Re: Any word on Apache 2 support for CF5/Linux?

"Sean A Corfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:D5C19F2F-F1F0-11D6-9787-0003939B3F7E@;corfield.org... > Last I heard there were still compatibility issues with mod_perl and > Apache 2.0.x (and some other modules I believe)? Apache 2.0.x is great, but all the major modules are having co

Re: Any word on Apache 2 support for CF5/Linux?

On Wednesday, Nov 6, 2002, at 15:29 US/Pacific, Dave Watts wrote: > There are a lot of people sticking with Apache 1.3.x, as far as I can > tell. Last I heard there were still compatibility issues with mod_perl and Apache 2.0.x (and some other modules I believe)? That's why we're moving to a tw

RE: Any word on Apache 2 support for CF5/Linux?

We've figured out what to do, just trying to get it all ship-shape to get it out to ya! -Vern > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:todd@;web-rat.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 3:57 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Any word on Apache 2 s

RE: Any word on Apache 2 support for CF5/Linux?

> Yeah, and the latest and greatest apache is 2.0.43 ... > and, until Macromedia figures out what to do to resolve > the magic number that continues to keep changing, nothing > can be done about that. Vern mentioned that they are > working on it (for the next updater?) According to previous po

RE: Any word on Apache 2 support for CF5/Linux?

Yeah, and the latest and greatest apache is 2.0.43 ... and, until Macromedia figures out what to do to resolve the magic number that continues to keep changing, nothing can be done about that. Vern mentioned that they are working on it (for the next updater?) On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Dave Watts wro

RE: Any word on Apache 2 support for CF5/Linux?

> Isn't Apache 2 still considered beta? No, Apache 2 is gold, and is the recommended platform according to the Apache Group. This is especially true if you're running Apache on Windows - Apache 1.3.x was always considered beta quality on Windows by the Apache Group. > If it's not considered bet

RE: Any word on Apache 2 support for CF5/Linux?

2 support for > CF5/Linux? > > > -Original Message- > From: Paul Hastings [mailto:paul@;tei.or.th] > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 11:14 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Any word on Apache 2 support for CF5/Linux? > > > > (Note: Microsoft still patches older relea

Re: Any word on Apache 2 support for CF5/Linux?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Isn't Apache 2 still considered beta? If it's not considered beta > anymore, then why is Apache 1.3.x still being maintained? apache 2 is not considered beta anymore. Why is 1.3 still being maintained? Because the ASF knows that some people do not want to do a major

Re: Any word on Apache 2 support for CF5/Linux?

Paul Hastings wrote: >>(Note: Microsoft still patches older releases of SQL Server.) > > the last publically available service pack for what i would consider "old" > sql server--6.5--is sp5a and was done up in dec-1998 to jan-1999. its still > available but not been updated. and i'd think you'd be

RE: Any word on Apache 2 support for CF5/Linux?

Again. I am totally confused. -Original Message- From: Craig Thomas [mailto:craig@;januzzithomas.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 11:10 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Any word on Apache 2 support for CF5/Linux? >>>Does Netscape support version 4 of their browser? Pro

RE: Any word on Apache 2 support for CF5/Linux?

: Re: Any word on Apache 2 support for CF5/Linux? > (Note: Microsoft still patches older releases of SQL Server.) the last publically available service pack for what i would consider "old" sql server--6.5--is sp5a and was done up in dec-1998 to jan-1999. its still available but not been

Re: Any word on Apache 2 support for CF5/Linux?

> What a lame-brained analogy. Todd, there is a VAST difference between > a browser (i.e. CLIENT) and a SERVER. CF is a server, one upon which large, > complex, business systems are built. Companies who want to compete > in that arena don't just abandon support of earlier releases. > > (Note: Micr

RE: Any word on Apache 2 support for CF5/Linux?

>>>Does Netscape support version 4 of their browser? Probably not anymore. >>>Does Microsoft support version 4 of their browser anymore? >>Definitely not. >>What a lame-brained analogy. Todd, there is a VAST difference between Besides which, both of these are FREE.

Re: Any word on Apache 2 support for CF5/Linux?

> (Note: Microsoft still patches older releases of SQL Server.) the last publically available service pack for what i would consider "old" sql server--6.5--is sp5a and was done up in dec-1998 to jan-1999. its still available but not been updated. and i'd think you'd be even harder pressed to find

Re: Any word on Apache 2 support for CF5/Linux?

At 09:39 AM 11/6/02 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Greg, > >Not really fair for a harsh demand like that. Perfectly fair. >Does Netscape support version 4 of their browser? Probably not anymore. >Does Microsoft support version 4 of their browser anymore? Definitely not. What a lame-brained a

Re: Any word on Apache 2 support for CF5/Linux?

and the nextron thing is just for windows I believe, not linux. On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Jeffry Houser wrote: > > > I believe this is the one you said you had problems with, though. > > > At 08:42 AM 11/6/2002 -0500, you wrote: > >Has anyone successfully built

Re: Any word on Apache 2 support for CF5/Linux?

Greg, Not really fair for a harsh demand like that. Does Netscape support version 4 of their browser? Probably not anymore. Does Microsoft support version 4 of their browser anymore? Definitely not. Their answers will most likely be "upgrade" to our latest and greatest! Why would Macromed

Re: Any word on Apache 2 support for CF5/Linux?

I believe this is the one you said you had problems with, though. At 08:42 AM 11/6/2002 -0500, you wrote: >Has anyone successfully built a mod_coldfusion.so for Apache 2 >and Linux? > >We've just moved to RedHat 8.0 and had to regress back to >Apache 1.3.27

Any word on Apache 2 support for CF5/Linux?

Has anyone successfully built a mod_coldfusion.so for Apache 2 and Linux? We've just moved to RedHat 8.0 and had to regress back to Apache 1.3.27 (which we had to build ourselves) because Macromedia has elected not to provide support of the prior release on the current, more secure, Apache web ser