+1 for Sublime Text 2!
-Original Message-
From: Paul Kukiel [mailto:pkuk...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 11:52 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Modern (and free) html/cf editor that is similar to Homesite?
Sublime is amazing I have just switched. It's not free but if you use
/cf editor that is similar to Homesite?
+1 for Sublime Text 2!
-Original Message-
From: Paul Kukiel [mailto:pkuk...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 11:52 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Modern (and free) html/cf editor that is similar to Homesite?
Sublime is amazing I have just
[mailto:r...@whitestonemedia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 12:14 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: RE: Modern (and free) html/cf editor that is similar to Homesite?
+1 for Sublime Text 2!
-Original Message-
From: Paul Kukiel [mailto:pkuk...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 11:52 PM
I teach web design and web programming at a public high school. I have
been using homesite for my classes, but it doesn't play well in our
environment (locked down C drive, network drives...trust me, it has
issues). Are there any current text editors that play well with HTML, CSS,
JavaScript,
I know this option isn't free but you may want to contact them and see if
you can work something out with them since it's for educational use.
http://www.sublimetext.com/
This is probably the best editor I've ever used. It is very similar to
Homesite in may respects but it just takes it to a
(and free) html/cf editor that is similar to Homesite?
I know this option isn't free but you may want to contact them and see if
you can work something out with them since it's for educational use.
http://www.sublimetext.com/
This is probably the best editor I've ever used. It is very similar
I'd argue that the 'spirit' of that mode should preclude someone from
using it in a classroom environment. (Unless the licenses are paid for
of course.)
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Paul Kukiel pkuk...@gmail.com wrote:
Sublime is amazing I have just switched. It's not free but if you use
I teach web design and web programming at a public high school. I have
been using homesite for my classes, but it doesn't play well in our
environment (locked down C drive, network drives...trust me, it has
issues). Are there any current text editors that play well with HTML, CSS,
JavaScript,
I think there's a CF plugin for Notepad++
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Pete Ruckelshaus
pruckelsh...@gmail.comwrote:
I teach web design and web programming at a public high school. I have
been using homesite for my classes, but it doesn't play well in our
environment (locked down C
Notepad++ http://notepad-plus-plus.org
It even has a plugin for ColdFusion.
-Original Message-
From: Pete Ruckelshaus [mailto:pruckelsh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 10:16 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Modern (and free) html/cf editor that is similar to Homesite?
I teach web
http://www.ultraedit.com/downloads/ultraedit_download.html
http://download.cnet.com/HomeSite/3000-10247_4-10001199.html
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
+1 for Notepad++
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Paul Ihrig pih...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.ultraedit.com/downloads/ultraedit_download.html
http://download.cnet.com/HomeSite/3000-10247_4-10001199.html
~|
Order the
Another +1 for Notepad++.
-Carl
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
1++ for Notepad++.
Also Komodo Edit is pretty slick. It supports CSS, JS, PHP etc.with code
hinting and code complete. Not as light weight as Notepad++ but it is a
very nice product.
http://www.activestate.com/komodo-edit
HTH
G!
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Carl Von Stetten
Anybody having a problem getting the Notepad++ cold fusion Lexer plug-in to
install?
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Gerald Guido gerald.gu...@gmail.comwrote:
1++ for Notepad++.
Also Komodo Edit is pretty slick. It supports CSS, JS, PHP etc.with code
hinting and code complete. Not as
It would not install successfully using the plugin manager.
I installed manually.
-Original Message-
From: Tim L (g-mail) [mailto:homet...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 1:49 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Modern (and free) html/cf editor that is similar to Homesite?
Anybody
-
From: Tim L (g-mail) [mailto:homet...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 1:49 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Modern (and free) html/cf editor that is similar to Homesite?
Anybody having a problem getting the Notepad++ cold fusion Lexer plug-in to
install?
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:44 PM
the plugin manager.
I installed manually.
-Original Message-
From: Tim L (g-mail) [mailto:homet...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 1:49 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Modern (and free) html/cf editor that is similar to Homesite?
