Re: An effort to make cold fusion 8 standard edition more efficie nt

2008-03-03 Thread Rick Mason
Claude, EXT is a javascript library that Adobe incorporated into CF-8. http://extjs.com/ Note version 1.0 is in CF-8 even though they're shipping version 2.0 now. Rick Mason On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Claude Schneegans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you seriously looked at what Ext

Re: An effort to make cold fusion 8 standard edition more efficie nt

2008-03-03 Thread Don L
I thought she was mocking, that ticked me off, if my bad I'll take back the 'annoying' thing... Claude, EXT is a javascript library that Adobe incorporated into CF-8. http://extjs.com/ Note version 1.0 is in CF-8 even though they're shipping version 2.0 now. Rick Mason On Sat, Mar 1, 2008

Re: An effort to make cold fusion 8 standard edition more efficie nt

2008-03-02 Thread Don L
I have been using the EXT 2.0 stuff along with jQuery and it has been really really nice. I have control over when I load the JS files and how they are cached. Do you happen to have some sort write-up or quick guide on getting started with the 8k ish light-weight Ext htmleditor? Thanks.

Re: An effort to make cold fusion 8 standard edition more efficie nt

2008-03-02 Thread Gerald Guido
http://www.google.com/search?q=Ext+htmleditorsourceid=navclient-ffie=UTF-8rlz=1B3GGGL_enUS233US233 First page got me two EXT ports CF. http://www.danvega.org/blog/index.cfm/2008/1/31/Ext-Forms-Using-cfExt http://www.madfellas.com/blog/index.cfm/2008/1/16/ColdExt--an-Ext-JS-tag-library On Sun,

Re: An effort to make cold fusion 8 standard edition more efficie nt

2008-03-02 Thread Don L
Thanks. Yes, I also found the first cf port, but I would be very reluntant to use it for my purpose (I'm sure they did good job...) but my main purpose of not to use FckEditor is to speed it up, with all library support files, I'm not certain it would help me with this particular case, I may

Re: An effort to make cold fusion 8 standard edition more efficie nt

2008-03-01 Thread J.J. Merrick
Congrats on quitting smoking. Keep it up for another week and we will get you a cake :-) I agree, my experience with the CFAJAX stuff is that it is a great start but has a couple of more iterations to go. I have been using the EXT 2.0 stuff along with jQuery and it has been really really nice. I

Re: An effort to make cold fusion 8 standard edition more efficie nt

2008-03-01 Thread Claude Schneegans
Have you seriously looked at what Ext offers? What's Ext ? -- ___ REUSE CODE! Use custom tags; See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm (Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Thanks.

Re: An effort to make cold fusion 8 standard edition more efficie nt

2008-03-01 Thread Gerald Guido
What's Ext ? It's a tractor. On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Claude Schneegans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you seriously looked at what Ext offers? What's Ext ? -- I get up every morning determined to both change the world and have one hell of a good time. Sometimes this makes

Re: An effort to make cold fusion 8 standard edition more efficie nt

2008-03-01 Thread Don L
(Again, my opinion) Now, with these new CF8 Ajax components, developers are using cfform again, to get the fancy grids and auto-suggest. Right on. Ajax is BIG deal, also, I love ColdFusion, and I don't want people to get wrong idea... Ok, I've cracked some core text editing js code, now,

Re: An effort to make cold fusion 8 standard edition more efficie nt

2008-02-29 Thread Gerald Guido
ColdFusion 8 Enterprise hosting FREE Subversion hosting -Original Message- From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 12:26 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: An effort to make cold fusion 8 standard edition more efficie nt IIS supports compression, but it's

Re: An effort to make cold fusion 8 standard edition more efficie nt

2008-02-29 Thread Don L
Dave, Rick, Russ, John and Gerald, Thank you all for your thoughts. To Gerald, you were probably referring to IIS6. My opinion still is, if feasible, the best option is, not to have/load unnecessary heavy-duty javascripts in the first place, and to make things/features more configurable by

