't have
anything against .NET and have done some coding with it. The
A couple of things come to mind. First is the primary reason I use CF:
Speed of development. CF can be seen as a framework for Java much like
jQuery is a framework for JavaScript. It takes care of the bulk of the
heavy lifting and grunt work so you can focus on writing productive code.
,NET is a
Justin,
With regard to a CFML engine running on .NET, New Atlanta has a
BlueDragon .NET edition
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm that does
exactly that.
-Carl V.
On 3/12/2013 2:07 PM, Justin Scott wrote:
For those of u on this list that have experience with both, can
With regard to a CFML engine running on .NET, New Atlanta has a
BlueDragon .NET edition that does exactly that.
Thanks Carl, I knew they had a Java version but wasn't aware of the
.NET edition. Good to know if I ever run across one of those types of
clients.
-Justin
Justin,
As a one-time Java BlueDragon user, I'd say the .NET version is the only
reason I'd use BlueDragon over ACF at this point. They have fallen way
behind in comparable feature support (last time I checked they were
about equivalent to ACF 7/8).
-Carl V.
On 3/12/2013 3:49 PM, Justin
Justin...
OpenBD began its days as a .Net engine...
Regards,
Andrew Scott
WebSite: http://www.andyscott.id.au/
Google+: http://plus.google.com/113032480415921517411
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Justin Scott leviat...@darktech.orgwrote:
For those of u on this list that have
And I am sure that if you get to the real nuts and bolts of it, Java is
more popular on the Enterprise level than .Net is.
Regards,
Andrew Scott
WebSite: http://www.andyscott.id.au/
Google+: http://plus.google.com/113032480415921517411
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Gerald Guido
I can't vouch for New Atlanta itself, but BD.NET has not seen any activity
for a number of years, and never got beyond CFMX 7 compat, as far as I can
recollect.
OpenBD is - as far as I can tell - a stagnant project (except for Alan
doing what best suits Alan: fair enough... that was always the
This is a traditionally unpopular metric with CF developers, but there's
this:
http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html
Java's more prevalent than .NET platform languages, but that's not a
compelling reason to use either (/or).
And let's not forget that CFML is not Java,
well, , being as it compiles to java byte code, and you can distribute any
CFML app as pure JAVA, no CFML in sight, which would make it a java app.
I have never tried this TBH, but I would presume you just deploy your app
as a war file, so it presumably would not even need a CFML engine, it will
Well that's fine (and, yes, that's how you do the deployment). But a
language is what you type in to the IDE or text editor, not what it
compiles down to, or that one deploys. Java byte code is no more Java than
CFML is, for that matter.
CFML is not Java. Java is Java.
A better defence of
Russ,
From memory as I haven't done it for awhile, is that the runtime is bundled
with your application meaning you need to supply a serial number with the
war as well. All that assumption was prior to ColdFusion 10, so it may
handle it differently.
Regards,
Andrew Scott
WebSite:
No Adam, the compiled version is Java.
Same as both Java and .Net compile down to a bytecode that is interpreted
at the machine language level, which makes machine code not .Net or Java
either :P
Regards,
Andrew Scott
WebSite: http://www.andyscott.id.au/
Google+:
To the OP: CFML is withering away... get used to it. Take whatever
opportunity you can to shift to a different language. Either .net-based
languages or Java would be good options.
*
*
True but tizz a crying shame. I have been all over the map but I have yet
to find a replacement that I *really*
Well that's fine (and, yes, that's how you do the deployment). But a
language is what you type in to the IDE or text editor, not what it
compiles down to, or that one deploys. Java byte code is no more Java than
CFML is, for that matter.
CFML is not Java. Java is Java.
That's true from a
24 matches
Mail list logo