Anybody having a problem getting
Anybody having a problem getting the Notepad++ cold fusion Lexer plug-in
to
install?
You have to do it manually. The installer does not work. Go here and DL the
latest version and follow the instructions in the zip file:
https://bitbucket.org/bbluemel/nppcoldfusion/downloads
That worked like a
Nobody has mentioned Sublime Text 2
http://www.sublimetext.com/2
a superb editor, a natural if you are moving on from Homesite
On 14/08/2012 00:15, Pete Ruckelshaus wrote:
I teach web design and web programming at a public high school. I have
been using homesite for my classes, but it
Sublime Text 2 is not free.
-Steve
On Monday, August 13, 2012, Kym Kovan wrote:
Nobody has mentioned Sublime Text 2
http://www.sublimetext.com/2
a superb editor, a natural if you are moving on from Homesite
On 14/08/2012 00:15, Pete Ruckelshaus wrote:
I teach web design and web
Sublime is amazing I have just switched. It's not free but if you use it
as the free version its the same just has a pop up to purchase every now
and then.
Highly recommended for a speedy editor.
Paul.
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Kym Kovan dev-li...@mbcomms.net.au wrote:
Nobody has
Hi all,
i search for a good free Coldfusion-Editor for Mac? On PC i use Homesite+ and
it works real good.
If you got a Softwarelink please tell me.
Thank´s and best regards
Nic.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most
CFEclipse. Just grap Eclipse for Mac and install the CFEclipse plugin
Jake Churchill
CF Webtools
11204 Davenport, Ste. 100
Omaha, NE 68154
http://www.cfwebtools.com
402-408-3733 x103
nic olai wrote:
Hi all,
i search for a good free Coldfusion-Editor for Mac? On PC i use Homesite+
and
Eclipse with CFEclipse/CF Extensions?
I use TextMate for simple file editing (ie, things not in an Eclipse Project).
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 9:39 AM, nic olai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
i search for a good free Coldfusion-Editor for Mac? On PC i use Homesite+
and it works real good.
Yes cfeclipse, but TextMate with the CFML pack is nice as well. If eclipse
intemidates you check out pulse (http://www.poweredbypulse.com/) it takes
the hassle out of eclipse.
Adam Haskell
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Raymond Camden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eclipse with CFEclipse/CF
So if I have a file - file.cfc for example - I could split it up easily?
But would I still be able to instanciate it the same way?
I am sure you know as well as I, that sometimes refactoring is just not an
option...
That's true, although with either CFCs or includes there are easy ways
to
into
separate CFC's? Would that be any more efficient than having them in one
big file (as long as they were all related of course).
Eric
/*-Original Message-
/*From: Michael Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/*Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 5:42 AM
/*To: CF-Talk
/*Subject: Re: Best CF
If the file is so large that the IDE can't load it, that means we're talking
about thousands or tens of thousands of lines of code. It really needs to be
split up into smaller components that do more specific things, because what
this really becomes is an example of an anti-pattern known as a God
So if I have a file - file.cfc for example - I could split it up easily?
But would I still be able to instanciate it the same way?
Yes `0
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
So if I have a file - file.cfc for example - I could split it up easily?
But would I still be able to instanciate it the same way?
Yes, just make sure you're not using a cfinclude within a function. That
exposes all protected local vars. Rather include the entire function as in
!---
I can see how a CFC can get large as is it supposed to be a library
of like functions, so if you had a site that had a calendar that was
cfc based (for instance) and you had all of you calendaring functions
in that cfc, that could get huge. Would you really want to break up
the functional
So if I have a file - file.cfc for example - I could split it up easily?
But would I still be able to instanciate it the same way?
Yeah, CFCs in particular would be functionaly the same.
--
s. isaac dealey ^ new epoch
isn't it time for a change?
ph: 617.365.5732
-Original Message-
From: s. isaac dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 7:32 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Best CF editor?
So if I have a file - file.cfc for example - I could split it up easily?
But would I still be able to instanciate it the same way?
Yeah
On Friday 30 May 2008, Aaron Rouse wrote:
I looked earlier and believe I have 3.3.2
Workspace-wide search is in the 3.3 series too. Probably 3.2 if I remember my
home machine right...