RE: An effort to make cold fusion 8 standard edition more efficie nt

2008-02-29 Thread Russ
-Talk Subject: Re: An effort to make cold fusion 8 standard edition more efficie nt Dave, Rick, Russ, John and Gerald, Thank you all for your thoughts. To Gerald, you were probably referring to IIS6. My opinion still is, if feasible, the best option is, not to have/load unnecessary heavy

RE: An effort to make cold fusion 8 standard edition more efficie nt

2008-02-29 Thread Dave Watts
My opinion still is, if feasible, the best option is, not to have/load unnecessary heavy-duty javascripts in the first place, and to make things/features more configurable by design. In the case of cf8's integration with FukEditor, as some else has alluded on a separate thread before, it

Re: An effort to make cold fusion 8 standard edition more efficie nt

2008-02-29 Thread Don L
Thank you for your time, inputs, Dave, and some of your points seem reasonable..., I'm very lousy in spelling among many other shortcomings :) Don First, perhaps you shouldn't call it FukEditor. The actual name is problematic enough. Second, I love CF a lot, but it's not Adobe's flagship

Re: An effort to make cold fusion 8 standard edition more efficie nt

2008-02-29 Thread Cutter (CFRelated)
Don, I'm going to try to be nice here. I'm quitting smoking right now, so if I seem snappy try not to take it personally. Adobe has given us tools, within CF, to do things that most backend, server-side developers never (or rarely) get into. It made them dead simple, used the best and most

Re: An effort to make cold fusion 8 standard edition more efficie nt

2008-02-29 Thread Gerald Guido
My opinion still is, if feasible, the best option is, not to have/load unnecessary heavy-duty javascripts in the first place I am sure that the CF development team wrestled with these issues and did the best that they could with the time frame and what they had to work with. IMO they did an

Re: An effort to make cold fusion 8 standard edition more efficie nt

2008-02-29 Thread Claude Schneegans
3. Use something else that's not integrated. 4. develop your own ;-) -- ___ REUSE CODE! Use custom tags; See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm (Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Thanks.

Re: An effort to make cold fusion 8 standard edition more efficie nt

2008-02-29 Thread James Holmes
Have you seriously looked at what Ext offers? On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 3:34 AM, Claude Schneegans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3. Use something else that's not integrated. 4. develop your own ;-) -- mxAjax / CFAjax docs and other useful articles: http://www.bifrost.com.au/blog/

RE: An effort to make cold fusion 8 standard edition more efficie nt

2008-02-28 Thread Dave Watts
And on js, Gzip components is recommended, does the current cf8 standard support that? For instance, ext-core.js is called by cf server instance, not manually called by a developer. Yes, if your web server is configured to gzip static files, these files will be gzipped. All CF does is write

Re: An effort to make cold fusion 8 standard edition more efficie nt

2008-02-28 Thread Don L
Thanks for the idea, Dave, unfortunately my version of the web server does not seem to support compression, oddly it has a dll for compression... I'll probably need to do more research... Don Yes, if your web server is configured to gzip static files, these files will be gzipped. All CF does

Re: An effort to make cold fusion 8 standard edition more efficie nt

2008-02-28 Thread Rick Root
Yeah, that kind of compression is almost always a web server function. On 2/28/08, Don L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the idea, Dave, unfortunately my version of the web server does not seem to support compression, oddly it has a dll for compression... I'll probably need to do more

RE: An effort to make cold fusion 8 standard edition more efficie nt

2008-02-28 Thread Russ
-Original Message- From: Don L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 9:11 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: An effort to make cold fusion 8 standard edition more efficie nt Thanks for the idea, Dave, unfortunately my version of the web server does not seem to support

RE: An effort to make cold fusion 8 standard edition more efficie nt

2008-02-28 Thread John Mason
Message- From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 12:26 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: An effort to make cold fusion 8 standard edition more efficie nt IIS supports compression, but it's a PITA to configure. Of course MS doesn't provide any sort of GUI for this and you