Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

> >> >> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/browse/-/4021/ref >> >> =br >> >> _bx_c_2_4/002 >> >> -1274419-3838416 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I don't think it matters, since we all know where >> &

Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

>> > Personally, it always irks me that CF books aren't in > >> > with > >> > the programming > >> > books.  Maybe we should all start complaining to the > >> > chains about this, and > >> > MM -- MM should file its own protests. I think. > >> > >> > H. > >> > >> &

Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

matters, since we all know where they >> > are >> > anyways :-) >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Owens, Howard >> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 6:45 PM >> > To: CF-Talk >> > S

Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

ef=br_bx_c_2_4/002 > -1274419-3838416 > > > > > I don't think it matters, since we all know where they are > > anyways :-) > > > -Original Message- > > From: Owens, Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 6:4

RE: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

anyways :-) > -Original Message- > From: Owens, Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 6:45 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup > Speaking of more legitimacy -- what's up with chain > bookstores

RE: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

308 Télécopieur : (514) 287-1733 http://www.technomedia.ca _ -Original Message- From: Owens, Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: September 30, 2003 6:45 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup Speaking of more legitimacy

Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

er 30, 2003 11:21 PM   Subject: RE: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup   I don't think it matters, since we all know where they are anyways :-)   -Original Message-   From: Owens, Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 6:45 PM   To: CF-Talk   S

RE: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

I don't think it matters, since we all know where they are anyways :-) -Original Message- From: Owens, Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 6:45 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup Speaking of more legitimacy -- what

Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

> > > -Original Message- > > From: Dave Hodder [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 12:38 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup > > > > Jim McAtee wrote:

RE: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

ar / E.W. Scripps Co. www.venturacountystar.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: GoCatGo1956 ~~ > -Original Message- > From: Dave Hodder [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 12:38 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusi

Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

Jim McAtee wrote:> There's already a CF newsgroup.  Why the need for another?It's covered in the comp.lang.coldfusion rationale.  Some of us on the existing alt.comp.lang.coldfusion group feel a "proper" comp.* group would give ColdFusion more legitimacy, as well as the group having better propagat

Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

Mike Brunt wrote:> Thanks Dave, I don’t think my question was well put.  What I was trying to> figure out is who voted and why the initiative missed the mark, was there> anything we could have done?  Again, sorry if this is ultra-newbie but it> seems such a bloody shame this failed.I don't know.  T

Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

From: "Dave Hodder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> For those who are interested, the results for comp.lang.coldfusion can > now be found on (message > ).> > There were 96 YES votes, 8 NO votes, 3 abstaining votes and 1 invalid > vote.  Because we did not have 100 more YES than NO votes, I'm sad to > say the

RE: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

Thanks Dave, I don’t think my question was well put.  What I was trying tofigure out is who voted and why the initiative missed the mark, was thereanything we could have done?  Again, sorry if this is ultra-newbie but itseems such a bloody shame this failed.Kind Regards - Mike BruntWebapper Service

RE: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

It's buried down in that link - must wait 6 months.   _  From: Angel Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 11:26 AMTo: CF-TalkSubject: RE: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup So can you try again?-Gel-Original Message-From: Dave Hodder [m

Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

Angel Stewart wrote:> Can you try again?Yes, but not immediately.  The method by which "Big Eight" newsgroups (such as comp.* groups) are created is governed by a document entitled The Big Eight Newsgroup Creation Process; we're forbidden from trying again for six months.CheersDave [Todays Threads

RE: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

So can you try again? -Gel -Original Message-From: Dave Hodder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] It was a vote to create a Usenet discussion forum under the comp.* hierarchy.The full results, including the list of voters and rationale are at <.">http://groups.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=1064642212.

Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

Mike Brunt wrote:> Excuse my ignorance here but who are the people who voted and where did they> vote?It was a vote to create a Usenet discussion forum under the comp.* hierarchy.The full results, including the list of voters and rationale are at

RE: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

Excuse my ignorance here but who are the people who voted and where did theyvote?Kind Regards - Mike BruntWebapper Services LLCWeb Site http://www.webapper.comBlog http://www.webapper.netWebapper -Original Message-From: Angel Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, September 27, 20

RE: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

Can you try again? 0_0 -Gel -Original Message-From: Dave Hodder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For those who are interested, the results for comp.lang.coldfusion can now be found on (message ).There were 96 YES votes, 8 NO votes, 3 abstaining votes and 1 invalid vote.  Because we did not have 1

RE: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

F-Talk  Subject: Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup  For those who are interested, the results for comp.lang.coldfusion can  now be found on (message  ).  There were 96 YES votes, 8 NO votes, 3 abstaining votes and 1 invalid  vote.  Because we did not have 100 more YES than NO votes,

RE: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

Wow,What a shame:(I am stunned that Macromedia did not organise it's employees to getinvolved.  -Original Message-  From: Dave Hodder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Sent: 27 September 2003 11:41  To: CF-Talk  Subject: Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup  For those wh

Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

For those who are interested, the results for comp.lang.coldfusion can now be found on (message ).There were 96 YES votes, 8 NO votes, 3 abstaining votes and 1 invalid vote.  Because we did not have 100 more YES than NO votes, I'm sad to say the proposal failed.  Even so thank you everyone who too

Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

Matt Liotta wrote: > > That doesn't make much sense. ColdFusion is a product name; not a > language. Oh, and BTW, it is trademarked. CFML on the other hand is a > language, is not trademarked, and most importantly is implemented by > two difference products, ColdFusion and BlueDragon. The c

RE: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

ECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 4:32 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup > > Dave Hodder wrote: > > >Hello, > > > >A Call For Votes has been issued to hopefully create the Usenet > >newsgroup comp.lang.coldf

Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

> The subject of which name would be best came up during the Request For > Discussion process; in the end most people seemed to prefer > comp.lang.coldfusion. For my own take on the issue, see > groups?selm=slrnbjg6ko.238.dmh%40armaros.dmh.org.uk>. > That doesn't make

Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

Jesse Houwing wrote: > Did you spot alt.comp.lang.coldfusion already? It's already there to > serve the same purpose, Hi Jesse, Yes, I'm a poster on alt.comp.lang.coldfusion, and in fact alt.comp.lang.coldfusion is where the idea originally came up. Our hope is that comp.lang.coldfusion, if

Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

Kevin Graeme wrote: >It's been a while since I've done usenet, but I recall there being something >significant with getting a non-alt.* newsgroup. One thing that I do know is >that many ISPs and companies don't permit alt.* groups on their nntp server. > >-Kevin > > That seems legit, though I've

Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

Jim Campbell wrote: > I voted for this as well. There are enough news servers that don't > bother with alt.* access due to titanic storage requirements if you want > retention of anything more than a few days. Besides, having a > comp.lang.* address makes ColdFusion look legit :), although, >

Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

ed. > >fyi > >tony weeg >sr. web applications architect >navtrak, inc. >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >www.navtrak.net >office 410.548.2337 >fax 410.860.2337 > > >-Original Message- >From: Jesse Houwing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003

Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

"Jesse Houwing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 3:32 PM Subject: Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup > Dave Hodder wrote: > > >Hello, > > > >A Call For Votes has been issued to hop

RE: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

PROTECTED] www.navtrak.net office 410.548.2337 fax 410.860.2337 -Original Message- From: Jesse Houwing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 4:32 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup Dave Hodder wrote: >Hello, > >A Call For Votes

Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

Dave Hodder wrote: >Hello, > >A Call For Votes has been issued to hopefully create the Usenet >newsgroup comp.lang.coldfusion. If created the group will provide a >useful forum for CFML/CFScript programming as well as ColdFusion >Server/BlueDragon Server configuration issues. > > Did you sp

CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup

Hello, A Call For Votes has been issued to hopefully create the Usenet newsgroup comp.lang.coldfusion. If created the group will provide a useful forum for CFML/CFScript programming as well as ColdFusion Server/BlueDragon Server configuration issues. Further information on the proposal, inclu