--
Tom Chiverton
This email is sent for and on behalf
On Sunday 01 Jun 2008, Aaron Rouse wrote:
How do you know with 100% certainty that some other editor is not going to
change the code on you in some odd ball case?
DW mangles my code (I've seen it do it, years ago).
Eclipse, in many years of using it, has never mangled my code.
So just on the
On Saturday 31 May 2008, Michael Christensen wrote:
and HomeSite for the large files (until I may eventually have time to split
them up).
That's the thing, CFEclipse chokes on files once their size gets so big you
should refactor them anyway :-)
--
Tom Chiverton
On Friday 30 May 2008, Qing Xia wrote:
But work set? Have not done that. I am going to look it up in the online
references you have so graciously provided.
I'd skip learning it, and jump straight to the (free) Mylyn plugin, which
automatically filters the file navigator based on what files you
On Sunday 01 Jun 2008, s. isaac dealey wrote:
the unlikely event that Dreamweaver did corrupt a file, recovery is
pretty simple.
*When you notice*.
--
Tom Chiverton
This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP.
Halliwells LLP
for a project with Mark?
:)
-Original Message-
From: Tom Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 3:55 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Best CF editor?
On Saturday 31 May 2008, Michael Christensen wrote:
and HomeSite for the large files (until I may eventually have time
I am sure you know as well as I, that sometimes refactoring is just not an
option...
On Saturday 31 May 2008, Michael Christensen wrote:
and HomeSite for the large files (until I may eventually have time
to split
them up).
That's the thing, CFEclipse chokes on files once their size
ROFL
/*-Original Message-
/*From: Jason Durham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/*Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 8:59 AM
/*To: CF-Talk
/*Subject: RE: Best CF editor?
snipped
/*It's nice to see some DWers come out of the closet! So who's going to
/*get the DW logo tattooed on their arm and apply
Hi. I'm Mike and I'm a Dreamweaver user.
It's nice to see some DWers come out of the closet! So who's going to
get the DW logo tattooed on their arm and apply for a project with Mark?
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the
You are aware - I hope - that CFEclipse has FTP support? It's the FIle
Browser. It works both with local paths and FTP paths. One benefit it
has over RDS is:
a) Most folks disable RDS on production
b) I love that w/ FTP, I can specify a folder to jump to immediately.
With RDS I have to dig down
)Eclipse. :)
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 9:20 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Best CF editor?
You are aware - I hope - that CFEclipse has FTP support? It's the FIle
Browser. It works both with local paths and FTP paths. One
Subject: Re: Best CF editor?
You are aware - I hope - that CFEclipse has FTP support? It's the FIle
Browser. It works both with local paths and FTP paths. One benefit it
has over RDS is:
a) Most folks disable RDS on production
b) I love that w/ FTP, I can specify a folder to jump to immediately
I am sure you know as well as I, that sometimes refactoring is just not an
option...
That's true, although with either CFCs or includes there are easy ways
to divide the file up into multiple without actually refactoring them
and take just a few minutes.
cfif b...1000 lines of
Tom Chiverton said:
On Sunday 01 Jun 2008, Aaron Rouse wrote:
How do you know with 100% certainty that some other editor is not going to
change the code on you in some odd ball case?
DW mangles my code (I've seen it do it, years ago).
Eclipse, in many years of using it, has never mangled
On Sunday 01 Jun 2008, s. isaac dealey wrote:
the unlikely event that Dreamweaver did corrupt a file, recovery is
pretty simple.
*When you notice*.
Given what I've seen, I wouldn't put not noticing down as being
particularly likely.
--
s. isaac dealey ^ new epoch
isn't it time for a
Unless someone tells me the code view doesn't change code - I will
never run DW. Period. I believe someone earlier in the thread said
that it was indeed fixed, but who would want to use an editor w/o
knowing if it will muck with your code??
The problem with the XML's entities is now fixed in
I think Massimo's point a msg ok makes a good point. You are right -
no program is w/o bugs. But I'd rather avoid the bugs I know about.
Anyway, this is just my personal opinion now.
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 10:48 PM, Kay Smoljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Raymond
Ok, but if you KNOW that there is a 0.01% chance of DW messing with
your code, that wouldn't worry you? I can just imagine the hours
wasted trying to figure out why somehting isn't working and it turns
out to be the editor messing with the file.
Sorry - even if it is 1 in a 1000, or 1 in
How do you know with 100% certainty that some other editor is not
going to change the code on you in some odd ball case? I honestly
think I have had Notepad, if it was not this then it was some built-in
editor on this Mac, change a display character on me before, should I
ban that from use
So the bugs that you have been made known about, you do in fact use those
specific syntaxes in XML?
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Raymond Camden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Massimo's point a msg ok makes a good point. You are right -
no program is w/o bugs. But I'd rather avoid the bugs
It's similarly unable to understand the carriage returns
inserted into documents on Macs, so when you open those you
get one big mass of text with no returns at all.
To be accurate, it understands those carriage returns just fine. What it
doesn't understand is that, on a Mac, a carriage
CF editor?
/*
/*Massimo(sp?) gave an example that I believe others were able to repeat
/*where
/*DW rewrites and XML file. I have seen DW do this for one of ours, here
is
/*what the files have prior to opening them:
/*
/*StyleSearch/StyleSearch
/*
/*When opened up in DW the display shows
The only thing I had in CFEclipse that I'd like to see in Dreamweaver is
the ability to get a list of methods in a CFC
Available since 3 years on my website :-)
http://www.massimocorner.com/dreamweaver/coldfusion/cf_function_nav.mxp
Thanks Massimo! Exactly what I was looking for. :)
--
That was back when DW was a design tool and didn't have the code view. It
also had the horrible Mac disembodied windows. We also were not happy with
the first version of it after MM dropped CfStudio. It has improved greatly
along the road to 8. I still wish they would make a version of it
DW7 was better and DW8 was really nice...though as Ray pointed out...there
was no SVN integration, which sucked.
There's a public beta of DW 9 out now, with some nice enhancements. A
work saving feature for me is a related files panel that clearly shows
any includes, imported files, blah,
I guess I assumed it was 7...
eric
/*-Original Message-
/*From: Massimo Foti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/*Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 12:27 AM
/*To: CF-Talk
/*Subject: Re: Best CF editor?
/*
/* DW7 was better and DW8 was really nice...
/*
/*Ehmm... DW 7 actually never
Yeah, but until 5, I really wouldn't call it code view...
/*-Original Message-
/*From: Massimo Foti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/*Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 12:30 AM
/*To: CF-Talk
/*Subject: Re: Best CF editor?
/*
/* That was back when DW was a design tool and didn't have the code view
Basically, it seems my choices come down to something like this;
HOMESITE
PROS: sturdy and reliable
CONS: not being updated
ECLIPSE
PROS: free, lots of good features, nice functions for CF
CONS: buggy, doesn't handle large files, even critical bugs seem to take a LONG
time to get fixed
APTANA
:19 AM
/*To: CF-Talk
/*Subject: Re: Best CF editor?
/*
/* That was back when DW was a design tool and didn't have the code view.
/*It
/* also had the horrible Mac disembodied windows. We also were not happy
/*with
/* the first version of it after MM dropped CfStudio. It has improved
/*greatly
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Eric Roberts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The separate windows thing really bugged me...but then again I really
dislike Macs too. It's one of the things I hate about gimp too, but
unfortunately I am forced to use that.
DW has had a docked, full MDI since the MX2004
Yeah...and that was a major improvement. The separate windows kept me from
using DW prior to that.
Eric
/*-Original Message-
/*From: Kay Smoljak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/*Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 8:52 PM
/*To: CF-Talk
/*Subject: Re: Best CF editor?
/*
/*On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 6:10
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Raymond Camden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless someone tells me the code view doesn't change code - I will
never run DW. Period. I believe someone earlier in the thread said
that it was indeed fixed, but who would want to use an editor w/o
knowing if it will
How do you know with 100% certainty that some other editor is not going to
change the code on you in some odd ball case? I honestly think I have had
Notepad, if it was not this then it was some built-in editor on this Mac,
change a display character on me before, should I ban that from use and
My problem with it appears to have been fixed in CS3 and is not repeatable
in CS4. And as I pointed out before my problem is so insanely rare to happen
to us that it is damn near not worth even mentioning.
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Raymond Camden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 31,
Ok, but if you KNOW that there is a 0.01% chance of DW messing with
your code, that wouldn't worry you? I can just imagine the hours
wasted trying to figure out why somehting isn't working and it turns
out to be the editor messing with the file.
Sorry - even if it is 1 in a 1000, or 1 in 1,
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Les Mizzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grab it and let Adobe know what you think...
Unless someone tells me the code view doesn't change code - I will
never run DW. Period. I believe someone earlier in the thread said
that it was indeed fixed, but who would want
-Talk
/*Subject: Re: Best CF editor?
/*
/*Ok, but if you KNOW that there is a 0.01% chance of DW messing with
/*your code, that wouldn't worry you? I can just imagine the hours
/*wasted trying to figure out why somehting isn't working and it turns
/*out to be the editor messing with the file
Yes, but if we ignore that it happens with very specific things and just
hound and hound on the fact that it happens then it is more fuel to the fire
against DW.
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Kay Smoljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Raymond Camden [EMAIL
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Raymond Camden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, but if you KNOW that there is a 0.01% chance of DW messing with
your code, that wouldn't worry you? I can just imagine the hours
wasted trying to figure out why somehting isn't working and it turns
out to be the
On Thursday 29 May 2008, Raymond Camden wrote:
Or do you mean DW in general?
Yeah, wasn't clear, sorry :-)
I've not played with the beta (doesn't run on Linux) but SVN is 'just another'
RCS system, it's not 'code oriented' as such - it's 'file oriented' as much
as anything.
As Flex Builder /
On Thursday 29 May 2008, Gerald Guido wrote:
I am one behind: 1.6.0_05. You think it would make a diff?
I'm actually using the beta (1.6.0_10-beta) day to day, and found it faster
than 0_06 was.
They've put effort into improving startup performance, for instance.
--
Tom Chiverton
All my contractors have to be CFEclipse using, Meat eatin' and Beer
Drinking mad persons. Its part of the contract.
If they have tattoo's they get a bonus.
MD
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 3:30 AM, James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect it's actually a fair observation, unfortunately. It
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Josh Nathanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm right there with you Kay. People are afraid to admit they use DW
because of the Eclipse gestapo.
Absolutely - I have tried and tried to like Eclipse, but it's too
project-based for me, and I miss DW's code
On Friday 30 May 2008, James Holmes wrote:
It's amazing that a choice of IDE could affect a teleworking contract.
In a remote-team environment, I think it's fairly important everyone has the
same tools (and the same problems with them).
--
Tom Chiverton
I'd want to look at code before assuming that it was built with a wizard.
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Mark Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I vill build a IDE that will last two zounsand yearz!
Ehem... no.. its the fact that if you made the effort to know
CFEclipse, in comparison to the
James
I get a number of CF's through, people claim many things on that nice
bit of fiction that is called a CV.
When I get to choosing people for interviews, people with Eclipse,
Frameworks, version control etc etc will be getting through (well, not
all the time) but at least it gives me an idea
That should have been CV's rather than CF's ;)
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Mark Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James
I get a number of CF's through, people claim many things on that nice
bit of fiction that is called a CV.
When I get to choosing people for interviews, people with
On Friday 30 May 2008, Mark Drew wrote:
CFEclipse, in comparison to the WYSIWYG coders, you at least know they
can type code and not just do it using Dreamweavers tutorials/helpers
I assume this is why most places set a practical programing test as part of
the interview.
--
Tom Chiverton
When was the last time you looked at Dreamweaver's code view?
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Mark Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its like reading that they have used Access compared to MS SQL to me.
--
mxAjax / CFAjax docs and other useful articles:
http://www.bifrost.com.au/blog/
On Friday 30 May 2008, Gerald Guido wrote:
because of the Eclipse gestapo.
I am sorry. The WHAT? The Eclipse gestapo? You HAVE to be kidding me.
Oh, no, everyone who uses Eclipse is a member of the Thousand Year Riche.
Oh yes.
Let me just check my suitcase for Scotch on the Rocks
Laptop:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Mark Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James
I get a number of CF's through, people claim many things on that nice
bit of fiction that is called a CV.
When I get to choosing people for interviews, people with Eclipse,
Frameworks, version control etc etc will
I vill build a IDE that will last two zounsand yearz!
Ehem... no.. its the fact that if you made the effort to know
CFEclipse, in comparison to the WYSIWYG coders, you at least know they
can type code and not just do it using Dreamweavers tutorials/helpers
etc.
Its a quick discrimination from
I have used Dreamweaver a lot. And I have looked at the code view and
used it (not just tried it, Its the fourth tool in my armoury of
editors) so I am not belittling the tool at all.
And no, I am not blinkered, I am NOT saying that if you have
Dreamweaver you will not get the job, it depends on
The project based thing does bug me about me Eclipse as well. I
think the bug for Let me double click on a file and open it in
Eclipse is something like 10 years old (Ok, maybe not 10...) I get
that projects are better, but not being able to quickly edit a file
just seems... silly.
Now that being
Just so I can continue to follow this little tit for tat...
What is blinkered?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Drew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 5:57 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Best CF editor?
I have used Dreamweaver a lot. And I have looked at the code
All my contractors have to be CFEclipse using, Meat eatin' and Beer
Drinking mad persons. Its part of the contract.
If they have tattoo's they get a bonus.
-- Ribeye,
-- Baltica No. 9
-- Motorhead insignia ad the Obey Giant Star
So, you hiring?
G
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Mark Drew
Ah... shows how much I know. I didn't know there was a CS4 yet. :)
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 8:34 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Best CF editor?
Did you try it with DW CS4? I assume all extensions for CS3 would work
Rick... Don't encourage them
Mark A. Kruger, CFG, MCSE
(402) 408-3733 ext 105
www.cfwebtools.com
www.coldfusionmuse.com
www.necfug.com
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 7:59 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Best CF editor
?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Drew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 5:57 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Best CF editor?
I have used Dreamweaver a lot. And I have looked at the code view and
used it (not just tried it, Its the fourth tool in my armoury
In ye olde times, and even now I presume, horses were given blinkers,
these little leather things so they wouldnt look to the sides and
could only look in one direction, the one you were pulling their heads
in.
Kinda kinky in an SM thing I guess, but meaning that I can only see
in one way, being
is blinkered?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Drew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 5:57 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Best CF editor?
I have used Dreamweaver a lot. And I have looked at the code view and
used it (not just tried it, Its the fourth tool in my
This is basically what bugs me about DW, it has this cloud around it that if
someone uses it then they must be using wizards, tutorials/helpers, and/or
WYSIWYG features. I have been using it for 4 years now and simply because
the people I do the bulk of my work for, they use it and in that entire
It's the closest I come to viewing a soap opera... As the IDE Churns...
-Original Message-
From: Mark Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 9:04 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Best CF editor?
Rick... Don't encourage them
Mark A. Kruger, CFG, MCSE
(402
Gotcha... we call them blinders, I think...(not being an equestrian)...
-Original Message-
From: Mark Drew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 9:07 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Best CF editor?
In ye olde times, and even now I presume, horses were given blinkers
: Best CF editor?
I have used Dreamweaver a lot. And I have looked at the code view and
used it (not just tried it, Its the fourth tool in my armoury of
editors) so I am not belittling the tool at all.
And no, I am not blinkered, I am NOT saying that if you have
Dreamweaver you
On Friday 30 May 2008, Aaron Rouse wrote:
and getting into an argument with a friend who insisted that she needed an
old version of CFStudio because, in her head, Homesite screws up code.
Even now (the design view of) DW does screw up your CFML, as attested in this
very thread.
(CF)Eclipse
1 - 100 of 447 matches
Mail list logo
